Proof: K&N "Filters" don't filter worth a damn
#26
Originally Posted by rotarygod
First of all, Gordon I do respect you and in no way am I trying to flame you for this thread. Please don't take it like that.
Lab tests are all fine and dandy but they aren't under real world conditions. I'd like to see someone use a paper filter element, establish a base flow, drive it for a 5 thousand miles and then remove it and test it's flow restriction again. Then I'd like to see the same done with others. This is alot of mileage but I think it is more realistic in it's outcome. In a lab, you may be in a controlled environment, but throwing a measured amount of dirt at something and then measuring the results isn't realistic.
The first hint of these concerns of mine about K&N was when I read about a test conducted by a heavy construction equipment manager who compared K&N vs. paper filters. The construction environments were extremely dusty and dirty, and he did in fact have an engine failure due to the dust passed through the K&N on the test machine (Every vehicle in the fleet had regular oil analysis records, so he documented how the oil analysis readings changed for the worse when the K&N had been in for a while). I read that test back around 1997, when I still had a K&N filter installed in my Taurus SHO - obviously I didn't like the implications of those test results, but the more I read, the more concerned I became about the reality vs. the marketing claims from K&N. The test results on Bob(is the oil guy)'s site are not unexpected to me now, and Anthony makes some realistic conclusions.
Regards,
Gordon
#28
What was hostile about what I wrote? No hostility is or was intended on my part.
Who exactly doesn't use any filters? I know we had some Motorola-sponsored race cars show up where I work as part of a promotion...they were a street-car-based racing class, I don't remember which...and they had K&N filters. They weren't brand new ones either :-)
jds
Who exactly doesn't use any filters? I know we had some Motorola-sponsored race cars show up where I work as part of a promotion...they were a street-car-based racing class, I don't remember which...and they had K&N filters. They weren't brand new ones either :-)
jds
Originally Posted by wakeech
they don't use any filters, because they don't flow as well as an unrestricted velocity stack. also, the name is on their car because of money, no reason other than that.
being a scientifically controlled test, you can't so easily refute what this man has put together here. people want to know, what's the best? what's the worst? why?
some of what has been done here has answered that, which is basically that paper media filters do not hinder airflow nearly as much as most would have you believe with pressure gradients found during the performance of your usual street engine, and that they obviously filter a whole lot better than filters composed of a lower density matrix (like the plastic type K&N employs).
it's not a complicated thing, i don't understand some of the hostility.
being a scientifically controlled test, you can't so easily refute what this man has put together here. people want to know, what's the best? what's the worst? why?
some of what has been done here has answered that, which is basically that paper media filters do not hinder airflow nearly as much as most would have you believe with pressure gradients found during the performance of your usual street engine, and that they obviously filter a whole lot better than filters composed of a lower density matrix (like the plastic type K&N employs).
it's not a complicated thing, i don't understand some of the hostility.
#29
For such a lame argument, I would have expected a better answer :D
Your post stated that not only did they not filter as well (not nearly as important for a race team) BUT that it also flowed poorly as it got dirty compared with other filters. Given that flow capability would be the ONLY factor of significant interest to a race team it doesn't seem likely that they would choose a filter that didn't at least meet that requirement.
Anyway, I suppose it doesn't really refute anything. Its just a question about something which, if your position is true, doesn't seem to make much sense.
jds
Your post stated that not only did they not filter as well (not nearly as important for a race team) BUT that it also flowed poorly as it got dirty compared with other filters. Given that flow capability would be the ONLY factor of significant interest to a race team it doesn't seem likely that they would choose a filter that didn't at least meet that requirement.
Anyway, I suppose it doesn't really refute anything. Its just a question about something which, if your position is true, doesn't seem to make much sense.
jds
Originally Posted by Gord96BRG
...
Racers? Come on, what a lame argument. Their filter requirements are much different than street filtering requirements, and you certainly understand the engineering analysis of requirements that goes in to selecting a race air filter will be much different than the requirements for selecting a street filter. If you insist, I can list them, but you actually cover a bunch of them yourself. Yes, in race use, ultimate flow capacity will be a much bigger factor, and engine durability in the hundreds of thousands of miles range will not.
...
Regards,
Gordon
Racers? Come on, what a lame argument. Their filter requirements are much different than street filtering requirements, and you certainly understand the engineering analysis of requirements that goes in to selecting a race air filter will be much different than the requirements for selecting a street filter. If you insist, I can list them, but you actually cover a bunch of them yourself. Yes, in race use, ultimate flow capacity will be a much bigger factor, and engine durability in the hundreds of thousands of miles range will not.
...
Regards,
Gordon
#30
Originally Posted by bureau13
Your post stated that not only did they not filter as well (not nearly as important for a race team) BUT that it also flowed poorly as it got dirty compared with other filters. Given that flow capability would be the ONLY factor of significant interest to a race team it doesn't seem likely that they would choose a filter that didn't at least meet that requirement.
Anyway, I suppose it doesn't really refute anything. Its just a question about something which, if your position is true, doesn't seem to make much sense.
Anyway, I suppose it doesn't really refute anything. Its just a question about something which, if your position is true, doesn't seem to make much sense.
Street racing (aka road racing, track racing, etc.)? It doesn't get that dirty, so they probably don't worry about performance of the filter when loaded, since their normal conditions would never encounter an environment to crud up a filter. Off-road racing is where the problems would be, and I'm sure lots of racers there are still using K&N (and might even still use them even if K&N didn't pay them to! ). I'd be most interested to see other independently performed runs of that same test suite.
Regards,
Gordon
#31
Here are a couple of interesting and informative quotes from the test.
"A small temperature change or a small change in humidity can cause the mass of a paper filter to change by several grams."
NOTE: ANYONE KNOW HOW WELL PAPER HOLDS UP WHEN IT IS WET OR MOIST? HERE IN HOUSTON WE GET ALOT OF HUMIDITY.
"Now I am not saying that ALL aftermarket filters are useless. A paper filter does not do well if directly wetted or muddy. (NOTE: THERE'S THE ANSWER!) It may collapse. This is why many off-road filters are foam. It is a compromise between filtering efficiency and protection from a collapsed filter."
NOTE: HOW OFTEN HAS YOUR FILTER COLLAPSED? Damn it Gord! Now you've got me backing you up with a comment like that! Bastard!!!
"The Flow Restriction response curves for each filter have the same basic shape. However, note how the AC Filter, which passed the smallest amount of dirt and had the highest dirt capacity and efficiency, also had the highest relative restriction to flow. The less efficient filters correspondingly had less restriction to flow. This illustrates the apparent trade-offs between optimizing a filter for dirt capturing ability and maximum airflow."
NOTE: SINCE GORD HAS GOTTEN ME TO AGREE WITH AT LEAST ONE POINT, I WILL ONLY POST WHAT IS WRITTEN IN THIS TEST. HERE IS A FOLLOWUP STATEMENT TO THE ABOVE.
"Does it flow better? At very high airflow volumes, probably. BUT, Our trucks CAN'T flow that much air unless super-modified, so what is the point? The stock filter will flow MORE THAN ENOUGH AIR to give you ALL THE HORSEPOWER the engine has to give."
NOTE: I AM STILL KEEPING MY K&N ON BOTH OF MY CARS!!!
"A small temperature change or a small change in humidity can cause the mass of a paper filter to change by several grams."
NOTE: ANYONE KNOW HOW WELL PAPER HOLDS UP WHEN IT IS WET OR MOIST? HERE IN HOUSTON WE GET ALOT OF HUMIDITY.
"Now I am not saying that ALL aftermarket filters are useless. A paper filter does not do well if directly wetted or muddy. (NOTE: THERE'S THE ANSWER!) It may collapse. This is why many off-road filters are foam. It is a compromise between filtering efficiency and protection from a collapsed filter."
NOTE: HOW OFTEN HAS YOUR FILTER COLLAPSED? Damn it Gord! Now you've got me backing you up with a comment like that! Bastard!!!
"The Flow Restriction response curves for each filter have the same basic shape. However, note how the AC Filter, which passed the smallest amount of dirt and had the highest dirt capacity and efficiency, also had the highest relative restriction to flow. The less efficient filters correspondingly had less restriction to flow. This illustrates the apparent trade-offs between optimizing a filter for dirt capturing ability and maximum airflow."
NOTE: SINCE GORD HAS GOTTEN ME TO AGREE WITH AT LEAST ONE POINT, I WILL ONLY POST WHAT IS WRITTEN IN THIS TEST. HERE IS A FOLLOWUP STATEMENT TO THE ABOVE.
"Does it flow better? At very high airflow volumes, probably. BUT, Our trucks CAN'T flow that much air unless super-modified, so what is the point? The stock filter will flow MORE THAN ENOUGH AIR to give you ALL THE HORSEPOWER the engine has to give."
NOTE: I AM STILL KEEPING MY K&N ON BOTH OF MY CARS!!!
Last edited by rotarygod; 11-01-2004 at 03:07 AM.
#33
I agree with rotarygod, I myself bought the K&N typhoon sys, and love it, I did see a better gas milleage also (God know's the 8 need it). I drove (and still) have my Honda Civic SI 1991 with close to 300 000 km on it with a K&N and still work fine ....but don't take my word for it, some hate it and lots more love it !? It will always be that way ....
#34
Originally Posted by Petrus
How about this one....?
(sorry, don´t have any more info on it...)
(sorry, don´t have any more info on it...)
#36
Btw if your looking for a compromise between a high filtering filter (like a baldwin) or a K&N, check out S&B.
http://www.sbfilters.com/home.htm
They're basically K&N filters, but with deeper pleats, reinforcement, and tighter meshes. Basically just a higher quality variant of a general K&N cotton gauze filter design. The biggest differences I've noticed between the two brands (having owned both), is the S&B's pleats don't bend or flex when you apply pressure, and you don't get the same "stary night" view when you hold them up to the light. They also tend to have a larger # of pleats, which extend an addition 0.5 to 1.5 inches (depending on filter) vs an equivilant K&N. More surface area = better flow and better filtration.
They also have a nice inverted cone on the bottom of the conical filters, which supposedly flows more air, but generally just results in a much louder intake. (Being that the filters aren't the restrictive part of the intake system).
There have been a number of studies showing through UOA's (used oil analysis's) that cotton gauze filters do in fact let additional dirt into the engine...but this is generally the cause of poor maintance of the filter, and not the filter itself. (Its a rather massive continuing debate) It also depends on whether your using a drop in filter, or running a full conical design which is exposed to exterior air elements. Obviously with a stock airintake system, the flow of particulate matter is already being smashed all around before it hits the actual filter element...vs an open air conical element exposed in the wheel well.
Just a suggestion for those who are looking for possible alternatives
http://www.sbfilters.com/home.htm
They're basically K&N filters, but with deeper pleats, reinforcement, and tighter meshes. Basically just a higher quality variant of a general K&N cotton gauze filter design. The biggest differences I've noticed between the two brands (having owned both), is the S&B's pleats don't bend or flex when you apply pressure, and you don't get the same "stary night" view when you hold them up to the light. They also tend to have a larger # of pleats, which extend an addition 0.5 to 1.5 inches (depending on filter) vs an equivilant K&N. More surface area = better flow and better filtration.
They also have a nice inverted cone on the bottom of the conical filters, which supposedly flows more air, but generally just results in a much louder intake. (Being that the filters aren't the restrictive part of the intake system).
There have been a number of studies showing through UOA's (used oil analysis's) that cotton gauze filters do in fact let additional dirt into the engine...but this is generally the cause of poor maintance of the filter, and not the filter itself. (Its a rather massive continuing debate) It also depends on whether your using a drop in filter, or running a full conical design which is exposed to exterior air elements. Obviously with a stock airintake system, the flow of particulate matter is already being smashed all around before it hits the actual filter element...vs an open air conical element exposed in the wheel well.
Just a suggestion for those who are looking for possible alternatives
Last edited by crossbow; 11-01-2004 at 08:15 AM.
#38
That is not an official Mazdaspeed, it's a cheap filter by some no name using the Mazdaspeed logo, ebay is full of that stuff... Including grounding kits that say Mazdaspeed and are not...
In regards to the K&N filters, they do not work and are not good for your engine... Not only do they not filter well they allow oil to coat your entire intake tract further complicating things like coating the MAF sensor and affecting it's readings...
In regards to the K&N filters, they do not work and are not good for your engine... Not only do they not filter well they allow oil to coat your entire intake tract further complicating things like coating the MAF sensor and affecting it's readings...
#39
Originally Posted by cortc
In regards to the K&N filters, they do not work and are not good for your engine... Not only do they not filter well they allow oil to coat your entire intake tract further complicating things like coating the MAF sensor and affecting it's readings...
So, like I said before, if these complaints were true K&N would not be a highly reputable and well established business. Millions of their filters have and continue to be sold. If they were as bad as some people here are claiming them to be, there would be no reason for the brand's popularity and reputation to be what it is. The only down side to oiled filters is that they don't filter as well as some other filters. But thats the trade off for better air flow. You can't have everything.
Just my 2 cents and I'm sticken by them. :D
#40
I have found that haines tube socks don't filter worth a damn but Nike crew socks filter with 99.4% efficiency, but damn when the turbo spooled up it sucked that sucker right in there and fubared my compressor wheel and shaft.
#41
They only pass oil if you over-oil the crap out of it. Or maybe if you oil the wrong side :D
jds
jds
Originally Posted by cortc
That is not an official Mazdaspeed, it's a cheap filter by some no name using the Mazdaspeed logo, ebay is full of that stuff... Including grounding kits that say Mazdaspeed and are not...
In regards to the K&N filters, they do not work and are not good for your engine... Not only do they not filter well they allow oil to coat your entire intake tract further complicating things like coating the MAF sensor and affecting it's readings...
In regards to the K&N filters, they do not work and are not good for your engine... Not only do they not filter well they allow oil to coat your entire intake tract further complicating things like coating the MAF sensor and affecting it's readings...
#42
got the rotery extreme installed a few weeks ago. I LUVVEEEEEDDDD IT? the sound sounds like A/C and when u steppppppppppppppppp on it. ERRRR sounds like a lawn mower not quite though. even my wife said ohh my god the soiund wat did you do to it???brought it to the Mazda dealer, they said wats thats noise. and i said thats the sound of a true rotary engine. I had K&N filters all my life i swear by it
#45
filtering ****
where are you in the world ? where i come from K&N filters retail at 10-15% cheaper than my local Mazda parts department .
Question:Can a huge corporation such as mazda not beat a very much smaller corporation K&N and make a better product and charge the customer more for it ?
Mod Edit: This is a 9 year thread bump, most of the people prior to this post haven't logged on in years. Many links may be broken.
Question:Can a huge corporation such as mazda not beat a very much smaller corporation K&N and make a better product and charge the customer more for it ?
Mod Edit: This is a 9 year thread bump, most of the people prior to this post haven't logged on in years. Many links may be broken.
Last edited by RIWWP; 04-30-2013 at 10:25 PM.
#46
where are you in the world ? where i come from K&N filters retail at 10-15% cheaper than my local Mazda parts department .
Question:Can a huge corporation such as mazda not beat a very much smaller corporation K&N and make a better product and charge the customer more for it ?
Question:Can a huge corporation such as mazda not beat a very much smaller corporation K&N and make a better product and charge the customer more for it ?
#48
where are you in the world ? where i come from K&N filters retail at 10-15% cheaper than my local Mazda parts department .
Question:Can a huge corporation such as mazda not beat a very much smaller corporation K&N and make a better product and charge the customer more for it ?
Question:Can a huge corporation such as mazda not beat a very much smaller corporation K&N and make a better product and charge the customer more for it ?
You actually are slow, it makes sense now.
Last edited by Mr.Mango; 05-01-2013 at 01:45 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Audio Concepts ATL
New Member Forum
21
09-26-2021 02:59 PM
GK1707
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
8
12-02-2015 11:01 AM
Aston177
Series I Trouble Shooting
7
09-04-2015 12:07 AM