Notices
Series I Engine Tuning Forum EMS (Flash Tuning, Interceptor, Piggy Back, Stand Alone)

Problems with scaling P2s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-29-2011 | 11:52 AM
  #76  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
The uncapping doesn't have any drilling going on, so it is safe, though the flow must be checked at 4 BAR. The spray pattern is still pretty good, but I wouldn't use an un-capped injector in the primary position.
Old 05-27-2011 | 07:12 AM
  #77  
Rote8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 2
From: Boosted...
Originally Posted by Brettus
I'm currently remote tuning an NA engine in preparation for FI . The owner has fitted yellow uncapped injectors in the P2 position . These should flow around 750ccs according to the data from the shop that flow tested them.
However if you look at what happened when I scaled the injectors to accomodate 750cc you can see that it went very lean .
To get back to where the stock injectors were I had to scale them by only 12% .

Only reason I can think of for the low flow is that one of the injectors is not working at all . If this were the case how would we go about testing this ?
Can anyone else see any other possibilities ?

Ignore the 8000rpm result - that is another issue to be resolved .


Those bigger injectors on the "P-2" position really richen the mixture when the APVs open.

Since you are remote, I think you need to specify that "P-2" is the two center positions of the 4 injector fuel rail.
Old 05-27-2011 | 03:21 PM
  #78  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,587
Likes: 1,527
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by Rote8
Those bigger injectors on the "P-2" position really richen the mixture when the APVs open.
.
If you are referring to the big dip at 7500 it's not the APVs . I discovered that it's a very strange anomaly that happens when you change the diff ratio . The ECU actually Jumped fueling maps because it did not expect to see such a high speed at that rpm.


Originally Posted by Rote8
Since you are remote, I think you need to specify that "P-2" is the two center positions of the 4 injector fuel rail.
Good point .
Old 05-28-2011 | 11:50 PM
  #79  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,081
obviousness eludes you ...
Old 05-29-2011 | 12:12 AM
  #80  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,587
Likes: 1,527
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
obviousness eludes you ...
wat ?
Old 05-30-2011 | 12:13 PM
  #81  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Rote8
Those bigger injectors on the "P-2" position really richen the mixture when the APVs open.
That is incorrect. The secondary injectors are tied to a valving event, not the P2s.
In fact, the opening of the APV is often the source of a considerable lean-spot.
The P2s are not tied to RPM like the APV, but load.
Furthermore, since they are in the primary intake tract, their contribution to the fuel delivery is pretty consistent.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theblinkof
Series I Trouble Shooting
33
10-04-2023 05:24 PM
Shankapotamus3
Series I Trouble Shooting
28
03-14-2021 03:53 PM
Zube6115
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
09-30-2015 12:57 PM
tommy26Germany
Series I Trouble Shooting
11
09-29-2015 10:33 AM
kody59
RX-8 Discussion
3
09-28-2015 03:43 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Problems with scaling P2s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 PM.