So my Turbo 8 is back on the road.
#1
So my Turbo 8 is back on the road.
Hey guys. I just got my 8 back this weekend and have about 500 miles on the rebuild. I plan to change the oil soon and figured it would be worth asking what is the suggested weight to run in an 8 with the Greddy Kit.
I also wanted to ask about the BOV setup. I bought the car already together with a blown front rotor. I noticed that the previous owner had a Greddy Type RS installed and is venting to atmosphere. The car is currently tuned on an EMangle Ultimate. Now I know you can sometimes play with the tuning to make the effects of a VTA BOV setup less noticeable on a MAF car, but I am thinking I may be better served by getting a recirculation adapter for the Type RS and switch back to recirculated. Any thoughts or suggestions?
I also wanted to ask about the BOV setup. I bought the car already together with a blown front rotor. I noticed that the previous owner had a Greddy Type RS installed and is venting to atmosphere. The car is currently tuned on an EMangle Ultimate. Now I know you can sometimes play with the tuning to make the effects of a VTA BOV setup less noticeable on a MAF car, but I am thinking I may be better served by getting a recirculation adapter for the Type RS and switch back to recirculated. Any thoughts or suggestions?
#2
I would suggest investing in another form of engine management. The Cobb AP, adaptronics, or mazdaedit are my suggestions. The AP seems to be the weapon of choice for most and is cheapest.
Emanage is a great tuning solution for older cars. It worked wonders on my old boosted project. The rx8's ECU is far more sophisticated and will in time learn it's way around the emanage causing your tune to be useless.
Recirc the BOV as it makes tuning easier and improves drive-ability.
Emanage is a great tuning solution for older cars. It worked wonders on my old boosted project. The rx8's ECU is far more sophisticated and will in time learn it's way around the emanage causing your tune to be useless.
Recirc the BOV as it makes tuning easier and improves drive-ability.
#3
Delete "Adaptronics" from your list, it is also a piggy back (unless you go for a full replacement ECU, in which case there are other challenges and a significantly higher cost). MazdaEdit is also cheaper than the AP unless you get the "pro" license level.
Last edited by RIWWP; 02-17-2014 at 11:27 AM.
#4
While I do plan on upgrading to a better ECU setup in the future (probably AP), it is not in the budget at the moment. My basic concerns right now is with my current tuning solution, would I be better going back to recirculating the BOV. For some reason, I doubt the current EMS system has been tuned to reduce the bad effects of VTA BOV on a MAF system.
#5
I don't think you understood what we are saying. It doesn't matter what you do with the tune now, the factory ECU will slowly correct for any tune you have on it until it's negated completely. If you can't afford to change tuning solutions now, you sure as hell can't afford to replace the engine tomorrow. Park the car until you can replace the EManage. You are literally just wasting money or time trying to tune the EManage.
But yes, go back to a recirc, you are going to need that regardless of tuning solution unless you convert to MAP based tuning instead of MAF based, which I believe requires a standalone ECU replacement.
But yes, go back to a recirc, you are going to need that regardless of tuning solution unless you convert to MAP based tuning instead of MAF based, which I believe requires a standalone ECU replacement.
#6
I don't think you understood what we are saying. It doesn't matter what you do with the tune now, the factory ECU will slowly correct for any tune you have on it until it's negated completely. If you can't afford to change tuning solutions now, you sure as hell can't afford to replace the engine tomorrow. Park the car until you can replace the EManage. You are literally just wasting money or time trying to tune the EManage.
But yes, go back to a recirc, you are going to need that regardless of tuning solution unless you convert to MAP based tuning instead of MAF based, which I believe requires a standalone ECU replacement.
But yes, go back to a recirc, you are going to need that regardless of tuning solution unless you convert to MAP based tuning instead of MAF based, which I believe requires a standalone ECU replacement.
I thank you for your input. I understand the EMangle (note how I spelled it in my first post ) is a pretty poor engine solution. I know over time the factory ECU corrects around the modifications the piggyback attempts to throw in there. I have 0% intention of tuning the Emangle in any way, shape, or form. I definitely plan to replace the EMS setup in the foreseeable future (probably this fall). However, having just shelled out the money to pay for a rebuild and owing money on income taxes this year, I simply can't do it right this second. This car is a weekend fun car, not a DD. However, I do plan on taking it to DGRR on the current EMS setup.
Now to the second paragraph, thank you for that. That is what I was asking about and your response confirmed my beliefs.
Again thank you all for your responses.
#9
I didn't realize Mazdaedit was so cheap! I could have sworn I saw a larger sticker price. I do like the idea of Map based tuning the Adaptronics brings to the table. I really should read up on the long term usage of that particular tuning solution. I don't recall anyone running into the same problems experienced by Emanage users...
#10
MazdaEdit is software that you install on a PC and connect to the ECU via an OBD2 USB cable. Part of the AP cost is buying the hardware as well.
EManage gets more exposure since it comes with the GReddy kit, and Adaptronic hasn't had much use. Plus they have a stand-alone ECUs that will work, so it clouds the information about the piggy back version.
EManage gets more exposure since it comes with the GReddy kit, and Adaptronic hasn't had much use. Plus they have a stand-alone ECUs that will work, so it clouds the information about the piggy back version.
#12
Key to making it work is to adjust fueling in areas below 0psi such that the ECU will not build a trim to counteract it . It can be a bit hit and miss but you can do it .
Once you have done that you should just limit your boost to below 6psi and you should be ok .
Other than that , I agree with what the others have said ....... Mazdaedit is my weapon of choice these days .
#15
^My response was more so to Brettus' comment, but yes you are correct. This isn't my 1st turbo rotary, but it is my 1st RX8. Considering how cheap the AP is with the MM tuning, I may just do that and call it a day since I don't plan on chasing big power with this car.
#19
Another related question. I know a lot of folks are saying for best performance, you should ditch the Greddy MAF housing and go with something like a hacked-up AEM unit. However, is this actually required to get a decent tune with the AP or is it more a matter of getting the maximum performance out of the system. Again I am not hunting for big power, but rather a smooth and dependable setup.
#20
Another related question. I know a lot of folks are saying for best performance, you should ditch the Greddy MAF housing and go with something like a hacked-up AEM unit. However, is this actually required to get a decent tune with the AP or is it more a matter of getting the maximum performance out of the system. Again I am not hunting for big power, but rather a smooth and dependable setup.