Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

would removing your cat increase your gas mileage?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-15-2004 | 05:47 PM
  #1  
brillo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
would removing your cat increase your gas mileage?

I know pulling the cat would free up some HP, just b/c its a restriction, but I was wondering if it would also improve mileage in any way...all environmental issues aside....
Old 09-15-2004 | 05:55 PM
  #2  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
definately if your car stopped dumping fuel on it to keep it cool. but then you wouldn't need to remove it
Old 09-15-2004 | 05:58 PM
  #3  
Rxdriftingaction's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
it won't got a big help. don't do that man.. maybe will increase 2~3hp. but u won't get some good deal with mpg. maybe will got worst.
Old 09-15-2004 | 06:33 PM
  #4  
MELRX8's Avatar
"RX-8 my stress reliever"
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Keizer, Oregon
Which is the greater restriction, cat or stock exhaust? In other words which will improve flow the most a high flow cat or after-market exhaust?
Old 09-16-2004 | 12:25 AM
  #5  
robertdot's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
From: BHM, AL
Originally Posted by MELRX8
Which is the greater restriction, cat or stock exhaust? In other words which will improve flow the most a high flow cat or after-market exhaust?
Go read racing beat's site. They talk about all that.

Rxdriftingaction, where are you from?
Old 09-16-2004 | 10:02 AM
  #6  
brillo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
bump
Old 09-16-2004 | 10:26 AM
  #7  
StealthTL's Avatar
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,284
Likes: 175
From: A Pacific Island.
Experiment underway......

I am running that experiment this week, will keep you posted on the results.

I removed the 'oxidation' bed of the catalyst, by far the biggest restriction. I retained the 'reduction' bed, (the first bed, before the secondary sensor) thus avoiding check engine lights.

I just finished my first tank of gas after the switch over, but don't want to quote results based on just one fill......

Will post next week.


S

(Anyone interested in detail can P.M. me, but don't go carving up your cats just yet.)
Old 09-16-2004 | 10:36 AM
  #8  
brillo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
Interesting, how is the noise level?
Old 09-16-2004 | 10:38 AM
  #9  
robertdot's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
From: BHM, AL
The problem with the gas mileage is the ECU fuel maps, not restrictions. It still going to run rich if the cat is there or not, and it is still going to get bad mileage.
Old 09-16-2004 | 10:57 AM
  #10  
StealthTL's Avatar
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,284
Likes: 175
From: A Pacific Island.
Noise....

Sounds louder, no doubt, but not any 'harsher'.....

I have a cat-back, it just makes the grumble and 'poppage' louder, if you know what I mean.

s
Old 09-16-2004 | 11:23 PM
  #11  
Felix W.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Lahr, Germany
cat removed - no CEL?

So how can you remove the cat, yet not get CEL codes? Do you use an O2 fooler?i don't understand which part of the cat you removed to reduce backpressure.
felix
Old 09-17-2004 | 04:22 AM
  #12  
robertdot's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
From: BHM, AL
Trick it with an O2 "fooler". Remove the whole thing. Cats are restrictive by their nature. You are shoving exhaust through tiny "honeycomb" holes. Remove it, replace it with a straight pipe, and it flows better. It's not going to increase your mileage (at least not enough to deal with the extra sound), and your HP increases are only marginal (according to Racing Beat).
Old 09-17-2004 | 09:49 AM
  #13  
shelleys_man_06's Avatar
Not anymore
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Agreed. Removing the cat will cause some gains in power, but I don't think it will increase gas mileage. You're freeing up more area for flow. I believe your engine will increase in thermal efficiency on the order of 0.001%.
Old 09-28-2004 | 01:43 AM
  #14  
shelleys_man_06's Avatar
Not anymore
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Okay. I'm seriously thinking about removing my cat, permanently, but I'm worried about my upcoming emissions exam. Yeah I call it an exam; it's worth 30% of my RX-8's grade for the semester. Seriously, are there any solutions to passing the emissions test without a cat in Texas?
Old 09-28-2004 | 02:07 AM
  #15  
Aoshi Shinomori's Avatar
Kaiten Kenbu Rokuren
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 934
Likes: 2
From: Central Valley, NY
Someone on here posted once about how they passed their tests without their cat. I believe it was something along the lines of a heat sheild? or something encasing his mid pipe, so when they pull out the mirror and look under the car, it looks like there is actually a cat. Don't take my word for it, as I don't know the regulations for emissions testing in Texas or any other state. But if all of what I just said was wrong(good probability) couldn't you just strap the cat back on the day of the test? Again I don't really know how long or how much work it would take to switch back on. Hope this helps.
Old 09-28-2004 | 02:13 AM
  #16  
IZoomZoomI's Avatar
Boost needed
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
isn't most the restriction from the exhaust manifold and not the cat?
Old 09-28-2004 | 02:13 AM
  #17  
shelleys_man_06's Avatar
Not anymore
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Well, rotaries are pretty damn loud without cats. As for the RX-8, I really don't care at this point in time. Like I said, I don't want to have to crawl under the car the day before the test just to put my cat back. I'm a lazy SOB. Plus, it would've been a clear sign I should've just kept it there in the first place. I'll figure something out. shelleys_man_06 always has a solution, even if it's crazy.
Old 09-28-2004 | 02:22 AM
  #18  
Aoshi Shinomori's Avatar
Kaiten Kenbu Rokuren
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 934
Likes: 2
From: Central Valley, NY
It's just one day a year, c'mon. But seriously if you are really against having to do that, there is always the high flow cat option.
Old 09-28-2004 | 08:05 AM
  #19  
shelleys_man_06's Avatar
Not anymore
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by IZoomZoomI
isn't most the restriction from the exhaust manifold and not the cat?
I'll admit the exhaust manifold is of a log-type. I prefer a long-tube header, but I don't know if that would fit. I know some aftermarket companies have them, but I'm looking forward to designing a turbine header.

Originally Posted by Aoshi Shinmori
It's just one day a year, c'mon.
What part of "I'm a lazy SOB" do you not understand? J/K p
Old 09-28-2004 | 08:18 AM
  #20  
Rasputin's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Originally Posted by robertdot
The problem with the gas mileage is the ECU fuel maps, not restrictions. It still going to run rich if the cat is there or not, and it is still going to get bad mileage.
Correct, unless you also make the following changes :

- disable catatyst temp protection (not advised as it also protects other exhaust hardware and sensors!) ;
- enable part throttle lean running in the map governing requested AFR (I'd love to be able to do this).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RevMeHarder
New Member Forum
6
08-16-2023 07:23 PM
WranglerFan
New Member Forum
4
05-31-2022 08:51 AM
GARCIAC951
Series I Tech Garage
8
09-10-2015 08:17 PM
ed0128
New Member Forum
7
09-09-2015 05:50 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 PM.