Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

To Intake? Or not to Intake?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-11-2007 | 12:00 AM
  #1  
hagar852's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: RI
To Intake? Or not to Intake?

I know I know... Another intake thread. I have search the forums extensively the last couple of days looking at all types of intakes and reading DIY and about 200 threads on the subject.

Ofcourse I have found a lot of people saying it is a waste of money and others who have been very satisfied.

Seeing that Rotary God suggested the Revi Intake I am leaing toward that one above all others. Ofcourse I am also interested in getting the duct with it. Only problem is, it will cost about $440.. which is the cheapest I can find it at the moment.

My main reason of interest is getting better gas mileage. I drive about 100 miles a day for my commute just to work, nevermind driving anywere else. So the optimistic 2mpg increase would be great. I am getting arond 22mpg now. And if I can get that much of an increase in mpg I would save about $280 dollar over the course of next year.

My second reason is I would like a bit more sound from under the hood. I don't want to buy an exhuast cause I don't want to be a rice man... Just the sound of the intake would be good enough for me.

Any other benefits from the intake would be a plus. One problem I didn't forsee is the license plate on the front grill. Would that negate the Revi air duct? Unfortunately Rhode Island requires a front plate.

What I did recently do was buy the K&N drop in Filter, which has made some improvements just not what I was really looking for in the sound aspect as some people reported it doing.

So my question is for the people who were once in my position and pulled the trigger to get the intake was it worth it to you?

Ofcourse I hate beating a dead horse, but this is the question I needed to ask you owners of Revi Intakes and Ram Air Ducts.
Old 07-11-2007 | 01:51 AM
  #2  
staticlag's Avatar
The Professor
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,479
Likes: 6
From: Omaha, NE
when I installed my REVi i couldnt feel a difference.

Sort of a big investment car. You sort of need all the little things for them to add up to appreciable gains.
Old 07-11-2007 | 09:40 AM
  #3  
rotorocks's Avatar
RotoRocks Powered
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 6
From: Delray Beach, FL
Not to intake.
If you want take the crap out of your stock box:
1. Disconnect and plug the VFAD vacuum line (this will permanently open your secondary intake channel)
2. Remove the panels from the Intake Box. (Installed in there for noise suppression i believe)
That will give you a couple of HP.

If you do some more stuff:
3. Take out your grill and drill 3/8" holes in every cell that is blocked
4. Remove the foam bumper pad and the plastic cover from under the front bumper. (shields the intake from direct air stream)

And you've got yourself a RAM air.

These simple mods will beat the hell out of any after market intake, and will cost you 0.00
Old 07-11-2007 | 09:45 AM
  #4  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
You can use the racing beat ram air duct with the oem box. So that's just $140. Then get yourself a nice green air intake filter (it's a drop in replacement for the oem filter) for about $60.

the gains should be similar, though you aren't going to get much of a sound increase.
Old 07-11-2007 | 09:51 AM
  #5  
rotorocks's Avatar
RotoRocks Powered
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 6
From: Delray Beach, FL
Originally Posted by mysql101
You can use the racing beat ram air duct with the oem box. So that's just $140. Then get yourself a nice green air intake filter (it's a drop in replacement for the oem filter) for about $60.

the gains should be similar, though you aren't going to get much of a sound increase.
he'll get plenty of sound increase if does the mods I described.
Old 07-11-2007 | 09:58 AM
  #6  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
if your method gets sound, then mine would get similar. both require vfad removal, and using the air duct will give a channel for air to head into the intake box.

i never noticed removing the air baffles in the intake box making much of a difference either way.
Old 07-11-2007 | 10:06 AM
  #7  
LainO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Could you go in depth a little more when it comes to taking the vfad vacumm line out and taking the panels out.. Im gonna do this today if its easy enough. Thank you.
Old 07-11-2007 | 10:07 AM
  #8  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
just browse the DIY forum. I'm sure there's a DIY for VFAD removal... you just have to remove the front bumper, then remove a sock-looking thing that sits over the rebar.
Old 07-11-2007 | 10:09 AM
  #9  
LainO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
So you remove the whole VFAd or just unplug it?
Old 07-11-2007 | 10:11 AM
  #10  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
unplugging it will allow it to suck up air without going through the sock area, but most people remove it completely.
Old 07-11-2007 | 10:12 AM
  #11  
hagar852's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: RI
I really don't want to mod the stock box.


I have the K&n drop in filter now. And there was a difference in response and smoother acceleration, just not what I want in sound.
Old 07-11-2007 | 11:49 AM
  #12  
rotorocks's Avatar
RotoRocks Powered
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 6
From: Delray Beach, FL
Removing the VFAD completely, will not give you anything performance wise, and will make the car too loud (compare to the stock). It may, (or may not) mess up your idling too. My car idled OK on some days, and real crappy on others, but then I did not have the meshes in either. Eventually I ended up putting the VFAD back in.
Once the vacuum line is off, both of the channels are wide open for the air to come in. Pulling the line off requires just that. just pull it off the metal tube on the VFAD unit, and cap it with a screw or something.
Removing the panels is easy.
Take out the box completely.
Open it
take out filter
look inside the box, and you'll see two parallel plastic panels. They are held in place with a couple of screws. Just unscrew them, and take the panels out.
Old 07-11-2007 | 12:34 PM
  #13  
Keef's Avatar
the shit starter
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: Houston
the mesh is what evens out the air flow for the MAF, that's probably why you were getting a rough idle...

Anyway, I have the K&N ver. 2 intake. I'm going too have too go with the belief that you only see gains on a cold day... On a hot day intakes just seem too breath in the hot air inside the engine compartment, which sometimes (until I had my ECU tuned by RB) caused my engine too die after some consistent high-rpm "spirited" driving
Old 07-19-2007 | 08:55 PM
  #14  
sosonic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 2
My thought is the Revi intake duct works well with Revi box. I went with the Odula intake duct (which gets cooler air from the front of the vehicle) which is made for the stock box. However, there are threads showing how to get a better fit with the Revi intake duct and stock box.

Last edited by sosonic; 07-19-2007 at 08:59 PM.
Old 07-19-2007 | 09:03 PM
  #15  
Georgia8er's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Did you see any increase in fuel economy when you put the K&N in?

Since you're looking for a fuel economy increase, I'll tell you what I've done. I was getting 22-24 mpg on long trips, interstate driving 70-80 mph. I just installed a K&N panel filter and my last long trip I got over 25.5 mpg. I'll have to see if this keeps up over time, and my old air filter was pretty dirty so that could have been affecting things. But right now I think it does help. If the K&N added 1.5 mpg to mine, I doubt a ram air would add any more, since there is a definite limit to how far you can go. I've already possibly added around 6%, so go figure.
Old 07-19-2007 | 09:18 PM
  #16  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,786
Likes: 455
From: San Antonio, Texas
$440.00 for sound? Hell you can get an exhaust for that price. But paying that much for sound is just dumb.

Roto, did you leave the VFAD in but remove the vacuum hose to open both channels?
Old 07-20-2007 | 03:57 AM
  #17  
LabDad's Avatar
Doggie Style :)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, HI
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
$440.00 for sound? Hell you can get an exhaust for that price. But paying that much for sound is just dumb.
I know a lot of folks that pay more than that to upgrade stereo systems. IMO the sound of our motor is much nicer to listen too .

FWIW I have a K&N Ver. II and love the sound. The HKS Hi-power is on order and I'll dyno the combo, base line was done last week and I got just over 170 rwhp.
Old 07-20-2007 | 04:26 AM
  #18  
DrewMan's Avatar
Culpam Poena Premit Comes
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
I have the K&N typhoon type II and it pulled a little harder and gave a LOT a noise.

Not too bad a mod. would the HKS racing suction provide more HP?
Old 07-20-2007 | 08:20 AM
  #19  
Trekk's Avatar
Goat rider
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
As I said before many times. I wouldn't get a K&N unless you have a RB ram or something close, or you will suck up lots of hot air.
Old 07-20-2007 | 08:45 AM
  #20  
Rhythmic's Avatar
Laid back in the pocket
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
RB duct+Typhoon 2 has been good for me. Plenty of added sound if that what your looking for. High rpm on the highway is quite noticeable with added flow from duct.
Old 07-20-2007 | 09:24 AM
  #21  
rotorocks's Avatar
RotoRocks Powered
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 6
From: Delray Beach, FL
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
$440.00 for sound? Hell you can get an exhaust for that price. But paying that much for sound is just dumb.

Roto, did you leave the VFAD in but remove the vacuum hose to open both channels?
Correct. VFAD in ,Vac line disconnected.
Please note i had a bunch of other mods done which I decrivbed earlier in this tread. (drilling the front grill, removing cover and the tyrofoam cusion from unnder the bumper)

Well the story is, I did remove the entire VFAD @ first. And it was kinda loud, but I liked it.
I was running with nitrous kit at the time, and had an intake backfire, which had blown out the meshes, so with no FVAD and no meshes, the idles got screwed up.
then I put the VFAD back in, the car got quieter, but still had a nice angry note in mid to high RPM range, and it fixed my adles.

Last edited by rotorocks; 07-20-2007 at 09:29 AM.
Old 07-20-2007 | 09:35 AM
  #22  
kevinmsm22's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
personally, I wouldn't intake first unless you find a bargain on used parts. Neglecting the noise, you'll be paying about $400 for a part you won't even notice. If you plan to a bunch of mods, I'd save it for later after you've exhausted others with alot more bang for buck. For the same price you could probably get an RP supercat, which will add noise and a proven 8 or 9 at the least, though I don't know how much of that you get with the stock cat-back still installed.
Old 07-20-2007 | 09:57 AM
  #23  
rotorocks's Avatar
RotoRocks Powered
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 6
From: Delray Beach, FL
I wouldn't change anything on the car, as far as the intake or exhaust is concerned, because none of the mods add any hp (or very minimal). Just putting in an Intake, and exhaust will run you in the area of $1000. For what? This is a useless and expensive mod.
Modifying the OEM intake will yield you the same (if not more noticeable results) and will cost you nothing.
This is a very well engineered vehicle, everything in it is designed literally with perfection in mind. The only way to get more power out of it NA, is to go with a catless pipe, and then install a stand alone engine management and lean it out. With that you could get 20-30 HP out of it. other than that, you will be throwing your money on shiny parts that cost a lot and improve nothing.

If you leave in the hot climate, drop $150 or whatever bucks on Mazsport cooling kit. It will keep your fans running sooner and faster and keep the engine cooler, thus preventing your car from going numb when it gets hot. You know the numb feel I am talking about? When the PCM pulls back the ignition and dumps fuel into your engine, to cool it off. That is what causes it to become annoyingly unresponsive in the hot days.

Last edited by rotorocks; 07-20-2007 at 10:07 AM.
Old 07-20-2007 | 11:41 AM
  #24  
Joel Ramsey's Avatar
you're a kid - go home
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
I agree with rotorocks. All I did was removed the baffles & silencer horn in my intake box, added a K&N drop in filter and drilled some holes. The change in the intake sound was unbelievable. I've had more people compliment the sound of my car under hard accelration than anything else.
Old 07-20-2007 | 12:01 PM
  #25  
VASasha's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
From: Bethesda, MD
If sound/mpg is what matters get the AEM/Mazdaspeed intake. Has great extra sound and allows the engine to breathe much easier. Plus if you get the Mazdaspeed one it will be covered by warranty.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 AM.