Ran a 5.3s in 0-60 MPH with GReddy, is it possible?
#1
Thread Starter
05 Champ Car Test Driver
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB - Canada
Ran a 5.3s in 0-60 MPH with GReddy, is it possible?
Today I ran a 5.30 s from 0-60 mph, i am using the greddy turbo at almost 7 psi, held constant at 5.2 psi from 5K up. Did a couple of runs in high 5's (5.7-5.8), but there was this run where I had an almost perfect launch (the tyres barely spun and got traction) and I saw a 5.3s. Also did some 1/4 miles run in mid 14's but those are the ones in which I did 5.8s in 0-60, the one in which i did 5.3 could not complete the 1/4 mile because i got some traffic in front. Yes i am doing it on the road but I make sure the pavement is as flat as possible. I know about a good place to do these runs. Before the turbo I was running consistent in the mid 15's in 1/4 mile and mid 6's from 0-60mph. What do you guys think? Is my Gtech full of crap or is it possible?
#2
Sure it's possible. Best times I see for NA are 5.5 sec. 0-60, 14.5 1/4 miles. A lot of typical runs are about 6.0 sec./15.1's. So 5.3 with a turbo is entirely reasonable. If you are at sea level & conditions are better you might even run lower.
#5
Originally Posted by JeRKy 8 Owner
Riiiiiight.....
#6
Originally Posted by Fanman
We had a poster on here (Deuse) that ran a 14.5 in Vegas....stock. It depends on which track you are at. If it is new, & traction is good, it is very possible. Do you think that the magazines did not run this time ? Maybe they helped the RX8 out a bit but making it shorter or something ? Also, when they got this time they tested the S2000 & 350Z on the same test. Just because you can't do it, doesn;t mean somebody else can't.
#7
Originally Posted by JeRKy 8 Owner
The magazines I remember reading all claimed 60 in 5.9 and quarter in 14.5. Where are you getting 5.5 from?
#9
Originally Posted by Fanman
We had a poster on here (Deuse) that ran a 14.5 in Vegas....stock. It depends on which track you are at. If it is new, & traction is good, it is very possible. Do you think that the magazines did not run this time ? Maybe they helped the RX8 out a bit but making it shorter or something ? Also, when they got this time they tested the S2000 & 350Z on the same test. Just because you can't do it, doesn;t mean somebody else can't.
#10
Originally Posted by Fanman
OK fine, 5.8 to 6.1 sec. 0-60 (simple transposition of the #'s from the S2000), but the 14.5 sec. is good to go.
In fact there'd probably be a lot fewer complaints here about the RX-8's acceleration if this were the case.
#11
Originally Posted by JeRKy 8 Owner
But it's not just "OK fine" man. If our cars were doing 60 in 5.5 seconds stock, then we'd be neck to neck with the all the car's competition...the s2000, 350z, SRT-4, and so on..
In fact there'd probably be a lot fewer complaints here about the RX-8's acceleration if this were the case.
In fact there'd probably be a lot fewer complaints here about the RX-8's acceleration if this were the case.
Of course we would like a 5.5 sec. 0-60 (which equates to a 14 flat 1/4 mile). That's a given but like you pointed out it doesn't do that.
All I'm saying is with the Greddy Turbo it can get down to a 5.3 sec. 0-60. If you want to complain about a 5.9 sec. 0-50 time then direct your frustration to Mazda, not me.
#12
a modded non FI car(catback, hiflow cat/mp, intake, pulleys, flywheel, tuning) could possibly do 5.5 with a good launch but 100% stock i dont believe this car could do a tick faster than 5.8/5.9. my guess is the average is probably 6.2
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimmyBlack
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades
273
02-10-2020 10:23 PM