Notices
Series I Do It Yourself Forum Wanna save some coin or time/money in the shop? Read up on Do-It-Yourself custom mods and repairs & post your own here.

DIY: Better Flowing Intake Box (Similar to RB Intake Box)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-09-2007 | 10:14 PM
  #101  
chetrickerman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 0
From: Waukesha Wisconsin
Originally Posted by Socket7
Threadjack

You need SUPER. It will transcode damn near any video format into almost any other video format. I assume your camera made a .3GP file?
http://www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html

Did i mention it's totally free?
/threadjack
will it work on a mac??
Old 11-10-2007 | 01:39 AM
  #102  
Socket7's Avatar
ಠ_ಠ
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 6
From: Under the Dumbarton Bridge
Originally Posted by chetrickerman
will it work on a mac??
Sure, if you have parallels.
Old 11-10-2007 | 02:25 AM
  #103  
chetrickerman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 0
From: Waukesha Wisconsin
so i guess not.
Old 11-10-2007 | 03:23 AM
  #104  
dshiznit1489's Avatar
Formerly Polak Graphics
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
interesting, im gonna do it tomorrow.
Old 11-10-2007 | 01:50 PM
  #105  
dshiznit1489's Avatar
Formerly Polak Graphics
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
just did it, removed 1 screen and drove it around a little. There is a change in sound, but nothing to noticable, one thing i did notice is that it responds better. I didnt notice any idle problems.

AWESOME DIY!
Old 11-10-2007 | 02:03 PM
  #106  
RufusVonStorm's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Fullerton, CA
Took out 1 of the screens and drove it around, i guess it is a little louder which is exactly what im looking for. Thanks very much to the OP for the great DIY

K&N for $50 is a great alternative to intake
Old 11-10-2007 | 04:07 PM
  #107  
Nubo's Avatar
Lubricious
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 4
From: SF Bay Area, California
The panels might look as if they are "in the way", and "just for noise damping", but that doesn't necessarily make it so. It's just as likely (more likely, imho) that they are there to reduce turbulence and encourage laminar flow. That is, to help airflow, not impede it. Fluid dynamics is not always intuitive. In any case, the proof is in the results. Absent any dyno tests or airflow/pressure measurements it's all guessing. "Feels faster" is probably just wishful thinking unless you're talking about a 10HP increase or better and I haven't seen anyone claim that kind of improvement.

Some people might like it if it's noisier, and that's fine if that's what you like. But consider that the noise is the result of turbulence and turbulence impedes airflow.
Old 11-10-2007 | 06:40 PM
  #108  
chetrickerman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 0
From: Waukesha Wisconsin
btw, some of the credit for this DIY has to go to charles hill, he came up with this stuff 3 years ago, (not trying to steal it from you SE3P)
Old 11-10-2007 | 06:48 PM
  #109  
Spinning Sushi's Avatar
Thread Starter
I <3 Sushi
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,967
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by chetrickerman
btw, some of the credit for this DIY has to go to charles hill, he came up with this stuff 3 years ago, (not trying to steal it from you SE3P)
No problem I didn't know he came up with it and couldn't find anything about it so I decided to post about my discovery.
Old 11-10-2007 | 08:21 PM
  #110  
chetrickerman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 0
From: Waukesha Wisconsin
yup, me and him had a little conversation about it, and how team flamed him for it. its all good though, you do deserve the credit for making the DIY and making it easier for people to find it.
Old 11-11-2007 | 01:41 AM
  #111  
gundarx's Avatar
Hummmmm...
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
I just removed the 2 walls from my intake yesterday and I'm glad that I found this thread. Here are my observations:

1. Unnoticeable change in sound when idle. (which is good!)
2. Intake suction sound can be heard particularly during light throttle operation with windows open or closed.
3. Low RPM range noticeably smoother esp. < 2K range
- I think this is the best benefit. Clutch engagement when moving off just got MUCH more pleasant
4. Actually whole RPM range to rev limiter felt smoother (feeling is similar to getting a fresh tank of gas)
5. With WOT operation, sound is louder but still sounds refined (unlike most CAI set-ups)
6. I'm pretty sure the idle has much less vibrations w/ or w/o AC.

My car's a '07 with 2300 mi. now and I've been religious in keeping my engine/car in the best shape possible. I have also been pre-mixing with Lucas UCL but this mod made it run much smoother. Although I haven't tested this mod that long, I would recommend it to anyone that doesn't mind the more apparent suction noise (or a bit more engine sound intrusion in the cabin) I mentioned. Also it's totally reversible, easy to do, and free. Ren. SE3P, chet, and CRH thanks for the info.
Old 11-11-2007 | 05:45 AM
  #112  
chetrickerman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 0
From: Waukesha Wisconsin
i feel so proud, i was mentioned in the credits, haha, but i hope you have a k&n, or good filter also
Old 11-11-2007 | 06:51 PM
  #113  
kalix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: 562 area code
Talking

Originally Posted by gundarx
I just removed the 2 walls from my intake yesterday and I'm glad that I found this thread. Here are my observations:

1. Unnoticeable change in sound when idle. (which is good!)
2. Intake suction sound can be heard particularly during light throttle operation with windows open or closed.
3. Low RPM range noticeably smoother esp. < 2K range
- I think this is the best benefit. Clutch engagement when moving off just got MUCH more pleasant

4. Actually whole RPM range to rev limiter felt smoother (feeling is similar to getting a fresh tank of gas)
5. With WOT operation, sound is louder but still sounds refined (unlike most CAI set-ups)
6. I'm pretty sure the idle has much less vibrations w/ or w/o AC.

My car's a '07 with 2300 mi. now and I've been religious in keeping my engine/car in the best shape possible. I have also been pre-mixing with Lucas UCL but this mod made it run much smoother. Although I haven't tested this mod that long, I would recommend it to anyone that doesn't mind the more apparent suction noise (or a bit more engine sound intrusion in the cabin) I mentioned. Also it's totally reversible, easy to do, and free. Ren. SE3P, chet, and CRH thanks for the info.
Definitely agree with #3. For the past few months I've been having rough shifting, and for whatever reason, this mod has made my shifts a whole lot smoother. It's a joy to drive this car again! Whatever benefit or not that this mod has, I'm sticking with my de-walled, single screen intake box.

Here's an audio sample http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jk4ijl6guj0

Not the best quality, but you can hear the suction at low RPMs. It's not the same as having a true aftermarket intake, but hey it's free.
Old 11-12-2007 | 03:58 PM
  #114  
lilring's Avatar
Finally a MT
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
ok, well i took out the walls and there is not one difference.
Old 11-12-2007 | 04:39 PM
  #115  
D_8's Avatar
D_8
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Hood River, Oregon
I did mine last night, took the walls and first screen with pipe. I do have a magnaflow exhaust so it was hard to tell the difference in engine sound but performance wise i did feel it respond a lil better...thankz guyz
Old 11-12-2007 | 04:45 PM
  #116  
rowteree's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 428
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by lilring
ok, well i took out the walls and there is not one difference.
if you don't have an aftermarket exhaust on your car you wont really see a difference at all. Some people listen very closely and others think there is no difference at all. Since i did this last week, i can't notice the walls have even been taken out so it sounds like i did nothing to it what so ever
Old 11-12-2007 | 07:58 PM
  #117  
lilring's Avatar
Finally a MT
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Originally Posted by rowteree
if you don't have an aftermarket exhaust on your car you wont really see a difference at all. Some people listen very closely and others think there is no difference at all. Since i did this last week, i can't notice the walls have even been taken out so it sounds like i did nothing to it what so ever
i have the borla Exhaust on mine, maybe its just that i cant hear any of the intake or something i dunno. but i cant tell to much of a difference
Old 11-13-2007 | 08:53 PM
  #118  
Atilla's Avatar
I am THAT guy
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 5
From: Caca Cali
DAMN YOU JOHN! where's my cred?? BOO!! haha! gg

Last edited by Atilla; 11-13-2007 at 08:56 PM.
Old 11-13-2007 | 11:42 PM
  #119  
Spinning Sushi's Avatar
Thread Starter
I <3 Sushi
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,967
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Thanks to Atilla as well
Old 11-14-2007 | 05:59 PM
  #120  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
Originally Posted by D_8
I did mine last night, took the walls and first screen with pipe.
alnielsen did the same exact procedure for me today. Didn't really notice a difference in sound. The car felt a little more responsive. However, the gross HP figure on my scangauge read 281 at one point. Highest I've seen before now is 254.
Old 11-14-2007 | 06:31 PM
  #121  
Cromax's Avatar
Buzz Buzz Buzz
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Victoria
That much of a difference?
Old 11-14-2007 | 08:15 PM
  #122  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
Not sure how much was due to the intake mods, air temp, humidity, etc. Just an observation I made. Also keep in mind it is measuring gross horse power. The difference in brake horse power would be less.
Old 11-14-2007 | 08:17 PM
  #123  
freebird_78's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
I did it, and noticed just about nothing. MAYBE a touch of improvement at low end, but if that IS true, then I think I also lost a touch on the top end. I'm talking levels that are just about inperceptable for either one. I think I'd feel more of a difference between a full tank of gas and half (weight).

No difference in sound.

I'll probably just go ahead and go back to stock. I can't imagine this making more than +/- 1-2% difference at all, but hey, for a 5 minute expirement, it was worth a shot.
Old 11-14-2007 | 08:24 PM
  #124  
chetrickerman's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 0
From: Waukesha Wisconsin
for some cars it works, and some it doesnt, try it if you want. if anyone is coming to the chicago meet this saturday wants is done, i can do it really quick.
Old 11-14-2007 | 09:46 PM
  #125  
eviltwinkie's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 1
From: everywherez...
Any way BH could make an accordion tube replacement for the stock intake?


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: DIY: Better Flowing Intake Box (Similar to RB Intake Box)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 AM.