Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

Throttle body?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-22-2004, 05:41 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
zmzmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Throttle body?

Why isn't anyone porting the throttle body or designing a new one?
Old 09-22-2004, 05:47 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
ironmedic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im not sure about rotaries but with my stang, we cannot port our throttle bodies due to a special coating on the inside of it to protect it from heat/corrosion, etc...

im sure later on they will have new throttle bodies for sale. personally i believe they dont do jack for your car unless the rest of the manifold is ported or its an aftermarket type.
Old 09-22-2004, 06:00 PM
  #3  
SIGSEGV
 
alex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cleaning and polishing only got me throttle response from the pedal .. I don't think I got hP out of it or it was minimal. This was off a 93 300ZX TT ..so, I'm comparing apples to oranges

edit: sorry, I meant clean and polishing the throttles not porting .. I was thinking of something else. :D

Last edited by alex; 09-22-2004 at 06:13 PM.
Old 09-22-2004, 06:10 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
Ajax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 2,390
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what we saw at racing beat, the intake seemed very purposely sized for the throttle body they used. Yes, a larger throttle body would mean you could use a larger intake and flow more air, but there didnt seem to be much room to really bore out on the throttle body.
I'm sure someone will do it eventually.
Old 09-22-2004, 07:59 PM
  #5  
Not anymore
 
shelleys_man_06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not really a good modification for a larger bore throttle body. You're not going to expect many gains. I agree with Ajax. The throttle body is built for the intake manifold. Changing it may actually hurt performance.
Old 09-22-2004, 08:04 PM
  #6  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
wouldnt hurt i think but since the intake manifold can only take the amount of air that its getting from the stock throttle body it wouldnt gain you anything. i know i was looking into this awhile back. the throttle body is not a bottleneck now.
Old 09-22-2004, 10:25 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
reddragonmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
big bore throttle bodies just give you a better throttle response, they dont do much in terms of HP. Of course im speaking of 5 years of vw vr6 motor tuning, not rotary
Old 09-22-2004, 11:03 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Ajax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 2,390
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by reddragonmd
big bore throttle bodies just give you a better throttle response, they dont do much in terms of HP. Of course im speaking of 5 years of vw vr6 motor tuning, not rotary
well.. let's put it this way..

assume the end of the throttle body is an extension of the intake.. If you make it wider than the intake, you increase the volume of air it can hold. If you fill that volume at the same rate that you did previously, you have less air pressure going into the engine. Assuming the engine can actually use more air, then the larger volume of air in that throttle body would probably give slight gains and you would notice throttle response increases because you have more air readily available but the pressure is lower.

If you change the intake to become more free flowing or add FI, a larger throttle body may result in horsepower gains, but you have to really treat it as just an extension of the intake manifold.

It's actually similar to wha we do in paintball with high pressure low volume vs low pressure high volume. If you have a valve chamber running 700 psi into it, that's 700 psi worth of force hitting the ball to propel it to 280 fps. Now assume you significantly increase the size of that valve chamber. You can store much more air there at a lower pressure and propel the ball to the same speed with much less force.
I think the standard formula is p1v1 = p2v2.
blah blah blah..
Old 09-23-2004, 12:21 AM
  #9  
drift addict
 
mspeed11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: austin, texas
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
your only as fast as your slowest link. this is true in everything! :D
Old 09-23-2004, 01:05 AM
  #10  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by mspeed11
your only as fast as your slowest link. this is true in everything! :D

It's a good thing the weakest link on this engine isn't the intake manifold or throttlebody.
Old 09-23-2004, 09:56 AM
  #11  
Not anymore
 
shelleys_man_06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From thermodynamics, assuming steady-state, I don't think you would be able to get any power, as the enthalpy going in is equal to enthalpy going out for a throttling process. I think you can get a change in power as the throttle opens with time (more mass flow rate).
Old 09-23-2004, 10:18 AM
  #12  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Will the "fly by wire" control stop everyone from modifying the body? Or am I just confused?
Old 09-23-2004, 12:16 PM
  #13  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Richard Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chatsworth Ca
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
To everyone except RG. WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT????
Old 09-23-2004, 04:44 PM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
zmzmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So a polish would give better throttle response? If so this seems like a avenue to explore.
Just my opinion.
Old 09-23-2004, 04:56 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts
A polish will do nothing useful. It is already pretty smooth. Making it shiny won't help. The only thing that would make a difference would be to make it larger. Then you run into a host of other problems though. Just leave it alone. There is nothing to be had there.
Old 09-23-2004, 05:27 PM
  #16  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Richard Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chatsworth Ca
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
AMEN.
RG answer your PM
Old 09-23-2004, 06:38 PM
  #17  
Not anymore
 
shelleys_man_06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's what I said, but in thermo II terms.
Old 09-23-2004, 07:10 PM
  #18  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by Richard Paul
To everyone except RG. WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT????

they are talking about "porting and polishing" the throttle body opening in order to gain more or better airflow. basically boring a larger smoother path thru the throttle body. but since it alreadys flows as much air as the intake manifold can handle there's no point. but you already knew that and were perhaps wondering what deep end they fell off of?
Old 09-24-2004, 08:34 AM
  #19  
Not anymore
 
shelleys_man_06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haha. I think Richard was referring to me.

I found the thread about throttle bodies I talked with bgreene about.

https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-aftermarket-performance-modifications-23/throttle-bodies-34579/
Old 09-24-2004, 12:26 PM
  #20  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Richard Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chatsworth Ca
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
Nope, it's Ajax that went off the deep end.
Old 09-24-2004, 12:30 PM
  #21  
Registered
 
Ajax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 2,390
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Richard Paul
Nope, it's Ajax that went off the deep end.
Lol, alcohol and cars will do that to ya.

Am I wrong that increasing the available volume (by boring out or replacing the throttle body) would change the overall air pressure inside the throttle body?

More space, same amount of air flowing in = less pressure.
Old 09-24-2004, 01:09 PM
  #22  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Richard Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chatsworth Ca
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
Think about it. OOps that's what you were doing. And that's agood thing, keep thinking. But you increase the area of the t body so you get a volume increase equal to the increase times the amount of t body on the manifold side. Which is nothing compared to the plenum size.

Next the air is always moving and when you figure the feet per second you will find the decrease from boring the t body to be so small that it has no effect. Now if you replace the t body with one a lot bigger the air really slows down and it hurts the response unless you have increases the airflow of the engine somehow like FI.

I'll see if I can find you some formula that I once wrote up to show basic math for engine builders.
Old 09-24-2004, 01:14 PM
  #23  
Registered
 
Ajax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 2,390
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Richard Paul
Think about it. OOps that's what you were doing. And that's agood thing, keep thinking. But you increase the area of the t body so you get a volume increase equal to the increase times the amount of t body on the manifold side. Which is nothing compared to the plenum size.

Next the air is always moving and when you figure the feet per second you will find the decrease from boring the t body to be so small that it has no effect. Now if you replace the t body with one a lot bigger the air really slows down and it hurts the response unless you have increases the airflow of the engine somehow like FI.

I'll see if I can find you some formula that I once wrote up to show basic math for engine builders.
Right, like i said above, it's useless unless you increase the rate at which you flow air into the throttle body unless the intake is being limited by the throttle body as it is. If you increase that rate (cfm), you increase the volume of air available immediately to the engine inside the throttle body. I realize it was probably pretty cryptic, but i was intoxicated :b
Old 09-24-2004, 03:34 PM
  #24  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 23 Posts
If your intake manifold runners and engine ports can't flow as much air as the throttlebody can, there isn't much point in making it larger. It won't help. The throttlebody is not a restriction in the system. The engine will only flow as good as the weakest point in the entire system. It doesn't matter if that restictin is before, at, or after the throttlebody. In the case if the Renesis, the restriction is in the engine itself not the manifold system.
Old 09-24-2004, 03:52 PM
  #25  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Richard Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chatsworth Ca
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
Here is the formula:

A= cfm over 60 over feet per sec

CFM = A x fps x 60

A= area
FPS= feet per sec

i can't get it to take the whole set of formula, it would be usfull.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Throttle body?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.