View Poll Results: If you could go for forced induction...
Turbo
115
56.93%
Supercharger
87
43.07%
Voters: 202. You may not vote on this poll
If you could go for forced induction...
#76
What would you call it then? I can't think of anything else it would be...
Oh. I must just be strange then.
It is no argument. It is fact. I have posted videos showing instant 13/14 lbs of boost at these RPM levels immediately when transitioning from a light throttle (manifold vacuum) to full load (full throttle).
The same set of videos, and the picture posted earlier shows about 40 or 50HP improvement of the stock figure at that point (bottom of the range). Since the stock figure was only about 40 or 50HP to start with, then I call that is a massive improvement. Like 100% rather than "not very high".
Thanks. But my argument holds water. It isn't theory. I've driven both.
Cheers,
Hymee.
Oh. I must just be strange then.
But for the sake of argument, even if you were and were able to push 10 psi at 2,000 rpm, your power levels would still not be very high. I haven't seen any dyno results from 2,000 rpm .. and at 3,000 rpm we already know the Pettit SC has no advantage over the MM turbo upgrade.
The same set of videos, and the picture posted earlier shows about 40 or 50HP improvement of the stock figure at that point (bottom of the range). Since the stock figure was only about 40 or 50HP to start with, then I call that is a massive improvement. Like 100% rather than "not very high".
Cheers,
Hymee.
#77
Oh. I must just be strange then.
The same set of videos, and the picture posted earlier shows about 40 or 50HP improvement of the stock figure at that point (bottom of the range). Since the stock figure was only about 40 or 50HP to start with, then I call that is a massive improvement. Like 100% rather than "not very high".
#78
No one drives around at 2000 rpm. But for the sake of argument, even if you were and were able to push 10 psi at 2,000 rpm, your power levels would still not be very high. I haven't seen any dyno results from 2,000 rpm .. and at 3,000 rpm we already know the Pettit SC has no advantage over the MM turbo upgrade.
That aside, I'm not arguing over your SC route. I'm just saying that your argument is a bit thin.
That aside, I'm not arguing over your SC route. I'm just saying that your argument is a bit thin.
I don't know what his SC does but no matter what it does I bet it does not make as much torque as a Turbo that is at the exact same peak HP, its just not possible with a SC. I do recognize what you are saying Hymee about the power being readily available but as mysql said above no one drives around at 2000 rpms in our cars, thats 40 mph in 6th gear. I usually have my car at 3500 rpms at the lowest for cruising, one reason why is it seems to gunk up my plugs if I don't spin the rotors more. Yours may be better than the Pettit but turbo's are just torque monsters.
#79
Who the hell drives around at 2000 RPM? I've got Pettit people asking me if I can make their kit idle at 2000 RPM.
Not a single dyno in the comparison begins at 2000 RPM.
The MM Upgrade chart is the only one that starts at 2500 and it is destroying everything else at that point, but that is because it was a load-hold start, so its a little unfair - but only at 2500 RPM.
If the people who buy your kit are driving around at 2000 RPM, I don't think this entire discussion is of much value to them anyway because they are eating peas and carrots from a blender.
A stock RX-8 is making about 60 HP at 3000 RPM. If you put 11 PSI into it it will make about 100 at that point with the GT3071. Look at the chart.
If the S/C can do the same, then you have broken even, power-wise, since the blower is drawing nearly 30 just to make that extra 40.
The turbo is only using 3 HP at that point.
You are calling boost threshold lag. Stop doing that.
Last edited by MazdaManiac; 03-19-2008 at 12:14 PM.
#80
I drive around at 2K all the time.
I have the final drive swap, so most of the time im in 6th gear at 45 or so.
Honestly, the reason I went huge t70 is strictly daily driveability and gas mileage.
On city streets I just don't need instant boost going to 300rwhp. intx injects fuel based on boost. The larger turbo will help keep me out of it on the daily drive. = better gas mileage on streets. And big power where I need it, on the track. Sure the exhaust restriction of the turbo in general will eat some gas mileage, but not as bad a gently pressing down on the pedal and getting 9psi.
I have the final drive swap, so most of the time im in 6th gear at 45 or so.
Honestly, the reason I went huge t70 is strictly daily driveability and gas mileage.
On city streets I just don't need instant boost going to 300rwhp. intx injects fuel based on boost. The larger turbo will help keep me out of it on the daily drive. = better gas mileage on streets. And big power where I need it, on the track. Sure the exhaust restriction of the turbo in general will eat some gas mileage, but not as bad a gently pressing down on the pedal and getting 9psi.
Last edited by staticlag; 03-19-2008 at 12:20 PM.
#81
Now you are really reaching.
Who the hell drives around at 2000 RPM? I've got Pettit people asking me if I can make their kit idle at 2000 RPM.
Not a single dyno in the comparison begins at 2000 RPM
The MM Upgrade chart is the only one that starts at 2500 and it is destroying everything else at that point, but that is because it was a load-hold start, so its a little unfair - but only at 2500 RPM.
If the people who buy your kit are driving around at 2000 RPM, I don't think this entire discussion is of much value to them anyway because they are eating peas and carrots from a blender.
A stock RX-8 is making about 60 HP at 3000 RPM. If you put 11 PSI into it it will make about 100 at that point with the GT3071. Look at the chart.
If the S/C can do the same, then you have broken even, power-wise.
You are calling boost threshold lag. Stop doing that.
Who the hell drives around at 2000 RPM? I've got Pettit people asking me if I can make their kit idle at 2000 RPM.
Not a single dyno in the comparison begins at 2000 RPM
The MM Upgrade chart is the only one that starts at 2500 and it is destroying everything else at that point, but that is because it was a load-hold start, so its a little unfair - but only at 2500 RPM.
If the people who buy your kit are driving around at 2000 RPM, I don't think this entire discussion is of much value to them anyway because they are eating peas and carrots from a blender.
A stock RX-8 is making about 60 HP at 3000 RPM. If you put 11 PSI into it it will make about 100 at that point with the GT3071. Look at the chart.
If the S/C can do the same, then you have broken even, power-wise.
You are calling boost threshold lag. Stop doing that.
Last edited by staticlag; 03-19-2008 at 12:18 PM.
#82
So how are those blended peas and carrots?
Yeah, otherwise I don't hit full boost until 3200 RPM.
Yeah, otherwise I don't hit full boost until 3200 RPM.
#83
Considering I SHIFT at 3K rpm in both my Civic and RX-7 daily driving, I can honestly say I drive at 2000 rpm all day. I also drive through the subdivision at 30 mph in 5th gear. I only have 5! Let's just say I had a positive displacement supercharger, which I don't. If I were driving this way and needed to step on the gas, boost would be instant and the car would accelerate. If it were a turbo under these same circumstances, it wouldn't even try to build boost. It would accelerate under no boost until speed got higher and boost kicked in. I know some people say to just downshift but that's the whole point of this. A positive displacement supercharger is like having a larger engine under the hood whereas a turbo is like having a smaller engine with a turbo. That's just the way it goes. Real world driving condition on the street favor a pd supercharger in my opinion. Then again not everyone drives civilized on the street so it goes back to driving habits. I can also get 20 mpg city in a rotary all day long and still keep up with traffic.
Having a supercharger kit that idles at 2000 isn't an indication that below this is unimportant. It's an indication that tuning sucks or that something else in the total design has serious flaws.
Having a supercharger kit that idles at 2000 isn't an indication that below this is unimportant. It's an indication that tuning sucks or that something else in the total design has serious flaws.
#84
Since the blower is pulling so much power at idle and the MAF is seeing th "puffs" from the blower, it can be pretty rough below 1100 RPM.
Sine the blower is eating more power than it is adding below 2000 RPM, I think the drag crowd is just thinking there is no reason to be down there.
Normally, I put the Pettit idle at 1100.
#86
Where did I say that? The point is that the Civic is rated at 127 hp. I can drive it under 3K rpm all day and keep up with traffic. It's final drive ratio is also 4.44:1. If you have an RX-8, under normal driving conditions you don't need to rev high at all except for the occasional stint to help with carbon buildup.
#87
You didn't.
But if you are driving a stock RX-8 at 2000 RPM and step on it, absolutely nothing happens.
If you are driving a turbo RX-8 at 2000 RPM and step on it, before you can even think of the word "lag" (as Hymee likes to call it), you are already at an RPM where you have full boost.
An S/C may have full boost right when you step on it, but it is still getting out of its own way, so there will not be a performance advantage at such a ridiculous breakpoint.
#88
The larger turbo will help keep me out of it on the daily drive. = better gas mileage on streets. And big power where I need it, on the track. Sure the exhaust restriction of the turbo in general will eat some gas mileage, but not as bad a gently pressing down on the pedal and getting 9psi.
Also a boost controller will help you configure spool times. This is all adjustable. You appear to be making decisions based on misconceptions.
That was my point. Even doubling the stock whp numbers at 2,000 rpm is still worthless. Then the SC is at a disadvantage after that.
#89
And doesn't change the fact that I don't need more power until above 6K,
and I don't need to ever go above 6K on city streets.
Even now N/A I never go above 6K on the streets, its too fast and loud for normal driving(catless).
#90
Where did I say that? The point is that the Civic is rated at 127 hp. I can drive it under 3K rpm all day and keep up with traffic. It's final drive ratio is also 4.44:1. If you have an RX-8, under normal driving conditions you don't need to rev high at all except for the occasional stint to help with carbon buildup.
A civic doesn't use oil injection in the cylinders and does not have a problem with a possible flood issue if the spark plugs get gunked up by the oil injection.
Lets not add other vehicles into the SC and Turbo conversation since they have nothing to do with whether a SC or Turbo is good for your 9200 rpm Rotary.
#91
If our turbo choices limited us to having power only after 5,000 rpm, I think I would be all over the superchargers. I don't like having to mash the throttle to accelerate. I like to be able to push it down and get power. Not all at once, but power modulated by throttle. So the more I press, the more I get. The 3071R delivers that. It's much more smooth and has much more torque than the greddy, but with the same spool time as the smaller turbo.
Seriously, 3k - 4.5k is where my car cruises in town and on the highway. I usually do 80-90 mph in 6th on the highway. Boost is immediate, and instant. I don't need to downshift.
Seriously, 3k - 4.5k is where my car cruises in town and on the highway. I usually do 80-90 mph in 6th on the highway. Boost is immediate, and instant. I don't need to downshift.
#92
Your civic isn't a Rotary and wouldn't perform any differently if you stayed at 1200 rpms all day for 2 years straight but we are talking about the Renesis and I don't know about you opinion but even the dealer says the car is made to rev and you don't want to cruise around at low rpm's never getting the rpms up.
A civic doesn't use oil injection in the cylinders and does not have a problem with a possible flood issue if the spark plugs get gunked up by the oil injection.
Lets not add other vehicles into the SC and Turbo conversation since they have nothing to do with whether a SC or Turbo is good for your 9200 rpm Rotary.
A civic doesn't use oil injection in the cylinders and does not have a problem with a possible flood issue if the spark plugs get gunked up by the oil injection.
Lets not add other vehicles into the SC and Turbo conversation since they have nothing to do with whether a SC or Turbo is good for your 9200 rpm Rotary.
Did you not see where I said I drive my Civic AND my RX-7 the same way??? I've owned rotaries for long enough that I know how to take care of them.
#93
If our turbo choices limited us to having power only after 5,000 rpm, I think I would be all over the superchargers. I don't like having to mash the throttle to accelerate. I like to be able to push it down and get power. Not all at once, but power modulated by throttle. So the more I press, the more I get. The 3071R delivers that. It's much more smooth and has much more torque than the greddy, but with the same spool time as the smaller turbo.
Seriously, 3k - 4.5k is where my car cruises in town and on the highway. I usually do 80-90 mph in 6th on the highway. Boost is immediate, and instant. I don't need to downshift.
Seriously, 3k - 4.5k is where my car cruises in town and on the highway. I usually do 80-90 mph in 6th on the highway. Boost is immediate, and instant. I don't need to downshift.
I'm the guy who spends most of his city and highway driving in 6th gear.
Last edited by staticlag; 03-19-2008 at 01:38 PM.
#94
I bought the car because I loved the high revving motor is I wanted to cruise at 2000 rpms I would have bought a Civic or Accord.
Last edited by Rocketman1976; 03-19-2008 at 01:27 PM.
#95
Your civic isn't a Rotary and wouldn't perform any differently if you stayed at 1200 rpms all day for 2 years straight but we are talking about the Renesis and I don't know about you opinion but even the dealer says the car is made to rev and you don't want to cruise around at low rpm's never getting the rpms up.
A civic doesn't use oil injection in the cylinders and does not have a problem with a possible flood issue if the spark plugs get gunked up by the oil injection.
Lets not add other vehicles into the SC and Turbo conversation since they have nothing to do with whether a SC or Turbo is good for your 9200 rpm Rotary.
A civic doesn't use oil injection in the cylinders and does not have a problem with a possible flood issue if the spark plugs get gunked up by the oil injection.
Lets not add other vehicles into the SC and Turbo conversation since they have nothing to do with whether a SC or Turbo is good for your 9200 rpm Rotary.
#96
My streetported 13B revs to 9000 rpm before I cut ignition. The redline the engine has by comparison is completely irrelevant. At the end of the day, you also have nothing more than a 13B. I don't care where you cut redline off at.
I'm not saying you have to drive around all day at 2000 rpm. I am saying you don't need to drive at high rpms to get around. You don't. Normal driving habits of the average person do not involve flooring it everywhere and driving at 5K rpms. Again, I don't care what engine you have. The Renesis is a 13B and it is a 4 stroke engine. It doesn't matter. I don't drive around all day in 3rd gear and cruise at 5K just because the engine likes to rev.
You show me a "trustworthy" dealership and I'll show you one that isn't quite as dumb and lazy as the others.
I'm not saying you have to drive around all day at 2000 rpm. I am saying you don't need to drive at high rpms to get around. You don't. Normal driving habits of the average person do not involve flooring it everywhere and driving at 5K rpms. Again, I don't care what engine you have. The Renesis is a 13B and it is a 4 stroke engine. It doesn't matter. I don't drive around all day in 3rd gear and cruise at 5K just because the engine likes to rev.
You show me a "trustworthy" dealership and I'll show you one that isn't quite as dumb and lazy as the others.
#97
If our turbo choices limited us to having power only after 5,000 rpm, I think I would be all over the superchargers. I don't like having to mash the throttle to accelerate. I like to be able to push it down and get power. Not all at once, but power modulated by throttle. So the more I press, the more I get. The 3071R delivers that. It's much more smooth and has much more torque than the greddy, but with the same spool time as the smaller turbo.
Seriously, 3k - 4.5k is where my car cruises in town and on the highway. I usually do 80-90 mph in 6th on the highway. Boost is immediate, and instant. I don't need to downshift.
Seriously, 3k - 4.5k is where my car cruises in town and on the highway. I usually do 80-90 mph in 6th on the highway. Boost is immediate, and instant. I don't need to downshift.
One of the main joys of having a turbo Renesis is that it isn't boggy and doggy at part throttle/lower RPMs. Yeah, the turbo is spinning almost all the time, but what I get in return is part-throttle torque, glorious torque.
It, uh, feels like a larger, torque-ier engine...
Did I say 'torque' enough times?
#98
#99
Yeah, MM turbo upgrade is a pretty nice setup. But personally it just wasn't for me. For just the reason you describe, the linear nature of the power. I don't care about getting more power on my daily drive, I just like power to be there only when I put the pedal to the metal, much like an unlimited huge shot of nitrous.
I'm the guy who spends most of his city and highway driving in 6th gear.
I'm the guy who spends most of his city and highway driving in 6th gear.