Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Point of no return for FI?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-01-2009 | 01:51 AM
  #26  
chickenwafer's Avatar
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
From: Denver
You guys make it sound like you only get a few days of enjoyment with your FI setup before you are pulling the motor. That is simply not the case.

With a solid tune, responsible driving and good maintenance, a properly turbo'ed/supercharged Renesis can last for 30,000+ miles. The truth is we've have solid engine management (Cobb AP) for how long now? Once the Cobb is out there for more years, the tuning is perfected, I'm confident we can see higher mileage FI Renny's.

Will an NA Renesis outlast an FI Renesis? More than likely. But I lost a motor NA due to no fault of my own at 46,000 miles so I'd rather enjoy those miles buy producing double the factory power output instead of worrying
Old 02-01-2009 | 03:31 AM
  #27  
laythor's Avatar
I zoom therefore I am.
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,919
Likes: 12
From: San Jose, CA
I think people misunderstand the difference between "increased chance" and "assured chance" of engine failure.

Going FI increases your chance of an engine failure because there are things you can do wrong that will cause this. Going FI in no way assures you of a greater chance of engine failure then staying NA.
Old 02-01-2009 | 04:43 PM
  #28  
Red Rex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
All valid points guys.

FI crushes piston engines in terms of mechanical error pretty quick. But come on. We have no valves to float, no rods to warp, and no pistons to melt. It all depends on the tune and how much effort you're willing to take care of your ride.

When was the last time anyone checked the fluid levels in their batteries hmm? Car maintenance goes beyond checking your oil and tire pressure once a week. This I think is the main reason the RX8 has an unreliable reputation. Not many people are willing to put forth the effort to maintain their cars while naturally aspirated, and even fewer do it right when force fed.
Old 02-01-2009 | 04:50 PM
  #29  
Red Rex's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
BTW I couldn't find the leak. I snipped my questionable vacuum hose at the crack and zip-tied it on tight. After a quick wash I drove around to see if there was any change. Only stayed on primary ports but still drives like a champ. Bogus CEL. Now I'm going to kick back and enjoy the rest of my 20th bday =p

Last edited by Red Rex; 02-01-2009 at 04:57 PM.
Old 02-02-2009 | 12:34 AM
  #30  
chickenwafer's Avatar
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Originally Posted by Red Rex
When was the last time anyone checked the fluid levels in their batteries hmm?
Never. Sealed gel battery FTW.

But you are right. The RX-8 gets a bad rap thanks to soccer moms and teenies that have no clue about the upkeep required for a rotary.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hunterkelley24
Series I Engine Tuning Forum
14
06-14-2022 09:32 AM
poacherinthezoo
RX-8 Discussion
4
08-04-2016 12:01 AM
projectr13b
RX-8 Racing
20
05-14-2016 07:25 PM
Jazzmeson
RX-8 Multimedia/Photo Gallery
11
03-02-2016 03:25 PM
cliffkemp
Series I Trouble Shooting
7
10-04-2015 12:11 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:54 PM.