The Interceptor-X for N/A Cars
#576
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
Originally Posted by MPG > HP
Per jird20's post - Swoope, how long after testing will it take you to run enough miles to get initial MPG numbers? Kudos to Scott for a great job! I'm sure that many of us would have gladly plunked down an extra $1,600, when we bought the car, to get the HP and MPG improvements promised by your product. The ability to carry forward to FI is a definite +!
beers
Last edited by swoope; 01-04-2006 at 01:39 AM.
#577
Originally Posted by toca
why pay 1600 when i can get a hks f con for this car for 1000. and get it tuned for a few hundred more. remember this is not 1600 tuned will still need to spen few hundred to get it tuned
#578
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by epitrochoid
not to mention that this can only be purchased and installed by certain shops, and there's only a couple in the US...unless you're talking about getting one used, in which case you're comparing apples to oranges. plus have you ever seen a street rx-8 with a working FCON setup? i haven't. not even a track-only car.
#579
Registered
Originally Posted by toca
why pay 1600 when i can get a hks f con for this car for 1000. and get it tuned for a few hundred more. remember this is not 1600 tuned will still need to spen few hundred to get it tuned
#580
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
carbonRX8 Quote:
um, Not.
247-41.99= 205.01 rwhp
thats the # scott got, the rx-8 its capable of this hp, the only thing that dont allow the car to get this #'s is the cars ecu tune to save the cat.
Last edited by rotary crazy; 01-04-2006 at 06:24 AM.
#582
Riot Controller
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/archiv.../t-154395.html
good read. but really, who cares what your crank numbers are? the engine doesn't accelerate the car, the wheels do.
good read. but really, who cares what your crank numbers are? the engine doesn't accelerate the car, the wheels do.
#584
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
15% to 20% its whats normally use by allmost every tuner, so 17%.
when the rx-8 was lauch the question of how much rwhp the rx-8 put out was ask to a mazda exc I belive by the guys at rotarynews.com and his answer was 205 rwhp.
the s2000 puts out 205 to 207 rwhp so this means the car does't have 247/250 hp ?
I understand what you are saing if you increase the engine power the % loss most go down, but the only figure I know of to calculate drive train loss is 15 to 20 %.
when the rx-8 was lauch the question of how much rwhp the rx-8 put out was ask to a mazda exc I belive by the guys at rotarynews.com and his answer was 205 rwhp.
the s2000 puts out 205 to 207 rwhp so this means the car does't have 247/250 hp ?
I understand what you are saing if you increase the engine power the % loss most go down, but the only figure I know of to calculate drive train loss is 15 to 20 %.
Last edited by rotary crazy; 01-04-2006 at 01:33 PM.
#585
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Virginia/Maryland
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think 15% gives a very rough estimate, but really drive train loss is a constant plus a percentage related to the square of the acceleration of the parts.
#586
U-Stink-But-I-♥-U
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 12 o'clock on the Beltway.
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
247hp x 17%= 41.99
247-41.99= 205.01 rwhp
thats the # scott got, the rx-8 its capable of this hp, the only thing that dont allow the car to get this #'s is the cars ecu tune to save the cat.
247-41.99= 205.01 rwhp
thats the # scott got, the rx-8 its capable of this hp, the only thing that dont allow the car to get this #'s is the cars ecu tune to save the cat.
#587
Riot Controller
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if you guys read the link i posted, you'll see that the percentage figure is more or less static, while the actual number of horsepower lost changes. as the force applied to a gear increases so do the bad forces that generate power robbing heat. if there are more calories of heat being lost in the gears of the transmission and differential, there is less power coming out. if there is 247hp worth of energy going into a series of gears and only 205 coming out, you've lost 42hp to heat. the energy has to go somewhere (some can even be lost to light, but i hope our transmissions don't get that hot)
i think everyone can agree that the drivetrain heats up considerably under spirited driving. in normal driving, when maybe only 80hp is sent through the drivetrain, everything stays pretty cool. when 247hp is sent through the drivetrain, more heat is generated, thus more power is lost. the relationship (ie - percentage effeciency) is constant (at least within a relavent range as at extreme power levels the heat generated cannot be dissapated quickly enough and the gears can bind), and the number of HP lost is increased. if you took your entire drivetrain and melted it into a block, and calculated the power required to accelerate it to a given velocity you'd have a constant value. you have to accelerate X amount of mass at a moment of Y and that does not change regardless of BHP of the motor. however this number is small in comparison to the power lost to heat.
but back on topic...
i think everyone can agree that the drivetrain heats up considerably under spirited driving. in normal driving, when maybe only 80hp is sent through the drivetrain, everything stays pretty cool. when 247hp is sent through the drivetrain, more heat is generated, thus more power is lost. the relationship (ie - percentage effeciency) is constant (at least within a relavent range as at extreme power levels the heat generated cannot be dissapated quickly enough and the gears can bind), and the number of HP lost is increased. if you took your entire drivetrain and melted it into a block, and calculated the power required to accelerate it to a given velocity you'd have a constant value. you have to accelerate X amount of mass at a moment of Y and that does not change regardless of BHP of the motor. however this number is small in comparison to the power lost to heat.
but back on topic...
#588
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
it's been proven that the drum dyno drivetrain losses method is highly unreliable, the only accurate way to measure drivetrain loss on a chassis dyno is to install a torque transducer in the drivetrain and measure the actual efficiency
unfortunately drum roller dynos dominate the market, but if you can then at all costs you need to be on a low-inertia Dynapack or Rototest setup that bolts on in place of the drive wheels if you want good chassis dyno info
some info (Adobe PDF file)
unfortunately drum roller dynos dominate the market, but if you can then at all costs you need to be on a low-inertia Dynapack or Rototest setup that bolts on in place of the drive wheels if you want good chassis dyno info
some info (Adobe PDF file)
Last edited by TeamRX8; 01-04-2006 at 05:37 PM.
#589
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by epitrochoid
if you guys read the link i posted, you'll see that the percentage figure is more or less static, while the actual number of horsepower lost changes. as the force applied to a gear increases so do the bad forces that generate power robbing heat. if there are more calories of heat being lost in the gears of the transmission and differential, there is less power coming out. if there is 247hp worth of energy going into a series of gears and only 205 coming out, you've lost 42hp to heat. the energy has to go somewhere (some can even be lost to light, but i hope our transmissions don't get that hot)
i think everyone can agree that the drivetrain heats up considerably under spirited driving. in normal driving, when maybe only 80hp is sent through the drivetrain, everything stays pretty cool. when 247hp is sent through the drivetrain, more heat is generated, thus more power is lost. the relationship (ie - percentage effeciency) is constant (at least within a relavent range as at extreme power levels the heat generated cannot be dissapated quickly enough and the gears can bind), and the number of HP lost is increased. if you took your entire drivetrain and melted it into a block, and calculated the power required to accelerate it to a given velocity you'd have a constant value. you have to accelerate X amount of mass at a moment of Y and that does not change regardless of BHP of the motor. however this number is small in comparison to the power lost to heat.
but back on topic...
i think everyone can agree that the drivetrain heats up considerably under spirited driving. in normal driving, when maybe only 80hp is sent through the drivetrain, everything stays pretty cool. when 247hp is sent through the drivetrain, more heat is generated, thus more power is lost. the relationship (ie - percentage effeciency) is constant (at least within a relavent range as at extreme power levels the heat generated cannot be dissapated quickly enough and the gears can bind), and the number of HP lost is increased. if you took your entire drivetrain and melted it into a block, and calculated the power required to accelerate it to a given velocity you'd have a constant value. you have to accelerate X amount of mass at a moment of Y and that does not change regardless of BHP of the motor. however this number is small in comparison to the power lost to heat.
but back on topic...
umm... NO
you don't loose the vast majority of power to heat. Most well lubricated gear sets (excluding worm drives) are about 98% efficient at delivering power - meaning you are losing 2% to friction which will cause heat. Then throw in another percent or two to account for frictional loses in bearings.
The other say 10% of your power is being lost before it hits the wheels because everything in your drivetrain has mass - and all that mass needs to be accelerated. It takes power to accomplish this. Also guess what - the dyno can control the rate at which all this rotating mass is accelerating by controlling the load on the dyno and how fast it lets the tires accelerate... meaning the percentage of drivetrain loses can vary depending on how the dyno is opporated.
#590
Mazsport.net
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the shop
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
Scott, did you hold the timing to 30 degrees from 6K to redline?
Last edited by MazsportScott; 01-04-2006 at 07:48 PM.
#591
Mazsport.net
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the shop
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chikmag382
Scott,
I know this thread is for N/A cars but I just watched your video of a dyno pull on your website and I was just wondering if you have 2 different pre-programmed values that you will ship the Interceptor with for N/A or for turbo cars.
Holla at your boy,
Whitey
I know this thread is for N/A cars but I just watched your video of a dyno pull on your website and I was just wondering if you have 2 different pre-programmed values that you will ship the Interceptor with for N/A or for turbo cars.
Holla at your boy,
Whitey
#593
I'm going to have to agree with Epitrochoid (dude I had to look at your sign-on like three times to spell that. Why can't you be Sam or Mack?) Anyway, hp to the wheels is all that matters. Who gives a flip if you crank out 500 if you only lay down 200. Slight embellishment to prove a point.
Epi....didn't you order a plug-in from Scott also? Did you get it yet?
Epi....didn't you order a plug-in from Scott also? Did you get it yet?
#595
Mazsport.net
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the shop
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I do not have an in house dyno for sound/fume reasons but I use one about ten minutes from my shop. The dyno charge is 125 per hour and my rate is 100 per hour.
#597
If I wanted to get enough pulls for an accurate reading (3 or 4)? on a stock 8 how long would it take? I would like to get a good base number now before I add a few mods. Is there any tuning at all that you can do without adding a plug-in? Last question guys, no hijacking here.
#600
Mazsport.net
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the shop
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FlyingLeggs
If I wanted to get enough pulls for an accurate reading (3 or 4)? on a stock 8 how long would it take? I would like to get a good base number now before I add a few mods. Is there any tuning at all that you can do without adding a plug-in? Last question guys, no hijacking here.