radar detector differences
#27
Originally posted by MrWigggles
So you have withdrawn your support for Escort 8500 then as well?
You would do great in congress.
-Mr. Wigggles
So you have withdrawn your support for Escort 8500 then as well?
You would do great in congress.
-Mr. Wigggles
My first post on this thread was this:
.
The Escort 8500 is a very good detector, but for me, I plan on getting the Valentine V-1. ....
Either choice, Escort 8500 or Valentine V-1, would get you a great detector.
Either choice, Escort 8500 or Valentine V-1, would get you a great detector.
Buy what you want. If you feel the Bel is good enough for you, then so be it. If you think the 8500 is good enough for you, then so be it. I think the Valentine is good for me, so that's what I'll get.
Now find someone else to pick a senseless argument with
Last edited by RX-8 Zoomster; 09-01-2003 at 05:40 PM.
#28
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: If you believe...
Originally posted by eccles
Actually, you have that backwards - Escort is the company, and Passport is their 12V-powered radar detector range. Their cordless range is the Escort Solo.
Actually, you have that backwards - Escort is the company, and Passport is their 12V-powered radar detector range. Their cordless range is the Escort Solo.
Last edited by RX-8 Zoomster; 09-01-2003 at 05:46 PM.
#30
Originally posted by myrx8
Can't we all just get along?
Can't we all just get along?
BTW, myrx8, I agree with your choice of radar detectors.
Last edited by RX-8 Zoomster; 09-01-2003 at 05:49 PM.
#31
Registered User
Originally posted by RX-8 Zoomster
Really I'm trying, but some people seem dense.
BTW, myrx8, I agree with your choice of radar detectors.
Really I'm trying, but some people seem dense.
BTW, myrx8, I agree with your choice of radar detectors.
If you said, "I've used all of the current radar detectors and only the 8500 and V1 have the performance I like" then that would be a more valid statement and would be from personal experience. Have you ever used a Bel 980 or 985?
Your initial conclusion about Bel conflicted mine so I am asking you to defend your claim. Is that being "dense" or simply thorough?
-Mr. Wigggles
#32
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lenexa, KS
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will admit, I have not used the Bel series 985, but I did have, as a backup in my trunk the Bel 960.
I use the V-1 as the primary, but in a pinch, the Bel does do a great job.
I use the V-1 as the primary, but in a pinch, the Bel does do a great job.
#33
Originally posted by MrWigggles
Your own source (Car and Driver) does not appear to support the conclusion that the Bel is a "lesser" radar detector brand as you stated it to be. Since you give no other source for that conclusion. I was/am questioning it.
If you said, "I've used all of the current radar detectors and only the 8500 and V1 have the performance I like" then that would be a more valid statement and would be from personal experience. Have you ever used a Bel 980 or 985?
Your initial conclusion about Bel conflicted mine so I am asking you to defend your claim. Is that being "dense" or simply thorough?
-Mr. Wigggles
Your own source (Car and Driver) does not appear to support the conclusion that the Bel is a "lesser" radar detector brand as you stated it to be. Since you give no other source for that conclusion. I was/am questioning it.
If you said, "I've used all of the current radar detectors and only the 8500 and V1 have the performance I like" then that would be a more valid statement and would be from personal experience. Have you ever used a Bel 980 or 985?
Your initial conclusion about Bel conflicted mine so I am asking you to defend your claim. Is that being "dense" or simply thorough?
-Mr. Wigggles
The rating in Car & Driver did rate the Passport 8500 and the Bel 980 within 6 points of one another. However the Valentine 1 was rated about 30 points higher. That's not to say the the Passport or the Bel detectors are not good detectors. It's just the criteria of Car and Driver that they felt the Valentine was better in their eyes.
I never used the Valentine V1, Passport 8500 nor the Bel 980, so I can't say from experience which one is best. I imagine you have not used all three either. I wish I could say that I could get all three, place them side by side and then choose the best one for me. Unfortunately I can't do that. A detector is a big investment. I don't feel comfortable buying the Bel and maybe finding out it does not work as well as I anticipated. All I got to go on is unbias magazine reports that rate the detectors. There are a number of reviews and magazines that have rated both the Passport 8500 and the Valentine V1 consistently high. And that is probably one of the detectors I will get. That is not to say the Bel does not work nor does it's job inefficently. The Valentine is my #1 choice, however the discounting one can get on the Passport 8500, makes it a very attractive option one should consider. Since you have used the Bel 980 and are satisfied in it's performance, then that is what is important.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Austin22
New Member Forum
5
09-23-2015 04:46 PM