Brillo's Test of the Mazsport Fan Modification
#77
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
The MAF is completely ignored by the Int-X.
The PCM still reads it, but can't use it for anything since it no longer has control over the fuel and spark.
I've played with its output values at idle and it has no effect on idle speed.
The PCM still reads it, but can't use it for anything since it no longer has control over the fuel and spark.
I've played with its output values at idle and it has no effect on idle speed.
How does the int-x know how much fuel to inject?
Does it guess or estimate the air volume via a data table (and throttle position) instead of reading it directly from the sensor?
#78
Originally Posted by Jax_RX8
I am curious as to how this is possible as I have not heard of this in a modern ECU controlled engine. ECU's (int-x or other) normally need to know the amount of air entering the engine to provide the proper amount of fuel (at the desired air to fuel ratio).
#79
And therein lies the problem with the Int-X.
It uses a MAP sensor to determine manifold pressure. The other side of the equation - temperature - is handled by the really coarse coolant temp and air temp compensation screens which don't even read the sensors correctly.
This, effectively, makes it a hybrid alpha-N type system.
This is why it is impossible to get an OEM-like tune out of it in its current configuration.
It uses a MAP sensor to determine manifold pressure. The other side of the equation - temperature - is handled by the really coarse coolant temp and air temp compensation screens which don't even read the sensors correctly.
This, effectively, makes it a hybrid alpha-N type system.
This is why it is impossible to get an OEM-like tune out of it in its current configuration.
#80
Originally Posted by Jax_RX8
Things to check:
Did you connect the ground? Are you sure it is making metal frame contact?
Did you seat the controller switches properly - pushed them down tight and all the way into the slots properly? Are they in the right slots?
Did you overbend or stretch and possibly break one of the wires? Did you cut a big enough slot/groove in the fuse box to get the wire out without pinching/cutting?
That about all that can go wrong unless the sensor itself is not functioning properly
Did you connect the ground? Are you sure it is making metal frame contact?
Did you seat the controller switches properly - pushed them down tight and all the way into the slots properly? Are they in the right slots?
Did you overbend or stretch and possibly break one of the wires? Did you cut a big enough slot/groove in the fuse box to get the wire out without pinching/cutting?
That about all that can go wrong unless the sensor itself is not functioning properly
Thanks. The CEL dissapeared after I released the Coolant Resevoir cap for a while. I think there was air trapped intermitently in the Coolant hoses.
#82
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
And therein lies the problem with the Int-X.
It uses a MAP sensor to determine manifold pressure. The other side of the equation - temperature - is handled by the really coarse coolant temp and air temp compensation screens which don't even read the sensors correctly.
This, effectively, makes it a hybrid alpha-N type system.
This is why it is impossible to get an OEM-like tune out of it in its current configuration.
It uses a MAP sensor to determine manifold pressure. The other side of the equation - temperature - is handled by the really coarse coolant temp and air temp compensation screens which don't even read the sensors correctly.
This, effectively, makes it a hybrid alpha-N type system.
This is why it is impossible to get an OEM-like tune out of it in its current configuration.
This won't be seen on my 8 working that way - seems like the total tuning is just a Scientific Wild *** Guess (SWAG) - just a little better than a WAG.
So I assume you have to use the int-x because of the turbo? No wonder turbo cars are so hard to tune
#83
So what happens during cold days when the air is more dense? If the MAF is not used during the tuning process wouldn't a cold day potentionally cause problems?
I talked to an FD tuner and he mentioned that this was one of the issues with tuning rotary's. Some guys who had there FD's tuned to the teeth would have to add more fuel, on colder days, manually. He did mention to me that they (they in this case would be the tuners he knows) do not use MAF sensors at all. In fact I looked under his hood and viola...No MAF.
Disclaimer: This information is being withdrawn from memory. I am no tuning expert by any means but I do have enough knowledge to be dangerous...LMAO! I only offer this statment for the sake of discussion. Should I creat a new thread on this?? I dont recall this being discussed before?
I talked to an FD tuner and he mentioned that this was one of the issues with tuning rotary's. Some guys who had there FD's tuned to the teeth would have to add more fuel, on colder days, manually. He did mention to me that they (they in this case would be the tuners he knows) do not use MAF sensors at all. In fact I looked under his hood and viola...No MAF.
Disclaimer: This information is being withdrawn from memory. I am no tuning expert by any means but I do have enough knowledge to be dangerous...LMAO! I only offer this statment for the sake of discussion. Should I creat a new thread on this?? I dont recall this being discussed before?
Last edited by cavemancan; 02-19-2007 at 12:35 PM.
#84
You can get a good tune with the Int-X - it will idle well and produce excellent power.
However, it will only do so if you are happy running rich everywhere except cruise where it can be lean or rich depending on the weather.
If you tune for OEM-like A/F at idle, cruise and light to mid throttle, the values will change as soon as the air density changes and the compensation table for that are too coarse and rely on bad data, which makes them fairly ineffective.
However, it will only do so if you are happy running rich everywhere except cruise where it can be lean or rich depending on the weather.
If you tune for OEM-like A/F at idle, cruise and light to mid throttle, the values will change as soon as the air density changes and the compensation table for that are too coarse and rely on bad data, which makes them fairly ineffective.
#85
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
You can get a good tune with the Int-X - it will idle well and produce excellent power.
However, it will only do so if you are happy running rich everywhere except cruise where it can be lean or rich depending on the weather.
If you tune for OEM-like A/F at idle, cruise and light to mid throttle, the values will change as soon as the air density changes and the compensation table for that are too coarse and rely on bad data, which makes them fairly ineffective.
However, it will only do so if you are happy running rich everywhere except cruise where it can be lean or rich depending on the weather.
If you tune for OEM-like A/F at idle, cruise and light to mid throttle, the values will change as soon as the air density changes and the compensation table for that are too coarse and rely on bad data, which makes them fairly ineffective.
#88
For those who've installed this, a question. Is there any coolant mess when cutting the elbow out? I live in an apartment complex and don't wan't to kill any of the neighbors dogs and such. It's sitting on the counter now, installing this weekend.
#89
Originally Posted by EXILE
cavemancan,
did you ever install the cooling fan mod? what are your thoughts? do you have any rough idle issues?
EXILE
did you ever install the cooling fan mod? what are your thoughts? do you have any rough idle issues?
EXILE
But I should install it this weekend.
Does anyone know if the cooling mod would work if I got the Racing Beat Flash?
#90
Originally Posted by therm8
For those who've installed this, a question. Is there any coolant mess when cutting the elbow out? I live in an apartment complex and don't wan't to kill any of the neighbors dogs and such. It's sitting on the counter now, installing this weekend.
#91
Originally Posted by therm8
For those who've installed this, a question. Is there any coolant mess when cutting the elbow out? I live in an apartment complex and don't wan't to kill any of the neighbors dogs and such. It's sitting on the counter now, installing this weekend.
beers
#92
Originally Posted by cavemancan
Don't hate me but I got lazy and I have not installed it yet...
But I should install it this weekend.
Does anyone know if the cooling mod would work if I got the Racing Beat Flash?
But I should install it this weekend.
Does anyone know if the cooling mod would work if I got the Racing Beat Flash?
as to the rb flash.. the cooling mod would be redundant, and i would not run them together...
beers
#96
Originally Posted by mysql101
I just got my G-Tech Pro SS in the mail today. After I calibrated the RPMs, I did a test run. The RPM signal seems to work fine when the car is moving, but if I'm at idle, the G-Tech thinks my RPM is moving around randomly. Also my ScanGauge II would sometimes get messed up. When I contacted ScanGauge company, they said that sometimes happened when it gets erratic voltages.
Another thing w,is that you dont have to calibrated in neutral.I find,the best way i think,is calibrated with the car moving.Because,you can be more precise with rpms keep steady.In neutral,is very difficould to be target the rpms needed.The only think with that mod,is to find,the best gear,to mutch the speed of vihiecle with rpms!
#97
Originally Posted by swoope
you slacker. it is a 10 minute install..
as to the rb flash.. the cooling mod would be redundant, and i would not run them together...
beers
as to the rb flash.. the cooling mod would be redundant, and i would not run them together...
beers
I kinda figured that running the two mods together would be redundant. What about the Interceptor-X? I believe it has the ability to run the fans sooner.
Basically I am trying to find a reason to keep the cooling mod or sell it. If the Int-x already has the ability to run the fans sooner then it makes no sence for me to keep the cooling mod.
#99
Originally Posted by mysql101
it doesn't.
I don't know why people think it does.
I don't know why people think it does.
I will eventually get the Int-X but until I have enough money for it I think I will get the RB flash.
The cooling mod will just have to me kept in a safe place until that time.
#100
Originally Posted by swoope
as to the rb flash.. the cooling mod would be redundant, and i would not run them together...
beers
i dont see how it would hurt if you have both, correct me if im wrong but i believe that the mazsport mod allows fan to kick on sooner than the rb flash. which would be working the same if you had the stock flash and the cooling mod. so all in all it would actually benifit the rb flash setup.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shankapotamus3
Series I Trouble Shooting
28
03-14-2021 03:53 PM