Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

Driveability with RB flywheel ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-13-2005 | 01:21 PM
  #1  
Sapphonica's Avatar
Thread Starter
PingMobile
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Oakland
Driveability with RB flywheel ?

I am thinking about putting a Racing Beat flywheel in my 8, but wonder if the gain in lower-gear acceleration has a downside.

For those of you who've done this for a street application, does your car coast down too quickly at low speeds and/or require more finesse going up/down hills in city driving...not sure if these would exactly be the bad things one might see with less rotational inertia, but surely there must be some reason why Mazda didn't put a 12 # flywheel in the car to begin with?

Thanks.
Old 04-13-2005 | 01:30 PM
  #2  
Fanman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, CA
I have the SR Motorsports unit (though I probably would have gotten the RB if I hadn't gotten a screaming deal on the SR one. In my opinion the biggest downside is that sometimes the engagement of gears is a bit light, leading to stalling. Embarrassing a bit, but not to bad. other than that no drivability issues whatsoever. No issues with coasting, you do have to rev tha car a bit from complete stop, more so than when it had a regular flywheel.
Old 04-13-2005 | 01:46 PM
  #3  
Jaguar_MBA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
From: Des Moines, Iowa
I have th RB flywheel...no issues at all with street applications......It is one of the best mods you can do short of Forced induction or Nitrous.
Old 04-13-2005 | 06:49 PM
  #4  
shaunv74's Avatar
Power!!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 3
From: Sunny See attle
I also have the RB flywheel and think it's just fine. No problems at all up hill and no coasting issues. You have to use a little more gas to keep the revs up starting up in 1st but it's a small adjustment that takes no time to get used to. I love the performance gain and most people that drive it or ride in it don't notice anything different either. I say go RB! :D
Old 04-13-2005 | 07:11 PM
  #5  
dvcn's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Installed the Racing Beat aluminum flywheel about a year ago. It's been great. This is one of the few modifications that has no downside other than cost. It gives better performance, does not hurt gas mileage and will actually make your transmission/driveline last longer (due to lower inertia/shock loads). It makes driving the 8 so much more fun.

I'm not sure why there are so many driveability myths out there. The only complaint I've heard out of an aluminum flywheel owner was why they hadn't done it sooner.
Old 04-14-2005 | 09:49 PM
  #6  
rx-81688's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
I also ordered the RB flywheel, and it came in about a month ago, did't have time to install yet, but plan to do it this weekend, and tips that i need? after all that good stuff u guys talk about the RB flywheel i feel good that i have it. Thanx
Old 04-15-2005 | 12:16 AM
  #7  
WidGet's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Which one would u guys recommend? The RB flywheel or the unorthodox racing flywheel?
Old 04-15-2005 | 12:31 AM
  #8  
sleeepyhead's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: CA
i have a rb flywheel in my rx-7 and noticed the easier stalling and harder 2 start from a hill and stuff and didnt feel any power gain at all. I thought i just wasted my 400 dollars and a lil bit of the car's drivability just to make my car rev faster at idle until i learned how to heel toe downshift. A faster and smoother heel toe downshift seems to be its only performance gain but is actually well worth it. Then again after a day with it installed i drove it just as easily as i drove the stock flywheel, got used to it so now theres no negatives other than price
Old 04-15-2005 | 02:41 AM
  #9  
cretinx's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 502
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by dvcn
Installed the Racing Beat aluminum flywheel about a year ago. It's been great. This is one of the few modifications that has no downside other than cost. It gives better performance, does not hurt gas mileage and will actually make your transmission/driveline last longer (due to lower inertia/shock loads). It makes driving the 8 so much more fun.

I'm not sure why there are so many driveability myths out there. The only complaint I've heard out of an aluminum flywheel owner was why they hadn't done it sooner.
They're not myths. Racing Beat probably got it right this time without going overboard on lightness (as they tend to do with all their products - not extreme, just right).

I had a Celica GT-S and put a Fidanza 5.7 lb flywheel in there - it basically ruined the car for street applications.
Old 04-15-2005 | 06:51 AM
  #10  
RX4life's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
From: Burnaby, BC
^^^5.7lbs are you sure????

thats ridiculous.. i dont even think race cars have that light a wheel.

did you have to rev it to like 5K rpms just to launch the car off 1st gear .. and i cant imagine driving on hills ...
Old 04-15-2005 | 08:43 AM
  #11  
dvcn's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by sleeepyhead
i have a rb flywheel in my rx-7 and noticed the easier stalling and harder 2 start from a hill and stuff and didnt feel any power gain at all. I thought i just wasted my 400 dollars and a lil bit of the car's drivability just to make my car rev faster at idle until i learned how to heel toe downshift. A faster and smoother heel toe downshift seems to be its only performance gain but is actually well worth it. Then again after a day with it installed i drove it just as easily as i drove the stock flywheel, got used to it so now theres no negatives other than price

You need to go drive an 8 without an aluminum flywheel then report back.
Old 04-15-2005 | 09:31 PM
  #12  
Phlash's Avatar
Go Speed Racer, Go!
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 0
From: Chattanooga, TN
I have the MazdaSpped flywheel. For the $ it's probably one of the best mods I've made. Not only comes alive after 4k but also spins down quicker. Stalled it a couple times when new, but now, it's just easy sailing....
Old 04-15-2005 | 10:03 PM
  #13  
cretinx's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 502
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by RX4life
^^^5.7lbs are you sure????

thats ridiculous.. i dont even think race cars have that light a wheel.

did you have to rev it to like 5K rpms just to launch the car off 1st gear .. and i cant imagine driving on hills ...
Yes.

5.7 lbs.

It was hellish.
Old 04-19-2005 | 07:08 AM
  #14  
lethologica's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
My service guy told me it just makes the car easier to stall. He says he has got one in his Focus, he loves it but every so often when he isn't paying attention... It will just stall.

Does anyone have any idea how much this increases HP at the rear wheels? What is the drive train percent loss after installation?
Old 04-19-2005 | 02:13 PM
  #15  
MadDog's Avatar
Consiglieri
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: yourI'mgirl
Your service guy must be the worst stick-driver ever!

I ran some numbers not too long ago. I made some assumptions which I won't bore you with, but they seem pretty reasonable because substituting the REAL, stock numbers into my equations gave 220 HP at the crank which is what people seem to be getting on dynos. Anyway, according to my simulation the HP realized at the rear wheels is only slightly different with a light flywheel. I'm talking 2-3 HP max - and that's if you had a FW with zero rotational inertia, which is unobtainable! You have to realize that the inertia of the FW is about 1% of the total inertia of the vehicle. So, loosing that 1% inertia gives you a 1% gain in the apparent power that can be used to propel the vehicle forward - 1% of 220 is 2.2HP.

That being said, I have a MS flywheel and love it. I wish I had gone with the lightest one I could find.

-MD
Old 04-19-2005 | 08:47 PM
  #16  
cretinx's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 502
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by MadDog
Your service guy must be the worst stick-driver ever!

I ran some numbers not too long ago. I made some assumptions which I won't bore you with, but they seem pretty reasonable because substituting the REAL, stock numbers into my equations gave 220 HP at the crank which is what people seem to be getting on dynos. Anyway, according to my simulation the HP realized at the rear wheels is only slightly different with a light flywheel. I'm talking 2-3 HP max - and that's if you had a FW with zero rotational inertia, which is unobtainable! You have to realize that the inertia of the FW is about 1% of the total inertia of the vehicle. So, loosing that 1% inertia gives you a 1% gain in the apparent power that can be used to propel the vehicle forward - 1% of 220 is 2.2HP.

That being said, I have a MS flywheel and love it. I wish I had gone with the lightest one I could find.

-MD
flywheels don't give horsepower, they make it easier for the engine to spin.
Old 04-20-2005 | 01:10 AM
  #17  
MadDog's Avatar
Consiglieri
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: yourI'mgirl
that's why I said "apparent power". lightend flywheels are just a way to reduce drive train losses. more of the available power from the engine can be used spinning the wheels instead of the mass of the flywheel.
Old 04-20-2005 | 09:03 AM
  #18  
rx8wannahave's Avatar
Follower of CHRIST!!!!!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
From: Planet Earth
I too want to add a flywheel at some time in the future but I thought going light was a good thing. What I mean is, I guess there is a point where you really should not go any lighter. RB states that the stock flywheel is about 16+ pounds while their flywheel is about 12 pounds. I was going to go with another company (in the future) because their flywheel was 10 pounds and cost a little less, but I guess taking off too much is not a good thing. Do you all think 10 pounds might be taking off too much?

Also, to be honest I think I might stay away from doing the flywheel since it sounds like it's a major operation and I don't think I have the skills to do such a big job (nor good tools).

Thoughts...
Old 04-21-2005 | 09:38 PM
  #19  
Mzdarx8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Thumbs up

I just had one installed tuesday. Pettit racing did the install on a 8.5lb. aluminum. Cost about 450.00 for labor. As far as weight Cam said the lighter the better! (quote). Driving is easy. You can launch with very little throttle maybe 1500k to roll. The revs are the best part! You can sit at a light and rev up to 7k and back down in maybe 2 seconds. Awesome response!

Hope this helped!
Old 04-26-2005 | 01:03 AM
  #20  
socalightning's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Beach'n SD, So Cal, USA
My 8 drives better with the RB flywheel! Not much of a downside at all. Mazda should have installed one in every 8.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RXFEVER
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
38
08-29-2018 11:14 AM
RXFEVER
West For Sale/Wanted
17
09-11-2016 03:51 PM
xAgyex
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
0
09-28-2015 09:54 AM
p8ntman442
Series I Tech Garage
3
09-23-2015 10:18 PM
Anthony Kevin
New Member Forum
1
09-07-2015 08:36 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.