Placement of Radar Detector
11-11-2003 | 08:15 PM
#26
Registered
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,966
Likes: 4
From: Boulder County, Colorado
Originally posted by Sputnik
If one wanted (and as long as the tint band at the top of the windshield does not block radar waves), they could do a custom install by taking apart a standard radar detector, locating the antennae on the back of a mirror, and installing the display LEDs above or below the mirror, and the buttons above or below the mirror, or in the back of the mirror. For a real cool install, they could wire the detector so that the steering wheel buttons could also operate the detector. And for the ultimate, they'd figure out how to display the text display from like an Escort 8500 in the stock radio display.
---jps
If one wanted (and as long as the tint band at the top of the windshield does not block radar waves), they could do a custom install by taking apart a standard radar detector, locating the antennae on the back of a mirror, and installing the display LEDs above or below the mirror, and the buttons above or below the mirror, or in the back of the mirror. For a real cool install, they could wire the detector so that the steering wheel buttons could also operate the detector. And for the ultimate, they'd figure out how to display the text display from like an Escort 8500 in the stock radio display.
---jps
07-10-2004 | 06:09 PM
#27
Registered User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
From: Fort Myers, FL
For those shopping for a detector:
I just got a new radar detector and spent days figuring out which one to buy. I ended up with a BEL Vector 995. I was deciding between the Escort 8500 x50 and the BEL RX 65. Then I discovered the newest family member the 995. I called BEL 3 times and spoke to a salesman, a techician and service guy. All of them told me that the Vector 995 was identical to the RX 65 except that it did not have the "threat" circuit activated (distinguishes type of multiple signals at one time) I asked the tech guy what that meant and he said that either unit alerts you but the threat circuit just tells you what type of signal (up to 3) from multiple directions. So, in case you are shopping and have already looked at the websites that rate them right now the #1 rated is Escort 8500 x50 and BEL RX65 - primarily due to range and POP detection.Both have identical; performance but the 8500 comes in blue or red led and the BEL has voice alert. The 995 is, as I said, like the RX 65 as per the company - same antenna, same false alarm circuitry.
For hard wiring:
Where is the best location to wire this. One thread is showing a visor mount. Any ideas?
I just got a new radar detector and spent days figuring out which one to buy. I ended up with a BEL Vector 995. I was deciding between the Escort 8500 x50 and the BEL RX 65. Then I discovered the newest family member the 995. I called BEL 3 times and spoke to a salesman, a techician and service guy. All of them told me that the Vector 995 was identical to the RX 65 except that it did not have the "threat" circuit activated (distinguishes type of multiple signals at one time) I asked the tech guy what that meant and he said that either unit alerts you but the threat circuit just tells you what type of signal (up to 3) from multiple directions. So, in case you are shopping and have already looked at the websites that rate them right now the #1 rated is Escort 8500 x50 and BEL RX65 - primarily due to range and POP detection.Both have identical; performance but the 8500 comes in blue or red led and the BEL has voice alert. The 995 is, as I said, like the RX 65 as per the company - same antenna, same false alarm circuitry.
For hard wiring:
Where is the best location to wire this. One thread is showing a visor mount. Any ideas?
Last edited by RodsterinFL; 07-10-2004 at 06:11 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ktec
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications
3
07-29-2015 02:17 PM
adrian-1
Series I Interior, Audio, and Electronics
3
04-01-2004 11:31 PM
z00m-z00m
Series I Interior, Audio, and Electronics
5
09-16-2003 04:54 PM
