Baseline Automated Tuning Beta Now Available for Download
08-23-2009, 01:19 PM
#553
Dongbag extrordinare
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Away from the fruits of my labor
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08-23-2009, 01:33 PM
#554
Bummer (I have only seen on 8 club-er since being here; ghey!);
Logging interval depends on the number of sensors your logging; if you pick them all I think it is 500ms for the AP.
The AF latency is 570ms or so I think; Chase would know.
And you can run a log to see for yourself too.
Logging interval depends on the number of sensors your logging; if you pick them all I think it is 500ms for the AP.
The AF latency is 570ms or so I think; Chase would know.
And you can run a log to see for yourself too.
08-23-2009, 03:57 PM
#557
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08-24-2009, 09:54 AM
#559
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Son of a monkey lovin' *****!!!!!! Car would not run! DAMN!!!!
After careful review, I noticed that I failed to extend the trends using Chaces' map and my logs were null and void. Started over and double checked everything and will run the map in its correct form and then do logs. Then, I will scale the MAF as intended.
After careful review, I noticed that I failed to extend the trends using Chaces' map and my logs were null and void. Started over and double checked everything and will run the map in its correct form and then do logs. Then, I will scale the MAF as intended.
08-24-2009, 10:04 AM
#560
so you logged running my map. you entered those logs in baseline and got a maf scale. you made the changes to my maf scale in racetuner. you saved the map and loaded it to your ap. then you flashed it, and your car wouldn't start?
that seems highly unlikely. wth? i are confused.
that seems highly unlikely. wth? i are confused.
08-24-2009, 10:36 AM
#561
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so you logged running my map. you entered those logs in baseline and got a maf scale. you made the changes to my maf scale in racetuner. you saved the map and loaded it to your ap. then you flashed it, and your car wouldn't start?
that seems highly unlikely. wth? i are confused.
that seems highly unlikely. wth? i are confused.
I started from scratch and extended all trends and will get new logs and then apply the new m-values.
Again, completely my fault.
08-24-2009, 09:03 PM
#564
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I double checked everything and loaded Chaces' tune. It felt much better than the first time. All except, low RPM range. A real slug. Feels like its bogging down when you stomp from a dead stop. Anyway. Logged some more and will apply those values tomorrow. These logs were very different from the others. Update tomorrow. Pending if I'm busy at work or not. Oh, the Rpm's after driving for a while settled at about 800 at a stop. At first, 1000-1100.
08-25-2009, 08:58 AM
#567
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep. Its an auto. I'm getting ready to apply the m-values. I noticed the bogging/hesitation wasn't nearly as bad this morning.
I never got the chance to do a damn thing today. Actually busy at work.
Edit to include, bwahahahaha. My car is insane! Peculiar isn't it?
I never got the chance to do a damn thing today. Actually busy at work.
Edit to include, bwahahahaha. My car is insane! Peculiar isn't it?
Last edited by Its Chey; 08-25-2009 at 08:11 PM.
08-25-2009, 11:06 PM
#568
dude, what are you doing to your maf voltage? why does it say 2.34 so many times? no wonder your car died. holy ****. wow. NOOOOO!
you're supposed to multiply your m-values by the numbers on the bottom, the mass air flow. i should have been more clear about that.
so when you set up your maf in baseline, it wants the low numbers on the top 0.86, 0.98, 1.02, 1.05, 1.09, 1.13. then when you scale your maf, it sets those numbers next to your m-values. .86 maf volts corresponds to some mass air flow number on your maf calibration.
So if next to .86 on your baseline maf scale, you have an m value of 1.05, you go in racetuner and multiply the number BELOW .86 by 1.05. On mine,directly below .86 is 1.95. If baseline tells me my m-value for .86 is 1.05, i multiply 1.95 by 1.05 and leave .86 alone.
get it?
i don't think you need more logs. just revert to your working map, my map, and multiply your m-values correctly. then see what happens. i reckon then it will be time to lean out your fuel maps for maximum power -- rarr.
you're supposed to multiply your m-values by the numbers on the bottom, the mass air flow. i should have been more clear about that.
so when you set up your maf in baseline, it wants the low numbers on the top 0.86, 0.98, 1.02, 1.05, 1.09, 1.13. then when you scale your maf, it sets those numbers next to your m-values. .86 maf volts corresponds to some mass air flow number on your maf calibration.
So if next to .86 on your baseline maf scale, you have an m value of 1.05, you go in racetuner and multiply the number BELOW .86 by 1.05. On mine,directly below .86 is 1.95. If baseline tells me my m-value for .86 is 1.05, i multiply 1.95 by 1.05 and leave .86 alone.
get it?
i don't think you need more logs. just revert to your working map, my map, and multiply your m-values correctly. then see what happens. i reckon then it will be time to lean out your fuel maps for maximum power -- rarr.
Last edited by myriadshalaks; 08-25-2009 at 11:18 PM.
08-26-2009, 05:06 AM
#570
Its pronounced Che'
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: RVA
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dude, what are you doing to your maf voltage? why does it say 2.34 so many times? no wonder your car died. holy ****. wow. NOOOOO!
you're supposed to multiply your m-values by the numbers on the bottom, the mass air flow. i should have been more clear about that.
so when you set up your maf in baseline, it wants the low numbers on the top 0.86, 0.98, 1.02, 1.05, 1.09, 1.13. then when you scale your maf, it sets those numbers next to your m-values. .86 maf volts corresponds to some mass air flow number on your maf calibration.
So if next to .86 on your baseline maf scale, you have an m value of 1.05, you go in racetuner and multiply the number BELOW .86 by 1.05. On mine,directly below .86 is 1.95. If baseline tells me my m-value for .86 is 1.05, i multiply 1.95 by 1.05 and leave .86 alone.
get it?
i don't think you need more logs. just revert to your working map, my map, and multiply your m-values correctly. then see what happens. i reckon then it will be time to lean out your fuel maps for maximum power -- rarr.
you're supposed to multiply your m-values by the numbers on the bottom, the mass air flow. i should have been more clear about that.
so when you set up your maf in baseline, it wants the low numbers on the top 0.86, 0.98, 1.02, 1.05, 1.09, 1.13. then when you scale your maf, it sets those numbers next to your m-values. .86 maf volts corresponds to some mass air flow number on your maf calibration.
So if next to .86 on your baseline maf scale, you have an m value of 1.05, you go in racetuner and multiply the number BELOW .86 by 1.05. On mine,directly below .86 is 1.95. If baseline tells me my m-value for .86 is 1.05, i multiply 1.95 by 1.05 and leave .86 alone.
get it?
i don't think you need more logs. just revert to your working map, my map, and multiply your m-values correctly. then see what happens. i reckon then it will be time to lean out your fuel maps for maximum power -- rarr.
It actually gets easier. Definately still a lil difficult though. The only reason I keep posting my stuff is to help the baseline challenged, I make the mistakes that everyone can learn from.
Last edited by Its Chey; 08-26-2009 at 05:29 AM.
08-26-2009, 07:20 AM
#571
Opps - yeah good catch chase!!!
I am honestly not a fan of how easy the AP will let you screw with the scales as opposed to the values.
But yes - your M values are to affect the BOTTOM row - the data not the top with is the voltage scale.
Hopefully, this will make things mo-betta.
I am honestly not a fan of how easy the AP will let you screw with the scales as opposed to the values.
But yes - your M values are to affect the BOTTOM row - the data not the top with is the voltage scale.
Hopefully, this will make things mo-betta.
08-30-2009, 12:20 PM
#573
so i was helping chey last night over the phone. he's running the stock map. i checked his engine set-up. everything fine. i checked his logs, all open loop. i walked him through the import log and set-up template. we got a maf scale.
baseline was telling him he was 10 percent rich below 2.77 and 10 percent lean above 2.89. 2.77 and 2.89 were fine. i had him multiply one side by 1.05 and the other by .95. so we did half what baseline said.
when he flashed, he got pcm 335. weird. wth could have happened?
chey, is what i said here what you did?
baseline was telling him he was 10 percent rich below 2.77 and 10 percent lean above 2.89. 2.77 and 2.89 were fine. i had him multiply one side by 1.05 and the other by .95. so we did half what baseline said.
when he flashed, he got pcm 335. weird. wth could have happened?
chey, is what i said here what you did?
