2006 twinturbo factory rx8
#28
Registered
On a purely strategic level, I think mazda would find it hard to pitch a twin turbo rotary if the current naturally aspirated Rx8 is reasonably thirsty already. If anything, they would be trying to improve efficiency further and improve fuel economy. Turbocharging would propell them in the other direction. And with increasing fuel costs, I just can't see it happening
#31
WWW.ROTARYSTUFF.COM
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#32
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
kinda on topic, i have a rx8 and am not on the list on bad gas mileage. i usually get ~ 21mpg. 15% city rest interstate. the worst i have got was 18mpg. just after i hit 600 miles and drove the **** out of it.
the brakes are amazing, if you go fast you must slow down.
??? i drove a 78 rx7 about 750 miles and remember getting about 15 mpg. no big deal it was 78 and gas was cheap.
also got to drive the first year twin turbo for about 75 miles, all ugly. great car, wait really great car.
what kinda mileage did the last gen of the rx7 twin turbo get???
beers
the brakes are amazing, if you go fast you must slow down.
??? i drove a 78 rx7 about 750 miles and remember getting about 15 mpg. no big deal it was 78 and gas was cheap.
also got to drive the first year twin turbo for about 75 miles, all ugly. great car, wait really great car.
what kinda mileage did the last gen of the rx7 twin turbo get???
beers
#36
in love with curves
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chattanooga TN
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.streetcarforums.com/image...ies/bsflag.gif
And my mom told me my wife would do anything I asked her too once we got married. I got OWND.
And my mom told me my wife would do anything I asked her too once we got married. I got OWND.
Last edited by mtnpass; 12-20-2004 at 07:20 PM.
#39
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Turbochargers aren't going to hurt gas mileage that much. The point of turbochargers are to use a smaller more fuel efficient engine but be able to have morepower when needed. In the case of the RX-8 in your regular driving you will see little diference in fuel economy with a factory turbo vs. the stock naturaly aspirated engine. If you are driving it hard and on boost a lot you will see a decrease in fuel economy.
#41
Registered User
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
Smells like Hawaii Fish to me
That's some good ****.
-Mr. Wigggles
#42
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My 93 with 350RWHP gets better gas mileage than the 8, as long as I'm not going to crazy. Turbos increase a motors efficency by harnesing the energy lost through heat and volumetric expansion. Reliability is the deciding factor, not gas mileage.
#43
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, and I gotta call bs. With the advances made in singles, Mazda would never again use a twin setup. Small, efficent single turbos spool damn near as fast, are far more reliable, weigh less, and more importantly, are cheaper to produce. Twins are for V-Configuration piston motors. No need for a twin on a Renny. Although a set of BNR stage 3's running sequential would be interesting.
#44
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MrWigggles
Smells like good mojo. The guy's in Iowa talking to a dealer in Hawaii.
That's some good ****.
-Mr. Wigggles
That's some good ****.
-Mr. Wigggles
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
akagc
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
08-11-2015 07:07 PM
vetteor8
New Member Forum
3
08-09-2015 05:56 PM