INT X engine management
12-10-2007, 02:35 AM
#28
Administrator
but just in case they are here https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.p...03#post2152603
12-10-2007, 06:45 PM
#34
Guys ---please. I started this thread just to throw out a compliment concerning my satisfaction with using the INT X . Thats all. As far as I am concerned it works pretty good and has a lot of flexibility to it. My car --with some tweaking--runs well with the base map and the unit offers the flexibility that i am interested in.
I am not about debating anymore the good and the bad about the Pettit kit. Some things worked for me and i thought I would share---thats all.
Asking can we please bring it back to that.
oscd
I am not about debating anymore the good and the bad about the Pettit kit. Some things worked for me and i thought I would share---thats all.
Asking can we please bring it back to that.
oscd
12-10-2007, 07:03 PM
#35
I just realized that my private messages does not seem to be private? Very interesting. It is good to know the environment one is communicating in. At least adjustments are available.
Good insight into early retirement. Does this mean anything to anyone s_pvgov\.66\onidex.
I am out of here.
oscd
Good insight into early retirement. Does this mean anything to anyone s_pvgov\.66\onidex.
I am out of here.
oscd
12-10-2007, 07:10 PM
#36
Guys ---please. I started this thread just to throw out a compliment concerning my satisfaction with using the INT X . Thats all. As far as I am concerned it works pretty good and has a lot of flexibility to it. My car --with some tweaking--runs well with the base map and the unit offers the flexibility that i am interested in.
I am not about debating anymore the good and the bad about the Pettit kit. Some things worked for me and i thought I would share---thats all.
Asking can we please bring it back to that.
oscd
I am not about debating anymore the good and the bad about the Pettit kit. Some things worked for me and i thought I would share---thats all.
Asking can we please bring it back to that.
oscd
However, I don't think you even realize how messed up some of the things you discussed really are.
Certainly, reading the "Pettit Owners" gives one cause for pause.
Why are all of the SC folks so afraid of debate? The turbo folks don't seem to be.
Try looking through the threads of all the early adopters and the few kit makers and see how that went.
Remember - even under law there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.
Privacy must be created and preserved. There is no right to it.
That said, there are only two ways your PMs are not private:
1) The "other party" does not desire to keep them so;
2) The admins of this site are similarly disinterested.
What was private (and revealed) in this thread?
Last edited by MazdaManiac; 12-10-2007 at 07:13 PM.
12-10-2007, 07:22 PM
#37
To be honest, I thought it was quite commendable of OD to decide to stick with the IntX as opposed to simply joining the stampede of Pettit owners to the re-flash.
As far as PMs possibly being subject to public scrutinty, lemme clear THIS up right now; MM is a friggin' *******. There. I said it.
Now what.
As far as PMs possibly being subject to public scrutinty, lemme clear THIS up right now; MM is a friggin' *******. There. I said it.
Now what.
Last edited by Charles R. Hill; 12-10-2007 at 07:48 PM.
12-10-2007, 07:35 PM
#38
God damnit Ray! There you go letting people know my secret!
Now I'll never win Marietta 8's "Mr. Congeniality" award.
Actually, I'd be really interested in seeing how the flash gets along with Dan's idle air bleed system.
Now I'll never win Marietta 8's "Mr. Congeniality" award.
Actually, I'd be really interested in seeing how the flash gets along with Dan's idle air bleed system.
12-10-2007, 07:52 PM
#40
To be honest, I thought it was quite commendable of OD to decide to stick with the IntX as opposed to simply joining the stampede of Pettit owners to the re-flash.
As far as PMs possibly being subject to public scrutinty, lemme clear THIS up right now; MM is a friggin' *******. There. I said it. Now what.
As far as PMs possibly being subject to public scrutinty, lemme clear THIS up right now; MM is a friggin' *******. There. I said it.
Now what.It's the facial hair that does it for me...
Haa haa...
12-10-2007, 10:13 PM
#44
Pettit fangurl <3
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Aston, PA
Posts: 5,386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont think you missed much...
personally i think the flash is the way to go...i dont really have a high opinion of the x....it was a means to an end at the time...just biding my time for the flash...
i will admit that im not that knowledgable when it comes to engine management but it just makes good sense to me that if you can reconfigure your PCM to work with an FI product allowing the car to run in the most efficient way...have the best drivability, etc...its a no-brainer....IMO...
others may have different opinions...
opinions are like ********, everyone has one...
personally i think the flash is the way to go...i dont really have a high opinion of the x....it was a means to an end at the time...just biding my time for the flash...
i will admit that im not that knowledgable when it comes to engine management but it just makes good sense to me that if you can reconfigure your PCM to work with an FI product allowing the car to run in the most efficient way...have the best drivability, etc...its a no-brainer....IMO...
others may have different opinions...
opinions are like ********, everyone has one...
12-10-2007, 10:15 PM
#45
Pettit fangurl <3
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Aston, PA
Posts: 5,386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no he wont because i specifically asked moon if they had the flash portable in a lap top or something
https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...&postcount=778
and he answered
https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...&postcount=779
just in case ill ask him again
https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...&postcount=778
and he answered
https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...&postcount=779
just in case ill ask him again
PS...they dont have the flash ready for the AT...not for awhile yet
