Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

I want your opinion On Turbo question ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-12-2009, 06:30 PM
  #26  
sold the 8... :(
iTrader: (7)
 
05rex8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why int-x? what type of turbo setup are you going with? the only reason for buying the int-x anymore is if you have the esmeril turbo kit
Old 02-12-2009, 07:11 PM
  #27  
The Bawss
 
AngryBumblebee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cobb all the way!!!!
Old 02-12-2009, 08:13 PM
  #28  
RX-8 = Japanese MG
 
SlideWayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bay area, CA
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Cobb has made all the other EMS solutions totally obsolete.

It remaps the factory ECU to chase new targets instead of the piggyback stuff.

The Int-X and Xede are the next best thing, since they at least take full control of spark and fuel.

No one has yet managed 50k+ miles on a turbo Renesis. Every blown engine is due to a failure of the rear (apex) seal. That's 100% as far as I know. Many suspect there's cooling problems, especially with a turbo sitting so close to the rear housing.

The last engine I popped was tuned very conservatively AND I was running 2 gallons of 104 race gas with every tank. No pings did I hear. Blew anyway.

Maybe with a top-mount turbo along with a correctly-sized turbo + Accessport, we'll see some reliability. Maybe. But just count on a new engine if you FI.

If the REW could be made cost-effective AND able to pass CA emissions, then I'd sell a kidney to finance the swap.
Old 02-13-2009, 09:53 PM
  #29  
Supercharged by Pettit
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
NYC Drift King's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 4,198
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im working with steven to build a turbo setup as similar to his as posible. If I cant find the parts seperatly then i will most likely purchase a full kit from SFR or PTP.
Old 02-13-2009, 10:22 PM
  #30  
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
chickenwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would advise to buy a complete kit to avoid a lot of head aches. Trust me, chasing down stupid little parts is annoying and it adds up, quick.

Also, everyone says they want 350-rwhp, but that's a lot. That's nearly double the power you have now- work your way up to it. The car will feel hella fast with "just" 280-rwhp.

I would also strongly consider the Cobb AP. It is a little difficult with the MAF, but not that bad. Well worth it. Also some kind of ignition upgrade is advised, as well as cooling upgrades.
Old 02-13-2009, 10:26 PM
  #31  
sold the 8... :(
iTrader: (7)
 
05rex8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^listen to this man!
Old 02-14-2009, 01:13 AM
  #32  
Turbocharger Guru
 
Bryan@BNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Birmingham, AL USA
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by paulmasoner
he knows just tired of hearing ppl complain about how this motor is so special and cant be boosted like the older rotaries....

yeah I know. I have a hard time seeing that much power out of the side exhaust port design. That is a lot of heat blowing past the side seals. Most of the heat in the older ****** motors is concentrated in the middle of the apex seal and the double apex springs are capable of handling 1700F EGT's. The side seal and corner seal springs are the first to collapse b/c of excessive heat because they are so tiny.
Old 02-14-2009, 01:40 AM
  #33  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by SlideWayz
No one has yet managed 50k+ miles on a turbo Renesis. Every blown engine is due to a failure of the rear (apex) seal. That's 100% as far as I know.
neither are true, and the second one isnt even close
Old 02-14-2009, 02:08 AM
  #34  
hakuna matata!
iTrader: (41)
 
alz0rz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
fear mongering by the uninformed.. ftw. =/
Old 02-14-2009, 01:04 PM
  #35  
RX-8 = Japanese MG
 
SlideWayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bay area, CA
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by paulmasoner
neither are true, and the second one isnt even close
Really? OK then, give me the examples of 50k+ miles FI & also of blown turbo Renesis engines that had a front rotor/seal failure instead of rear.

Go on then.
Old 02-14-2009, 01:05 PM
  #36  
RX-8 = Japanese MG
 
SlideWayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bay area, CA
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alz0rz
fear mongering by the uninformed.. ftw. =/
I've been on this board since early 2005 & read every turbo thread. I also have a degree in Nuclear Engineering from MIT.

...how about you?
Old 02-14-2009, 01:32 PM
  #37  
sold the 8... :(
iTrader: (7)
 
05rex8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I lol'd
Old 02-14-2009, 01:45 PM
  #38  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by SlideWayz
Really? OK then, give me the examples of 50k+ miles FI & also of blown turbo Renesis engines that had a front rotor/seal failure instead of rear.

Go on then.
none that i'm aware of to quote from the forum here, and since this forum obviously encompasses the entirety of all RX-8 enthusiasts worldwide, i'll just go ahead and say you're right to avoid a stupid argument.

Originally Posted by SlideWayz
Every blown engine is due to a failure of the rear (apex) seal. That's 100% as far as I know.
as for this, the apex seals are not always the culpirt as is famous in previous rotaries. factors like port location, cooling, etc make the side seals a weaker link - and the trend thus far is that side seals are most problematic. in fact, the apex seals are tremendously more forgiving than those of an RE/REW.

and btw there have been front rotor failures reported here as well


Originally Posted by 05rex8
I lol'd
me too
Old 02-14-2009, 01:59 PM
  #39  
RX-8 = Japanese MG
 
SlideWayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bay area, CA
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by paulmasoner
none that i'm aware of to quote from the forum here, and since this forum obviously encompasses the entirety of all RX-8 enthusiasts worldwide, i'll just go ahead and say you're right to avoid a stupid argument.

as for this, the apex seals are not always the culpirt as is famous in previous rotaries. factors like port location, cooling, etc make the side seals a weaker link - and the trend thus far is that side seals are most problematic. in fact, the apex seals are tremendously more forgiving than those of an RE/REW.

and btw there have been front rotor failures reported here as well

me too
OK, so let's generate some quantitative data. You can start with mustering up all the turbo Renesis engines with (1) front rotor failures & (2) non-Apex seal failures.

Also, go ahead and provide the list of all the turbo Renesis engines that have gone more than 50k miles without failure.

Let's have regard for truth and fact. I gave you the data I've gathered. What's your data?
Old 02-14-2009, 02:19 PM
  #40  
sold the 8... :(
iTrader: (7)
 
05rex8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^but you didn't provide proof either, just talking out of your *** really.
Old 02-14-2009, 03:03 PM
  #41  
What mawd bug?
iTrader: (3)
 
tubingchamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Surrey, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SlideWayz
I also have a degree in Nuclear Engineering from MIT.
Wow, I didn't know the renesis had a lot in common with a Nuclear device..
Old 02-14-2009, 04:28 PM
  #42  
HAVOC
 
WingleBeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MIT = rotatry masters
Old 02-14-2009, 05:11 PM
  #43  
Registered
 
halimsteven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chickenwafer
I would advise to buy a complete kit to avoid a lot of head aches. Trust me, chasing down stupid little parts is annoying and it adds up, quick.

Also, everyone says they want 350-rwhp, but that's a lot. That's nearly double the power you have now- work your way up to it. The car will feel hella fast with "just" 280-rwhp.

I would also strongly consider the Cobb AP. It is a little difficult with the MAF, but not that bad. Well worth it. Also some kind of ignition upgrade is advised, as well as cooling upgrades.
yeah, i am working with him to get the turbo set up, and we are going to get it as a kit, adn we don't wanna be in headache to get stuff to build up a turbo kit.
the cooling system is on the target for sure, and we already have them in mind what we need to make it happen, of course in the end he will have AI. we are talking about radiator, water pump, anything else that help for cooling.

AS far IGNITION, this is really debating, we are looking for the good product, as lately we can see there are a lot of out there, the only thing we can do is waiting to the result from other people experience toward the products.

AS EMS, i don't have any weight among them, but since i am using INT-X, and i have the tuner that can tune it directly, it's better for us to use INT-X. i have seen AP, it is good, but JEFF is a busy guy, cool guy, but if we can be independent and use our tuner to tune the car, i think it will be better route for all type of turbo car.
just incase if we wanna upgrade the turbo or what ever it is, we don't have to wait for JEFF to download teh map, we just can tune it.

chickenwafer, i am not an expert, but i am open for the advice toward the cooling and ignition, if you are willing to share.
i accept the advice from ppl too, and remember that i am not an expert, and we always learn something new.
steven
Old 02-14-2009, 06:35 PM
  #44  
hakuna matata!
iTrader: (41)
 
alz0rz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
cooling - BHR/griffin radiator, mazmart water pump, use the AP to alter fan-on temps. these are the absolutes... ultimately you want to introduce water/methanol injection to keep the EGT temps down.

ignition - BHR Yukon coil conversion

ems - as has been said the accessport is the best route.. I say leave the ems purchase till the end.. remember the Cobb street tuner software for the rx8 is just now making it's way into tuners hands

Last edited by alz0rz; 02-14-2009 at 06:38 PM.
Old 02-14-2009, 06:41 PM
  #45  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by SlideWayz
Let's have regard for truth and fact. I gave you the data I've gathered. What's your data?
data? all you did was pull a statement out of your *** that tells me your an educated person who doesnt read too well. but, no thanks, you can believe what you like, i'm not here to teach you anything Mr. MIT. I'll tell you where to look though... failures - start here, then talk to(listen rather) those who rebuild a lot of rennies. FI longevity - your probably gonna have to leave the forum to find, again a good place to start is rebuilders, oh and people who work with race teams.

fwiw the only 2 FI failures that were confirmed apex's(or even corners) i can think of off the top of my head were due to 1) WAY overboosting, and 2) complete lack of tuning.... if your doing things right, you should have side seal longevity failure before apex seal failure
Old 02-14-2009, 06:53 PM
  #46  
Supercharged by Pettit
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
NYC Drift King's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 4,198
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks everyone ESPECIALLY steven; for all the advice. When it comes down to it I am a newbie when it comes to boost. I have been stuffing my brain with knowledge for thae last couple of weeks. Theirs just so much information on these turbo threads; its hard to desiffer opinion from fact.
Old 02-14-2009, 08:14 PM
  #47  
RX-8 = Japanese MG
 
SlideWayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bay area, CA
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by paulmasoner
data? all you did was pull a statement out of your *** that tells me your an educated person who doesnt read too well. but, no thanks, you can believe what you like, i'm not here to teach you anything Mr. MIT. I'll tell you where to look though... failures - start here, then talk to(listen rather) those who rebuild a lot of rennies. FI longevity - your probably gonna have to leave the forum to find, again a good place to start is rebuilders, oh and people who work with race teams.

fwiw the only 2 FI failures that were confirmed apex's(or even corners) i can think of off the top of my head were due to 1) WAY overboosting, and 2) complete lack of tuning.... if your doing things right, you should have side seal longevity failure before apex seal failure
No, I did a survey.

Tell ya what, muster up all those turbo Renesis engines with 50k+ miles boosted and ANY turbo Renesis engines that didn't bugger up something in the rear housing/seals.

Back to the main topic: if you boost this engine, be prepared to replace it before you've clocked 50k miles FI.
Old 02-14-2009, 08:18 PM
  #48  
Life begins @ 30 psi
 
blackenedwings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SlideWayz
I've been on this board since early 2005 & read every turbo thread. I also have a degree in Nuclear Engineering from MIT.
This made me then then ...its truly sig worthy.
Old 02-14-2009, 08:22 PM
  #49  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by SlideWayz
Back to the main topic: if you boost this engine, be prepared to replace it before you've clocked 50k miles FI.
that is good advice. truly you should be prepared to replace it immediately.
Old 02-14-2009, 08:43 PM
  #50  
Supercharged by Pettit
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
NYC Drift King's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 4,198
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by paulmasoner
that is good advice. truly you should be prepared to replace it immediately.
Damn this sounds almost so depressing. Just thinking about This; I probably will spend some where around 8 grand in the next 3-4 months for a complete turbo setup, with supporting mods, AI, installation, and Tuning. Just to blow a engine and spend a other 2k on a block plus install. all this plus the remander of my loan i might aswell sell the car break even. put a down payment on a BMW M3 which will have the horses im looking for.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: I want your opinion On Turbo question ...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 PM.