How fast is a turbo?
#51
Originally Posted by RotaryManiac
Doesnt the power start to drop off after 7000rpm? I dont think thats accentuating a car that has a 9000 redline, with peak hp at 8500.
EDIT: please correct me if i'm wrong about the power starting to drop with the greddy somewhere at 7000rpm.
EDIT: please correct me if i'm wrong about the power starting to drop with the greddy somewhere at 7000rpm.
#52
Originally Posted by evilbada1
srt4's stage 3 ecu gives u somewhere around 350whp, and its not even a major upgrade like bigger turbo upgrade.
you're proud because you can keep up with stock evo,sti's with greddy turbo?
i wouldn't consider greddy fast AT ALL.
you're proud because you can keep up with stock evo,sti's with greddy turbo?
i wouldn't consider greddy fast AT ALL.
#53
Originally Posted by Fanman
It's not meant to. Everybody reading these threads knows the turbo is small. As Richard Paul put it best, it is a good street kit. It offers good boost on the low end & mid range. The RX8 vs. EVO/STI/Mustang threads have been done before. Of course an RX8 won't be as fast for as cheap as these cars. Hell, a stock NA RX8 isn't as fast as some of these comparably priced cars. This has been said time & again if you want a monster motor this isn't the car for you. The Greddy Turbo kit just accentuates the positive things about this car at a decent price. You can get the 400 whp monsters with other upcoming kits, but be prepared to pay for it. This isn't the car if you want a 400+ whp monster. If you want that then the EVO, STI & Mustang are better for you.
sorry if i didn't make myself very clear..
what i meant was greddy has chance against n/a cars with simple bolt ons, but not factory turboed cars with simple bolt ons..
anyhow, someone mentioned awd system makes evo, sti monsters..
from dig yes, from roll no.
what makes them monster is their potential.
like i said, simple bolt ons yield as much as what greddy offers rx8
but do i want those cars? no, they're ugly, i would've considered cars like that if rx8 wasn't out.
what i was saying is greddy does not accentuate rx8 and it is not competitive in terms of power.
350whp+ in rx8 however, is more of a competition to those cars that i mentioned
(it will mostly outrun those that are even slightly modded).
my point is greddy turbo is purely for the fun, not for competition.
seriously think about this,
you go to a local meeting where there are bunch of rx7's , evo's srt4's and sti's.
will you be confident with your power and say you pull 270whp or wutever at the wheel in front of those guys? in order to at least hang with those cars, you need at least 350 at the wheel.
#54
Originally Posted by RotaryManiac
Agreed.
EDIT: i really would like to know what the power drop off is at with the greddy. I believe i saw something that said it was at 7000rpm. If so, i think that completely goes against the awesome high revs of the car. Once again, correct me if im wrong. This would also be a big reason for me not to get the turbo. I'd want one that wouldnt drop until at least 8000.
EDIT: i really would like to know what the power drop off is at with the greddy. I believe i saw something that said it was at 7000rpm. If so, i think that completely goes against the awesome high revs of the car. Once again, correct me if im wrong. This would also be a big reason for me not to get the turbo. I'd want one that wouldnt drop until at least 8000.
#55
Originally Posted by evilbada1
sorry if i didn't make myself very clear..
what i meant was greddy has chance against n/a cars with simple bolt ons, but not factory turboed cars with simple bolt ons..
anyhow, someone mentioned awd system makes evo, sti monsters..
from dig yes, from roll no.
what makes them monster is their potential.
like i said, simple bolt ons yield as much as what greddy offers rx8
but do i want those cars? no, they're ugly, i would've considered cars like that if rx8 wasn't out.
what i was saying is greddy does not accentuate rx8 and it is not competitive in terms of power.
350whp+ in rx8 however, is more of a competition to those cars that i mentioned
(it will mostly outrun those that are even slightly modded).
my point is greddy turbo is purely for the fun, not for competition.
seriously think about this,
you go to a local meeting where there are bunch of rx7's , evo's srt4's and sti's.
will you be confident with your power and say you pull 270whp or wutever at the wheel in front of those guys? in order to at least hang with those cars, you need at least 350 at the wheel.
what i meant was greddy has chance against n/a cars with simple bolt ons, but not factory turboed cars with simple bolt ons..
anyhow, someone mentioned awd system makes evo, sti monsters..
from dig yes, from roll no.
what makes them monster is their potential.
like i said, simple bolt ons yield as much as what greddy offers rx8
but do i want those cars? no, they're ugly, i would've considered cars like that if rx8 wasn't out.
what i was saying is greddy does not accentuate rx8 and it is not competitive in terms of power.
350whp+ in rx8 however, is more of a competition to those cars that i mentioned
(it will mostly outrun those that are even slightly modded).
my point is greddy turbo is purely for the fun, not for competition.
seriously think about this,
you go to a local meeting where there are bunch of rx7's , evo's srt4's and sti's.
will you be confident with your power and say you pull 270whp or wutever at the wheel in front of those guys? in order to at least hang with those cars, you need at least 350 at the wheel.
#56
Originally Posted by Spyder_doo
Dont get me wrong but I thought the stage 3 kit for the srt-4 was an upgraded turbo from factory? What would you consider fast?
what i consider fast is 12 sec car.
#57
Originally Posted by Fanman
I can agree with this. The Greddy kit is a good street/everyday kit for not much $. Pretty soon we will have bigger/better kits but for far more $$$. Depends on your priorities. Evo's, STI, etc. are like putting a nice hat on an ugly dog. There is a reason we (RX8 owners) didn't get them. I don;t know of many NA cars where you start with low hp & can get high hp for little $. Not the RSX Type S, Not Toyota Celica, etc. Nissan 350Z's the FI kits are $5K+, Mustangs & GTO's start with 300-400 hp stock, & of course the FI'ed cars. If you want maximum hp this is a poor platform to start with. Much more of a balanced car (For example the Acura Type S won a comparo last month in Car & Driver vs. SRT-4, Chevy Cobalt, etc despite posting slower times) or the RX8 winning when they compared it to the Mustang Cobra, Infiniti G35.
at least not if you aren't exceeding 400whp. of course there would be things that need to upgraded as power comes along, but i dont' see a reason why the renesis can't handle 400whp. Well, i'm not even going that far,, i think i'll be happy with 350whp. And yea, the greddy is cost-effective. but there are tradeoffs.
i wouldn't mind spending 8k to make my 8 to reach 350whp. That's IF it only costs 8K.
#58
well, while the rx8 isnt a platform for a fast car, i think it has such good qualities that are overlooked by the masses simply because its magazine times arent as good as other cars in its class. I think the money it costs to spend to make the car fast (8-10k) is well worth it because while you may have spent a lot to make it fast you now have the speed of the other cars and everything they dont (refined styling, interior amenities and quality, awesome driveability and handling, etc) plus when you put it into perspective, nissan Z ownesr spend typically 6k+ on thier FI, and theres lots of people running the greddy TT setup which ends up being about 8k after its all said and done, so spending 8k on boosting the 8 to 350 isnt as rediculous as some make it out to be.
#60
Those are the exact reasons why I chose the car. I think this car is good for an honest 260-300 whp. We are lucky in that we have a greddy kit, that when all is said & done you are looking at about $5K for 240+ whp, or you can step up to the PTP or SSR/SFR units & get 300+whp for $7K-$8K. 400 whp sounds awesome but nobody has really had that long term, everyday driver, except Manuel & those PR guys. Cars like us, S2000, RSX Type S, Celica, etc. It takes $ to make a fast car, but these cars have a lot of other features. If max hp (400+ hp) then the SRT-4, 350Z, Mustang GT, GTO, EVO, STI would be better platforms, but like you said tradeoffs. Hell, put $5K in the Mustang or GTO & you are looking at 450-500+ whp easy. Depends on how much people value hp vs. other aspects of the car.
#61
now we're on the same page.
yes, there are many cars out there that will easily be fast as hell with minimal amount of money. I want to make my 8 fast enough that it will have no problem hanging with those guys but still outway them in every other aspect. while ptp and sfr may not get you over 400whp, that is not what you want from an 8. i would be completely happy with 350whp.
yes, there are many cars out there that will easily be fast as hell with minimal amount of money. I want to make my 8 fast enough that it will have no problem hanging with those guys but still outway them in every other aspect. while ptp and sfr may not get you over 400whp, that is not what you want from an 8. i would be completely happy with 350whp.
#62
Bottom line, no matter what car you have, and how much you mod it to make it faster, there is always going to be someone faster than you. Its a vicious cycle. Just get your car to a level you are comfortable with and be happy. There, entire thread condensed in one post. :p
#63
Two points:
1) I was on a autocross track with an STi a couple of months ago. At that time, I had zero track experience while the driver of the STi was not a newbie. I have no idea if he was moded or not, probably not. I had the Canzoomer installed which gave a dyno verified 15HP gain. I was by far the fastest 8 on the course. The STi was faster than me in the straights, but not blowing me away. I was hanging with him in the turns and probably could have done a lot better than that if I had any experience.
Since then I have installed the GReddy turbo. I'm only running 5.5 psi, and I haven't dynoed or tuned it yet, but given the extreme difference in power, I am pretty sure that if I couldn't pass that same STi on that same track, a decent driver could probably leave him in a cloud of dust. With the turbo the difference across the entire power band is remarkable. Its a totally different car altogether. Until you've driven one, you really can't appreciate the difference. One of our fellow members drove my car and then couldn't believe how bad his own car felt on the way home! And this is only running 5.5 psi and a really conservative tune! This leads me to my next point.
2) properly tuned the GReddy turbo doesn't really loose power at high RPM. Take a look at Adrian-1's before and after dyno chart. The HP is certainly not increasing at the same rate over 7k RPM, but its not loosing power like the pre-tune dyno.
As for me, my 8 is not running super rich in the upper RPM range like some. I don't feel like its loosing power, but I haven't dynoed yet. My car is acting exactly like GReddy intended, 10.5AFR across the board with the GReddy map as shipped, and the ECU isn't trying to lean me out yet either.
1) I was on a autocross track with an STi a couple of months ago. At that time, I had zero track experience while the driver of the STi was not a newbie. I have no idea if he was moded or not, probably not. I had the Canzoomer installed which gave a dyno verified 15HP gain. I was by far the fastest 8 on the course. The STi was faster than me in the straights, but not blowing me away. I was hanging with him in the turns and probably could have done a lot better than that if I had any experience.
Since then I have installed the GReddy turbo. I'm only running 5.5 psi, and I haven't dynoed or tuned it yet, but given the extreme difference in power, I am pretty sure that if I couldn't pass that same STi on that same track, a decent driver could probably leave him in a cloud of dust. With the turbo the difference across the entire power band is remarkable. Its a totally different car altogether. Until you've driven one, you really can't appreciate the difference. One of our fellow members drove my car and then couldn't believe how bad his own car felt on the way home! And this is only running 5.5 psi and a really conservative tune! This leads me to my next point.
2) properly tuned the GReddy turbo doesn't really loose power at high RPM. Take a look at Adrian-1's before and after dyno chart. The HP is certainly not increasing at the same rate over 7k RPM, but its not loosing power like the pre-tune dyno.
As for me, my 8 is not running super rich in the upper RPM range like some. I don't feel like its loosing power, but I haven't dynoed yet. My car is acting exactly like GReddy intended, 10.5AFR across the board with the GReddy map as shipped, and the ECU isn't trying to lean me out yet either.
#66
Thread Starter
503wtq Boosted Bimmer
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, California
Originally Posted by Rotary Rasp
Do you guys think any of the other promised s/c out there will produce better results?
Originally Posted by Rotary Rasp
Has any company tried using a variable vane turbo on the rx-8 yet?
#67
The only S/C that I'm worried will be better than the turbo is Hymee's. It looks like it will be a beast. I think with all the time spent developing the Pettit, Axial Flow, and Hymee, the drivability will be better than an untuned GReddy, but that is purely speculation, and also depends on what ems they use to control it. As far as a variable vane turbo...I have no idea.
#69
Originally Posted by Red Devil
Isn't Hymee's even an autorotor like Pettit's? I seem to recall is simply a larger model to push more cfm.
yup, the development of the s/c is coming along should expect it by years end the way they're going. The blower is considerbly larger but biggest thing is I think they're going to offer motec as an option for fuel management. Hope they can find a way to use a m48 or m400 with the unit instead of the m800 later on to save the customer some dollars w/o the sacrafice of flexible tuning.
If you live in the states the only downside I see with the hymee kit as oppose to the other sc kits, is the shipping cost, should jack up the price by a bit. But I suppose if you can afford a blower with motec you can't really stress about paying for shipping .
#71
Originally Posted by evilbada1
now we're on the same page.
yes, there are many cars out there that will easily be fast as hell with minimal amount of money. I want to make my 8 fast enough that it will have no problem hanging with those guys but still outway them in every other aspect. while ptp and sfr may not get you over 400whp, that is not what you want from an 8. i would be completely happy with 350whp.
yes, there are many cars out there that will easily be fast as hell with minimal amount of money. I want to make my 8 fast enough that it will have no problem hanging with those guys but still outway them in every other aspect. while ptp and sfr may not get you over 400whp, that is not what you want from an 8. i would be completely happy with 350whp.
its mostly compression, and a really good solid tuning system
#72
Originally Posted by StealthFox
its not the kits limiting power my friend, both kits run t4's, they are capable of approximately 500-550 wheel horsepower
its mostly compression, and a really good solid tuning system
its mostly compression, and a really good solid tuning system
Last edited by Fanman; 09-16-2005 at 01:33 AM.
#73
Originally Posted by IZoomZoomI
If you live in the states the only downside I see with the hymee kit as oppose to the other sc kits, is the shipping cost, should jack up the price by a bit. But I suppose if you can afford a blower with motec you can't really stress about paying for shipping .
#74
Originally Posted by Red Devil
A complete standalone Motec? Or is it closer to the Interceptor EMS? I actually just spent a while looking through his thread, but maybe I missed that...