are there any downsides to a lightened flywheel?
#1
are there any downsides to a lightened flywheel?
Hey all
I recently bought an 09 MT GT, and was thinking about putting a lightened flywheel in it. I don't have any experience with this stuff, and this seems like a safe place to start.
I know the upsides of a lightened flywheel. Are there any downsides?
I recently bought an 09 MT GT, and was thinking about putting a lightened flywheel in it. I don't have any experience with this stuff, and this seems like a safe place to start.
I know the upsides of a lightened flywheel. Are there any downsides?
#2
I don't think I would put a lightweight flywheel on if you didn't already need to change the clutch out which might take some time. I have the act prolite and I didn't notice that much of a difference. I could be the only one but I think you can spend your money better in other areas right now.
#3
no drawbacks that I know of.
I agree with WVboosted8 though, it's probably best to do this upgrade if you're changing out a clutch.
unless of course you really just love working on your car.
I agree with WVboosted8 though, it's probably best to do this upgrade if you're changing out a clutch.
unless of course you really just love working on your car.
#4
The only downside is that the stock, heavier, flywheel provides a little more inertial mass which aides in starting. But so minor it's not worth being concerned about. The upside of faster spool ups with the lighter flywheel far outweighs this minor downside.
Concur with WV, not really worth doing unless you're also replacing your clutch, as it's allot of work getting in there. Better, and less expensive, things to do first.
Concur with WV, not really worth doing unless you're also replacing your clutch, as it's allot of work getting in there. Better, and less expensive, things to do first.
#7
what i noticed is that the revs raise faster, which is a plus, but they also drop faster, which makes it hard to rev match haha, by the time i get the foot on both the brake and gas the rev is already dropped out of the good part of the rpm range =\
#9
- its a bit harder to drive, just need some time to get used to
- rpm revs up faster, but it also drops down faster (cuz its lighter)
- its easier on drivetrain (slightly)
Get something with replaceable fricition plate. so the flywheel will last the life of the car. just change the plate everytime you swap clutch, the friction plate is cheap (compare to a brand new flywheel)
- rpm revs up faster, but it also drops down faster (cuz its lighter)
- its easier on drivetrain (slightly)
Get something with replaceable fricition plate. so the flywheel will last the life of the car. just change the plate everytime you swap clutch, the friction plate is cheap (compare to a brand new flywheel)
#14
For those who have a lightweight fly, about what rpm are you guys typically starting in first gear? I just put my fidanza in, and now it seems like I have to slip the clutch at like 3k just to start, before it was much less than that.
#15
The answer to the question is, "it depends on what you're using the car for." If it's your run-of-the-mill street car that won't see any serious straight-line, then a nice, steel lightweight flywheel will be nice. As stated already, it reduces deceleration time in-between gear shifts. It'll also add some "spice and spunk" to the car. If the car is being built for straight-line, use a heavy flywheel. The heavier the flywheel, the more inertia it will have, therefore the easier it is to launch from the tree with more target-RPM consistency. Been there, done that. Also, for those considering a high overlap setup later, I don't recommend a lighter than stock flywheel as the driveline will thrash quite a bit at lower RPM's in taller gears.
B
B
#16
You don't need anything above idle to get moving, just slowly let off the clutch and the car will move in first gear. You can slip it more to get moving in 1st, but as you practice you won't need it much.
Of course, if your coils are dying, one of the symptoms is being unable to move the vehicle without reving it up, otherwise it stalls. I've been there and done that
#17
On our Rx8s and with a stock or semistock clutch, shouldnt be an issue at all.
I know with my last car(Built/Procharged C5)I actually removed my aluminum flywheel and went to a lightened steel one(split the difference in wieght). With a very aggressive clutch and the ultra-light flywheel the car was hard to get rolling from a start. It was either push the revs high or it would fall on its face when the clutch instantly grabbed.
I know with my last car(Built/Procharged C5)I actually removed my aluminum flywheel and went to a lightened steel one(split the difference in wieght). With a very aggressive clutch and the ultra-light flywheel the car was hard to get rolling from a start. It was either push the revs high or it would fall on its face when the clutch instantly grabbed.
#18
On our Rx8s and with a stock or semistock clutch, shouldnt be an issue at all.
I know with my last car(Built/Procharged C5)I actually removed my aluminum flywheel and went to a lightened steel one(split the difference in wieght). With a very aggressive clutch and the ultra-light flywheel the car was hard to get rolling from a start. It was either push the revs high or it would fall on its face when the clutch instantly grabbed.
I know with my last car(Built/Procharged C5)I actually removed my aluminum flywheel and went to a lightened steel one(split the difference in wieght). With a very aggressive clutch and the ultra-light flywheel the car was hard to get rolling from a start. It was either push the revs high or it would fall on its face when the clutch instantly grabbed.
I'm a fan of doing anything within reason to lighten up the rotating assembly for the sake of bringing some low-end to the RE, but going with too light of a flywheel is not a good solution I don't think for the reasons Mawnee just gave. I don't know when and what weight flywheel on the 8 will do that, but I suspect it wouldn't take a lot.
B
#19
But isn't the point of getting a lighter flywheel to reduce the drivetrain loss and get somewhat more power from it?
Let's take BHR's 9 pound flyhweel for example (since it's the lightest), the people who own this, does it really make a difference in terms of acceleartion and power?
Let's take BHR's 9 pound flyhweel for example (since it's the lightest), the people who own this, does it really make a difference in terms of acceleartion and power?
#20
But isn't the point of getting a lighter flywheel to reduce the drivetrain loss and get somewhat more power from it?
Let's take BHR's 9 pound flyhweel for example (since it's the lightest), the people who own this, does it really make a difference in terms of acceleartion and power?
Let's take BHR's 9 pound flyhweel for example (since it's the lightest), the people who own this, does it really make a difference in terms of acceleartion and power?
#21
^ Right. But there is a difference between the torque when the clutch is engaged and the inertia carried at the point of engagement.
This is all kind of moot though. As I said, on an Rx8 with a stock or near stock clutch it will never be an issue. We arent using clutches with 850ft/lbs of grabbing force here
A lightwieght flywheel will definetly change the way the car feels to you, and most agree its for the better
This is all kind of moot though. As I said, on an Rx8 with a stock or near stock clutch it will never be an issue. We arent using clutches with 850ft/lbs of grabbing force here
A lightwieght flywheel will definetly change the way the car feels to you, and most agree its for the better
#22
You do not lose torque from a lightweight flywheel.
http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/flywhee...orque_loss.htm
#23
That's an urban legend, so you have to tread carefully so as to not misinform others.
You do not lose torque from a lightweight flywheel.
http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/flywhee...orque_loss.htm
You do not lose torque from a lightweight flywheel.
http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/flywhee...orque_loss.htm
I offered my personal experience of a situation where a lightwieght flywheel becomes a problem. However, I have stated TWICE now that on our car it is a non point anyway and that I am simply pointing out what the counterpoint is.
I am not here to argue or blast holes in others "opinions". I have offered my feedback and experience with lightwieght flywheels. My opinion is really not debatable. You are however free to offer your own opinion.
#24
lol yea, didnt matter on the track. But on the streets leaving lights it was stall the car or chirp the tires to get rolling