Relocation of MAFS on Turbo Applications
#1
Thread Starter
Apexing at Oak Tree
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: The Blue, Educated State in the North
Relocation of MAFS on Turbo Applications
Has anyone with a turbo relocated the MAFS to the post intercooler side of the system (i.e. right in front of the throttle body or there abouts). It seems the MAFS would get a better reading of exactly what is going into the engine at that point. However, I searched and didn't see anything on this, so there must be a reason why nobody (or not many people) have done it. Ideas?
#3
I remember on some other cars people tried this but the MAF sensors were too fragile and broke in the compressed air stream. I don't know how fragile the RX-8 MAF is, but at under 14 pounds for more people, that isn't a boat load of boost. I think the situation I remember was around 25 pounds of boost people were running that MAFs broke.
#4
You'll just have to adjust the fuel maps slightly because the car will be a little rich. So far it has worked great...
Chris.....Esmeril
#5
Thread Starter
Apexing at Oak Tree
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: The Blue, Educated State in the North
this is all good feedback. The next question is, has anyone done it with the GReddy kit. I've not seen a kit where there is a MAFS bung on the pipe right before the throttle body. How did you guys do it? Custom pipe and bung?
#8
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
I was discussing this with tdiddy the last time we ran into one another at a meet. If I go the custom turbo route some day, I might just save myself the hassle and use the MS CAI as it already incorporates the MAF on a 3" tube in the very location everyone is discussing. Really, though, this will be dependent on Cobb's recommendation after they release the Accessport.
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
^That would work, isn't the intake 3.5" tubing like the AEM? The MAF sensor is calibrated for 3.5", so you could use it as is. However, if you mounted it to the 3" pipe on the Greddy kit you would have to tune for it (like Chris has done) or recalibrate it, if Cobb does indeed make it an option. If anyone needs a MAF adapter, let me know, as I can make them for both 3 and 3.5" diameter tubing.
#10
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
^That would work, isn't the intake 3.5" tubing like the AEM? The MAF sensor is calibrated for 3.5", so you could use it as is. However, if you mounted it to the 3" pipe on the Greddy kit you would have to tune for it (like Chris has done) or recalibrate it, if Cobb does indeed make it an option. If anyone needs a MAF adapter, let me know, as I can make them for both 3 and 3.5" diameter tubing.
#11
Yes, the Mazdaspeed intake is 3.5". It could easily be modified to be used with the Pettit supercharger and using part of it could be possible for a custom turbo setup. I don't know if using the MAF mount piece would be easily done though. Notice in the pictures that the MAF mount piece has a slight bend in it. This could be a problem. Also, and probably more important, is the length of the MAF mount piece. It extends past the top cross member at the front of the engine bay. This could be a problem getting the piping from the intercooler to meet in with the MAF mounting piece. I'm sure it could be done but there might be easier ways.
#12
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Yes, the Mazdaspeed intake is 3.5". It could easily be modified to be used with the Pettit supercharger and using part of it could be possible for a custom turbo setup. I don't know if using the MAF mount piece would be easily done though. Notice in the pictures that the MAF mount piece has a slight bend in it. This could be a problem. Also, and probably more important, is the length of the MAF mount piece. It extends past the top cross member at the front of the engine bay. This could be a problem getting the piping from the intercooler to meet in with the MAF mounting piece. I'm sure it could be done but there might be easier ways.
One of his earlier pictures in the initial stages, but the idea is transparent:
https://www.rx8club.com/attachment.p...5&d=1160961612
For that matter, I'd still like to figure out some way to Vmount an intercooler. I'm just not comfortable with a FMIC on a rotary.
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
#14
We relocate the MAF right before the TB on our SFR turbo system.We made a custom MAF housing with screens in it as we found out that running this MAF without screens, right before the TB, lead to some erratic idle issues.
#15
Hmmm...what I'd had in mind from time to time was to run from the intercooler and attach to the MS/Maf mount like how Rotorocks did his rear mount turbo...probably relocate the battery to the trunk and place the intake filter there to lead down to the turbo. Though that location might be horrible for sucking in hot air from the engine bay, but no worse then the GReddy location.
One of his earlier pictures in the initial stages, but the idea is transparent:
https://www.rx8club.com/attachment.p...5&d=1160961612
For that matter, I'd still like to figure out some way to Vmount an intercooler. I'm just not comfortable with a FMIC on a rotary.
One of his earlier pictures in the initial stages, but the idea is transparent:
https://www.rx8club.com/attachment.p...5&d=1160961612
For that matter, I'd still like to figure out some way to Vmount an intercooler. I'm just not comfortable with a FMIC on a rotary.
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
That's a good point, Tim. I bought a 304 stainless sample pack (part#92405T15) from McMaster.com and found the "30x30x.010" to work best for my setup.
#17
I experimented with the MAF in both positions and I found no benefit to having it post-compressor.
In theory, it would eliminate vented volume errors, but since I didn't have those to begin with, this benefit did not outweigh the consequences.
Erratic idle was persistent. Adding screens may have improved this, but I wasn't particularly sanguine about having all of that obstruction post compressor.
Having the IAT post compressor is a good idea, however.
In theory, it would eliminate vented volume errors, but since I didn't have those to begin with, this benefit did not outweigh the consequences.
Erratic idle was persistent. Adding screens may have improved this, but I wasn't particularly sanguine about having all of that obstruction post compressor.
Having the IAT post compressor is a good idea, however.
#18
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
I experimented with the MAF in both positions and I found no benefit to having it post-compressor.
In theory, it would eliminate vented volume errors, but since I didn't have those to begin with, this benefit did not outweigh the consequences.
Erratic idle was persistent. Adding screens may have improved this, but I wasn't particularly sanguine about having all of that obstruction post compressor.
Having the IAT post compressor is a good idea, however.
In theory, it would eliminate vented volume errors, but since I didn't have those to begin with, this benefit did not outweigh the consequences.
Erratic idle was persistent. Adding screens may have improved this, but I wasn't particularly sanguine about having all of that obstruction post compressor.
Having the IAT post compressor is a good idea, however.
edit: seems many factory turbo cars, are locating the IAT pre turbo, never really got that logic myself as it would seem I'd want to favor reading the charge temps post intercooler...
#19
#20
Thread Starter
Apexing at Oak Tree
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: The Blue, Educated State in the North
Thanks for all the input. The solution Synaptic3 is going with is using the blue MAFS mounting tube that comes with the Racing Beat kit. We are going to cut the pipe that comes up to the throttle body and insert the Racing Beat tube with silocone couplers there. Now clearly it would add quite a bit of complexity to put one of the screens in there before the MAFS. Also, would the airflow through the MAFS be as erratic post turbo/intercooler as it would directly post air filter like in an N/A application?
And please excuse my ignorance, but what is IAT?
And please excuse my ignorance, but what is IAT?
#21
The idle could be considerably more erratic since the air is "chopped" by the turbo.
The pipe diameter is also not a minor consideration. It is very difficult to "recalibrate" for the incorrect sizing of the charge pipe.
IAT = Intake Air Temperature sensor.
The pipe diameter is also not a minor consideration. It is very difficult to "recalibrate" for the incorrect sizing of the charge pipe.
IAT = Intake Air Temperature sensor.
#22
Thread Starter
Apexing at Oak Tree
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: The Blue, Educated State in the North
The piping diameter for the racing beat MAFS pipe is 3.5" which makes it perfect for this, except the screen issue. I'll have to look into the racing beat setup to see how the screen is in there again.
Anyone else running this?
Last edited by RPIRX-8; 07-27-2007 at 05:11 PM.
#23
Get a thiker mesh with larger cells, if you worry about it breaking.
#24
Thread Starter
Apexing at Oak Tree
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: The Blue, Educated State in the North
as MM put it - "chopper" air, probably would not be to big of an issue past intercooler. The air will have plenty of time to get "back together", however you may probably want to keep it away from the BOV somewhere.
Get a thiker mesh with larger cells, if you worry about it breaking.
Get a thiker mesh with larger cells, if you worry about it breaking.
#25
Unless someone can show significant advantage over a properly installed and tuned setup with the MAF before the turbo, this doesn't sound like the relocation effort is worthwhile.
And besides air loss from a non-recirculated BOV, the MAF should read the same either way.
I'd rather have screens on the non compressed air stream too.
And besides air loss from a non-recirculated BOV, the MAF should read the same either way.
I'd rather have screens on the non compressed air stream too.