Altonov's geared supercharger
#1
Thread Starter
rock-->o<--hard place
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 0
From: Canberra, AUSTRALIA
Altonov's geared supercharger
As reported on the fastcar site, a centrifugal supercharger attached to a two speed automatic gearbox, promising 85% efficiency
Expensive, but one can expect the price to come down. Something to ponder
Expensive, but one can expect the price to come down. Something to ponder
#4
The McCullugh that was to original Paxton used a two speed pulley setup operated by solonoid. That was the first two speed centrifugal supercharger.
And when you get 85% efficient centrifugal compressors you better call someone.
And when you get 85% efficient centrifugal compressors you better call someone.
Last edited by Richard Paul; 05-06-2006 at 04:25 PM.
#6
ok .. i dont get the whole supercharger / turbo bs .. if you need high pressure air why not pick up a compressor with a can from home depot put a 7-10lbs limiter on the output and plug into the engine? so why? can someone set me straight here
#10
The can would be on the roof, the compressor would be in the trunk and the extension cord would be really really long.
-Mr. Wigggles
Ps. If it helps, think of an automobile engine as a 200 HP gasoline powered air pump that happens to have 3000 lb load attached.
-Mr. Wigggles
Ps. If it helps, think of an automobile engine as a 200 HP gasoline powered air pump that happens to have 3000 lb load attached.
Last edited by MrWigggles; 05-07-2006 at 03:24 AM.
#11
Now to something completely different ...
So this supercharger with transmission has two speeds. Is that enough for a centrifugal? Don't centrifugals have about 1500 RPM sweet zone of operation? Wouldn't you need three or four gears for a car like the RX-8 or any high reving auto?
Also since when has any automatic transmission on anything led to an end product that was "85% effiecient"? Surely when the supercharger is switching gears its not going to be 85% efficient.
Also I would think you could have some really wild fuel management issues with Supercharger that switches gears at certain intervals combined with a driver who switches gears and modulates the throttle whenever he damn well pleases. Some whacky combination of the driver and supercharger behaviour could generate a sequence of events the fuel manangement doesn't know how to handle or wasn't tuned for. Replacing engines is very expensive trial and error tuning.
I think this two gear supercharger really is an OEM item and not well suited for the aftermarket world because the implementation will likely require some good coordination with rest of the car's electronics. Only the OEM is going to have that full control. Tuners trying to slap on something like this might be in for a risky venture.
-Mr. Wigggles
So this supercharger with transmission has two speeds. Is that enough for a centrifugal? Don't centrifugals have about 1500 RPM sweet zone of operation? Wouldn't you need three or four gears for a car like the RX-8 or any high reving auto?
Also since when has any automatic transmission on anything led to an end product that was "85% effiecient"? Surely when the supercharger is switching gears its not going to be 85% efficient.
Also I would think you could have some really wild fuel management issues with Supercharger that switches gears at certain intervals combined with a driver who switches gears and modulates the throttle whenever he damn well pleases. Some whacky combination of the driver and supercharger behaviour could generate a sequence of events the fuel manangement doesn't know how to handle or wasn't tuned for. Replacing engines is very expensive trial and error tuning.
I think this two gear supercharger really is an OEM item and not well suited for the aftermarket world because the implementation will likely require some good coordination with rest of the car's electronics. Only the OEM is going to have that full control. Tuners trying to slap on something like this might be in for a risky venture.
-Mr. Wigggles
Last edited by MrWigggles; 05-07-2006 at 03:21 AM.
#12
A single speed supercharger or turbo that's 75% efficient, is only that efficient at a small portion of it's operating range. The idea here is to get to that range early, and then as you pass it, to shift to high gear and get to that range again. This way you can get a better power curve across the rev range, and the centrifugal blower can be less peaky and the car can be more liveable on the street.
That's how I see it, anyway.
Take a look at a dyno for a Vortech or Comptec supercharged S2000. They make a little more power than stock up to around 6000rpm, then power rockets up from there. 2 speeds would allow for a peak in the lower rpms along with the one in the upper rpms.
Me, i'd just use a twin screw charger.
That's how I see it, anyway.
Take a look at a dyno for a Vortech or Comptec supercharged S2000. They make a little more power than stock up to around 6000rpm, then power rockets up from there. 2 speeds would allow for a peak in the lower rpms along with the one in the upper rpms.
Me, i'd just use a twin screw charger.
#14
I'm sure Vtec has a little to do with it. But Vtec is not some magical "turn your car into a supercar" device, it's just vvt. Slap a centrifugal unit on any engine and you'll see the same type of curve. I just used the S2k because of it's similar rev range.
#15
Also I would think you could have some really wild fuel management issues with Supercharger that switches gears at certain intervals combined with a driver who switches gears and modulates the throttle whenever he damn well pleases. Some whacky combination of the driver and supercharger behaviour could generate a sequence of events the fuel manangement doesn't know how to handle or wasn't tuned for. Replacing engines is very expensive trial and error tuning.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nowakm99
Series II Technical and Trouble shooting
1
10-09-2015 08:10 AM