Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Anybody tried running the 380cc P2 injectors in the P1 position ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-03-2010 | 01:48 PM
  #26  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Regardless of what pump you use, the target rail pressure is about the same (58 - 65 PSI).
The difference is that on the vast majority of OE pumps (if not ALL of them), the target fuel pressure is not met at high demand.
I've see fuel pressures drop to as low as 40 PSI on a known "good" OE pump at 6000 RPM on a 300 HP FI application. I've seen lower than that on my own system and actually lost an engine to it.
Since upgrading the OE assembly with the Walbro pump, I've never seen the fuel pressure drop below 60 PSI, even as I ran on "fumes".

The net fuel pressure is exactly the same on the primary and secondary rails, which have enough flow to supply a little over 4000 cc at 65 PSI each. You wont exceed that on the secondary rail and you definitely wont exceed it on the primary rail.

Retuning will have to be done, but only because the tuning was already "wrong" to compensate for sagging fuel pressures.

Last edited by MazdaManiac; 03-03-2010 at 02:09 PM.
Old 03-03-2010 | 02:04 PM
  #27  
Highway8's Avatar
Registered RX8 Nut
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 8
From: Fairfield, CA
MM calibration service purchased, Fuel pump assembly has been ordered and my injectors will be sent to kgpart.com for service, flow matched and upgraded.
Old 03-03-2010 | 02:09 PM
  #28  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Highway8
MM calibration service purchased, Fuel pump assembly has been ordered and my injectors will be sent to kgpart.com for service, flow matched and upgraded.
w00t!
Old 03-03-2010 | 02:16 PM
  #29  
Highway8's Avatar
Registered RX8 Nut
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 8
From: Fairfield, CA
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
w00t!
Well that supercharger isnt any fun sitting in a box. If i am going to get the most out of the norcal dyno/tune day in a few months I better get started working on the car now.
Old 03-03-2010 | 02:22 PM
  #30  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Highway8
If i am going to get the most out of the norcal dyno/tune day in a few months I better get started working on the car now.
You guys need to get cracking on that and set a date!
Old 03-03-2010 | 02:24 PM
  #31  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,601
Likes: 1,534
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac

Retuning will have to be done, but only because the tuning was already "wrong" to compensate for sagging fuel pressures.
I see . How much difference in AFR have you seen going from stock to Walbro
Old 03-03-2010 | 02:29 PM
  #32  
Highway8's Avatar
Registered RX8 Nut
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 8
From: Fairfield, CA
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
You guys need to get cracking on that and set a date!
I will head over to that thread right now. I want this thing to happen, the timing would be perfect for me.
Old 03-03-2010 | 02:33 PM
  #33  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Brettus
I see . How much difference in AFR have you seen going from stock to Walbro
Oh, I dunno.
I started over.
The target lambda and the actual lambda always line up on my setup.
Old 03-04-2010 | 08:57 AM
  #34  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 38
From: macon, georgia
Need to clarify--when i agreed with Team I was reponding to his bypass statement and I was wondering if that changed with the new designed pump assembly in the 09 models.
I have had differences in the fuel rail pressures----when i blew the line connector spacer out!
OD
Old 03-04-2010 | 09:29 AM
  #35  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by olddragger
I have had differences in the fuel rail pressures----when i blew the line connector spacer out!
OD
Oh? And what are they?
Old 03-04-2010 | 03:35 PM
  #36  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 38
From: macon, georgia
Not enough!
Old 03-04-2010 | 03:42 PM
  #37  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,601
Likes: 1,534
From: Y-cat-o NZ
So from the above and referencing my own experience at approx. 350whp I could conclude that :
380/480/380 with a Walbro pump is a pretty safe bet if your target is 350whp ......
Old 03-04-2010 | 08:06 PM
  #38  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Brettus
So from the above and referencing my own experience at approx. 350whp I could conclude that :
380/480/380 with a Walbro pump is a pretty safe bet if your target is 350whp ......
Well, that's net 200cc less then I recommended, isn't it? (And in the wrong positions.)
Old 03-04-2010 | 08:24 PM
  #39  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,601
Likes: 1,534
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Well, that's net 200cc less then I recommended, isn't it? (And in the wrong positions.)
Yes 200cc less - just wanted to point out that if one gets the blues from an AT and juggles things around that 350whp is doable .

380 P1 /480 Sec /380 P2 are the positions you recomended to me the other day
Old 03-04-2010 | 08:32 PM
  #40  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Brettus
380 P1 /480 Sec /380 P2 are the positions you recomended to me the other day
No you recommended that.

Originally Posted by Brettus
380/480/380 works well to 350whp but there is not much in reserve for anything past that .
I said:

Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Stock P1 and S with 700cc or larger P2.
If you were just going to add blues, you would have 380/380/480.

The blues go in P2.

Then, you have enough fuel for 350, but you are right at the edge (MAX of 380 or so crank HP).

290/380/700 Gets you over 420 at the crank.
Old 03-04-2010 | 08:40 PM
  #41  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,601
Likes: 1,534
From: Y-cat-o NZ
which is it ?

Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
You need to run 480s in the secondaries if you run 380s in the P1 spot.


Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Then, you have enough fuel for 350, but you are right at the edge (MAX of 380 or so crank HP).
.
My reference point is I ran 350whp with only 290/380/480 and saw afrs starting to lean out due to under capacity .
Add another 200cc by changing out the reds( 9% ) + whatever you get from upgrading the pump and you should be sweet at 350 .

Last edited by Brettus; 03-04-2010 at 08:47 PM.
Old 03-04-2010 | 08:50 PM
  #42  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
280/380/700
or
380/480/700

Those are your choices.

I guess you can do 380/480/480.
Old 03-04-2010 | 09:12 PM
  #43  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,601
Likes: 1,534
From: Y-cat-o NZ
WHP considerations aside - is there any reason why 380/480/380 would be a bad combo ?
Old 03-05-2010 | 01:10 AM
  #44  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Brettus
WHP considerations aside - is there any reason why 380/480/380 would be a bad combo ?
Not particularly, though I like having the smaller primary/secondary combo.
But that is TOTALLY personal preference.
There isn't any serious technical reason why 380/480/380 wouldn't work.
You should be able to hit 300 - 320 WHP safely with that combo.
Old 03-05-2010 | 01:11 PM
  #45  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,601
Likes: 1,534
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Not particularly, though I like having the smaller primary/secondary combo.
But that is TOTALLY personal preference.
There isn't any serious technical reason why 380/480/380 wouldn't work.
You should be able to hit 300 - 320 WHP safely with that combo.
I hit 350whp with 200cc less than that (290/380/480)at which point injectors were at 90% and AFRs were starting to go lean up top .
Which is why I made the above statement about 380/480/380 working to 350 - you would have about 9% spare capacity not counting whatever you got from upgrading the pump .
I guess that is still below the recommended 75% max duty cycle so not ideal .

Nevertheless a lot of people have done the swap to AT blues and i'm sure they would like to know how far they can push that combo without going to aftermarket injectors.
Old 03-05-2010 | 01:22 PM
  #46  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
I run 290/380 and modified blues in P2.
Old 03-05-2010 | 01:46 PM
  #47  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,601
Likes: 1,534
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Interesting . Do you prefer the modded blues vs aftermarket because of latency issues ?
Old 03-05-2010 | 01:50 PM
  #48  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
I prefer them because they are cheap and they work.
Old 03-24-2010 | 10:45 PM
  #49  
Brettus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,601
Likes: 1,534
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Turns out the rich 'accelerator pump' effect I was getting was more to do with maf scaling than anything else .
Compare previous log to this one and there is no rich condition this time . Injectors still the same as before 380/380/480

Now can conclude that there don't seem to be any issues with running this setup.
Attached Thumbnails Anybody tried running the 380cc P2 injectors in the P1 position ?-throttle-pump-test.jpg  
Old 03-25-2010 | 12:09 AM
  #50  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Brettus
Now can conclude that there don't seem to be this issue with running this setup.
Fixed.
Don't jump to conclusions.
You'll eventually find the big issue.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Anybody tried running the 380cc P2 injectors in the P1 position ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 AM.