Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Ran a 5.3s in 0-60 MPH with GReddy, is it possible?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-03-2005 | 03:48 AM
  #1  
Lschiavo's Avatar
Thread Starter
05 Champ Car Test Driver
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB - Canada
Ran a 5.3s in 0-60 MPH with GReddy, is it possible?

Today I ran a 5.30 s from 0-60 mph, i am using the greddy turbo at almost 7 psi, held constant at 5.2 psi from 5K up. Did a couple of runs in high 5's (5.7-5.8), but there was this run where I had an almost perfect launch (the tyres barely spun and got traction) and I saw a 5.3s. Also did some 1/4 miles run in mid 14's but those are the ones in which I did 5.8s in 0-60, the one in which i did 5.3 could not complete the 1/4 mile because i got some traffic in front. Yes i am doing it on the road but I make sure the pavement is as flat as possible. I know about a good place to do these runs. Before the turbo I was running consistent in the mid 15's in 1/4 mile and mid 6's from 0-60mph. What do you guys think? Is my Gtech full of crap or is it possible?
Old 07-03-2005 | 04:51 AM
  #2  
Fanman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, CA
Sure it's possible. Best times I see for NA are 5.5 sec. 0-60, 14.5 1/4 miles. A lot of typical runs are about 6.0 sec./15.1's. So 5.3 with a turbo is entirely reasonable. If you are at sea level & conditions are better you might even run lower.
Old 07-25-2005 | 04:18 PM
  #3  
JeRKy 8 Owner's Avatar
Stuck in a love triangle
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 3
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by Fanman
Sure it's possible. Best times I see for NA are 5.5 sec. 0-60, 14.5 1/4 miles.

Riiiiiight.....
Old 07-25-2005 | 04:20 PM
  #4  
Gambit's Avatar
Screw gas mileage
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 1
From: Marlton, NJ
he didn't say they were stock
Old 07-25-2005 | 04:25 PM
  #5  
Fanman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, CA
Originally Posted by JeRKy 8 Owner
Riiiiiight.....
We had a poster on here (Deuse) that ran a 14.5 in Vegas....stock. It depends on which track you are at. If it is new, & traction is good, it is very possible. Do you think that the magazines did not run this time ? Maybe they helped the RX8 out a bit but making it shorter or something ? Also, when they got this time they tested the S2000 & 350Z on the same test. Just because you can't do it, doesn;t mean somebody else can't.
Old 07-25-2005 | 04:35 PM
  #6  
JeRKy 8 Owner's Avatar
Stuck in a love triangle
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 3
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by Fanman
We had a poster on here (Deuse) that ran a 14.5 in Vegas....stock. It depends on which track you are at. If it is new, & traction is good, it is very possible. Do you think that the magazines did not run this time ? Maybe they helped the RX8 out a bit but making it shorter or something ? Also, when they got this time they tested the S2000 & 350Z on the same test. Just because you can't do it, doesn;t mean somebody else can't.
The magazines I remember reading all claimed 60 in 5.9 and quarter in 14.5. Where are you getting 5.5 from?
Old 07-25-2005 | 07:30 PM
  #7  
Fanman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, CA
Originally Posted by JeRKy 8 Owner
The magazines I remember reading all claimed 60 in 5.9 and quarter in 14.5. Where are you getting 5.5 from?
OK fine, 5.8 to 6.1 sec. 0-60 (simple transposition of the #'s from the S2000), but the 14.5 sec. is good to go. As for him asking if 5.3 sec. can be done. Yes, it can. That equates out to about a 13.7-13.8 in the 1/4 mile. He's already right there.
Old 07-25-2005 | 07:47 PM
  #8  
nolarx8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Hell Yes
Old 07-25-2005 | 11:04 PM
  #9  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Fanman
We had a poster on here (Deuse) that ran a 14.5 in Vegas....stock. It depends on which track you are at. If it is new, & traction is good, it is very possible. Do you think that the magazines did not run this time ? Maybe they helped the RX8 out a bit but making it shorter or something ? Also, when they got this time they tested the S2000 & 350Z on the same test. Just because you can't do it, doesn;t mean somebody else can't.
He also claimed he ran it in nasty heat @99mph with a 1.9 60', he's full of crap.
Old 07-26-2005 | 07:42 PM
  #10  
JeRKy 8 Owner's Avatar
Stuck in a love triangle
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 3
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by Fanman
OK fine, 5.8 to 6.1 sec. 0-60 (simple transposition of the #'s from the S2000), but the 14.5 sec. is good to go.
But it's not just "OK fine" man. If our cars were doing 60 in 5.5 seconds stock, then we'd be neck to neck with the all the car's competition...the s2000, 350z, SRT-4, and so on..

In fact there'd probably be a lot fewer complaints here about the RX-8's acceleration if this were the case.
Old 07-26-2005 | 07:47 PM
  #11  
Fanman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
From: Glendale, CA
Originally Posted by JeRKy 8 Owner
But it's not just "OK fine" man. If our cars were doing 60 in 5.5 seconds stock, then we'd be neck to neck with the all the car's competition...the s2000, 350z, SRT-4, and so on..

In fact there'd probably be a lot fewer complaints here about the RX-8's acceleration if this were the case.
"OK, fine" in that you are right. Our cars do not do a 5.5 sec. 0-60, but the original statement was it did a 5.5 sec. 0-60 & 14.5 sec. 1/4 mile time. The 5.5 sec. 0-60 was a mistake, the 14.5 sec. time is correct.

Of course we would like a 5.5 sec. 0-60 (which equates to a 14 flat 1/4 mile). That's a given but like you pointed out it doesn't do that.

All I'm saying is with the Greddy Turbo it can get down to a 5.3 sec. 0-60. If you want to complain about a 5.9 sec. 0-50 time then direct your frustration to Mazda, not me.
Old 07-29-2005 | 11:33 PM
  #12  
StealthFox's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
a modded non FI car(catback, hiflow cat/mp, intake, pulleys, flywheel, tuning) could possibly do 5.5 with a good launch but 100% stock i dont believe this car could do a tick faster than 5.8/5.9. my guess is the average is probably 6.2
Old 07-29-2005 | 11:46 PM
  #13  
Baller's Avatar
Chicks dig me!
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: What Happens in Vegas, Stays in Vegas!
nice
Old 08-04-2005 | 01:36 AM
  #14  
hai's Avatar
hai
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
think it would help if we just had better time management? That way, we wouldn't have the need to be in such a rush? Normally, i'd just leave slightly earlier.
Old 08-05-2005 | 08:42 AM
  #15  
Rich150001's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Va
Make sure to read the instructions on your gtech. You must make sure its in the center of your car, the ground is flat, and the unit is perfectly even. Atleast thats what my gtech pro says.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimmyBlack
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades
273
02-10-2020 10:23 PM
mdl0209
Series I Trouble Shooting
14
05-23-2019 05:46 PM
projectr13b
RX-8 Racing
20
05-14-2016 06:25 PM
Brokegang
New Member Forum
27
01-03-2016 12:45 PM
Jonesboy2398
New Member Forum
4
09-13-2015 05:28 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Ran a 5.3s in 0-60 MPH with GReddy, is it possible?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 AM.