New EMS System
#27
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
Originally Posted by brillo
Unless you are going to rip out the whole PCM (not recommended) all ECU mods are going to be a "piggy back" unless they are flashing the stock PCM.
You are not as informed on this subject as you think you are. Your statement is false.
.
#28
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
I don't want to hijack the thread, but here are your answers:
https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tech-garage-22/dyno-results-compilation-77031/
Go the last post in the dyno thread
https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tech-garage-22/dyno-results-compilation-77031/
Go the last post in the dyno thread
Let's face it, the rotary needs to be force fed to make HP & torque on par with its looks and handling, not to mention with its competition, which is beating the stuffing out of it, sales-wise.
#29
Bummed, but bring on OU!
Originally Posted by dDuB
I don't understand why these EMS systems are so exciting for people. Sure they are "plug n' play" but so what? Why wait for someone to come out with something like that when you can easily go buy a Microtech, leave the stock ecu to control the manifold stuff, and use the Microtech for everything else?
Microtech =$$ and that's sans harness.
#30
always preoccupied.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by therm8
Microtech =$$ and that's sans harness.
A used and perfectly working microtech can be had for 600-900 easily.
How is this expensive? Isn't the interceptor $1800?
In fact, I know someone selling a brand new in box Microtech LT-8s with harness for $900 shipped.
#31
Bummed, but bring on OU!
Originally Posted by dDuB
Uh no. Brand new microtech with universal harness that will need to be cut to length for a little over $1000. Even if you buy one without the harness so what? I built an entire harness for my rx7 with different colored wires for everything, meaning I had to buy a lot of different colored water, solder, shrink wrap, etc for a little over $50.
A used and perfectly working microtech can be had for 600-900 easily.
How is this expensive? Isn't the interceptor $1800?
In fact, I know someone selling a brand new in box Microtech LT-8s with harness for $900 shipped.
A used and perfectly working microtech can be had for 600-900 easily.
How is this expensive? Isn't the interceptor $1800?
In fact, I know someone selling a brand new in box Microtech LT-8s with harness for $900 shipped.
so $900. Then you have software at $100-150. Then if you want to have map switching capability like the UTEC, you need the hand held controller $100-150.
So why not get excited about something that can do the same for $2-300 less. It's all moot anyway, because there's no product for the 8 as of now, so it's probably not coming at all.
#33
Bummed, but bring on OU!
Originally Posted by dDuB
Software? Since when does it not come with the software?
LT-8 $1095 AU
Software $150 AU
The ecu comes preloaded with a map, but you must buy the software to tune it yourself.
You sellin' Microtech's or something? The Utec is cheaper (or would be if it existed), and is therefore worthy of looking at instead of the Microtech. This argument is silly, and I'll take no further part in it.
#34
always preoccupied.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well that's too bad the official site lists the software seperately. Lots of online venders and on Ebay has the software included in the package, for a good price.
No I'm not selling Microtechs, I'm just trying to show people there are more options out there than they think. Which also includes Haltechs, Megasquirts, Wolf 3D, and so on.
I wasn't comparing to the Utech either, since theirs isn't even out and we don't know how it will perform. I was talking about the Microtech versus the Interceptor.
No I'm not selling Microtechs, I'm just trying to show people there are more options out there than they think. Which also includes Haltechs, Megasquirts, Wolf 3D, and so on.
I wasn't comparing to the Utech either, since theirs isn't even out and we don't know how it will perform. I was talking about the Microtech versus the Interceptor.
#36
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dDuB
Uh no. Brand new microtech with universal harness that will need to be cut to length for a little over $1000. Even if you buy one without the harness so what? I built an entire harness for my rx7 with different colored wires for everything, meaning I had to buy a lot of different colored water, solder, shrink wrap, etc for a little over $50.
A used and perfectly working microtech can be had for 600-900 easily.
How is this expensive? Isn't the interceptor $1800?
In fact, I know someone selling a brand new in box Microtech LT-8s with harness for $900 shipped.
A used and perfectly working microtech can be had for 600-900 easily.
How is this expensive? Isn't the interceptor $1800?
In fact, I know someone selling a brand new in box Microtech LT-8s with harness for $900 shipped.
-shrug-
#39
Go Texas Longhorns!
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
You are not as informed on this subject as you think you are. Your statement is false.
.
.
well please explain then. As far as I can see, and as I stated before, your EMS options are:
1. Complete standalone unit such as a Motec (expensive and not very practical since you lose several features such as Radio, Powersteering and A/C)
2. Reflash - several options are being worked on, none available yet.
3. "piggyback" - ranges from the emanage at the low end to standalone's such as the microtech "Interceptor-x" which control some key engine functions, but still use the stock ecu for others, hence the term "piggyback"
#40
Registered
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
You are not as informed on this subject as you think you are. Your statement is false.
.
.
Why don't you go on to quantify your statement since you apparently know something the rest of the planet doesn't?
#41
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
You're wrong too, you need to think outside the box
for starters, the Astra Racing ECU is neither an external piggyback, standalone, or flash. That's not what I was referring to, but it proves my point.
not sure why you're panties are in such a wad about it though if you want to say that I'm FOS and don't have a clue that's ok but there's no reason to take it so personal
if you think you understand everything RX-8 related known on earth you're kidding yourself though, even I'm not foolish enough to think that ... this site is good but it is not the all inclusive definitive knowledge bank for all things RX-8
for starters, the Astra Racing ECU is neither an external piggyback, standalone, or flash. That's not what I was referring to, but it proves my point.
not sure why you're panties are in such a wad about it though if you want to say that I'm FOS and don't have a clue that's ok but there's no reason to take it so personal
if you think you understand everything RX-8 related known on earth you're kidding yourself though, even I'm not foolish enough to think that ... this site is good but it is not the all inclusive definitive knowledge bank for all things RX-8
#42
#1 Legend
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
for starters, the Astra Racing ECU is neither an external piggyback, standalone, or flash. That's not what I was referring to, but it proves my point.
just curious
-hS
#43
Go Texas Longhorns!
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
You're wrong too, you need to think outside the box
for starters, the Astra Racing ECU is neither an external piggyback, standalone, or flash. That's not what I was referring to, but it proves my point.
not sure why you're panties are in such a wad about it though if you want to say that I'm FOS and don't have a clue that's ok but there's no reason to take it so personal
if you think you understand everything RX-8 related known on earth you're kidding yourself though, even I'm not foolish enough to think that ... this site is good but it is not the all inclusive definitive knowledge bank for all things RX-8
for starters, the Astra Racing ECU is neither an external piggyback, standalone, or flash. That's not what I was referring to, but it proves my point.
not sure why you're panties are in such a wad about it though if you want to say that I'm FOS and don't have a clue that's ok but there's no reason to take it so personal
if you think you understand everything RX-8 related known on earth you're kidding yourself though, even I'm not foolish enough to think that ... this site is good but it is not the all inclusive definitive knowledge bank for all things RX-8
I'm using the term piggyback very loosely to define any PCM modifcation that does not involve a reflash or all out replacement. This may be causing confusion. I don't know a better metaphor for allowing the stock PCM to control certain things while the "piggyback" device controls other key features.
I went to the astra racing site, but I can't find any info on their ECU, therefore, I don't know their ECU strategy. I'm not sure how any modification could fall ouside my three broad categories, but I never claim to be an expert.
#44
Registered
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
You're wrong too, you need to think outside the box
for starters, the Astra Racing ECU is neither an external piggyback, standalone, or flash. That's not what I was referring to, but it proves my point.
for starters, the Astra Racing ECU is neither an external piggyback, standalone, or flash. That's not what I was referring to, but it proves my point.
And here's a direct quote from HFAlex himself:
Originally Posted by hfalex
Yes.
First we have to disconnect the main chip (CPU) from the board, closa e "jumper", then we have to reprogram it. We modify the mapping LUT with a freeware sw that can be also downloaded from my website. The only problem has been the checksums, but a Milan based company fixed thi problem. Thats it.
About tha MAF sensor, i read a lot of people think it is the mai problem, but i don't understand why since we had no problem to manage absolute pressures up to 2 bar just only with a few little changes.
First we have to disconnect the main chip (CPU) from the board, closa e "jumper", then we have to reprogram it. We modify the mapping LUT with a freeware sw that can be also downloaded from my website. The only problem has been the checksums, but a Milan based company fixed thi problem. Thats it.
About tha MAF sensor, i read a lot of people think it is the mai problem, but i don't understand why since we had no problem to manage absolute pressures up to 2 bar just only with a few little changes.
#45
Go Texas Longhorns!
Originally Posted by Ajax
Last time I talked to hfalex from astra about their ECU modification, it actually was a flash. They removed the actual ECU EEPROM from the board, put it onto a flash board that they either created or acquired and reprogram the ECU and then put it back in the car.
And here's a direct quote from HFAlex himself:
And here's a direct quote from HFAlex himself:
This could be considered a "fourth option", but no a very realistic one from a consumer standpoint.
#46
Registered
Originally Posted by brillo
Ok, I did think about this afterthefact, but this has to be the harest way to go about this from a consumer perspective, therefore I didn't really want to count it.
This could be considered a "fourth option", but no a very realistic one from a consumer standpoint.
This could be considered a "fourth option", but no a very realistic one from a consumer standpoint.
I don't know what is involved in removing the CPU, but I doubt it's that complicated. The worst case situation would be desoldering the actual chip from the board. Best case situation is the CPU is on its own board and you just disconnect that board, close a jumper and the board itself is then used to program the CPU with whatever map you want. Getting that map right = the trick.
#47
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its not exactly a flash though because they are not altering the OEM fuel tables - instead placing their own code in the processor to overide the factory fuel tables...
... from what i gather anyway
... from what i gather anyway
#49
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay, so rather than start a new thread I resurrected this one...has anyone actually used or know of anyone that has used the Utec? It's cheaper than the interceptor and appears to have the same capabilities...
#50
Originally Posted by Red Devil
Okay, so rather than start a new thread I resurrected this one...has anyone actually used or know of anyone that has used the Utec? It's cheaper than the interceptor and appears to have the same capabilities...