Engine Manager Software - Basic Question
#1
Engine Manager Software - Basic Question
It seems to me, that while many people are working on, or have produced mods for HP increases (Turbo, nitrous, supercharger) no one has cracked the electronic management properly yet, and this seems to be hindering all these upgrades.
Is this fairly accurate?
Im still very definately in wait and see mode, but am considering some sort of boost at some point. (quite likely linked to cash situation!)
Is this fairly accurate?
Im still very definately in wait and see mode, but am considering some sort of boost at some point. (quite likely linked to cash situation!)
#3
L+L is right. At this point we seem to be limited to about 75 h.p. in upgrades before the PCM becomes a hurdle. I have done a 55 shot with the standard other bolt-ons and the PCM is becoming an issue.
CRH
CRH
#4
hey, we actually LOST hp with the big streetport because the ecu freaked out and said no....but then we gained it all back-and more when we got the cz on.
the ecu is based on self-preservation of the engine. yes, it's a hindurance, but it's an excellent design by itself. it shows mazda is taking the extra step for reliability these days. they want the rotary to be known as a reliable engine.
think of how many 2nd and 3rd gen rx7 owners added exhaust, upped the boost with an fcd, and blew their **** up... so you get a lot of guys claiming rotaries aren't reliable when it had nothing to do with anything except the owners lack of tuning knowledge.
yes, i wish it were easier to tweak, but you gotta hand it to mazda. i think they did the right thing.
the ecu is based on self-preservation of the engine. yes, it's a hindurance, but it's an excellent design by itself. it shows mazda is taking the extra step for reliability these days. they want the rotary to be known as a reliable engine.
think of how many 2nd and 3rd gen rx7 owners added exhaust, upped the boost with an fcd, and blew their **** up... so you get a lot of guys claiming rotaries aren't reliable when it had nothing to do with anything except the owners lack of tuning knowledge.
yes, i wish it were easier to tweak, but you gotta hand it to mazda. i think they did the right thing.
#8
there is a race team- been around the forum a little while showing picsof their car(s), trying to sell of their wheels and seats etc who are writing maps to the pcm they are running a SC i thnk. Racing Beat has also said ON THIS FORUM that they can now write maps to the pcm but have not decided yet whether to offer a "flash" or not
#9
Originally Posted by zoom44
there is a race team- been around the forum a little while showing picsof their car(s), trying to sell of their wheels and seats etc who are writing maps to the pcm they are running a SC i thnk. Racing Beat has also said ON THIS FORUM that they can now write maps to the pcm but have not decided yet whether to offer a "flash" or not
#10
thanks ajax thought they were italian
and here is the quote from RB
and here is the quote from RB
Originally Posted by Racing Beat Inc
Guys,
Yes, we have been working with the ECU, and have gotten to the point of being able to download, reprogram, and reflash the ECU. However, that was the easy part.... finding "hidden" gains has been a challenge.
We have been busy with several more pressing projects recently (i.e. air intake) and just haven't gotten around to getting back to this project. More will be posted as things advance.
Jim L
Racing Beat
Yes, we have been working with the ECU, and have gotten to the point of being able to download, reprogram, and reflash the ECU. However, that was the easy part.... finding "hidden" gains has been a challenge.
We have been busy with several more pressing projects recently (i.e. air intake) and just haven't gotten around to getting back to this project. More will be posted as things advance.
Jim L
Racing Beat
#11
Re Astra, I have a price list with the race ECU on it. As far as know, it could well be an aftermarket ECU board integrated in the original PCM box. Some of my EFI Technology customers do the same to meet Group N regulations on rally cars. Worth a second, deeper look though.
Re Racing Beat, I can't believe they wanted to develop yet another air intake instead of being the only company on the market capable of re-calibrationg the OEM PCM. Does not make any sense to me. Powerchips (in Switzerland) claims the same though. But in this case, I know for sure they talk bollocks after having a chat with their engineer!
Fabrice
Re Racing Beat, I can't believe they wanted to develop yet another air intake instead of being the only company on the market capable of re-calibrationg the OEM PCM. Does not make any sense to me. Powerchips (in Switzerland) claims the same though. But in this case, I know for sure they talk bollocks after having a chat with their engineer!
Fabrice
#13
Originally Posted by zoom44
concurrent developement. they were/are working on both at the same time as well as other projects unrelated to the 8. the intake just got done first.
What I'm looking for is a complete indexing and access of all maps, functions and scalars in the calibration in order to :
- increase the catalyst temperature that governs the catalyst protection enrichment strategy
- modify the open/close loop table and set the AFR at part throttle slightly lean.
For Hymee's S/C project, it would be also interesting to have access to the MAFS transfer function (enabling him to use another, bigger capacity MAFS), base fuel tables, base spark tables, BARO sensor transfer function (to be replaced by a MAP sensor)...
Fabrice
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Audio Concepts ATL
New Member Forum
21
09-26-2021 02:59 PM