I gutted the cat from my OEM midpipe yesterday.
#26
Call me ROTO BAGGINS
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The big OH yeah! (Cincinnati, OH)
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thinking about the expansion/compression causing more turbulence
The point is not "is there a restriction?"
- obviously the diameter change will affect the flow, but even with the catalyst intact, the gas still has to expand then recompress......
The question is "is the empty chamber more restrictive than the SAME cavity filled with pounds of ceramic" to which the answer must be no.
S
The point is not "is there a restriction?"
- obviously the diameter change will affect the flow, but even with the catalyst intact, the gas still has to expand then recompress......
The question is "is the empty chamber more restrictive than the SAME cavity filled with pounds of ceramic" to which the answer must be no.
S
Again, I am not trying to say one side is right and the other side is wrong - I'm just playing devil's advocate and trying to apply the principles of fluid flow I remember from college.
#27
Boost 4 Life
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thinking about the expansion/compression causing more turbulence
The point is not "is there a restriction?"
- obviously the diameter change will affect the flow, but even with the catalyst intact, the gas still has to expand then recompress......
The question is "is the empty chamber more restrictive than the SAME cavity filled with pounds of ceramic" to which the answer must be no.
S
The point is not "is there a restriction?"
- obviously the diameter change will affect the flow, but even with the catalyst intact, the gas still has to expand then recompress......
The question is "is the empty chamber more restrictive than the SAME cavity filled with pounds of ceramic" to which the answer must be no.
S
The preasure will drop and increase with or without the cat.
#30
Do you think an independent tester (Import Tuner) is going to lie?
They are not promoting any product and the don't get a kick back from the EPA.
#31
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
Interesting discussion .
Firstly I agree with Turborx8 that with a turbo the stock midpipe with gutted cat works very well .
As far as NA goes i would still lean towards it providing improved performance even though there is that expansion and contraction business going on .
If you gut your cat and get a torch and shine it down there you will see very smooth transitions - especially the exit .
My money would be on it improving the performance N/A by just as much as any other midpipe out there .....
Firstly I agree with Turborx8 that with a turbo the stock midpipe with gutted cat works very well .
As far as NA goes i would still lean towards it providing improved performance even though there is that expansion and contraction business going on .
If you gut your cat and get a torch and shine it down there you will see very smooth transitions - especially the exit .
My money would be on it improving the performance N/A by just as much as any other midpipe out there .....
#32
I <3 Sushi
iTrader: (21)
Actually, knocking out the honeycomb in an OEM cat for N/A applications such as the one on the 8 will rill rob horsepower. I know what you're thinking, bullshit, right? Do a search and find out.
EDIT: Wow, nvm, the information as to why it reduces power is already in this thread.
EDIT: Wow, nvm, the information as to why it reduces power is already in this thread.
Last edited by Spinning Sushi; 04-27-2009 at 05:49 PM. Reason: lulz
#34
Interesting discussion .
Firstly I agree with Turborx8 that with a turbo the stock midpipe with gutted cat works very well .
As far as NA goes i would still lean towards it providing improved performance even though there is that expansion and contraction business going on .
If you gut your cat and get a torch and shine it down there you will see very smooth transitions - especially the exit .
My money would be on it improving the performance N/A by just as much as any other midpipe out there .....
Firstly I agree with Turborx8 that with a turbo the stock midpipe with gutted cat works very well .
As far as NA goes i would still lean towards it providing improved performance even though there is that expansion and contraction business going on .
If you gut your cat and get a torch and shine it down there you will see very smooth transitions - especially the exit .
My money would be on it improving the performance N/A by just as much as any other midpipe out there .....
+1 Agreed
Now I wish someone dyno their 8 to confirm it either way.
#35
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
The only problem I am having is when I let off the gas my exhaust system pops. If I am accelerating and I let off fast it sounds like a gun shot!
I thought if I recirculate my BOV it would solve the problem but it only helped a little.
What can I do to solve this issue?
My backfiring has got better as my tune got better . Still get it a bit though .....
#36
Reginald P. Billingsly
iTrader: (5)
If some one can prove me wrong that in NA applications a gutted cat is better than a proper midpipe, I will delete all of my posts in this thread.
Last edited by bose; 04-27-2009 at 09:05 PM.
#37
Call me ROTO BAGGINS
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The big OH yeah! (Cincinnati, OH)
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^+1. The only people presenting anything other than what they THINK are the people who agree that gutting the cat is not an improvement. People hear the difference and automatically assume they feel it too.
#38
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
but gutting your cat actually loses power it's been dyno proven by lots of people.
Bose - this original assertion is hopelessly wrong, and I don't see you bringing these 'dynos' to back it up.
prove me wrong that in NA applications a gutted cat is better than a proper midpipe,
Nobody claimed that a gutted cat beats a 'proper midpipe', and it seems you are now trying to weasel out of your first erroneous statement.......
Bose - this original assertion is hopelessly wrong, and I don't see you bringing these 'dynos' to back it up.
prove me wrong that in NA applications a gutted cat is better than a proper midpipe,
Nobody claimed that a gutted cat beats a 'proper midpipe', and it seems you are now trying to weasel out of your first erroneous statement.......
#39
Reginald P. Billingsly
iTrader: (5)
but gutting your cat actually loses power it's been dyno proven by lots of people.
Bose - this original assertion is hopelessly wrong, and I don't see you bringing these 'dynos' to back it up.
prove me wrong that in NA applications a gutted cat is better than a proper midpipe,
Nobody claimed that a gutted cat beats a 'proper midpipe', and it seems you are now trying to weasel out of your first erroneous statement.......
Bose - this original assertion is hopelessly wrong, and I don't see you bringing these 'dynos' to back it up.
prove me wrong that in NA applications a gutted cat is better than a proper midpipe,
Nobody claimed that a gutted cat beats a 'proper midpipe', and it seems you are now trying to weasel out of your first erroneous statement.......
Here AGAIN is the proof I bring to the table, yes it is not mine but it is proof none the less, how does this make me hopelessly wrong? I'm not trying to 'weasel' out of anything I'm trying to be more clear as I feel you and other's are not comprehending what I'm saying, or your just that stubborn, either way I don't care it's your cars do what you want. How about you guys go cut some coils off your springs too.
Last edited by bose; 04-27-2009 at 09:48 PM.
#40
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Montreal,QC
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is to generalize that gutting the cat will have negative effects. Some cars, whose cat's are removed gain horsepower, I.E, the Rx-8, Mazda 6, Honda civic. I would like to name more, but I've done that and I noticed a big gain in the 6 and the civic.
I'm not stating that you are wrong, but it varies and depends on a bunch of stuff.
I'm not stating that you are wrong, but it varies and depends on a bunch of stuff.
#42
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
I read that link . In summation it said that they saw identical power with the gutted cat . With a test pipe they saw more power up top with a small reduction down low .
Being that was not an RX8 and knowing how much air an rx8 flows - I don't think it proves that gutting the cat on an 8 will give similar results .
Being that was not an RX8 and knowing how much air an rx8 flows - I don't think it proves that gutting the cat on an 8 will give similar results .
#44
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
after reading it I am less confident than i was ............. So I'll concede you do have the upper hand on this . I'd like to see it tested all the same .
I did swap from a testpipe to a gutted cat when I was NA for a while and really liked the tone it gave my Trust catback
I did swap from a testpipe to a gutted cat when I was NA for a while and really liked the tone it gave my Trust catback
#45
Call me ROTO BAGGINS
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The big OH yeah! (Cincinnati, OH)
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is to generalize that gutting the cat will have negative effects. Some cars, whose cat's are removed gain horsepower, I.E, the Rx-8, Mazda 6, Honda civic. I would like to name more, but I've done that and I noticed a big gain in the 6 and the civic.
I'm not stating that you are wrong, but it varies and depends on a bunch of stuff.
I'm not stating that you are wrong, but it varies and depends on a bunch of stuff.
Shazy, I am not going to say that all cars react to a gutted cat in the same way - there is no doubt that there can be very significant differences. But when you say you noticed a big gain in the 6 and Civic, that's hardly solid evidence. The only dyno evidence I've seen in this thread backs up the assertion that gutting the cat is actually detrimental to power, or at the very least, produces no gain. You can sit here and SAY gutting a cat increases power all you want, but until you offer significant viable data that backs up your assertion, you're just blowing smoke.
It seems logical that they would engineer the RX8 well enough that the cat would be ideally tuned to reduce pressure drops and not impact power. So quite frankly, until I see actual dyno results that a gutted cat produces gains in an NA vehicle, specifically the RX8, I will remain in Missouri (the Show Me state).
#46
Registered
iTrader: (1)
There is more to it than just a steady state flow...because, at that point in the exhaust its not steady state. Now further on down the line after the muffler, I can see it being more of a "steady state".
Anyways, what I am getting at is when all the innards are removed, you are not just removing something that "restricts", but you are changing the working volume of the chamber. And not only that, but how the chamber itself resonates.
For the same reason the K+N short ram loses power, gutting the cat can lose power as well. Just like the stock intake is tuned to certain frequencies (see Hemholtz), the exhaust is tuned much the same way.
To keep it very simple, the stock intake takes the pulse from the intake port being closed off and "bounces" that shock wave off the stock box just as the next charge is being pulled in. The increases the overall efficiency of the stock intake immensely. Sure the K+N probably performs better on a flow bench (a steady state flow), but is not tuned like the stock intake. All of the applies to the back side of the engine as well with the exhaust. Just be mindful of this.
For turbo applications that might just work. Once the exhaust is passed through the impeller, its smoothed/compressed out much more than N.A. N.A is going to rely on Hemholtz tuning much more than a turbo application in that application.
I'm not claiming that gutting the cat adds or removes power, it may add power in certain ranges and remove power in others...I don't know, but I am saying that it can change it, and it may have an adverse effect.
There is a lot more going on there than just "flow" and "restriction".
Anyways, what I am getting at is when all the innards are removed, you are not just removing something that "restricts", but you are changing the working volume of the chamber. And not only that, but how the chamber itself resonates.
For the same reason the K+N short ram loses power, gutting the cat can lose power as well. Just like the stock intake is tuned to certain frequencies (see Hemholtz), the exhaust is tuned much the same way.
To keep it very simple, the stock intake takes the pulse from the intake port being closed off and "bounces" that shock wave off the stock box just as the next charge is being pulled in. The increases the overall efficiency of the stock intake immensely. Sure the K+N probably performs better on a flow bench (a steady state flow), but is not tuned like the stock intake. All of the applies to the back side of the engine as well with the exhaust. Just be mindful of this.
For turbo applications that might just work. Once the exhaust is passed through the impeller, its smoothed/compressed out much more than N.A. N.A is going to rely on Hemholtz tuning much more than a turbo application in that application.
I'm not claiming that gutting the cat adds or removes power, it may add power in certain ranges and remove power in others...I don't know, but I am saying that it can change it, and it may have an adverse effect.
There is a lot more going on there than just "flow" and "restriction".
#48
Call me ROTO BAGGINS
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The big OH yeah! (Cincinnati, OH)
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's the link to the import tuner article where they test it on a Miata. With the cat intact, they get 104.1 - with the cat gutted they get 103.0. Meaning gutting the cat actually decreased horsepower by 1.1.
I'm not saying that what happens in a Miata has to happen in an RX8, but that's the only hard evidence anyone has presented thus far.
#49
I'd like to see a 8 dyno'ed before I become a beliver(Kepping an open mind). Untill then to me it's like removing your airfilter from your stock airbox= more flow.
btw: I have two cats, one gutted and one thats not. I have switched back and forth. Their is almost no differents in noise but the gain is noticeable. If I could gain 1 more HP I would buy a midpipe. Untill then......
btw: I have two cats, one gutted and one thats not. I have switched back and forth. Their is almost no differents in noise but the gain is noticeable. If I could gain 1 more HP I would buy a midpipe. Untill then......
#50
Reginald P. Billingsly
iTrader: (5)
Why the **** would you remove the air filter. That's got to be the most asinine thing I have ever heard of in my entire life. Even if you gained 10 hp why would you risk getting all the **** that's in the air in you engine.
Oh wait, Import Tuner did a test on this: http://www.importtuner.com/tech/impp...wer/index.html
But they don't know anything do they.
Oh wait, Import Tuner did a test on this: http://www.importtuner.com/tech/impp...wer/index.html
But they don't know anything do they.