Brettus NA power project
#177
I've probably milked this for long enough now so here goes .
Technical details :
It's bridgeported and has small peripheral exhaust ports ................. so there is a **** ton of overlap but relatively small ports. Not terribly exciting but should make a difference.
Will start by venting the PPs to atmosphere (not as noisy as you might think because they open so much later than the side ports) and using the wastegate to control when that happens.
Technical details :
It's bridgeported and has small peripheral exhaust ports ................. so there is a **** ton of overlap but relatively small ports. Not terribly exciting but should make a difference.
Will start by venting the PPs to atmosphere (not as noisy as you might think because they open so much later than the side ports) and using the wastegate to control when that happens.
#178
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,604
Likes: 1,535
From: Y-cat-o NZ
I discussed small peripheral ports with a very skillful mechanic some years ago, he had no experience with rotary, but suggested a knife like port that was adjusted with RPM on 2 stroke engines. I do not have the fabrication skills, and he sadly died, so did not go further. I assumed that it was difficult to make, but as he said "they make it work on high stress 2 stroke".
The following users liked this post:
Brettus (02-02-2020)
#180
I've probably milked this for long enough now so here goes .
Technical details :
It's bridgeported and has small peripheral exhaust ports ................. so there is a **** ton of overlap but relatively small ports. Not terribly exciting but should make a difference.
Will start by venting the PPs to atmosphere (not as noisy as you might think because they open so much later than the side ports) and using the wastegate to control when that happens.
Technical details :
It's bridgeported and has small peripheral exhaust ports ................. so there is a **** ton of overlap but relatively small ports. Not terribly exciting but should make a difference.
Will start by venting the PPs to atmosphere (not as noisy as you might think because they open so much later than the side ports) and using the wastegate to control when that happens.
#181
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,604
Likes: 1,535
From: Y-cat-o NZ
My biggest challenge atm is how to test it because without the wastegate i have to open the ports manually and as mentioned ...engine will barely run below 2500 with them open ...
Last edited by Brettus; 02-02-2020 at 09:22 PM.
#182
My thought as well. I have some other friends doing motor cross, I'll see if they have an input some time.
But if doable, it would open doors....
Edit: Think he was talking about this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-...r_valve_system
But if doable, it would open doors....
Edit: Think he was talking about this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-...r_valve_system
Last edited by AAaF; 02-03-2020 at 04:07 PM.
#183
Actually , my fabricator couldn't make me the mini manifold i needed to fit the WG due to everyone wanting their rides ready for 'Rotary Reunion'. So at the moment I've just got some galvanised pipe fittings with a plug on the end.
My biggest challenge atm is how to test it because without the wastegate i have to open the ports manually and as mentioned ...engine will barely run below 2500 with them open ...
My biggest challenge atm is how to test it because without the wastegate i have to open the ports manually and as mentioned ...engine will barely run below 2500 with them open ...
The following users liked this post:
sask8s2 (02-03-2020)
#185
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,604
Likes: 1,535
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Update time ............... I managed to do some runs with the PPs open . Had to drive out to remote location , drive car onto ramps , remove the plugs from the pp pipes the do the runs ,put the plugs back for the drive back into town . Was a bit of a pia but at least I got a test done.
Initial results compared to strong stock engine (the one that dynoed at 220whp):
up to 3600rpm ...same power
3600-6000 ..... lost power
6000-7000.......same
7000-9000 .......small gain
That was a few days ago and since then I've done some tweaking with ssv timing which got back most of the lost power so currently:
up to 4500...same power
4500-6000...lost power
6000-7000...same power
7000-9000...small gain
Plan on doing some testing with vdi and apv timing (along with work out the pp open timing) to try and improve power band some more with the goal of minimising the mid range loss and maximising the gains in high rpm range.
Overall ...fat lady hasn't broken into song ..... but.............. nothing to get excited about.... yet.
Initial results compared to strong stock engine (the one that dynoed at 220whp):
up to 3600rpm ...same power
3600-6000 ..... lost power
6000-7000.......same
7000-9000 .......small gain
That was a few days ago and since then I've done some tweaking with ssv timing which got back most of the lost power so currently:
up to 4500...same power
4500-6000...lost power
6000-7000...same power
7000-9000...small gain
Plan on doing some testing with vdi and apv timing (along with work out the pp open timing) to try and improve power band some more with the goal of minimising the mid range loss and maximising the gains in high rpm range.
Overall ...fat lady hasn't broken into song ..... but.............. nothing to get excited about.... yet.
Last edited by Brettus; 02-06-2020 at 01:40 PM.
The following 5 users liked this post by Brettus:
AAaF (02-06-2020),
jcbrx8 (02-08-2020),
kevink0000 (02-06-2020),
sask8s2 (02-06-2020),
sharingan 19 (05-21-2021)
#186
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,604
Likes: 1,535
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Re the stock engine I pulled out . The porting appears to be unmolested so I think we can safely call it a 'stock' Renesis.
It does have the best compression and vacuum of any engine I've ever tested though so it's as good as it gets.
Also : I dynoed another rx8 (on the same dyno )last week. This was a raced prepped rx8 with full 3" exhaust and good engine (not rebuilt) . It dynoed at 206whp, which is the same as another raced prepped rx8 (with freash rebuild) engine I did last year on same dyno.
So ...it's still a bit of a puzzle as to why mine got such a good number . One thing that came to mind though .............. I do have very thin (comparatively) oil in the gearbox ....................... Kevin ?????
It does have the best compression and vacuum of any engine I've ever tested though so it's as good as it gets.
Also : I dynoed another rx8 (on the same dyno )last week. This was a raced prepped rx8 with full 3" exhaust and good engine (not rebuilt) . It dynoed at 206whp, which is the same as another raced prepped rx8 (with freash rebuild) engine I did last year on same dyno.
So ...it's still a bit of a puzzle as to why mine got such a good number . One thing that came to mind though .............. I do have very thin (comparatively) oil in the gearbox ....................... Kevin ?????
#187
Update time ............... I managed to do some runs with the PPs open . Had to drive out to remote location , drive car onto ramps , remove the plugs from the pp pipes the do the runs ,put the plugs back for the drive back into town . Was a bit of a pia but at least I got a test done.
Initial results compared to strong stock engine (the one that dynoed at 220whp):
up to 3600rpm ...same power
3600-6000 ..... lost power
6000-7000.......same
7000-9000 .......small gain
That was a few days ago and since then I've done some tweaking with ssv timing which got back most of the lost power so currently:
up to 4500...same power
4500-6000...lost power
6000-7000...same power
7000-9000...small gain
Plan on doing some testing with vdi and apv timing (along with work out the pp open timing) to try and improve power band some more with the goal of minimising the mid range loss and maximising the gains in high rpm range.
Overall ...fat lady hasn't broken into song ..... but.............. nothing to get excited about.... yet.
Initial results compared to strong stock engine (the one that dynoed at 220whp):
up to 3600rpm ...same power
3600-6000 ..... lost power
6000-7000.......same
7000-9000 .......small gain
That was a few days ago and since then I've done some tweaking with ssv timing which got back most of the lost power so currently:
up to 4500...same power
4500-6000...lost power
6000-7000...same power
7000-9000...small gain
Plan on doing some testing with vdi and apv timing (along with work out the pp open timing) to try and improve power band some more with the goal of minimising the mid range loss and maximising the gains in high rpm range.
Overall ...fat lady hasn't broken into song ..... but.............. nothing to get excited about.... yet.
My idea for a PP was not to increase NA power, but to increase the potential and reliability when adding FI. For a turbo setup, it must redefine the definition of plumbing nightmare, but for a supercharger setup, its another story. Regarding reliability part, idea was that it would relive the side exhaust port, and thereby take away the worst punishment.
The following users liked this post:
jcbrx8 (02-06-2020)
#188
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,604
Likes: 1,535
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Great work! Where do you find the motivation and courage? I'm deeply impressed.
My idea for a PP was not to increase NA power, but to increase the potential and reliability when adding FI. For a turbo setup, it must redefine the definition of plumbing nightmare, but for a supercharger setup, its another story. Regarding reliability part, idea was that it would relive the side exhaust port, and thereby take away the worst punishment.
My idea for a PP was not to increase NA power, but to increase the potential and reliability when adding FI. For a turbo setup, it must redefine the definition of plumbing nightmare, but for a supercharger setup, its another story. Regarding reliability part, idea was that it would relive the side exhaust port, and thereby take away the worst punishment.
You are probably correct on all that. I did briefly consider making this an FI setup also but decided the power level on my stock renesis turbo was ample and if I wanted more, the next step was an REW . There doesn't seem to be much point going higher on a hybrid Renesis because it's never going to spool as well or make the power as easily as an REW can.
At sub 400 levels though ...it's frickin' awesome and ,for a street car, there is no point fitting an REW to achieve a sub 400 output.
#198
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,604
Likes: 1,535
From: Y-cat-o NZ
I'm going to vent the PPs to atmosphere initially which is way more scavenging than anything that could be done with headers........... I think.
I am seeing maybe 10-15 extra g/s flow up top with pps open right now . With what i'm doing opening up the port exit inserts etc, I might be able to do better than that ...fingers xd
#199
Brett,
Watching this with interest,as always.
If nobody tries this stuff, then all of us learn less. Good for you. Thanks for the effort, and keeping us all up to date.
For the "strong" engine, what compression numbers did you see? Just curious.
The Redline MT-LV is of course the game changer. I knew it all along. :
Watching this with interest,as always.
If nobody tries this stuff, then all of us learn less. Good for you. Thanks for the effort, and keeping us all up to date.
For the "strong" engine, what compression numbers did you see? Just curious.
The Redline MT-LV is of course the game changer. I knew it all along. :
#200
Thread Starter
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,604
Likes: 1,535
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Brett,
Watching this with interest,as always.
If nobody tries this stuff, then all of us learn less. Good for you. Thanks for the effort, and keeping us all up to date.
For the "strong" engine, what compression numbers did you see? Just curious.
The Redline MT-LV is of course the game changer. I knew it all along. :
Watching this with interest,as always.
If nobody tries this stuff, then all of us learn less. Good for you. Thanks for the effort, and keeping us all up to date.
For the "strong" engine, what compression numbers did you see? Just curious.
The Redline MT-LV is of course the game changer. I knew it all along. :
Compression was around 115-120psi from memory and vacuum was -20psi . Vever seen that much vacuum on that gauge before ...it's normally below 19.
Re the oil ..... it must be worth a few horses .....but certainly not 15! Maybe 5 on a good day ..