Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Sound Performance Quick Spool Valve

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-23-2010, 08:56 AM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
arghx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Sound Performance Quick Spool Valve

Anyone tried one or at least considered one on an Esmeril style setup?



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KNLKVgg8po

http://www.spracingonline.com/store/...ool_Valve/3659

It's used on turbos with divided inlets. You can't really make a divided manifold for a Renesis because of the exhaust port design, so I think this would be ideal. Unfortunately they're not cheap. It's controlled by an actuator which is the pretty much the same thing you find on an internal wastegate. I'm not sure how much pressure it takes to open it, but the simplest way to control the valve would be to use a pressure switch and solenoid valve to control its opening.

Also, there is precedent for using this type of system on rotaries. Mazda actually had a similar system on 87-88 Rx-7's .
It was controlled by vacuum instead of pressure. The factory ECU switched a vacuum solenoid at 3000rpm to open the valve in the manifold.
Attached Thumbnails Sound Performance Quick Spool Valve-3659.jpg   Sound Performance Quick Spool Valve-turbomani1.jpg  
Old 09-23-2010, 10:14 AM
  #2  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Phish806's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Des Moines, Ia
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe that there is not enough room to jsut install this on an esmeril kit. I think there would be some major rework of the flange/manifold to get the apparatus to fit between the turbo and flange.

Name:  CIMG0574.jpg
Views: 415
Size:  43.2 KB

jsut dont htink it would fit because of hte cross brace and that acuator valve sticking off the plate.
Old 09-23-2010, 09:06 PM
  #3  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,792
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,666 Posts
Cut off the current manifold flange and weld this piece on in place of it with the actuator on the top side away from the cross brace
Old 09-23-2010, 09:59 PM
  #4  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Phish806's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Des Moines, Ia
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
Cut off the current manifold flange and weld this piece on in place of it with the actuator on the top side away from the cross brace
Hence the rework part
Old 09-23-2010, 10:06 PM
  #5  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,792
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,666 Posts
You would have to rework the downpipe otherwise because of the turbo relocation if you just sandwiched it inbetween. Choose your poison.
Old 09-24-2010, 07:25 AM
  #6  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Phish806's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Des Moines, Ia
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If i were to do this i would go the route Team said, not sure if uninstalling everything to get to the manifold and to get it off the car would be worth the gains though.
Old 09-24-2010, 09:04 AM
  #7  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Phish806's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Des Moines, Ia
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would like to see a before and after dyno or some other comparison to show the differnce this would make. It sounds like an interesting idea but jsut need to be sold on it a little more.
Old 09-24-2010, 11:19 AM
  #8  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
arghx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Here's the comparison dynosheet from their website, for what it's worth



I'm certain it would increase low end torque. How much in a Renesis application is anybody's guess. And I'm sure you would be using a simple control method... in this dyno they probably duty controlled the quick spool valve using an AEM EMS and a boost control style solenoid. Depending how much "spring pressure" the actuator has (doesn't seem to be listed), you may just be able to run a hose to the actuator and be done with it.

The only reason I am not super skeptical about this product is that Mazda used an OEM quick spool valve on a production rotary. I haven't heard whether the Sound Performance unit is prone to failure, but I don't doubt that it improves low end torque.
Attached Thumbnails Sound Performance Quick Spool Valve-36594.jpg  

Last edited by arghx7; 09-24-2010 at 11:28 AM.
Old 09-24-2010, 11:35 AM
  #9  
13B-RE
iTrader: (1)
 
ChrisRX8PR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Plymouth, MN
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I will soon be testing this one...same thing...half the price.

http://performancemetalwerkz.webs.com/

Best regards,

Chris
Old 09-24-2010, 01:01 PM
  #10  
Rear Mount GT35R
iTrader: (7)
 
bumblebeerx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: toledo,ohio
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
let us know what you find Chris. there could end up being a home for this on my rear mount system depending on the gains.
Old 09-24-2010, 05:34 PM
  #11  
I divide by zero
 
Mawnee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seriously considered one on my setup. Especially since I was running a 1.00 divided hotside. Just never got around to it.
Old 09-24-2010, 11:18 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Talic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada, UAE, Philippines.
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
funny thing is when i was trying to fab up a full duel exhaust this is what i was planing
the guys at work were laughing at me because i was about to make it 1 a year ago
i should have then been a producier damnit cuz im still twin scroll i may be joining you bumblebeer because i have room for it
Old 09-25-2010, 09:14 AM
  #13  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Phish806's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Des Moines, Ia
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If i still had the whole kit uninstalled i would seriouslly think about it. Could be a good project for down the road.
Old 09-25-2010, 02:39 PM
  #14  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,792
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,666 Posts
Compared to the modification removing the manifold should be no big deal
Old 09-25-2010, 02:56 PM
  #15  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,537
Received 1,500 Likes on 847 Posts
Through testing we have seen a 33% decrease in spool up time. Making cars that might have alot of lag come alive. This was on a rear mount turbo kit where lag is usually very timely. Jeremy, who has been testing this flange for us has stated that he has a whole new car now
Old 09-25-2010, 09:13 PM
  #16  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,792
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,666 Posts
It's definitely an interesting design feature
Old 09-25-2010, 11:48 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
BigTurbo74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Make a good turbo setup and you won't have a need for it. 09factors car for example, top mount t4 turbo, in a few psi by 2200rpms.
https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-specific-performance-mods-97/my-new-install-project-176409/
Old 09-26-2010, 06:01 AM
  #18  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,792
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,666 Posts
^^ Unless of course it allows boost to come in sooner and better still ....
Old 09-26-2010, 02:30 PM
  #19  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
ssspeedfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm happy to see Chris is already involved in making better his kit! Especially since this makes sense and could be making newer kits with this.
Old 09-29-2010, 07:15 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
BigTurbo74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
^^ Unless of course it allows boost to come in sooner and better still ....
But if it breaks, ouch!
Old 10-01-2010, 04:35 PM
  #21  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,792
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,666 Posts
Originally Posted by BigTurbo74
But if anything on a turbo engine breaks, ouch!
Fixed ....
Old 07-25-2011, 02:15 PM
  #22  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Updates?
Old 07-25-2011, 02:18 PM
  #23  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by arghx7
You can't really make a divided manifold for a Renesis because of the exhaust port design
Factually incorrect.

It has already been accomplished with several different designs for a "front/top" mount system and a low-mount divided design is in the works presently.
Old 07-25-2011, 02:30 PM
  #24  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
FazdaRX_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Pictures?
Old 07-25-2011, 03:25 PM
  #25  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,792
Received 2,044 Likes on 1,666 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Factually incorrect.

It has already been accomplished with several different designs for a "front/top" mount system and a low-mount divided design is in the works presently.


that's the way I had planned to do it as well, looking forward to seeing some results eventually


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Sound Performance Quick Spool Valve



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 AM.