Racecar a`la Rx-8.
#29
Originally Posted by shaunv74
Any way you can post a graph of HP and tq in ftlbs for us knuckle draggers in the states?
Though I would strongly agree with RG - the powerband on this kit isn't street friendly.
#30
Originally Posted by Lasse wankel
Nice pic,s Lennart! It shall be interestnig to see who,s the fastest on Friday at Mantorp Park track!? Humm....
/Lasse
/Lasse
#31
Is this the stage 1 or stage 2 kit? Looks really impressive, I've been waiting for a SC system for years and it doesn't looks like any of the others are close to release. And I think I'd prefer a kit that kicks in around 4k, I see very little use for boost below 4k rpm.
#32
Originally Posted by RX-Hawk
Is this the stage 1 or stage 2 kit? Looks really impressive, I've been waiting for a SC system for years and it doesn't looks like any of the others are close to release. And I think I'd prefer a kit that kicks in around 4k, I see very little use for boost below 4k rpm.
#33
Originally Posted by RX-Hawk
Is this the stage 1 or stage 2 kit? Looks really impressive, I've been waiting for a SC system for years and it doesn't looks like any of the others are close to release. And I think I'd prefer a kit that kicks in around 4k, I see very little use for boost below 4k rpm.
My car is a "racecar" not street legal so I have no use under 5k anyway.
#35
Originally Posted by rotarygod
Most of your daily driving is under 4500 rpm. You'll lose gas mileage like crazy. I've never been a fan of centrifugal superchargers so admittedly I am biased against them. The dynos show why though. Performance is not about peak horsepower. Average horsepower is faster and centrifugals don't have nearly as much average horsepower as the peak would imply. I'd personally rather sacrifice 30 peak horsepower to get a wider and stronger average powerband. I guarantee it would be faster.
#38
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Originally Posted by Lennart
It`s stage 2 kit. The kit has been there for a couple of years. (In AUS.)
My car is a "racecar" not street legal so I have no use under 5k anyway.
My car is a "racecar" not street legal so I have no use under 5k anyway.
What about some other specs: type of dampers, maybe spring rates, brakes, etc...
#39
Car looks nice. But I have some real problems with your graphs.
I haven't time right now and I will get back on this today.
Just to get you guys thinking let's start with a 120% power increase from 10 psi manifold pressure. Or Pr of 1.68.
I'd buy 55% if eveything were done right.
I have more questions but you guys know how fast I type.
I haven't time right now and I will get back on this today.
Just to get you guys thinking let's start with a 120% power increase from 10 psi manifold pressure. Or Pr of 1.68.
I'd buy 55% if eveything were done right.
I have more questions but you guys know how fast I type.
#40
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBalrog
myriadshalaks whats your mpg? How many miles per tank?
#43
Originally Posted by Richard Paul
Car looks nice. But I have some real problems with your graphs.
I haven't time right now and I will get back on this today.
Just to get you guys thinking let's start with a 120% power increase from 10 psi manifold pressure. Or Pr of 1.68.
I'd buy 55% if eveything were done right.
I have more questions but you guys know how fast I type.
I haven't time right now and I will get back on this today.
Just to get you guys thinking let's start with a 120% power increase from 10 psi manifold pressure. Or Pr of 1.68.
I'd buy 55% if eveything were done right.
I have more questions but you guys know how fast I type.
#46
Originally Posted by myriadshalaks
really? I hardly get out of 2nd in daily driving. and i am almost always above 5k rpm. who shifts at 4k, honestly?
#47
Originally Posted by Richard Paul
Car looks nice. But I have some real problems with your graphs.
I haven't time right now and I will get back on this today.
Just to get you guys thinking let's start with a 120% power increase from 10 psi manifold pressure. Or Pr of 1.68.
I'd buy 55% if eveything were done right.
I have more questions but you guys know how fast I type.
I haven't time right now and I will get back on this today.
Just to get you guys thinking let's start with a 120% power increase from 10 psi manifold pressure. Or Pr of 1.68.
I'd buy 55% if eveything were done right.
I have more questions but you guys know how fast I type.
#48
OK Fred you want to go there?
Let's take your 100 HP engine that was detuned from 200 HP.
In order to do that you had to give it less valve timing, less compression, smaller ports and slow it down.
Then in order to base your new found power on the potential power you first need to bring all those factors back to the high power tune.
Our instant case did no such thing, he only put the SC on and an exhaust.
So where did he get 120% increase from 10 psi boost?
Was it the exhaust or the sparkplug wires?
Everyone wants to know so they can get out there before the store runs out of sparkplug wires.
I don't know where your 250hp engine came from but the only ones I saw were 219 and 221 at the flywheel. You know where that was and you know they are honest. Then we know that Hymee tried with headers and a Motec and never got 230. You know they had control of all the tuning and the people running the dyno facility know rotarys.
Would you like to go back to basic airflow and figure it out from there? We have that info also.
Listen I'm all for someone getting good power out of these things because that means I can do it too. I applaud these guys for doing what they did, I just can't let some shop get away with pouring BS on with a cement mixer.
There is someone over here tonight that can type so if you think we should do all the math then I'll get her in here and go at it.
Other then all that how are things in Texas?
Someone contacted me today wanting an Rx7 kit, Maybe you might want to build those. I can't even say if the brackets work.
Let's take your 100 HP engine that was detuned from 200 HP.
In order to do that you had to give it less valve timing, less compression, smaller ports and slow it down.
Then in order to base your new found power on the potential power you first need to bring all those factors back to the high power tune.
Our instant case did no such thing, he only put the SC on and an exhaust.
So where did he get 120% increase from 10 psi boost?
Was it the exhaust or the sparkplug wires?
Everyone wants to know so they can get out there before the store runs out of sparkplug wires.
I don't know where your 250hp engine came from but the only ones I saw were 219 and 221 at the flywheel. You know where that was and you know they are honest. Then we know that Hymee tried with headers and a Motec and never got 230. You know they had control of all the tuning and the people running the dyno facility know rotarys.
Would you like to go back to basic airflow and figure it out from there? We have that info also.
Listen I'm all for someone getting good power out of these things because that means I can do it too. I applaud these guys for doing what they did, I just can't let some shop get away with pouring BS on with a cement mixer.
There is someone over here tonight that can type so if you think we should do all the math then I'll get her in here and go at it.
Other then all that how are things in Texas?
Someone contacted me today wanting an Rx7 kit, Maybe you might want to build those. I can't even say if the brackets work.
#49