ProCharger System for RX-8 Ready
#1
ProCharger System for RX-8 Ready
As of Oct. 2005 DNA Motor Sports in cooperation with Rotor Master (both from Australia) have been selling a Super Charger kit for the RX-8. It is a bolt on Kit with everything included. Installable in a day. Boost is great with no special engine mods required for the stage 1 kit. They are working on the stage 2 kit now, which is said to come with the larger fuel injectors, fuel pump, etc. Again everything is planned to be included with the stage 2 kit too.
I am NOT affiliated with them in anyway, I simply know about the kit, and have seen many people asking for SC kits for the RX-8, so I am letting people know.
http://www.dnamotorsport.com/
http://www.rotormaster.com.au/
The kits are built using ProCharger SuperChargers and I can't begin to tell you how great they are, let the record stand, they devastate the competition in most race categories where ProCharger vehicles have been entered for several years now...
http://www.procharger.com/
I am waiting only for the completion of the stage 2 kit, which is estimated to produce around 400 RWHP...If I remember the details right...
Peace,
I am NOT affiliated with them in anyway, I simply know about the kit, and have seen many people asking for SC kits for the RX-8, so I am letting people know.
http://www.dnamotorsport.com/
http://www.rotormaster.com.au/
The kits are built using ProCharger SuperChargers and I can't begin to tell you how great they are, let the record stand, they devastate the competition in most race categories where ProCharger vehicles have been entered for several years now...
http://www.procharger.com/
I am waiting only for the completion of the stage 2 kit, which is estimated to produce around 400 RWHP...If I remember the details right...
Peace,
#5
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
The DNA link claims 60-84% more power. If we're to say 185whp @ 60% then we're looking at 296whp @ 7psi. Though this is a centrifugal unit, correct? I wonder just how high in the rpm's you must go before actually seeing even 5psi, and where does the 7psi come in? I guess I'm questioning how useable the powerband will be for us daily drivers.
#6
Registered Lunatic
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 38
From: SF Bay Area, California
Originally Posted by Umbra
Unless the US price is a lot less that is way to expensive
No way I'd buy it for that much, no matter how nice it is.
#7
On my mustang I start making boost around 3k and by 6k (redline) im at max, this is on a procharger P1-SC. Actually helps me because the torque is already very strong without boost and when the car finally gets enough foward motion to aid in traction the boost picks up from there. I love my procharger though, I gained roughly 130 rwhp from 5 psi and 230rwhp from 10 psi over NA. Also while you dont make low RPM gains when racing if you keep the revs higher you will always be boosting.
$9999.... Thats just insane I bought my entire kit with intercooler and bypass valve for about 4k.
$9999.... Thats just insane I bought my entire kit with intercooler and bypass valve for about 4k.
Last edited by strokercharged95gt; 01-06-2006 at 08:58 AM.
#8
$7500 USD for a centrifugal S/C kit? 60% - 85% more HP?
Which is it and who do I complain to when it only makes the 60% instead of the 85%?
If you drive a ProCharger at an RPM that produces any boost below 5k RPM, it will be pulling 20 or more HP at 9k just to drive itself.
Which is it and who do I complain to when it only makes the 60% instead of the 85%?
If you drive a ProCharger at an RPM that produces any boost below 5k RPM, it will be pulling 20 or more HP at 9k just to drive itself.
#9
I dont think they are looking to appeal to the masses with an $7500 system plus tuning. BUT it has been done! I have alway thought a sc would be better for this heat producing engine. RP come on baby--maybe they can help with the ecu bit? Kudos to this crew. I wish I had that kind of money. Car will be much more dependanble that a turbo(NOT knocking turbo people)
olddragger
olddragger
#10
I don't know where the idea of SC over turbo has come from with regards to heat - both make plenty.
As I have noted elsewhere, I put a centrifugal SC and then, later, a turbo on the same car.
The turbo was no hotter than the SC and was significantly more driveable, quieter and dependable.
As I have noted elsewhere, I put a centrifugal SC and then, later, a turbo on the same car.
The turbo was no hotter than the SC and was significantly more driveable, quieter and dependable.
#11
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
I don't know where the idea of SC over turbo has come from with regards to heat - both make plenty.
As I have noted elsewhere, I put a centrifugal SC and then, later, a turbo on the same car.
The turbo was no hotter than the SC and was significantly more driveable, quieter and dependable.
As I have noted elsewhere, I put a centrifugal SC and then, later, a turbo on the same car.
The turbo was no hotter than the SC and was significantly more driveable, quieter and dependable.
like YOU know anything about superchargers... :-p
:D
#13
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Did I mention it made more power at the same boost?
With the supercharger:
With the turbo:
WOW...Sure got me beat...course I had a 'tiny' turbo ~7-8psi. :D
How did you tune the car? I had a GREAT piece of advanced technology - called an FMU....100+psi fuel pressure does crazy things.
ha!
#14
FMU = F*cked Motor Up
100 PSI? You do realize that anything after 80 PSI or so actually lowers the amount of fuel going in since the spray pattern goes to hell.
I was using a LinkAFM and then added an additional injector controller from SDS.
The fun part was, my car was making more power at the wheels just off idle than it did stock at the flywheel at peak!
100 PSI? You do realize that anything after 80 PSI or so actually lowers the amount of fuel going in since the spray pattern goes to hell.
I was using a LinkAFM and then added an additional injector controller from SDS.
The fun part was, my car was making more power at the wheels just off idle than it did stock at the flywheel at peak!
Last edited by MazdaManiac; 01-06-2006 at 11:47 AM.
#15
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
FMU = F*cked Motor Up
100 PSI? You do realize that anything after 80 PSI or so actually lowers the amount of fuel going in since the spray pattern goes to hell.
I was using a LinkAFM and then added an additional injector controller from SDS.
The fun part was, my car was making more power at the wheels just off idle than it did stock at the flywheel at peak!
100 PSI? You do realize that anything after 80 PSI or so actually lowers the amount of fuel going in since the spray pattern goes to hell.
I was using a LinkAFM and then added an additional injector controller from SDS.
The fun part was, my car was making more power at the wheels just off idle than it did stock at the flywheel at peak!
Car had pretty safe (11.5-12.3, if I recall) a/f...I pretty much let the shop tune the car to run as much power as my $4000 budget and their messing w/ fuel pressure would allow. Car ran that strong for several years...until the guy who bought it burned a piston at the drag strip.
The PITA the PGT was to me helps keep me from buying a greddy turbo for the rx8...I'm just tired of issues and tuning. Now...if YOU were within my zip code, I'd consider it.
#18
Originally Posted by dmp
You'll have to change your location: "More towards the left (coast) than (most of) you"
Wear Sunscreen....above all.
Wear Sunscreen....above all.
How am I supposed to get that George Hamilton tan with all that sunscreen in the way?
Back to topic - anyone else think that there might be a reason HKS hasn't brought their centrifugal kit to market?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TotalAutoPerformance
Group Buy Center
2
09-02-2015 01:40 PM
Nisaja
RX-8 Discussion
51
09-01-2015 04:29 AM
gregs
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
08-06-2015 11:43 PM
2004, 2006, 2009, australia, bolton, charger, dyno, kit, mazda, price, pro, procharger, rotormaster, rx8, supercharger