Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Hey guys got a question for you all. Has anyone pushed the renesis motor n/a?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-21-2008 | 08:06 PM
  #1  
insane<se3p>'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Was Temecula, CA now AZ
Hey guys got a question for you all. Has anyone pushed the renesis motor n/a?

all the places i look, i see everyone using forced induction... which i love, but i also like the smoothness and feel of the n/a rotary. i want to tune the rotary but all i hear is that you can't get anything big. could the motor push 300-350 to the crank with no forced induction?
thanks.
Old 08-21-2008 | 08:10 PM
  #2  
xfukxshytxupx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
i doubt ur gonna be able to get those kinda of numbers but u deff could get an inprovment witout goin turbo... just do some reasearch i mean i just put a intake and i can tell theres a pretty good improvment already
Old 08-21-2008 | 08:12 PM
  #3  
alnielsen's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 12,255
Likes: 7
From: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
No, with some work you may make 225 rwhp.
Old 08-21-2008 | 08:14 PM
  #4  
insane<se3p>'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Was Temecula, CA now AZ
yah, i just have a drop in k&n... got it for free.

i feel some improvement. i just found a thread that talks about n/a. im gunna read it put already the frist couple of post say that make n/a 220. which isn't bad, for a 1.3.
Old 08-21-2008 | 08:17 PM
  #5  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
300 NA would require a 20b type setup.
Old 08-21-2008 | 08:37 PM
  #6  
insane<se3p>'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Was Temecula, CA now AZ
20b n/a would be just heaven!

one of the reason why i want to know, im tired of people talking **** on the renesis. i know mazda built a great engine, and i want to prove to a lot of people that the engine can be tuned to high performance engine.
Old 08-21-2008 | 08:54 PM
  #7  
Cattywampus's Avatar
Turbos blow!!
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: my engine bay
You may get close to 300 with the 16x. The 20b will exceed 300 n/a. I think the Rolex cup car is around 420. May be wrong though

Last edited by Cattywampus; 08-24-2008 at 06:22 PM.
Old 08-21-2008 | 09:43 PM
  #8  
ftf1337's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
The Rolex RX-8 cup cars are in the +400hp range.
Old 08-21-2008 | 09:47 PM
  #9  
Bastage's Avatar
DEVILMAN
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 1
From: Melbourne, FL
425 @ 8500 rpms

http://www.speedsourceinc.com/index....&section=mazda

It's so beautiful:

Old 08-22-2008 | 08:07 AM
  #10  
Falken's Avatar
Drop it into 3rd
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by insane<se3p>
all the places i look, i see everyone using forced induction... which i love, but i also like the smoothness and feel of the n/a rotary. i want to tune the rotary but all i hear is that you can't get anything big. could the motor push 300-350 to the crank with no forced induction?
thanks.
You won't get those numbers without FI. And if you want to argue the merits of natural aspiration be prepared to be utterly incinerated - I tried it for five pages before I gave up.

I like N/A much better for some reason too. Some people just dont.


Originally Posted by xfukxshytxupx
i doubt ur gonna be able to get those kinda of numbers but u deff could get an inprovment witout goin turbo... just do some reasearch i mean i just put a intake and i can tell theres a pretty good improvment already
An intake might land you 5hp? You have a sensitive butt my friend
Old 08-22-2008 | 11:09 AM
  #11  
rotary.enthusiast's Avatar
The Local Idiot
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: Big D, Texas
N/A is great if you can get the power you want out of it. However, the renesis has a peak potential of somewhere around the 260 HP (at the crank) mark. The only way to make more power on this engine is to force more air down it's gullet I'm afraid.
Old 08-22-2008 | 12:52 PM
  #12  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,444
Likes: 2,799
From: The Dark Side
I agree with everyone here, no way you'll see that kind of hp on an N/A Reni.

turbo it and you'll be all set.
Old 08-22-2008 | 01:10 PM
  #13  
mysql's Avatar
Doppelgänger
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 1
From: Florida
I expect more power when I get more power, therefor it is everything I though it would be.
Old 08-22-2008 | 01:11 PM
  #14  
maxxdamigz's Avatar
Baro Rex
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Well, if you reworked the intake and exhaust track, switched to custom lightweight higher compression rotors, upgraded most of your bearings, removed all the emissions equipment, and tuned to get your redline up to like 12k and raise your VE peak above 7k, you could conceivably do 300+ hp at the e-shaft. You would just need to find a way to make 160 ft lbs at 10,000 rpms. Then again, at that point, if you ever tried to drive the car in traffic, you'd probably shoot yourself.
Old 08-22-2008 | 01:16 PM
  #15  
secret8gent's Avatar
the enemy in the mirror
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: billerica, ma
peripheral intake and exhaust plus a tune, (and built intakes/exhausts specifically for peak hp) might get you close to 300 IMO - but it really won't be a renesis anymore when you're done.

the rolex cars are closer to 450 i think (with a 20b PP).

FI lets you get the power without major (internal) engine mods. (even though some might be helpful)

[edit: oh hey- posts before me saying similar things when i refreshed. I didn't explicitly think of a substantial redline increase, even less practical than my suggestions?]
Old 08-22-2008 | 01:31 PM
  #16  
rotary.enthusiast's Avatar
The Local Idiot
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: Big D, Texas
With all of those mods it wouldn't really be a renesis anymore

I think the most practical way to significantly increase HP N/A without throwing away everything but the rotor housings would be to look at increased red line, and what it would take to sustain a reasonable amount of torque at those higher RPMs. You'd have a big challenge on your hands in terms of the intake, and I don't think much can be done to improve the flow through the intake or exhaust ports themselves.
Old 08-22-2008 | 03:48 PM
  #17  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,444
Likes: 2,799
From: The Dark Side
^^^ and have a video camera handy
Old 08-22-2008 | 04:10 PM
  #18  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 25
From: Houston
I've physically pushed a car with an n/a Renesis in it. Does that count?
Old 08-22-2008 | 04:14 PM
  #19  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,444
Likes: 2,799
From: The Dark Side
only if you pushed uphill
Old 08-22-2008 | 04:15 PM
  #20  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 25
From: Houston
Originally Posted by secret8gent
the rolex cars are closer to 450 i think (with a 20b PP).
Speedsource made 425 hp on their 3 rotor car while BK Motorsports was making 450 hp on the Courage. The reason for this was very good and purposely done. BK was running a closer ratio transmission and a higher redline than the Speedsource car. Speedsource purposely ran longer intake runners as a result. While they made less peak horsepower and at a slightly lower rpm limit, their powerband was broader and more suited to their gearing. Both engines were developed at the same time and place as each other.

There's far more to making power than just the engine itself. It's what you intend to do with it that really affects what it can and does do. There have been large bridgeported drag race engines that have topped 375 hp at over 10,500 rpm but their powerbands were VERY peaky.
Old 08-22-2008 | 04:16 PM
  #21  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 25
From: Houston
Ray if your powerband keeps going up then you may actually want to think about fabbing up a new upper intake manifold that is longer to bring the peak back down. You should increase average power as well. "Should" being the key word.
Old 08-22-2008 | 04:29 PM
  #22  
rotary.enthusiast's Avatar
The Local Idiot
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: Big D, Texas
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
I have my redline at 9,500 and we are going to turn it up to 10K soon. With the porting I have we still have not been limited by the factory intake box with the inner panels and one screen removed.
Did you port it yourself? I've heard rather disappointing results from early porting attempts on the renesis... that doesn't mean those people knew what they were doing though
Old 08-22-2008 | 04:39 PM
  #23  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,444
Likes: 2,799
From: The Dark Side
RG porting special
Old 08-22-2008 | 05:24 PM
  #24  
J8635621's Avatar
Pew Pew Pew
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 128
From: Waco
trescientos hp? muy loco
Old 08-22-2008 | 05:54 PM
  #25  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,609
Likes: 1,536
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill

200 lb./ft. of torque at 7,878 RPMs. Do the math.........
WTF ? That's the same as the turbo guys are getting ???????

Last edited by Brettus; 08-22-2008 at 06:37 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 PM.