Cobb AcessPORT with TURBO Discussion
#235
Finally Boosted!!!!!!!
#237
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is some more data for you. It is also in CSV format so you can plot it however you want. It computes two pressures, the higher one is your real boost pressure-- another way to look at is the extra pressure the atmosphere would have to be at for an NA motor to ingest the same amount of mass your turbo does. I have even compensated for the actual VE of the renesis as measured by Hymee in https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tech-garage-22/measured-mass-air-flow-efficiency-33370/ as well as your altitude, humidity and ambient temp.
The second, slightly lower number in the CSV is the pressure of the intake charge inside the 1.308L displacement volume of the engine after the intake port closes. It can be reasonably proven that you needed at least this much pressure outside the intake port. In reality you need more -- you have to overcome the natural VE of the motor and your density invariably has decreased due to inperfect intercooling. Less density == more pressure needed to ingest the air we already know flowed through the MAF.
Now that I've processed your logfile completely, I see you have a boost spike at 4500 RPM. It seems the VE of a stock motor is close to the least there (82%) so the turbo has to supply more pressure to make it eat. The NA renesis at WOT consumes 95g/s there and your logs show you eating 220g/s! That is 19.1psi! Even if we assume 100% VE I still see you peaking over 15psi in places.
I have also enclosed the AWK program I wrote to crunch your CSV file into a boost pressure CSV. Might be useful if anybody wants to double-check my math or plug in different numbers for the VE table or atmospheric air density. Its really a pretty simple script and you don't need to be a programmer to read it.
#242
#243
The calibrations are done mathematically, based on the VE of the engine, the injector sizes, etc.
I don't mind the int-x, it's really great for getting max power, but it's sub par for idle and it does require proper tuning and an eye kept on ambient temperatures, otherwise the AFR can wander away from what you expect.
#244
RX-8 = Japanese MG
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bay area, CA
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You don't understand the difference between dynamic and static tuning?
I'm not saying the Inx-X is 'bad', it's just obsolete. I have an Xede, which does everything the Int-X does PLUS sense/control boost. You know what? My Xede is obsolete too.
Turbocharging this car increases the odds of a blown engine. How might one best manage this risk? Answer: having the tune be very accurate and automatically adjust itself with changing conditions. That's why modern factory PCMs do this.
Being able to leverage this capability is a good thing.
It is better than tuing the car for one given set of temp/humidity/etc. then not adjusting the tune as conditions change. So, yes, any stand alone that can only do a static tune is more likely to make your engine blow than a method that adjusts the tune as needed to keep AFRs in a safer place.
This is just a simple, logical fact...nothing to get emotional about.
Last edited by SlideWayz; 04-22-2008 at 11:44 AM.
#245
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Like mysql101 said, if you are planning on keeping the Int-X just have 2 diff. maps, one for cold, one for warm/hot, and do make sure they are tuned by a professional.
SlideWayz has a point: Dynamic = AP and Static = Int-X ... So if you are not changing too much in temps, baro, and other factors then Int-X needs only 1 map, otherwise you need to tune to these specs statically. The AP does it itself but you need to initially set it up right.
SlideWayz has a point: Dynamic = AP and Static = Int-X ... So if you are not changing too much in temps, baro, and other factors then Int-X needs only 1 map, otherwise you need to tune to these specs statically. The AP does it itself but you need to initially set it up right.
#246
Boost Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WTF guys... why don't all parties involved get together and do a group hug or something. We are all Men here right? Can we stop the f-ing quibbling bs and get back to making the 8 better? Or did things change and nobody really f-ing care after the site was sold?
#248
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
![Banghead](https://www.rx8club.com/images/smilies/banghead.gif)
C'mon Jeff, if you can read this just take it easy and think of the Greater good served by you just taking the week off. We need you man, don't let his be the end of all the great work you've done on here.
I really don't want to have to move to the Dark Side permanantely.
Last edited by Jedi54; 04-22-2008 at 11:57 AM.