Performance tuning kits
#227
Couple of things...
1. Wouldn't I want to use a mid-pipe with an O2 bung to retain the O2 sensor w/ the Stage 2 instead of using the "fooler"? (Irregardless of the narrowband/wideband issue with the stock sensor)
2. I remember an interview w/ one of the Import Drag guys, maybe Abel Ibarra, saying they had switched to the Iridium(sp?) spark plugs because of the glowplug/preignition problem. Anyone else using these plugs?
1. Wouldn't I want to use a mid-pipe with an O2 bung to retain the O2 sensor w/ the Stage 2 instead of using the "fooler"? (Irregardless of the narrowband/wideband issue with the stock sensor)
2. I remember an interview w/ one of the Import Drag guys, maybe Abel Ibarra, saying they had switched to the Iridium(sp?) spark plugs because of the glowplug/preignition problem. Anyone else using these plugs?
#228
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Originally posted by labrat1123
2. I remember an interview w/ one of the Import Drag guys, maybe Abel Ibarra, saying they had switched to the Iridium(sp?) spark plugs because of the glowplug/preignition problem. Anyone else using these plugs?
2. I remember an interview w/ one of the Import Drag guys, maybe Abel Ibarra, saying they had switched to the Iridium(sp?) spark plugs because of the glowplug/preignition problem. Anyone else using these plugs?
Iridium plugs are a stock part on the RX-8.
#231
Flame Thrower
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Long Island
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Talking](https://www.rx8club.com/images/icons/icon10.gif)
Please email me with any information on how I can purchase this kit. devious121212@yahoo.com Thanks
#233
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kidwelly,Wales, UK
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by SunDiver
I too would like to try this on my UK model RX-8. I'm due to collect the car first week of January. It's a 231hp UK model. I have both a wideband and laptop datalogging facilities. I've done a lot of tuning in the past on my MX-5 (Miata in the US) - it runs a turbo and makes around 250hp / 230lbft at the 'wheel. I'd certainly be interested in giving it a go on the UK model. As to marrying it with a Borla, I could try that too; years ago my first MX-5 modification was to swap out the OEM exhaust for a Borla.
When it's available, I'd certainly be interested in buying one to see how things go on a UK model. Also happy to supply ECU wiring information and WB data if required.
All the best
I too would like to try this on my UK model RX-8. I'm due to collect the car first week of January. It's a 231hp UK model. I have both a wideband and laptop datalogging facilities. I've done a lot of tuning in the past on my MX-5 (Miata in the US) - it runs a turbo and makes around 250hp / 230lbft at the 'wheel. I'd certainly be interested in giving it a go on the UK model. As to marrying it with a Borla, I could try that too; years ago my first MX-5 modification was to swap out the OEM exhaust for a Borla.
When it's available, I'd certainly be interested in buying one to see how things go on a UK model. Also happy to supply ECU wiring information and WB data if required.
All the best
I imagine it will as it seems to be bringing it closer to the ECU map of the Japanese RX8 (well the figures suggest so to a complete novice like me!)
#234
Forum Vendor
Thread Starter
We have recently shipped test units to users / tuners in Australia, the UK, and Germany.
I have received wide band sensor readings from users in Australia and the UK.
What we have seen so far is that the tuning maps there are similar or identical to what we see here.
Once we get some feedback from these people in actual use of our kits we will then be able to definitively post more info on this.
I have received wide band sensor readings from users in Australia and the UK.
What we have seen so far is that the tuning maps there are similar or identical to what we see here.
Once we get some feedback from these people in actual use of our kits we will then be able to definitively post more info on this.
#235
Forum Vendor
Thread Starter
Regarding O2 foolers:
A friend here in Alberta is running a midpipe with a Random Tech cat, and the O2 sensors install in bungs, and has had no issues.
Random also built and installed test units in cars in the Atlanta area and they too see no problem, and have not had to use O2 foolers.
With a Random 700099 high flow cat in a custom mid-pipe, high temperature resistant cat in your mid pipe you do not seem to need an O2 fooler, the flow is better, and performance gains are noticeable, ASSUMING YOU HAVE INSTALLED a TUNING to allow the engine to use proper fuel/air mixtures.
As for longevity of this cat, the oldest examples are now months in use, and have encountered no problem so far.
A friend here in Alberta is running a midpipe with a Random Tech cat, and the O2 sensors install in bungs, and has had no issues.
Random also built and installed test units in cars in the Atlanta area and they too see no problem, and have not had to use O2 foolers.
With a Random 700099 high flow cat in a custom mid-pipe, high temperature resistant cat in your mid pipe you do not seem to need an O2 fooler, the flow is better, and performance gains are noticeable, ASSUMING YOU HAVE INSTALLED a TUNING to allow the engine to use proper fuel/air mixtures.
As for longevity of this cat, the oldest examples are now months in use, and have encountered no problem so far.
#236
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i want to make it simple, with the stage 1 is easier if i have to take it back to the dealership for any warranty?? and what about the sensor is receving from the tires while is spinning faster? is allready upgraded? that mean too that i can use the exhaust and the intake with the stage 1 rigth??
#237
Forum Vendor
Thread Starter
Originally posted by RX-jimenez
i want to make it simple, with the stage 1 is easier if i have to take it back to the dealership for any warranty?? and what about the sensor is receving from the tires while is spinning faster? is allready upgraded? that mean too that i can use the exhaust and the intake with the stage 1 rigth??
i want to make it simple, with the stage 1 is easier if i have to take it back to the dealership for any warranty?? and what about the sensor is receving from the tires while is spinning faster? is allready upgraded? that mean too that i can use the exhaust and the intake with the stage 1 rigth??
You can also leave it in, turn it off, and there is no sign it is there.
To find it they would have to remove the ECU box cover.
And there is no normal service reason for doing that.
About to post a thread on installation method.
Lots of pics.
Take a look and you will see what is involved.
#239
8 the HARD way.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry, I got a probably a dumb question.. but these threads are HUGE and couldnt find an answer..
Where is the ECU located on the car anyway? And with this plugin box, is it somewhere you can easily get to, as you say?
Guess I should wait for the pics eh.. heh
Where is the ECU located on the car anyway? And with this plugin box, is it somewhere you can easily get to, as you say?
Guess I should wait for the pics eh.. heh
Last edited by RX-Nut; 01-11-2004 at 12:53 AM.
#240
Forum Vendor
Thread Starter
Originally posted by RX-Nut
Sorry, I got a probably a dumb question.. but these threads are HUGE and couldnt find an answer..
Where is the ECU located on the car anyway? And with this plugin box, is it somewhere you can easily get to, as you say?
Guess I should wait for the pics eh.. heh
Sorry, I got a probably a dumb question.. but these threads are HUGE and couldnt find an answer..
Where is the ECU located on the car anyway? And with this plugin box, is it somewhere you can easily get to, as you say?
Guess I should wait for the pics eh.. heh
The ECU box is at the very front, under the hood, on the passenger side.
It is the black plastic box next to the battery, closest to the right.
#241
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: south shore MTL
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Octane
found this about octane, hope it helps
http://www.btinternet.com/~madmole/R...RONMONPON.html
Madjoker
http://www.btinternet.com/~madmole/R...RONMONPON.html
Madjoker
#242
Forum Vendor
Thread Starter
Good, but we have done the whole fuel/octane/additives thing to death a couple of months back.
Another good link:
http://www.cheresources.com/greengas.shtml
Another good link:
http://www.cheresources.com/greengas.shtml
#244
canzoomer.
ECU is basically a remaping of Fuel/Air/ignition? since each exhaust systems has it on performance characteristic. would the maping of the ECU base on the type of the aftermarket exhaust improve the performance more?
your input will great appreciate. thanks.
som
ECU is basically a remaping of Fuel/Air/ignition? since each exhaust systems has it on performance characteristic. would the maping of the ECU base on the type of the aftermarket exhaust improve the performance more?
your input will great appreciate. thanks.
som
#245
Forum Vendor
Thread Starter
Originally posted by Krashoper
canzoomer.
ECU is basically a remaping of Fuel/Air/ignition? since each exhaust systems has it on performance characteristic. would the maping of the ECU base on the type of the aftermarket exhaust improve the performance more?
your input will great appreciate. thanks.
som
canzoomer.
ECU is basically a remaping of Fuel/Air/ignition? since each exhaust systems has it on performance characteristic. would the maping of the ECU base on the type of the aftermarket exhaust improve the performance more?
your input will great appreciate. thanks.
som
The Stage2 adds ignition advance over-rides and a more aggrressive mixture level.
In general the way it works is based on data it collects from the MAF (air flow sensor) throttle positon sensor, O2 sensor.
If you improve air flow by using a better flowing exhaust system, for example, it properly compensates for the air flow rate and adds the appropriate mixture level of fuel.
As it is a piggy back it does not directly control the fuel injection duty cycle.
Here is basically how it works:
We run a stock engine at various throttle, rpm, and other sensor data ranges, and measure the mixture level that the ECU adjusts the air/fuel mix to.
We enter a setting for a series of points, separated by 100rpm intervals, to add or take away fuel from the mix provided by the ECU's control of the fuel injection system.
The way we do this is by telling the ECU that it is getting more or less air as measured by the MAF, and the ECU responds with the the actual changes to mixture by djusting the fuel injection duty cycle.
Let's say at 1/2 throttle, 5,000rpm we have observed that the ECU is running 10% too rich a mixture level.
We then feed the ECU a modified signal from the MAF that tells the ECU that is its getting less air intake as detected by the MAF than is real.
The ECU reacts by cutting the amount of fuel to match the new "faked" air input level.
We then re-test, and confirm that under this condition we now have the correct mixture, or adjust further until we have that "dialed in"
Then we do the same at the next rpm level, then at the next throttle position level, and so on.
It is a 2 dimensional grid of throttle and air flow measurements, with adjustment levels for each point on that grid.
Now, we add the readings from the exhaust O2 sensor to calibrate the emissions levels of hydrocarbons.
So it becomes a 3D grid of adjustments.
Our computer measures the sensor conditions 50 times per second, and adjusts the readings sent to the ECU each tme, by looking up the correct point in the grid maps and sending the necessary compensations to the ECU MAF input signals.
Ideal mixture levels produce the most power.
Technically speaking the most efficient burn level is aroud 14.6:1 mixture levels. When you are cruising with partial throttle that is what we make it do.
When you open up the throttle we make it a bit richer, as at mostly open or WOT throttle conditions this 14.6 mix would produce "knocking" or "pinging" which is when the mixture explodes instead of evenly burning.
We enrich the micture to about 13.2:1 at full throttle level to prevent that risk.
One may set it more agressively, perhaps to a 13.7:1 mix, and get more power, but then one needs to make sure the fuel is at the proper, higher octane levels, and there is still an increased level of risk of detontation.
At a 13.7:1 mix at full throttle one gets about 45hp gained over stock.
At 13.2:1 one gains about 20-25hp
We are providing the latter in Stage1.
A good safe map that will not knock, even if you use less than optimal gas, or are running at harsher atmospheric conditions.
The stock tuen on an RX-8 runs mixture levels as rich as more than 10:1 at WOT. this is why it loses power. It is like driving around with the choke stuck on.
Stage2 uses the more aggressive maps, and adds a few degrees of ignition advance to make more power.
One HAS to use at least 91 octane fuel to run safely.
However as we gain on power, the exhaust gas temperatures get higher, so one can not use a stock cat with Stage2, as the heat would strip the coatings off the cat's ceramic bricks, rendering it useless and damaged.
With Stage1 we stay in the safe range of temperatures.
Still it may reduce cat life, to say 50,000 miles, instead of the 120,000 the new EPA2 regulations require.
By tuning and adjusting these "maps" we produce a set that forces the ECU to provide the preferred corrected mixture levels.
So it definitely works with other aftermarket performance items to make them work properly.
If an improved exhasut results in more air flow, the maps tell the ECU to provide the correct fuel levels for that rate of airflow and throttle opening.
#248
8 the HARD way.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow. excellent summary CZ!!
I thought your unit just had preset maps that it followed, I didnt realize they were dynamic and would adjust accordingly if one changed intake or exhaust.. (duh, i'm clueless..)
SWEET. And from your new site, I see the cost is now $749.. Darn, should have ordered way back when.. heh shoulda woulda coulda.. Still, I would say it's well worth it!
I thought your unit just had preset maps that it followed, I didnt realize they were dynamic and would adjust accordingly if one changed intake or exhaust.. (duh, i'm clueless..)
SWEET. And from your new site, I see the cost is now $749.. Darn, should have ordered way back when.. heh shoulda woulda coulda.. Still, I would say it's well worth it!
#249
Int'l Man of Mystery
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by canzoomer
Regarding O2 foolers:
A friend here in Alberta is running a midpipe with a Random Tech cat, and the O2 sensors install in bungs, and has had no issues.
Random also built and installed test units in cars in the Atlanta area and they too see no problem, and have not had to use O2 foolers.
With a Random 700099 high flow cat in a custom mid-pipe, high temperature resistant cat in your mid pipe you do not seem to need an O2 fooler, the flow is better, and performance gains are noticeable, ASSUMING YOU HAVE INSTALLED a TUNING to allow the engine to use proper fuel/air mixtures.
As for longevity of this cat, the oldest examples are now months in use, and have encountered no problem so far.
Regarding O2 foolers:
A friend here in Alberta is running a midpipe with a Random Tech cat, and the O2 sensors install in bungs, and has had no issues.
Random also built and installed test units in cars in the Atlanta area and they too see no problem, and have not had to use O2 foolers.
With a Random 700099 high flow cat in a custom mid-pipe, high temperature resistant cat in your mid pipe you do not seem to need an O2 fooler, the flow is better, and performance gains are noticeable, ASSUMING YOU HAVE INSTALLED a TUNING to allow the engine to use proper fuel/air mixtures.
As for longevity of this cat, the oldest examples are now months in use, and have encountered no problem so far.
Anyway, just a quick question... so upgrading to a high temp,l high flow cat with a cat-back exhaust system while running Stage 1 mod, would see little if any performance gains? I know that Stage 2 would take full advantage of it, but say one didn't want to have to run 91 octane all the time or didn't always have access to quality stuff... would it still be worth it to purchase a cat +mid pipe from you?
#250
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 7,966
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
High flow cat and muffler would net you some performance gains, regardless of whether you had nothing, CZ Stage 1 or 2. Some vendors are claiming up to 20 WHP improvements from a midpipe & muffler... a high flow cat + muffler will come close to these numbers.
Both mods work better with better exhaust flow, but Stage 2 requires the new cat, as exhaust temps exceed what the stock cat can handle.
Both mods work better with better exhaust flow, but Stage 2 requires the new cat, as exhaust temps exceed what the stock cat can handle.