Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

anyone notice Bomzrading CAI for RX-8?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-17-2010 | 12:50 AM
  #1  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
anyone notice Bomzrading CAI for RX-8?

was Playing around on egay and came across Bomzracing cold air intake

looks alot like the AEM but with less couplers, and half the price. ($150)
wondering if anyone Purchased it, would be nice to know the MAF area's Diameter
Old 07-17-2010 | 12:15 PM
  #2  
Cam's Avatar
Cam
this space for rent
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Indy
If I were you I wouldnt mess around with an Ebay CAI. The MAF is too sensitive. Just pony up and get the AEM.
Old 07-17-2010 | 01:36 PM
  #3  
Race Roots's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (64)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,364
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Is it me or is the bracket on the wrong side?
Old 07-17-2010 | 03:49 PM
  #4  
RobGripper's Avatar
Cannada
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Is it me or is that lettering photoshopped by like a 12 year old?
Old 07-18-2010 | 01:12 AM
  #5  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by Race Roots
Is it me or is the bracket on the wrong side?
it is assembled upside down,

I just found it, Just wondering if anyone bought it or knew if the diameter of the MAF was the same as the AEM. it looks like an AEM copy so I would guess it would be the same.
Old 07-18-2010 | 01:32 AM
  #6  
gregs's Avatar
Pull My Finger
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 17
From: So.Cal
you should send the seller a message and ask him to measure the maf section
Old 07-18-2010 | 01:50 AM
  #7  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by gregs
you should send the seller a message and ask him to measure the maf section
Just did, I also looked on the BOMZ racing website, and they don't have the intake listed on their site, kinda interesting
Old 07-18-2010 | 04:34 AM
  #8  
bse50's Avatar
#50
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,521
Likes: 11
From: Caput Mundi
Did you notice the slight bend immediately after the MAF sensor location? That's not how the AEM is built.
Old 07-18-2010 | 08:48 AM
  #9  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,083
Two reducer couplings is a bad sign, looks like the front section necks down


.
Old 07-18-2010 | 09:06 AM
  #10  
RX8YA's Avatar
WAH WAH WAH
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: BK/Rockland County
AKA dont buy this POS
Old 07-18-2010 | 09:13 AM
  #11  
Highway8's Avatar
Registered RX8 Nut
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 8
From: Fairfield, CA
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
Two reducer couplings is a bad sign, looks like the front section necks down


.
I wouldn't worry about the reducers, the aem uses 1 plus that large coupler with the bulge to change pipe sizes. My concern and I cant believe I was the first to notice it. Where are the maf screens? No maf screens = BIG PROBLEM. You could take some screen door screen and place it around the pipe end and secure it with the coupler but it's a little far from the maf. Don't touch this intake unless you want a big headache.

Last edited by Highway8; 07-18-2010 at 09:16 AM.
Old 07-18-2010 | 10:41 AM
  #12  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,083
I have run screenless in both STU and now STX without issue. The whole MAF sensitivity/screen issue is highly over-rated.

My problem with this intake is that the front filter section is smaller diameter than the back MAF/TB section. Is the MAF section oversized or is the filter section undersized? Either way it's a problem IMO.
Old 07-18-2010 | 10:58 AM
  #13  
Never L8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 371
Likes: 1
From: Crystal Lake, Illinois
A lot of people have constructed their own CAI without an issue. I personally wouldn't do it, but that's simply because I value my car. There are some places where shortcuts are okay, but your air intake isn't one, IMO. There are too many issues with the pictures alone (bracket location, size of tubing, etc), so I would leave it be and spend the money on a quality product that's been proven.
Old 07-18-2010 | 12:06 PM
  #14  
alz0rz's Avatar
hakuna matata!
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 3
From: NYC
screensssssssss
Old 07-18-2010 | 12:22 PM
  #15  
Highway8's Avatar
Registered RX8 Nut
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 8
From: Fairfield, CA
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
I have run screenless in both STU and now STX without issue. The whole MAF sensitivity/screen issue is highly over-rated.

My problem with this intake is that the front filter section is smaller diameter than the back MAF/TB section. Is the MAF section oversized or is the filter section undersized? Either way it's a problem IMO.
When I first set up my supercharger I tried running it without a screen and the MAF readings were very irratic. I put in a screen and it was much better, it does help smooth out the air flow and improves MAF readings. Can you get away without it? You have and I am sure others have too, but I wouldnt take the risk on a MAF based car, IMHO. Mazda, AEM and racing beat all run 2 screens for a reason.

The OD of the AEM intake pipe on the filter section is 3.25" and the maf section has an OD of 3.5" and it runs two screens. My guess is this intake has a filter section of 3" because I have never seen a 3.25"-3.5" reducer coupler. AEM has that funny looking coupler to do the job.
Old 07-18-2010 | 12:53 PM
  #16  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,083
I have a 3.25" x 3.5" reducer coupler if anybody wants to buy it

I'll concede the FI has potential turbulence issues on the intake. I run NA and the only critical point I can see is that the filter inlet needs a smooth radius leading into the tube.
Old 07-18-2010 | 02:28 PM
  #17  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by bse50
Did you notice the slight bend immediately after the MAF sensor location? That's not how the AEM is built.
This Picture shows otherwise
Old 07-18-2010 | 02:46 PM
  #18  
bse50's Avatar
#50
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,521
Likes: 11
From: Caput Mundi
Yes, it shows that there's enough straight space behind the AEM!
Old 07-21-2010 | 09:45 PM
  #19  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
well the seller said it was only 3" Darn....
Old 07-22-2010 | 01:13 AM
  #20  
Highway8's Avatar
Registered RX8 Nut
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 8
From: Fairfield, CA
Originally Posted by FazdaRX_8
well the seller said it was only 3" Darn....
Its safe to assume the seller doesnt know much about the intake or our cars.

The picture would suggest otherwise and its safe to assume the seller doesnt know much about the intake or our cars. There are 2 reducers of the same size. we know for a fact that the throttle body is 3", so we know that the maf tube cant be 3". It must be 3.5" or 2.5". A logical conclusion is that the maf tube is 3.5" and the second reducers is to connect the 3.5" maf tube to the 3" filter pipe.

However I still dont think this intake is worth buying. No intake screens, (not required but do improve maf readings) and only a 3" filter tube ( Aem/mazdaspeed uses 3.25").

Save your money and find a good price on a used or new AEM, or cheaper yet, drop in filter and modifed stock intake.
Old 07-22-2010 | 04:54 AM
  #21  
Krazed_Rx8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 1
From: Glendale, California
I wouldn't cheap out on performance parts. Save up if u can't afford the Aem/Ms one.
Old 07-22-2010 | 10:02 AM
  #22  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
I may modify the stock intake, I wanna hear it
Old 07-23-2010 | 07:34 PM
  #24  
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by BoardSnow6
Modded my intake and removed so filter would suck in air behind radiator. i understand its warm air, but its also does not suck in water, and the air coming through creates, maybe, a ram effect. idk. the filter does not get hot btw.also added hood spacer bushings i took off of my 07 si to reduce under hood temps. saving up to get an aem but just wanted to try it in the meantime.funds are available, im just thinking if i should get an ap or not with the intake to save on shipping, or if i should get a midpipe and ap... decisions, decisions.
midepipe with AP will get you more performance.


got more emails from the seller, turns out its 3.5 at maf but only 3 inches on intake side, and there are no screens at all. too bad....


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: anyone notice Bomzrading CAI for RX-8?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:27 AM.