Ported renesis engine plus a 150 n2o shot will land me 350rwhp non-turbo..
#76
Originally Posted by Vrimmick
I know he did. 70 hp is way too much even for an air storm. Proper porting will do the trick though well.... hopefully. It sounds like porting is the best tuning method to get significant hp increase and it maybe hell of a good idea for FI applications, provided that side seal problem is a real issue here.
411-334 = 77?
This all confuses me, don't take this as an insult man, I'm just not understanding why an engine needs to be fed massive amounts of air to dyno correctly, moreso than while driving. What's the point of using fans? to sell more products? Any info is appreciated. Thanks.
#77
You cannot look at it in absolute values. 77 hp over 334 that is about 22% but 70 hp over 170-180 (what on average we're getting from dynoing rx8) equals roughly 41% - such a gain is unreal. But I am sure that 20% more can be squeezed from rx8 and that would equal 35hp bringing whp to 200-210. Why it needs air to release all the power? WTF knows? I wish I did .......I can only speculate. Perhaps if there is not enough air and the engine is put to stress (high revs) computer retards timing and changes a/f proportions to protect it. Dont worry you will never run out of air while driving it so all the ponies will be pulling on the road... they get lazy on a dyno though
I remember an article in Car and Driver about the effects of using different octane gas on power. Among tested cars was bmw m3 they could never get any real numbers from a dyno on this car because of the lack of blowing air... so they did not post any results for the bimmer.
BTW what do you mean sell more products? Fans you mean? Dont think mazda really cares about how the fans sell... but then who knows that might be a good point
I remember an article in Car and Driver about the effects of using different octane gas on power. Among tested cars was bmw m3 they could never get any real numbers from a dyno on this car because of the lack of blowing air... so they did not post any results for the bimmer.
BTW what do you mean sell more products? Fans you mean? Dont think mazda really cares about how the fans sell... but then who knows that might be a good point
Last edited by Vrimmick; 11-09-2004 at 09:26 PM.
#79
Originally Posted by BOOSTD 7
Fortunately it's usually other people's motors that I blow ... fortunately for me that is :D
#80
Errr...to everyone above, the point about the fans wasn't "let's simulate how air would be rammed into the motor at highway speeds, maybe that's why power is missing".
The point was: apparently the BWM (our car too, maybe) can sense that the airflow is not matching up with the apparent MPH, so it cuts back on the fuel or timing or what have you. So maybe we won't see an honest, 100% bone stock RX-8 making ~ 200 rwhp until someone runs the car on a 4 wheel dyno with big fans. [/wishful thinking]
Either that, or we're actually only getting 215 or so at the crank, so 180 rwhp is actually accurate. If that's the case, then jumping to 242 rwhp is....absolutely unholy. (Or, we're making 238 even during dyno testing, but our transmissions are lubricated with wood glue and pencil shavings.)
The point was: apparently the BWM (our car too, maybe) can sense that the airflow is not matching up with the apparent MPH, so it cuts back on the fuel or timing or what have you. So maybe we won't see an honest, 100% bone stock RX-8 making ~ 200 rwhp until someone runs the car on a 4 wheel dyno with big fans. [/wishful thinking]
Either that, or we're actually only getting 215 or so at the crank, so 180 rwhp is actually accurate. If that's the case, then jumping to 242 rwhp is....absolutely unholy. (Or, we're making 238 even during dyno testing, but our transmissions are lubricated with wood glue and pencil shavings.)
Last edited by BaronVonBigmeat; 11-09-2004 at 10:32 PM.
#81
Originally Posted by Vrimmick
Sarcasm? No. No air - no power. BMW tuner Dinan showed different power outputs depending on the amount of air being blown on the car while dynoing. They used a 470hp Dinan's M5 (415 expected at the wheels). It put out only 334hp whp on a dyno without blowing air and closed hood. Open the hood and turn on a small shop fan blowing air at 10mph and the number goes up to 371hp at wheels. Still not there. Start a $7000 electric fan that blasts air at 75mph and you'll see big 411 whp. So basically without a wind tunnel or an efficient blower there is no way to measure real hp on a dyno. And even if you take the engine out, the computer won't be fooled and without blowing air it wont show you its full potential. I bet you $50 that is the case with RX8. I wonder if anybody ever tried it.
But I'm willing to admit that you right that sticking the 8 on that particular Dyno would yield a close to real world HP number, but it still won’t be exact. For me it’s enough that I know that a 3100-3200lbs car can run a 14.5@94MPH under a hp calculator that’s putting about 197-205 to the wheels which makes me happy. ITS JUST A DAMN #'!!!!
I also fail to see how and I fail too see how the windtunnel Dyno is pertinent to Mr.P&P's testing?.... He dyno'd his stock 8 before he did his porting and he got a 197 once and 184 another time. Then he worked his magic and he dyno’d again and got 242..... As a comparative tool especially if done on the same day nothing beats a Dyno......
#82
Originally Posted by BaronVonBigmeat
Errr...to everyone above, the point about the fans wasn't "let's simulate how air would be rammed into the motor at highway speeds, maybe that's why power is missing".
The point was: apparently the BWM (our car too, maybe) can sense that the airflow is not matching up with the apparent MPH, so it cuts back on the fuel or timing or what have you. So maybe we won't see an honest, 100% bone stock RX-8 making ~ 200 rwhp until someone runs the car on a 4 wheel dyno with big fans. [/wishful thinking]
Either that, or we're actually only getting 215 or so at the crank, so 180 rwhp is actually accurate. If that's the case, then jumping to 242 rwhp is....absolutely unholy. (Or, we're making 238 even during dyno testing, but our transmissions are lubricated with wood glue and pencil shavings.)
The point was: apparently the BWM (our car too, maybe) can sense that the airflow is not matching up with the apparent MPH, so it cuts back on the fuel or timing or what have you. So maybe we won't see an honest, 100% bone stock RX-8 making ~ 200 rwhp until someone runs the car on a 4 wheel dyno with big fans. [/wishful thinking]
Either that, or we're actually only getting 215 or so at the crank, so 180 rwhp is actually accurate. If that's the case, then jumping to 242 rwhp is....absolutely unholy. (Or, we're making 238 even during dyno testing, but our transmissions are lubricated with wood glue and pencil shavings.)
Ohh, ok that makes more sense, I was not understand the whole fan thing.
#83
Originally Posted by Vrimmick
You cannot look at it in absolute values. 77 hp over 334 that is about 22% but 70 hp over 170-180 (what on average we're getting from dynoing rx8) equals roughly 41% - such a gain is unreal. But I am sure that 20% more can be squeezed from rx8 and that would equal 35hp bringing whp to 200-210. Why it needs air to release all the power? WTF knows? I wish I did .......I can only speculate. Perhaps if there is not enough air and the engine is put to stress (high revs) computer retards timing and changes a/f proportions to protect it. Dont worry you will never run out of air while driving it so all the ponies will be pulling on the road... they get lazy on a dyno though
I remember an article in Car and Driver about the effects of using different octane gas on power. Among tested cars was bmw m3 they could never get any real numbers from a dyno on this car because of the lack of blowing air... so they did not post any results for the bimmer.
BTW what do you mean sell more products? Fans you mean? Dont think mazda really cares about how the fans sell... but then who knows that might be a good point
I remember an article in Car and Driver about the effects of using different octane gas on power. Among tested cars was bmw m3 they could never get any real numbers from a dyno on this car because of the lack of blowing air... so they did not post any results for the bimmer.
BTW what do you mean sell more products? Fans you mean? Dont think mazda really cares about how the fans sell... but then who knows that might be a good point
I get it now. What I meant about selling more products, was that say a company is dynoing a product. They then use a fan to make the gains seem bigger, thus making their bogus product seem much better than it is. I made this assumption before I understood what you meant about the fans. I thought this was universal among cars which is why I was confused. Now that Baron explained that the ecu senses little to no airflow I understand it and most of my questions don't make much sense. Sorry for all of the confusion.
#84
Originally Posted by PoLaK
I also fail to see how and I fail too see how the windtunnel Dyno is pertinent to Mr.P&P's testing?.... He dyno'd his stock 8 before he did his porting and he got a 197 once and 184 another time. Then he worked his magic and he dyno’d again and got 242..... As a comparative tool especially if done on the same day nothing beats a Dyno......
#85
what if the air tunnel dyno was also in a big cooler like at a meat packing plant and we could also have a dehumidifier there too. cold, dry, 200mph wind blowing at the car on a 4wheel dyno. yeah and then we could...
#87
Originally Posted by Vrimmick
Well that was just a joke... not funny?
Or are you a non believer in the HP he made?
Originally Posted by zoom44
what if the air tunnel dyno was also in a big cooler like at a meat packing plant and we could also have a dehumidifier there too. cold, dry, 200mph wind blowing at the car on a 4wheel dyno. yeah and then we could...
#88
Originally Posted by BOOSTD 7
Fortunately it's usually other people's motors that I blow ... fortunately for me that is :D
#89
exactly my point polak- i was being silly because the dyno topic is silly. you can change a number of things about the conditions you dyno in and get a different number with each change. whats the point? dyno your car on the same dyno with as close to the same conditions as possible each time you dyno. the percentage increase or decrease is alot better to go by than just the number. also looking at the charts to see where in the band the power was made.
#90
Originally Posted by zoom44
exactly my point polak- i was being silly because the dyno topic is silly. you can change a number of things about the conditions you dyno in and get a different number with each change. whats the point? dyno your car on the same dyno with as close to the same conditions as possible each time you dyno. the percentage increase or decrease is alot better to go by than just the number. also looking at the charts to see where in the band the power was made.
#91
Mr. Port & Polish were are you installing the n2o hose thats send the juice in to the car,i know charles hooks his up to the rubber piece thats attached to the air cleaner.would you reccomend any other place.
#95
Originally Posted by Kari
350RWHP? I am sure he is adding additional fuel somewhere as a rotary needs about 4 850CC injectors to handle that much HP.
#97
Originally Posted by Kari
350RWHP? I am sure he is adding additional fuel somewhere as a rotary needs about 4 850CC injectors to handle that much HP.
#98
To do it the easy way you could just use an additional injector controller that doesn't touch the stock fuel or ecu systems. An additional fuel line with it's own dedicated pump could be used for this system. The factory ecu would never see it.
#100
Originally Posted by rotarygod
To do it the easy way you could just use an additional injector controller that doesn't touch the stock fuel or ecu systems. An additional fuel line with it's own dedicated pump could be used for this system. The factory ecu would never see it.