Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc
View Poll Results: Would you buy it
yes
62
83.78%
no
12
16.22%
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll

Better turbo kit then PTP and greddy for cheaper would you buy it

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-08-2006 | 04:03 PM
  #1  
Rotorize360's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Better turbo kit then PTP and greddy for cheaper would you buy it

If a tuner would put out a better turbo kit then the greddy and PTP kit on the market for a cheaper price better quality parts and engine management would you buy it over the greddy. Im concidering rushing my turbo setup pulling money out of savings and start building a production turbo kit to compete against the ptp and greddy kits. The reason would be to provide a better kit with better pricing that isnt a rip off. I will also be providing base maps with the kits so as soon as you install the kit you will have a good foundation to run off which would save you a bundle on tuning and make your life so much easier.
Old 07-08-2006 | 04:32 PM
  #2  
shakRpahX8's Avatar
Unknown
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
if it all comes out as success

you sir will be my best friend
Old 07-08-2006 | 04:35 PM
  #3  
RotoRocket's Avatar
Freely Radical
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 9
You'd be in like Flynn.
Old 07-08-2006 | 04:45 PM
  #4  
Trekk's Avatar
Goat rider
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
The question is kind of stupid if you think about it.
Who wouldn't want better for cheaper.
Real question is how many people will buy a turbo kit.
Old 07-08-2006 | 07:54 PM
  #5  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
How will it be better? Specifics, please. Otherwise, you are talking out of your ***.
Old 07-08-2006 | 08:02 PM
  #6  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Ja, wait till I pass you in my Super Charger
Old 07-08-2006 | 08:49 PM
  #7  
NoTears316's Avatar
Shock and Awe
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,871
Likes: 4
From: North Carolina
Emissions is important to me. If you can make one better and still ensure that it will pass emissions, I would be interested.
Old 07-08-2006 | 09:04 PM
  #8  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
im still waitng to see that one from ciao from down under
Old 07-08-2006 | 09:53 PM
  #9  
toxin440's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
From: Texas
depends man -- seems like the Axial flow unit, the PTP Unit, and the Petit unit are nearing completion, if it took them years to get their stuff out, to be honest I would be kinda worried about a kit that was slapped together in 30 or 60 days and rushed out.

I want to go FI soooo badly, but I have to play the waiting game. I know I'm probably going to spend at LEAST $5,000 for parts and installation and im sure more for tuning and misc stuff. For that Kinda money I want the best, and I just know I gotta wait till the Axial flow SC, PTP and Petit units hit the streets and get used/broken in and hear users experiences.

If you pushed something out though, it was cheap, kicked ***, and was reliable, and made some good power, then hell yeah I'd buy it.
Old 07-08-2006 | 10:21 PM
  #10  
cjkim's Avatar
^noob
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: socal
Originally Posted by zoom44
im still waitng to see that one from ciao from down under
Old 07-08-2006 | 10:54 PM
  #11  
StealthTL's Avatar
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,284
Likes: 175
From: A Pacific Island.
Cool Secrets....

The answer is 100% in the Engine Management you opt for.

I've seen lots of kits come and go, I was (briefly) even prototyping for STS, (the guys who put the turbo in the trunk- STS )

I also watched as the Great Canzoomer built a centrifugal supercharger with magnetic clutch disengagement, in his DRIVEWAY, only to be ultimately defeated by the stock ECU and laissez-fair fuel management.

I consider the PTP to be a little overbuilt (the stainless up-pipe) and a little under engineered (the battery), and like you, WAY overpriced, considering the integral part the (EXTRA $$$) fuel computer plays.

I would love to see a decent kit with a plug-and-play computer for a good price, and will surely be buying a kit when one appears.....


S
Old 07-08-2006 | 11:03 PM
  #12  
RazzyBRX-8's Avatar
Representin'!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Yeah, that would sound good if it wasn't just slapped together. I wanted to stick with N/A despite what everyone says but it's really hard to not be enticed with FI. If you could do it and prove it'd be reliable, then I probably would.
Old 07-09-2006 | 01:00 AM
  #13  
Nopstnz's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 939
Likes: 28
From: Port Royal, SC
Definitly yes. But reliability is always a must for me. If I am going to drop 5k plus for a turbo I don't want to have to turn around and drop nother 4k for a new engine, or whatever the cost is.
Old 07-09-2006 | 01:25 AM
  #14  
RotoRocket's Avatar
Freely Radical
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 9
In the world of FI applied to the Renesis, what is the weakest link that needs to be strengthened to ensure motor reliability and longevity?
Old 07-09-2006 | 05:56 AM
  #15  
Paul_in_DC's Avatar
Rotary Public
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 2
From: Northern Virginia near DC
I would only buy an FI setup after 1) my warranty runs out, 2) other people had been running the setup for years with relatively few problems, and 3) the price was $2,000 US or less.
Old 07-09-2006 | 06:46 AM
  #16  
dtorre's Avatar
Ultimate ****** Goderator
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Im mixed on this whole FI thing. I mean you could wait till your warranty runs out, but that would leave you with a 50K mile rotary engine that is now being turbo or super charged. I doubt the Ren will run 50K miles trouble free then be bolted up to a FI kit and expected to run care free for another 50K miles. Then again you could go FI within your first 50K, but if your engine has inherited problems not relating to your kit your screwed. I figure im gonna run my engine till it blows, then do a rebuild and then go FI on the new engine.
Old 07-09-2006 | 11:08 AM
  #17  
RotoRocket's Avatar
Freely Radical
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 9
Originally Posted by dtorre
Im mixed on this whole FI thing. I mean you could wait till your warranty runs out, but that would leave you with a 50K mile rotary engine that is now being turbo or super charged. I doubt the Ren will run 50K miles trouble free then be bolted up to a FI kit and expected to run care free for another 50K miles. Then again you could go FI within your first 50K, but if your engine has inherited problems not relating to your kit your screwed. I figure im gonna run my engine till it blows, then do a rebuild and then go FI on the new engine.

You seem to insinuate that the Renesis is somehow less reliable than the FD, when in fact, it seems to be much more so.

I was under the impression that the Renesis failures have been relatively rare, and that most were paired with ATs and used in desert-heat conditions.
Old 07-09-2006 | 11:13 AM
  #18  
Nopstnz's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 939
Likes: 28
From: Port Royal, SC
The only renesis faiulres I have heard of are in the blown engine club. And I think, if its not automatic, the reason was almost always the greddy turbo. But I am in the same boat as dtorre with FI. Except the last sentence
Old 07-09-2006 | 04:35 PM
  #19  
Paul_in_DC's Avatar
Rotary Public
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 2
From: Northern Virginia near DC
Originally Posted by dtorre
Im mixed on this whole FI thing. I mean you could wait till your warranty runs out, but that would leave you with a 50K mile rotary engine that is now being turbo or super charged. I doubt the Ren will run 50K miles trouble free then be bolted up to a FI kit and expected to run care free for another 50K miles. Then again you could go FI within your first 50K, but if your engine has inherited problems not relating to your kit your screwed. I figure im gonna run my engine till it blows, then do a rebuild and then go FI on the new engine.
So you're gonna wait 'til the 200,000 mile mark?
Old 07-09-2006 | 04:38 PM
  #20  
Rotorize360's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
How will it be better? Specifics, please. Otherwise, you are talking out of your ***.
Ill be using a better turbo, the one ptp initially set out to use but decided not to use becouse of pricing. Namely the GT35R. Also Ive seen alot of people complain abou the battery so Ill adress that

Originally Posted by Razz1
Ja, wait till I pass you in my Super Charger
I dont see that happening

Originally Posted by NoTears316
Emissions is important to me. If you can make one better and still ensure that it will pass emissions, I would be interested.
no but im sure I can help you out in fooling the emisions
Old 07-09-2006 | 04:51 PM
  #21  
Rotorize360's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by StealthTL
The answer is 100% in the Engine Management you opt for.

I've seen lots of kits come and go, I was (briefly) even prototyping for STS, (the guys who put the turbo in the trunk- STS )

I also watched as the Great Canzoomer built a centrifugal supercharger with magnetic clutch disengagement, in his DRIVEWAY, only to be ultimately defeated by the stock ECU and laissez-fair fuel management.

I consider the PTP to be a little overbuilt (the stainless up-pipe) and a little under engineered (the battery), and like you, WAY overpriced, considering the integral part the (EXTRA $$$) fuel computer plays.

I would love to see a decent kit with a plug-and-play computer for a good price, and will surely be buying a kit when one appears.....


S

yeah we will see what I end up doing for engine management I have most of the peices either in my possesion or on their way theres only a few things that I still have to pan out one of them being engine management
Old 07-10-2006 | 02:44 PM
  #22  
Red Devil's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Originally Posted by RotoRocket
In the world of FI applied to the Renesis, what is the weakest link that needs to be strengthened to ensure motor reliability and longevity?
I think the end user is the weakest part of the equation in this case, or that the Greddy kit was/is less than complete has gotten a few people also.



As far as engine management, I think you'd be better off releasing a tuner kit and letting everyone just go and source their own management.
Old 07-16-2006 | 05:26 PM
  #23  
Rotorize360's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
im going to have to delay the kit because Im going to the middle east. take care every one and hopefully Ill see you all when I finish my tour
Old 07-16-2006 | 06:12 PM
  #24  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Rotorize360
im going to have to delay the kit because Im going to the middle east. take care every one and hopefully Ill see you all when I finish my tour
OK. Stay cool and keep your head down. Which kit were you making, anyway?
Old 08-16-2006 | 01:27 AM
  #25  
Rotorize360's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
currently in israel and I have all the peices for my kit waiting at home how gay is that


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 AM.