Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

Brillo's Test of the Mazsport Fan Modification

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-18-2007 | 04:31 PM
  #76  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,083
it's usually the crappy dyno computer, not the pickup, that can't keep up
Old 02-18-2007 | 07:00 PM
  #77  
Jax_RX8's Avatar
Got Another Rotary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 608
Likes: 2
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
The MAF is completely ignored by the Int-X.
The PCM still reads it, but can't use it for anything since it no longer has control over the fuel and spark.
I've played with its output values at idle and it has no effect on idle speed.
I am curious as to how this is possible as I have not heard of this in a modern ECU controlled engine. ECU's (int-x or other) normally need to know the amount of air entering the engine to provide the proper amount of fuel (at the desired air to fuel ratio).

How does the int-x know how much fuel to inject?

Does it guess or estimate the air volume via a data table (and throttle position) instead of reading it directly from the sensor?
Old 02-18-2007 | 07:15 PM
  #78  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by Jax_RX8
I am curious as to how this is possible as I have not heard of this in a modern ECU controlled engine. ECU's (int-x or other) normally need to know the amount of air entering the engine to provide the proper amount of fuel (at the desired air to fuel ratio).
With MAP it reads pressure in the intake manifold and engine rpm to calculate how much fuel to inject... I guess the int-x also looks at temp? Not sure, since my MAF temp readings are incorrect with the int-x installed.
Old 02-18-2007 | 07:22 PM
  #79  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
And therein lies the problem with the Int-X.

It uses a MAP sensor to determine manifold pressure. The other side of the equation - temperature - is handled by the really coarse coolant temp and air temp compensation screens which don't even read the sensors correctly.
This, effectively, makes it a hybrid alpha-N type system.
This is why it is impossible to get an OEM-like tune out of it in its current configuration.
Old 02-18-2007 | 09:46 PM
  #80  
Goober8's Avatar
RE雨&
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Originally Posted by Jax_RX8
Things to check:

Did you connect the ground? Are you sure it is making metal frame contact?

Did you seat the controller switches properly - pushed them down tight and all the way into the slots properly? Are they in the right slots?

Did you overbend or stretch and possibly break one of the wires? Did you cut a big enough slot/groove in the fuse box to get the wire out without pinching/cutting?

That about all that can go wrong unless the sensor itself is not functioning properly
Jax,

Thanks. The CEL dissapeared after I released the Coolant Resevoir cap for a while. I think there was air trapped intermitently in the Coolant hoses.
Old 02-19-2007 | 09:55 AM
  #81  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 38
From: macon, georgia
well no damn wonder then(concerning the maf--now map and coolant sensors)
olddragger
Old 02-19-2007 | 11:19 AM
  #82  
Jax_RX8's Avatar
Got Another Rotary
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 608
Likes: 2
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
And therein lies the problem with the Int-X.

It uses a MAP sensor to determine manifold pressure. The other side of the equation - temperature - is handled by the really coarse coolant temp and air temp compensation screens which don't even read the sensors correctly.
This, effectively, makes it a hybrid alpha-N type system.
This is why it is impossible to get an OEM-like tune out of it in its current configuration.
Yuk!

This won't be seen on my 8 working that way - seems like the total tuning is just a Scientific Wild *** Guess (SWAG) - just a little better than a WAG.

So I assume you have to use the int-x because of the turbo? No wonder turbo cars are so hard to tune
Old 02-19-2007 | 12:33 PM
  #83  
cavemancan's Avatar
The forgestar be with you
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Florida
So what happens during cold days when the air is more dense? If the MAF is not used during the tuning process wouldn't a cold day potentionally cause problems?

I talked to an FD tuner and he mentioned that this was one of the issues with tuning rotary's. Some guys who had there FD's tuned to the teeth would have to add more fuel, on colder days, manually. He did mention to me that they (they in this case would be the tuners he knows) do not use MAF sensors at all. In fact I looked under his hood and viola...No MAF.

Disclaimer: This information is being withdrawn from memory. I am no tuning expert by any means but I do have enough knowledge to be dangerous...LMAO! I only offer this statment for the sake of discussion. Should I creat a new thread on this?? I dont recall this being discussed before?

Last edited by cavemancan; 02-19-2007 at 12:35 PM.
Old 02-19-2007 | 12:38 PM
  #84  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
You can get a good tune with the Int-X - it will idle well and produce excellent power.
However, it will only do so if you are happy running rich everywhere except cruise where it can be lean or rich depending on the weather.
If you tune for OEM-like A/F at idle, cruise and light to mid throttle, the values will change as soon as the air density changes and the compensation table for that are too coarse and rely on bad data, which makes them fairly ineffective.
Old 02-19-2007 | 12:45 PM
  #85  
cavemancan's Avatar
The forgestar be with you
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Florida
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
You can get a good tune with the Int-X - it will idle well and produce excellent power.
However, it will only do so if you are happy running rich everywhere except cruise where it can be lean or rich depending on the weather.
If you tune for OEM-like A/F at idle, cruise and light to mid throttle, the values will change as soon as the air density changes and the compensation table for that are too coarse and rely on bad data, which makes them fairly ineffective.
Hmm...this makes sense but seems inefficient. So then why is the MAF not used during tuning? I would think that utilizing the sensor would provide 2 benefits...1) Protection against variying air density (air temps) and 2) better milage (not that I care).
Old 02-19-2007 | 12:48 PM
  #86  
cavemancan's Avatar
The forgestar be with you
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Florida
- On topic reply:

I orderd the cooling mod last week and should be getting it anyday now.

I will post my thoughts on it as soon as its installed and working.
Old 04-05-2007 | 03:38 PM
  #87  
EXILE's Avatar
nighstorm project
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Texas
cavemancan,

did you ever install the cooling fan mod? what are your thoughts? do you have any rough idle issues?


EXILE
Old 04-05-2007 | 03:55 PM
  #88  
therm8's Avatar
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
For those who've installed this, a question. Is there any coolant mess when cutting the elbow out? I live in an apartment complex and don't wan't to kill any of the neighbors dogs and such. It's sitting on the counter now, installing this weekend.
Old 04-05-2007 | 05:37 PM
  #89  
cavemancan's Avatar
The forgestar be with you
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Florida
Originally Posted by EXILE
cavemancan,

did you ever install the cooling fan mod? what are your thoughts? do you have any rough idle issues?


EXILE
Don't hate me but I got lazy and I have not installed it yet...

But I should install it this weekend.

Does anyone know if the cooling mod would work if I got the Racing Beat Flash?
Old 04-06-2007 | 12:51 AM
  #90  
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
From: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
Originally Posted by therm8
For those who've installed this, a question. Is there any coolant mess when cutting the elbow out? I live in an apartment complex and don't wan't to kill any of the neighbors dogs and such. It's sitting on the counter now, installing this weekend.
no, very easy install.
Old 04-06-2007 | 01:00 AM
  #91  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,602
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by therm8
For those who've installed this, a question. Is there any coolant mess when cutting the elbow out? I live in an apartment complex and don't wan't to kill any of the neighbors dogs and such. It's sitting on the counter now, installing this weekend.
make sure you do it when the car is cold, and no you will not loose any coolant.

beers
Old 04-06-2007 | 01:02 AM
  #92  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,602
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by cavemancan
Don't hate me but I got lazy and I have not installed it yet...

But I should install it this weekend.

Does anyone know if the cooling mod would work if I got the Racing Beat Flash?
you slacker. it is a 10 minute install..

as to the rb flash.. the cooling mod would be redundant, and i would not run them together...

beers
Old 04-06-2007 | 03:25 AM
  #93  
N rider89's Avatar
^NieL
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 1
From: santa clara ,ca
Originally Posted by swoope
make sure you do it when the car is cold, and no you will not loose any coolant.

beers
i learned that the harder way. it was still semi warm and i got a little sprayed
Old 04-06-2007 | 03:35 AM
  #94  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,602
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by N rider89
i learned that the harder way. it was still semi warm and i got a little sprayed
sometimes old is good.

beers
Old 04-06-2007 | 04:11 AM
  #95  
N rider89's Avatar
^NieL
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 1
From: santa clara ,ca
well im still learning, so lesson learned. when messing with coolant hoses wait untill well cooled off.
Old 04-06-2007 | 06:26 AM
  #96  
TITANIUMRX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: PTOLEMAIDA GREECE
Originally Posted by mysql101
I just got my G-Tech Pro SS in the mail today. After I calibrated the RPMs, I did a test run. The RPM signal seems to work fine when the car is moving, but if I'm at idle, the G-Tech thinks my RPM is moving around randomly. Also my ScanGauge II would sometimes get messed up. When I contacted ScanGauge company, they said that sometimes happened when it gets erratic voltages.
I have the G-tech pro RR,and i calibrated with many dif cars.When i have problems with the readings in the idle,i turn the lights on,and i calibrated again with the lights up.Always the problem is gone.You must then,always,run that car,with the lights up.I read that trick in the manual off G-tech.In my RX8,i dont have the same problem also.
Another thing w,is that you dont have to calibrated in neutral.I find,the best way i think,is calibrated with the car moving.Because,you can be more precise with rpms keep steady.In neutral,is very difficould to be target the rpms needed.The only think with that mod,is to find,the best gear,to mutch the speed of vihiecle with rpms!
Old 04-06-2007 | 07:42 AM
  #97  
cavemancan's Avatar
The forgestar be with you
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Florida
Originally Posted by swoope
you slacker. it is a 10 minute install..

as to the rb flash.. the cooling mod would be redundant, and i would not run them together...

beers
I fart in your general direction!

I kinda figured that running the two mods together would be redundant. What about the Interceptor-X? I believe it has the ability to run the fans sooner.

Basically I am trying to find a reason to keep the cooling mod or sell it. If the Int-x already has the ability to run the fans sooner then it makes no sence for me to keep the cooling mod.
Old 04-06-2007 | 07:55 AM
  #98  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
it doesn't.

I don't know why people think it does.
Old 04-06-2007 | 08:27 AM
  #99  
cavemancan's Avatar
The forgestar be with you
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Florida
Originally Posted by mysql101
it doesn't.

I don't know why people think it does.
It was more of an assumption than anything else. I figured since the stock ECU has control of everything then maybe the Int-X may be able to control the fans.

I will eventually get the Int-X but until I have enough money for it I think I will get the RB flash.

The cooling mod will just have to me kept in a safe place until that time.
Old 04-06-2007 | 12:20 PM
  #100  
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
From: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
Originally Posted by swoope

as to the rb flash.. the cooling mod would be redundant, and i would not run them together...

beers

i dont see how it would hurt if you have both, correct me if im wrong but i believe that the mazsport mod allows fan to kick on sooner than the rb flash. which would be working the same if you had the stock flash and the cooling mod. so all in all it would actually benifit the rb flash setup.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shankapotamus3
Series I Trouble Shooting
28
03-14-2021 03:53 PM
mdl0209
Series I Trouble Shooting
14
05-23-2019 05:46 PM
urbanvoodoo
RX-8 Discussion
2
09-30-2015 12:41 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Brillo's Test of the Mazsport Fan Modification



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 AM.