Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Dyno Results - GReddy Turbo + Interceptor X

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-07-2005 | 10:28 AM
  #1  
Moostafa29's Avatar
Thread Starter
Storm Trooper
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 0
From: Freakmont, CA
Dyno Results - GReddy Turbo + Interceptor X

Here are my dyno results with the GReddy Turbo and Interceptor X EMS. This was done on a mustang dyno, using relatively concervative AFR. We had to pull a lot of timing because of the horrible gas we have in CA. These numbers were done at about 9.5psi after the car had cooled down. The final tune gave 225whp, and was done at 11-11.5psi. If we had let the car cool down, I think we could have gotten another 10-15whp out of it. I am running the RB exhaust, and RP high flow cat.
Attached Thumbnails Dyno Results - GReddy Turbo + Interceptor X-dyno-12-3-05-send.jpg  
Old 12-07-2005 | 10:38 AM
  #2  
IZoomZoomI's Avatar
Boost needed
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
wonder how much extra you can get out with the turboxs exhaust, should be a lot less restrictive compared to rb.
Old 12-07-2005 | 10:40 AM
  #3  
Moostafa29's Avatar
Thread Starter
Storm Trooper
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 0
From: Freakmont, CA
I'd like to hear it on a turbo'd car. NA is LOUD!
Old 12-07-2005 | 10:49 AM
  #4  
guy321's Avatar
Humpin legs and takin nam
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
From: Clearwater, Fl
That's good numbers on a mustang gyno
Old 12-07-2005 | 10:54 AM
  #5  
MadDog's Avatar
Consiglieri
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: yourI'mgirl
Nice, Moostafa. How is the drivability with the Interceptor now that you have it tuned? Also, it looks pretty heavily smoothed. I'd be interested in seeing some Interceptor AFR data a little less smoothed. Got any? If not, got any impressions you could share?

Thanks,
MD
Old 12-07-2005 | 11:27 AM
  #6  
PUR NRG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by MadDog
Also, it looks pretty heavily smoothed.
Any smoothing is done by the dyno software. What you see is straight from there.
________
blonde girl Cam

Last edited by PUR NRG; 05-01-2011 at 08:18 AM.
Old 12-07-2005 | 12:20 PM
  #7  
Avalonstar's Avatar
Beauty Without Rice
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
I'm interested in drivability too.
Old 12-07-2005 | 12:29 PM
  #8  
MadDog's Avatar
Consiglieri
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: yourI'mgirl
Originally Posted by PUR NRG
Any smoothing is done by the dyno software. What you see is straight from there.
Umm...Yeah...okay....

You can also change the smoothing parameters and get un-, or less-smoothed data if you so choose. I'm asking him if he has any of that...
Old 12-07-2005 | 01:01 PM
  #9  
Fanman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, CA
Single exhaust on the turbo have shown up to 10 lb.-ft. of torque.... "or so I've heard "
Old 12-07-2005 | 01:04 PM
  #10  
Brice-RX8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 882
Likes: 2
From: Winston-Salem, NC
Originally Posted by guy321
That's good numbers on a mustang gyno
Thats what I was going to say, I believe mustang dyno's are always a bit lower in their readings compared to a dynojet.
Old 12-07-2005 | 02:04 PM
  #11  
Xyntax's Avatar
THREAD KILLER
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, California
Mike, does it feel like it loses power after 7K RPM? I'm curious how a Greddy RX-8 would respond with the VDI disabled.

EDIT: Hey I just realized you dynoed at FFTEC. That's where I had my last dyno at 188 HP.
Old 12-07-2005 | 05:08 PM
  #12  
Moostafa29's Avatar
Thread Starter
Storm Trooper
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 0
From: Freakmont, CA
Originally Posted by Xyntax
Mike, does it feel like it loses power after 7K RPM? I'm curious how a Greddy RX-8 would respond with the VDI disabled.

EDIT: Hey I just realized you dynoed at FFTEC. That's where I had my last dyno at 188 HP.
You made some REALLY nice numbers from your dyno. I think that mine suffered from having to back off the timing to such a large extend. Without doing so, I was pinging everytime I'd go WOT. As far as the power, I honestly can't really tell there is a loss of power after 7k. Perhaps after I get used to driving it I will, but right now, I'm struggling not to hit fuel cut off, because you get to redline so quickly.
Originally Posted by MadDog
Nice, Moostafa. How is the drivability with the Interceptor now that you have it tuned? Also, it looks pretty heavily smoothed. I'd be interested in seeing some Interceptor AFR data a little less smoothed. Got any? If not, got any impressions you could share?

Thanks,
MD
Drivablity is fantastic. It really feels like the car came straight from Mazda like this. Only thing I don't particularly care for is the white smoke out the tailpipe all the time, but I know that can be resolved. I could try to get the original dyno curve from FFTEC this weekend if I can find the time, to compare those numbers to an unsmoothed AFR.

I was thinking about getting that mod to the interceptor to monitor my AFR, so that I can fine tune them slightly leaner. Should be able to pick up a little more power there too.
Old 12-07-2005 | 05:14 PM
  #13  
cleoent's Avatar
n00b
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,487
Likes: 1
From: Bay Area, CA
Nice numbers, the FFTEC guys are pretty cool!


Xyntax, what have you done to your car to pull 188 on a mustang? I know we've had this convo before, but i dont remember
Old 12-07-2005 | 05:34 PM
  #14  
Moostafa29's Avatar
Thread Starter
Storm Trooper
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 0
From: Freakmont, CA
Whats up with the headers? I want to see what you can get with those, and tuning.
Yeah, the guys there at FFTEC are hella cool. I do have to double check my receipt though...
Old 12-07-2005 | 06:56 PM
  #15  
Xyntax's Avatar
THREAD KILLER
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, California
I only have REVi intake/CAI, hot plugs, and CZ street-tuned map after reflashed with "R". The headers are sitting in my room. Any idea where and when we could get an install session? I know there's gonna be some guessing since it's the first time for most of us. We might need a lift due to the tight room in the header area. Did you install your turbo on just jacks?

This is Moostafa's thread, so let's not get off topic. Your AFR is just about right to get good reliable power, but how far did you pull timing? How was your timing map setup, did you mimic the stock setup? You know, gradual rise up to 6K and then it stays at 30 all the way. Does the I-X enable you to control timing split?

BTW, I was informed that the VDI stays off for the I-X. Nice
Old 12-07-2005 | 07:04 PM
  #16  
MazsportScott's Avatar
Mazsport.net
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: In the shop
"Does the I-X enable you to control timing split?"
Yes it does control split, it also retards the timing as boost pressure comes up.

"BTW, I was informed that the VDI stays off for the I-X. Nice"
Actually it is user definable, so is the SSV. In Mikes case the rev cut is @ 9250 and the VDI opens at 9500. (get it?)Scott
Old 12-07-2005 | 07:19 PM
  #17  
Xyntax's Avatar
THREAD KILLER
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, California
^ Got it. Thanks!
Old 12-07-2005 | 07:28 PM
  #18  
XDEEDUBBX's Avatar
RX8 HA HA
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,772
Likes: 5
From: Gardena Cali 310
Originally Posted by Fanman
Single exhaust on the turbo have shown up to 10 lb.-ft. of torque.... "or so I've heard "
HAHA
Old 12-07-2005 | 08:27 PM
  #19  
Moostafa29's Avatar
Thread Starter
Storm Trooper
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 0
From: Freakmont, CA
Originally Posted by Fanman
Single exhaust on the turbo have shown up to 10 lb.-ft. of torque.... "or so I've heard "
Spill it already
Old 12-07-2005 | 08:42 PM
  #20  
BigOLundh's Avatar
#1 Legend
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
Originally Posted by Brice-RX8
Thats what I was going to say, I believe mustang dyno's are always a bit lower in their readings compared to a dynojet.
Significantly Lower

Originally Posted by Moostafa29
Only thing I don't particularly care for is the white smoke out the tailpipe all the time, but I know that can be resolved.
WHAT???
Old 12-07-2005 | 08:43 PM
  #21  
Moostafa29's Avatar
Thread Starter
Storm Trooper
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 0
From: Freakmont, CA
Originally Posted by Xyntax
I only have REVi intake/CAI, hot plugs, and CZ street-tuned map after reflashed with "R". The headers are sitting in my room. Any idea where and when we could get an install session? I know there's gonna be some guessing since it's the first time for most of us. We might need a lift due to the tight room in the header area. Did you install your turbo on just jacks?

This is Moostafa's thread, so let's not get off topic. Your AFR is just about right to get good reliable power, but how far did you pull timing? How was your timing map setup, did you mimic the stock setup? You know, gradual rise up to 6K and then it stays at 30 all the way. Does the I-X enable you to control timing split?

BTW, I was informed that the VDI stays off for the I-X. Nice
Sorry to go off topic again (in my own thread!), but if putting on the headers is anything like putting on the exhaust manifold on the turbo installation, then it should only take 2-3 hours. The only thing I used were jackstands, a jack, and a brick. I'd like to take a look at it first, so I know what we are dealing with. I'd be down to do it in my driveway.

As far as tuning, I have really limited knowledge about that sort of thing, but am trying to learn here and there. I wouldn't dare tune my own car right now, so Sean at FFTEC did all the tuning, and consulting with Scott.
Old 12-07-2005 | 08:55 PM
  #22  
Xyntax's Avatar
THREAD KILLER
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, California
^ Cool. If the weather permits, maybe we could do this install this month. As for tuning, I wouldn't tune my own either if my engine is boosted. This is one of the reasons why I'm trying to experiment with my car while it is still in N/A form. Once I hit the ceiling for N/A, that's when I go FI, and then it's another chapter of learning from there.
Old 12-07-2005 | 09:02 PM
  #23  
kw1k's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: cali baby
ugh... smrx8 on the boards got 216whp N/A with tunning w/ the RIC Shaw ECU

With 55shot nitrous he got 243whp and that was on a mustang dyno.
Old 12-08-2005 | 12:13 AM
  #24  
IZoomZoomI's Avatar
Boost needed
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by kw1k
ugh... smrx8 on the boards got 216whp N/A with tunning w/ the RIC Shaw ECU

With 55shot nitrous he got 243whp and that was on a mustang dyno.

yea that was smrx8 car, how much is your 8 pulling btw? don't throw stones if you live in a glass house...

besides like mentioned above this is with 91 octane didn't smrx8 dyno with 93 gas?

Last edited by IZoomZoomI; 12-08-2005 at 12:19 AM.
Old 12-08-2005 | 12:44 AM
  #25  
Moostafa29's Avatar
Thread Starter
Storm Trooper
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 0
From: Freakmont, CA
Ca 91 gas = 89 other states = why we had to pull so much timing


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Dyno Results - GReddy Turbo + Interceptor X



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 AM.