Notices

BOSE OWNERS.. still stock?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-16-2003 | 03:02 PM
  #26  
Sputnik's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO, USA
Originally posted by Omicron
But I do have a question for everyone. While I understand that bass is omnidirectional, if you just add a sub in your trunk (as most seem to have done) don't the back seats block most of the bass? Or are the acoustically transparent to low bass?

Thanks...
Alot of the sound is blocked by the seats when a sub is put into a trunk, or otherwise separate from the inside of the car with the listener, especially around 80 Hz and above, which is normally where the output of the sub blends in with the midranges. Also, depending on the car, location of the subs, and other such things, the output of the sub in the cabin will not be as consistent at different frequencies. Don't forget, all of the sound has to transmit through the materials between you and the sub in the trunk, so all of the different resonances and properties of those materials change the sound, and dampen the impact.

Can you pump up the amps to the subs so that you can hear it in the car? Of course you can. But even so, all else being equal, it is much better to have the subs output in the cabin with the listener, than in the trunk.

---jps
Old 11-18-2003 | 05:00 PM
  #27  
Astor's Avatar
They Come At Night
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
extremely low and extremely high frequencies will ruin your hearing, by about 40 y/o. I've played in different bands since I was about 12 and I'm 30 now, I can definitely tell a difference. I have overcome most of it by training my ears to hear different frequencies. I've sat in at many a mastering house to help engineer & I've heard what you hear when you buy your CD's being played with. They listen at 80dB, you have to have perfectly resonant speakers with no echo. And placed in geometrically challanging spots. So let's say I know a little about music. When you have the volume down and it sounds muddy, I believe that is the Autopilot compensating for the Fletcher- Munson curve, that's where year ear hears differently at lower volumes. The midrange is more prominent at low volumes so you have to compensate by raising the treble and the bass. People on this list bust on Bose so much. I've had 2 Bose tower speakers with 10" subs at home for about 10 years, new they were $1,500.00 each. Best speakers, (acoustically) I've heard on a home system. I also had a set of 15" Cerwin Vega Tower Speakers with mid range cut and they still sound better. I can understand if you are into Hip Hop that the bass doesn't override the rest of the sound, but for music that needs clarity, it's a great system.
Old 11-20-2003 | 12:07 AM
  #28  
mmm's Avatar
mmm
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Originally posted by AfroCreame
THe Bose in the 8 sucks. It's muddy at low volume. Another thing that I've noticed is that 1 and 2 are too soft on the volume settings, but when you goto 3 it sounds clearer but it's quite a bit louder. I'll probably just live with it as I wanna spend money on other things.
I've seen a few people refer to volume levels around 3, when talking about problems with the audio pilot feature.

3? I rarely have my volume below 15. Except in rare circumstances, I never have it below about 7 or 8.

Am I the only one who thinks that 3 is preposterously low?
Old 11-20-2003 | 11:59 AM
  #29  
jonalan's Avatar
Pu-36 Space Modulator
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: St Charles, MO
Originally posted by mmm
I've seen a few people refer to volume levels around 3, when talking about problems with the audio pilot feature.

3? I rarely have my volume below 15. Except in rare circumstances, I never have it below about 7 or 8.

Am I the only one who thinks that 3 is preposterously low?
When I'm by myself, I usually have the volume between 12-15 (or more, depending on the CD). But, If someone else is in the car, it's usually around 3-4 -- you know, to allow for conversation.
Old 11-25-2003 | 04:25 PM
  #30  
dankgummy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: Arlington VA
Before my GT RX-8, I had a 03 Accord Coupe V6. The stock stereo (dont know the mfg) was better in the honda than this BOSE "premium" sound system.
Old 11-26-2003 | 01:19 AM
  #31  
djantlive's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: CA
for those wanting more oomph, check out the Infiniti Basslink. It's a small powered sub that won't take up your trunk.
Old 11-26-2003 | 09:14 AM
  #32  
demonfire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Northeast CT
i wonder if there is interest in perhaps 7" midbasses mounted in the doors, and component sets in kickpanels or something.

granted, it's much more expensive, but it locates the 20-250 Hz range up front, and leaves the trunk open, albeit except for an amp or two, which could be mounted in the wheel well, or on the back of the backseats.
Old 11-28-2003 | 04:40 PM
  #33  
Omicron's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,966
Likes: 4
From: Boulder County, Colorado
Originally posted by Sputnik
Alot of the sound is blocked by the seats when a sub is put into a trunk, or otherwise separate from the inside of the car with the listener, especially around 80 Hz and above, which is normally where the output of the sub blends in with the midranges. Also, depending on the car, location of the subs, and other such things, the output of the sub in the cabin will not be as consistent at different frequencies. Don't forget, all of the sound has to transmit through the materials between you and the sub in the trunk, so all of the different resonances and properties of those materials change the sound, and dampen the impact.

Can you pump up the amps to the subs so that you can hear it in the car? Of course you can. But even so, all else being equal, it is much better to have the subs output in the cabin with the listener, than in the trunk.

---jps
That's what I figured, thanks.
Old 12-21-2003 | 11:10 PM
  #34  
Doug Green's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
N0 HIGHS NO LOWS MUST BE BOSE!!!!
Bose is just a great marketing company and that is all, my new Bose really blows......I had to spend big to sound good....McIntosh amps, MB quartz.
Mercedes-Benz has quit using Bose in favor of Harmon K. and so has a number of builders that are in the know......Just remember NO highs No lows must be Bose!!!!!!

Kind regards,
Doug
Las Vegas
Old 12-22-2003 | 12:14 PM
  #35  
kristopher_d's Avatar
Drive Master
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Redmond
While the BOSE system definately needs some fill in the high-end, and some fill in the low-end wouldn't be bad, for an off-the-lot system, it's pretty damn good. Remember, even the PREMIUM sound systems from the Mfg are intended to meet the listening requirements of the widest possible population group. Most people are not audiophiles. This sound system is designed to pleasant for most people, not kick-*** for Mr Bass. How often do you see Mr Mid-Life-Crisis thumpin' the tunes. How often does the Little Old Lady from Pasedena shake the block with her subs.

Want more highs, $120 and an hour of your time will bring them in nice and crisp. Want more lows, a couple hundred bucks and about an hour will bring them ery richly.
Old 12-23-2003 | 09:10 PM
  #36  
h0rde's Avatar
CVRRVS CELER
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: York PA
Once you're used to having a sub in the trunk, it's difficult to be satisfied with the stock stereo of any car on the planet. I had a JL 12" in each of the last two cars I owned, and the 8 is getting one as soon as I can afford to do it again.
Old 12-24-2003 | 01:15 PM
  #37  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
Originally posted by h0rde
Once you're used to having a sub in the trunk, it's difficult to be satisfied with the stock stereo of any car on the planet. I had a JL 12" in each of the last two cars I owned, and the 8 is getting one as soon as I can afford to do it again.
I feel the same way

every car I've owned has had subs, tinted windows etc,etc
Old 12-24-2003 | 02:59 PM
  #38  
TybeeRX-8's Avatar
I REALLY LOVE THIS CAR!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: SE Coast
to answer the question...

I'm pretty happy with the Bose but agree that it sounds a little "muddy" at low volumes. What I have found it that at higher volumes...15 and up...it sounds pretty damn good to me. Then again, I listen to 70s-90s rock mostly,, with some new stuff like Dave matthews, etc. thrown in. Guess I'm just not a true audiophile, but suggest you turn it up before you upgrade. I like my music loud when I'm not listening to my 8's engine, exhaust. Enjoy.
Old 12-24-2003 | 08:03 PM
  #39  
bobclevenger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 493
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Calif.
A true audiophile wants accurate sound reproduction. That's all. Period. Not exaggerated highs, lows, or anything else. Now you may certainly have any audio system you want in your car, just don't claim to be an audiophile when your bass is sounding more like ArcLight (a B-52 strike for all you too young to know) than music. Your car; your sounds -- cool. But please don't inflict them on others. OK?
Old 12-27-2003 | 01:10 PM
  #40  
TybeeRX-8's Avatar
I REALLY LOVE THIS CAR!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: SE Coast
Originally posted by bobclevenger
A true audiophile wants accurate sound reproduction. That's all. Period. Not exaggerated highs, lows, or anything else. Now you may certainly have any audio system you want in your car, just don't claim to be an audiophile when your bass is sounding more like ArcLight (a B-52 strike for all you too young to know) than music. Your car; your sounds -- cool. But please don't inflict them on others. OK?
Please read the preceeding..."not a true audiophile" But I know what I like and this is a car, not a studio. In any case, there will be some tire noise, wind noise, engine noise (even with a rotary) that will interfere with the clear listening experience. Only at very high volumes will these "noises" be drowned out of the listening experience. So, be a little more realistic. And I'd bet my car that I'm older than you!!!
Old 12-27-2003 | 01:24 PM
  #41  
khoney's Avatar
FX8TED on my RX-8
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
This should have been a poll - I think the results would be surprising to those who say Bose blows. And no, I have no intention of 'upgrading'.
Old 12-27-2003 | 02:06 PM
  #42  
kristopher_d's Avatar
Drive Master
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Redmond
It's not upgrading, it's tuning.

I think the BOSE does a great job. Now I'm just filling in the sound where I want a little more deapth.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hunterkelley24
Series I Engine Tuning Forum
14
06-14-2022 09:32 AM
Jst4fun
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
9
03-05-2021 08:16 PM
duworm
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
1
10-01-2015 05:57 PM
jasonrxeight
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
2
09-30-2015 02:53 PM
Learners_Permit
Series I Interior, Audio, and Electronics
8
09-27-2015 08:38 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 PM.