Cool vs Hot - acceleration test results
#1
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,609
Likes: 1,536
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Cool vs Hot - acceleration test results
While doing testing of different tunes (using powermod piggyback) recently I noticed some irregularities in the results I was getting . Having read here that "heat is the enemy of the rotary" I decided to check this out .
First up I should say that these tests were done on a cool day (13 deg C ambient ) so It was easy for me to get the engine hot then cool it down again quickly. To get it hot I just had to sit with it idling for several minutes as the fans don't come on till way too late (as it turns out )
First chart shows 4 runs I did in this order
1/ Cool 1 (coolant temp 84 deg C)
2/ Hot 1 (96 deg C )
3/ Cool 2 (85 deg C )
4/ Hot 2 (96 deg C )
Have included intake air temps on this chart . You can see the first run had the lowest intake air temp as engine had only just reached operating temp & air duct was still cool.
Second chart shows mass air flow - note the difference for the first run where intake temp was lower .
Results :
0.5 s slower from 75 km/hr to 160 km/hr in 3rd gear ! This is a bigger difference than what I got with tuning !
This proves (to me anyway) that a hot engine produces significantly less power than a cool one .
Air temp did not seem as big a factor but looks to affect the result nevertheless.
So :
Mazsport cooling mod here i come !!!
Also : think the RB cold air duct is worth having .
First up I should say that these tests were done on a cool day (13 deg C ambient ) so It was easy for me to get the engine hot then cool it down again quickly. To get it hot I just had to sit with it idling for several minutes as the fans don't come on till way too late (as it turns out )
First chart shows 4 runs I did in this order
1/ Cool 1 (coolant temp 84 deg C)
2/ Hot 1 (96 deg C )
3/ Cool 2 (85 deg C )
4/ Hot 2 (96 deg C )
Have included intake air temps on this chart . You can see the first run had the lowest intake air temp as engine had only just reached operating temp & air duct was still cool.
Second chart shows mass air flow - note the difference for the first run where intake temp was lower .
Results :
0.5 s slower from 75 km/hr to 160 km/hr in 3rd gear ! This is a bigger difference than what I got with tuning !
This proves (to me anyway) that a hot engine produces significantly less power than a cool one .
Air temp did not seem as big a factor but looks to affect the result nevertheless.
So :
Mazsport cooling mod here i come !!!
Also : think the RB cold air duct is worth having .
Last edited by Brettus; 04-28-2013 at 05:07 PM.
#8
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,609
Likes: 1,536
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Just found this on the rotary extreme website to add more weight to the argument.
Runs are back to back to show the effect of heat soak on hp.
http://www.rotaryextreme.com/rx8dyno.html
Runs are back to back to show the effect of heat soak on hp.
http://www.rotaryextreme.com/rx8dyno.html
#10
Originally Posted by neit_jnf
pretty cool how the mass flow looks like a hp dyno chart with the 2 dips and everything!
So besides the cooling temp mod, what else can be done?
Would aftermarket oil coolers help? Or could a better radiator help more?
Nice experiment, the data is good to know.
Last edited by RX8PDX; 01-22-2007 at 04:42 AM.
#11
Originally Posted by swoope
yup,
it takes a lot of time to get rid of one heat soak cycle... you will enjoy scotts cooling mod.
beers
it takes a lot of time to get rid of one heat soak cycle... you will enjoy scotts cooling mod.
beers
#14
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,609
Likes: 1,536
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by t-run/8
I added the mazsport cooling mod as well but my butt didn't sense any increases. Hopefully it will just benefit in the long run.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gwailo
New Member Forum
38
05-14-2024 07:57 AM