Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Supercharger performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-22-2007, 03:08 AM
  #201  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 36 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by eviltwinkie
I cant see a poor flowing turbo creating an issue like this...I mean if the turbo was isolated from the equation...and we only consider that it lacks enough flow...that would probably translate to less heat...if it were flowing more than the engine could handle then I would assume that would translate to...its more than able to produce more than enough heat...as with more power comes the added joy of additional heat...

again i might be missing something...
this is out side of the tread topic..

pm me if you would like me to explain..

beers
Old 03-22-2007, 03:08 AM
  #202  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Moon Assad
Kinda like a cheak valve instead of that split port. Like I say use the whole port for the exaust. Only one side pushes exaust out at a time. Who nows how long it will last but it seems to be a good idea atleast in my eyes.
OOOOOHHH I get it...

I dont want to shoot down your idea at all...but I am compelled to play devils advocate here and point out the issues that pop into my mind in regards to that idea...so heres my constructive criticism...

the flapper would be required to flap back and forth for each side pretty damn fast in order to properly accomplish this task. this means you have to have some sort of mount for the axle which not only will be required to be as free as possible but also maintain its alignment overtime. because its also in a area which you are guaranteed to see massive amounts of heat, the material used will need to be able to withstand that type of duty. it will also probably have to be a certain weight so that it can "flap" at a speed which can keep up with the pulses. finally because its a moving part its another potential thing which could fail and while flapping you would probably hear a "flappity" noise which might turn some people off.
Old 03-22-2007, 03:11 AM
  #203  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by swoope
this is out side of the tread topic..

pm me if you would like me to explain..

beers
i was going to at first ask you why it was outside of topic since weve been talking about this all night now...however...

your right...this thread was about superchargers and its digressed into a possible heat issue on the housing caused by FI...

i personally blame the time...and the drugs...

Last edited by eviltwinkie; 03-22-2007 at 03:13 AM. Reason: wrong topic stated...again haa..
Old 03-22-2007, 03:18 AM
  #204  
Registered
 
Moon Assad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like I said its an idea. They have wastegates that can handle the heat so im sure with some R&D it can be done, I dont think youd here it at all. I came to me when I pulled that seporator out of the display block I was working on, hell if you can increase the flow through that por 25 to 50%, you have made a big difference, who nows.
Old 03-22-2007, 03:19 AM
  #205  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post


Image for reference...
Old 03-22-2007, 03:19 AM
  #206  
Registered
 
Moon Assad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by eviltwinkie
i was going to at first ask you why it was outside of topic since weve been talking about this all night now...however...

your right...this thread was about superchargers and its digressed into a possible heat issue on the housing caused by FI...

i personally blame the time...and the drugs...
LOL
Old 03-22-2007, 03:20 AM
  #207  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
My peak and average EGTs are more or less the same between the GReddy manifold/turbo and the much bigger T3/tubular manifold that I'm running now.
I don't think that high-RPM "choking" is pushing the temps up in the ports.
I'd like to see EGTs from a stock motor with the probe in the same location.
Old 03-22-2007, 03:20 AM
  #208  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 36 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Moon Assad
Like I said its an idea. They have wastegates that can handle the heat so im sure with some R&D it can be done, I dont think youd here it at all. I came to me when I pulled that seporator out of the display block I was working on, hell if you can increase the flow through that por 25 to 50%, you have made a big difference, who nows.

you are killing me.. i am you are thinking so way outside the box.. with meds..

beers
Old 03-22-2007, 03:20 AM
  #209  
Registered
 
Moon Assad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by eviltwinkie


Image for reference...

Nice, your the man.
Old 03-22-2007, 03:22 AM
  #210  
Registered
 
Moon Assad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
My peak and average EGTs are more or less the same between the GReddy manifold/turbo and the much bigger T3/tubular manifold that I'm running now.
I don't think that high-RPM "choking" is pushing the temps up in the ports.
I'd like to see EGTs from a stock motor with the probe in the same location.
That would be some info worth checking on
Old 03-22-2007, 03:23 AM
  #211  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 36 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
My peak and average EGTs are more or less the same between the GReddy manifold/turbo and the much bigger T3/tubular manifold that I'm running now.
I don't think that high-RPM "choking" is pushing the temps up in the ports.
I'd like to see EGTs from a stock motor with the probe in the same location.

that location would be?

beers
Old 03-22-2007, 03:25 AM
  #212  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Moon Assad
Like I said its an idea. They have wastegates that can handle the heat so im sure with some R&D it can be done, I dont think youd here it at all. I came to me when I pulled that seporator out of the display block I was working on, hell if you can increase the flow through that por 25 to 50%, you have made a big difference, who nows.
Yea I mean I can see where your going with that idea and I totally agree that if something could be done it would help tremendously. Looking at that image and from what I have heard from people who have gone in there...that port in the middle is pretty small compared to the outer ports. I have a hard time believing that the gas simply prefers to exit out of the "outer" side more often.

Again in my mind...its a design flaw but acceptable considering what they were shooting for. I would have preferred that the rotor chambers be separated from each other and perhaps offset so that you would have two equal sized ports on both sides of the chamber with 4 independant pipes...altho that might have created a heating issue...which may also be the real reason they decided to use a smaller "shared" port to limit the amount of heat between chambers...
Old 03-22-2007, 03:26 AM
  #213  
Registered
 
Moon Assad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by swoope
you are killing me.. i am you are thinking so way outside the box.. with meds..

beers

LOL, outside the box is a cause for inovation, think of the motor in your car, Wankle wasnt even in the boxes zipcode.
Old 03-22-2007, 03:28 AM
  #214  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
My peak and average EGTs are more or less the same between the GReddy manifold/turbo and the much bigger T3/tubular manifold that I'm running now.
I don't think that high-RPM "choking" is pushing the temps up in the ports.
I'd like to see EGTs from a stock motor with the probe in the same location.
Thanks for the info...it also reaffirms my belief that a choking turbo is not going to be generating additional heat...again I allow myself to be wrong or schooled differently however everything I know tells me that choking flow isnt going to be adding heat...
Old 03-22-2007, 03:31 AM
  #215  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Moon Assad
Nice, your the man.
Just stole it from a SAE article on MM site...its good to run your own servers haa haa
Old 03-22-2007, 03:35 AM
  #216  
Registered
 
Moon Assad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the flapper worked it would also remove more heat.
Old 03-22-2007, 03:40 AM
  #217  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
In regards to your idea...perhaps instead of flapping back and forth...you take a flat metal "flap" and install it vertically on a pin running thru the center so it moves horizontally...as the pulse comes into the port...the pressure blows the plate to the opposing port and effectively seals it...when the opposing port fires its pressure blows the flap the opposite direction...as long as your flap was large enough to completely cover the port...could withstand the heat...and was thin enough to give you the maximum volume AND retain enough structural integrity to not warp under the back-forth slamming...its wacky enough that it might work...perhaps shorten center pin so it doesnt actually make contact...or just bearly makes contact...and keep it long enough to prevent the pulse from going "around" the plate...
Old 03-22-2007, 03:42 AM
  #218  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Moon Assad
If the flapper worked it would also remove more heat.
This is true...I totally believe that a majority of the heat generated is simply because of the (in my opinion) poor exhaust characteristics...
Old 03-22-2007, 03:47 AM
  #219  
Registered
 
Moon Assad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You got the idea, you just explained it better. Im goint to play with it, I wouldnt try it with a turbo for odvoise reasons. You explained it very well, make the hinge sloppy and I dont think there will be any problems.
Old 03-22-2007, 03:52 AM
  #220  
Registered
 
Moon Assad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It dosnt even have to seal perfect, as long as the pulse gets directed out and not into the apposing port.
Old 03-22-2007, 03:54 AM
  #221  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Moon Assad
You got the idea, you just explained it better. Im goint to play with it, I wouldnt try it with a turbo for odvoise reasons. You explained it very well, make the hinge sloppy and I dont think there will be any problems.
OK...well I had originally thought you were thinking of anchoring the hinge towards the rear of the port so when it flapped you had a 45 degree angle inbound to the port which while that would work I dont think would be nearly as efficient as physically moving the entire plate to the opposing side.

The opening due to the angle at 45 degrees inbound would limit how much volume you could get into the port and so it would become your chokepoint. If you remove that dynamic and simply allow the entire plate to move to the opposing side, your restriction would be the volume of the port avail (port-flap width) and how much volume you have due to the port size from the chamber inbound.
Old 03-22-2007, 03:55 AM
  #222  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Moon Assad
It dosnt even have to seal perfect, as long as the pulse gets directed out and not into the apposing port.
exactly...its simply a redirection of the pulse energy and an increase in flow capacity...
Old 03-22-2007, 03:59 AM
  #223  
Registered
 
Moon Assad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What you think, 30 40 HP, also more flow for more porting.
Old 03-22-2007, 04:00 AM
  #224  
Banned
 
eviltwinkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: everywherez...
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Its times like these where I am reminded how much it sucks to not have a machine shop at my disposal. One of these days I'll get around to building a stirling cryocooler and attach it to an intercooler...bring on the heat!! as you add heat the pump gets progressively cooler as it works muuhaa haaa...
Old 03-22-2007, 04:03 AM
  #225  
Registered
 
Moon Assad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is the kind of think tank that im looking for. Arguing dosnt help at all.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Supercharger performance



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 PM.