Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

REV-I what you really thought?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-28-2007 | 09:09 AM
  #1  
kennyfrc1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
REV-I what you really thought?

I have read several posts here such as the "your favorite mod" and many others and no-one here really advocates adding intakes. I cannot seem to find a dyno plot of before and after and racing beat only claims ~2hp for most of the useable power band(2-8300). Which brings me to my question, What did you guys really think?
Old 06-28-2007 | 10:08 AM
  #2  
DarkBrew's Avatar
Extraordinary Engineering
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,733
Likes: 12
From: Burls On
Intake and exhaust mods on the '8 are for placebo effect only.
But if it makes you enjoy the ride more then what the hell!
Old 06-28-2007 | 10:26 AM
  #3  
kennyfrc1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Not quite worth the removal of my front bumper and two hours work for 2hp. I am a "newbie" but I have done alot of reading here and so far only the RP supercat midpipe looks to be a good mod. It appears to add and honest 9hp and some sound. I will probably use it with the stock exhaust.
Old 06-28-2007 | 10:51 AM
  #4  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Originally Posted by kennyfrc1
Not quite worth the removal of my front bumper and two hours work for 2hp. I am a "newbie" but I have done alot of reading here and so far only the RP supercat midpipe looks to be a good mod. It appears to add and honest 9hp and some sound. I will probably use it with the stock exhaust.
There was a dyno done a while back by a member named Polak. He did the RB intake and it may have only gained like 2-3hp at peak...but in the midrange it picked up 10whp. IMO, that's pretty substantial if you're looking for power in that rev range.
Old 06-28-2007 | 02:17 PM
  #5  
Keef's Avatar
the shit starter
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: Houston
I look back on how I spent my money on all my modifications... If I could have changed the order at all, I would have bought the Racing Beat flash first not last.

Tune first, and then maybe the placebo intakes/exhausts will become tuned placebo intakes/exhausts

Other than that your doing it for the noise
Old 06-28-2007 | 03:12 PM
  #6  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,444
Likes: 2,799
From: The Dark Side
take a look in the Tech section for my dyno thread... We dyno'd 19 RX-8's on the same day and 5 of the top 6 hp cars had RB intake or exhuast... hmm.....
Old 06-29-2007 | 05:14 AM
  #7  
Fanman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, CA
Again, not sure where people are getting this notion that 2-3 hp across the board & 6-10 hp on the top end is a "placebo" effect. No NA mods are going to give you much on the low end, not even the hi-flow cat, pullies, cat back exhaust, flash, anything. It's an NA mod just like everything else. The hp gain is on the middle-top end.
Old 06-29-2007 | 06:40 AM
  #8  
foo77's Avatar
4th batch : Apr 03'
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 1
From: Bor. Isle
i like it alot except when it comes to clean,i prefer stock intake,more easier than REVi,but other than that,i love it than stock intake
Old 06-29-2007 | 10:32 AM
  #9  
VASasha's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
From: Bethesda, MD
I'm sure the biggest issue that people have with intakes for the 8 is that it's not the same bang for the buck as it is on other cars.
Old 06-29-2007 | 09:46 PM
  #10  
Drizzt8's Avatar
"Here comes the Pain"
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB
I like mine, definitely felt an improvement in the upper and mid ranges over my stock one, but as posted previously not quite the bang for the buck you'd hope for.
Old 06-29-2007 | 10:18 PM
  #11  
Red_X8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Schaumburg, Illinois
Intake+exhaust are for sound. If you want to really increase acceleration accross the board get a lightweight flywheel.
Old 07-01-2007 | 02:36 AM
  #12  
DrewMan's Avatar
Culpam Poena Premit Comes
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Originally Posted by Red_X8
Intake+exhaust are for sound. If you want to really increase acceleration accross the board get a lightweight flywheel.


+1 for that!


too bad its also the most expensive! (labour costs)
Old 07-02-2007 | 11:37 AM
  #13  
g30ffman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
what about intake + exhaust and a little intake tuning? no considerable difference? with all that said what is the most power producing intake that you've all seen?
Old 07-02-2007 | 12:49 PM
  #14  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,444
Likes: 2,799
From: The Dark Side
g30ffman: The problem with answering your question is the unreliability of the data we have to work with.

- K&N once claimed their intake was producing 10+ hp. Some forum members did before & after dynos only to discover they'd LOST hp.

- Most RX-8 intakes will only produce a few hp here and there. I believe the main reason I went with the Revi is because I feel the Renesis simply needs better airflow to the engine and I think the Revi + duct helps accomplish that.
Even RB claims only around 3hp and possibly a little more at high rpm's.
Old 07-02-2007 | 01:56 PM
  #15  
Rhythmic's Avatar
Laid back in the pocket
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: Blacksburg, VA
Originally Posted by Jedi54
g30ffman: The problem with answering your question is the unreliability of the data we have to work with.

- K&N once claimed their intake was producing 10+ hp. Some forum members did before & after dynos only to discover they'd LOST hp.

- Most RX-8 intakes will only produce a few hp here and there. I believe the main reason I went with the Revi is because I feel the Renesis simply needs better airflow to the engine and I think the Revi + duct helps accomplish that.
Even RB claims only around 3hp and possibly a little more at high rpm's.
Was the lost hp with the typhoon version 2 or the old version 1?

I've been debating swapping my k&n v.2 for the Revi. Not yet convinced that its worth my time and effort. Maybe with the RB flash the extra high end flow of the k&n v.2 will be worth it?
Old 07-02-2007 | 02:19 PM
  #16  
g30ffman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Thats very true.. thanks for the input, guess we just have to go buy what the manufacture claims.. =(
Old 07-02-2007 | 02:22 PM
  #17  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,444
Likes: 2,799
From: The Dark Side
I would say go with an intake you like the looks / sound of the most. Off the top of my head, I would recommend:

- Racing Beat
- AEM / Mazdaspeed (they're the same)
Old 07-02-2007 | 02:24 PM
  #18  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,444
Likes: 2,799
From: The Dark Side
Rythmic: I want to say it was Version 1.... (been a while since I read the post) I'm leaning towards V1 just because the 8 hadn't been out long and people were skeptical about the claims.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
New_Mazda_Guy
NW RX-8 Forum
14
09-19-2019 12:20 PM
9krpmrx8
RX-8 Discussion
8
10-13-2015 02:36 PM
cliffkemp
Series I Trouble Shooting
7
10-04-2015 12:11 AM
Danield97
Series I Trouble Shooting
1
09-30-2015 06:59 PM
yapakanichi
Series I Exterior Appearance and Body Kits
5
09-17-2015 05:23 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:16 AM.