Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Turning Up the Boost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-18-2005 | 03:31 PM
  #26  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by cretinx
so am I hearing a 12.5-12.75 is better than a flat 12 AFR?
There is no "magic" number.
11:1 might be apropriate in some load ranges.
The idea is to run as lean as you can without incurring knock.
Generally, you want to tune about 1 point richer than maximum power.
The best thing is to tune super rich (just short of misfire) and gradually lean up until you hit peak torque than go a point richer than that.
There are some load points where I am at 13:1. that is just the nature of my particular motor.

You MUST do this on a dyno or in a controlled environment where you can hold a load for a few seconds without having to worry about driving.
Old 08-18-2005 | 03:54 PM
  #27  
TORacing's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 683
Likes: 1
Can't the intercetor do everything the Ultimate can do, but it is plug and play unlike the ultimte. Also can the ultimate control spark like the interceptor.
Old 08-18-2005 | 04:54 PM
  #28  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
The interceptor will totally remove the PCM from the ignition and fuel equation, if I understand it correctly.
The Ultimate can leave the PCM in the loop, as it were, so that the knock sensor and other saftey controls remain somewhat in place.
The main advantage to the Ultimate is its ability to "chase" a preset A/F target while modifying the fuel delivery in the same way as the original E-Manage.
This effectively removes the adaptive process from the PCM and is plug-and-play to the original Greddy harness in the turbo kit.
Old 08-18-2005 | 05:11 PM
  #29  
TORacing's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 683
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
The interceptor will totally remove the PCM from the ignition and fuel equation, if I understand it correctly.
The Ultimate can leave the PCM in the loop, as it were, so that the knock sensor and other saftey controls remain somewhat in place.
The main advantage to the Ultimate is its ability to "chase" a preset A/F target while modifying the fuel delivery in the same way as the original E-Manage.
This effectively removes the adaptive process from the PCM and is plug-and-play to the original Greddy harness in the turbo kit.
OOOH.
Old 08-18-2005 | 06:27 PM
  #30  
TORacing's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 683
Likes: 1
I just checked the Greddy site, and it said "Air-fuel target map for self-tuning to speed up intial tuning", this would lead me to believe that it doesn't do this on the fly, which means that you would still have the same problem with LTFT. While interceptor won't because you have complete control of spark and fuel. After talking to Scott at Mazsport over the phone earlier I am going with the interceptor.
Old 08-18-2005 | 06:53 PM
  #31  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Horse
I just checked the Greddy site, and it said "Air-fuel target map for self-tuning to speed up intial tuning", this would lead me to believe that it doesn't do this on the fly, which means that you would still have the same problem with LTFT.
Nope. It has an actual interactive MAP that is dedicated to the WBO2S input.
You input a target A/F and the Ultimate adds or subtracts from the additional injection and sub-injection MAPs to acheive the desired A/F.

Here is a picture of the actual MAP.
Instead of using the hotwire as the input, you use the "option 1" input.

Old 08-18-2005 | 07:04 PM
  #32  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
BTW - The Ultimate has proper controlls for all of the injectors seperately, unlike the Blue (which groups the secondaries and the primary 2 together) and it has seperate ignition MAPs for the leading and trailing plugs so that you can control split.
Old 08-18-2005 | 09:31 PM
  #33  
cretinx's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 502
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
There is no "magic" number.
11:1 might be apropriate in some load ranges.
The idea is to run as lean as you can without incurring knock.
Generally, you want to tune about 1 point richer than maximum power.
The best thing is to tune super rich (just short of misfire) and gradually lean up until you hit peak torque than go a point richer than that.
There are some load points where I am at 13:1. that is just the nature of my particular motor.

You MUST do this on a dyno or in a controlled environment where you can hold a load for a few seconds without having to worry about driving.
**** man . . . I should just pay you to tune my car - altered atmosphere got 218 whp out of my turbo kit at stock boost with stock everything on the car except 18x285s on 18x9.5 23lb rims in the rear.
Old 08-18-2005 | 09:52 PM
  #34  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Nope. It has an actual interactive MAP that is dedicated to the WBO2S input.
You input a target A/F and the Ultimate adds or subtracts from the additional injection and sub-injection MAPs to acheive the desired A/F.
I'm still confused over the OEM ECU and LTFT. Even if the Ultimate targets an A/F, the stock ECU is still changing it's trims, right? If so, is there a limit on the amount of trims the stock ECU will produce? Are we still going to need to "reset" the stock ECU every now and then even with the Ultimate?
Old 08-18-2005 | 09:58 PM
  #35  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
kevin i would think tha tif the PCM keeps telling the system to add fuel and it doesnt get its intended result at some point it MIGHT throw a cel. that is pure speculation on mypart.
Old 08-18-2005 | 09:59 PM
  #36  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
The LTFT won't go over 30%.
Additionally, I intend to wire the OEM WBO2S through the airflow meter 2 input on the Ultimate and spoof the factory PCM into thinking it isn't running so rich under boost so that it wont extend the LTFT as far.
Old 08-18-2005 | 10:06 PM
  #37  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Thanks Jeff and Charlie

Interesting to say the least. I'll need to follow your progress. I assume that you will start a new thread to let us know.
Old 08-18-2005 | 10:30 PM
  #38  
Greddyturbo1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
It seems to me it would be much easier to just buy the Intercepter, instead of constantly trying to trick the oem ecm by adding /subtracting wires ,plugs whatever...
Old 08-18-2005 | 10:55 PM
  #39  
zoomzoom_8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 531
Likes: 1
From: Topsail Island, NC
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
The LTFT won't go over 30%.
Additionally, I intend to wire the OEM WBO2S through the airflow meter 2 input on the Ultimate and spoof the factory PCM into thinking it isn't running so rich under boost so that it wont extend the LTFT as far.
Can you explain that more, I do not understand how that spoofs the oem ecu? Thanks
Old 08-18-2005 | 11:50 PM
  #40  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
The secondary airflow meter input will modify the O2 sensor signal to appear more lean when under boost.
Old 08-18-2005 | 11:53 PM
  #41  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by Greddyturbo1
It seems to me it would be much easier to just buy the Intercepter, instead of constantly trying to trick the oem ecm by adding /subtracting wires ,plugs whatever...
Sure. 3x the price to do essentially the same thing.
Maybe it would be "just easier" to buy a real stand alone like the Haltec.

If you are using the Greddy turbo kit already, the Ultimate plugs right in. All that needs to be added is a line from the Ultimate to the stand-alone WBO2S that everyone under boost should already have installed, unless they like living dangerously.
Old 08-19-2005 | 12:20 AM
  #42  
brillo's Avatar
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
Jeff,

What about the ignition timing control? All this fuel control looks great, but I figure that timing will be just as important for the FI folks.

I hope the emanage ultimate really works out for the Greddy turbo folks, it will be nice to add another ECU option to the list.
Old 08-19-2005 | 12:26 AM
  #43  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
The Ultimate has two separate timing MAPs - one for leading and another for trailing. This allows the split to be controlled.
They have also fixed the dwell current issue so that it won't burn coils.
Old 08-19-2005 | 01:08 AM
  #44  
brillo's Avatar
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
so the ultimate can completely control and sever the ingition timing just like the fuel? Can it read the stock ingition wheel signal? what are you tapping into for ignition?
If you guys can do that, your home free

in addition, what types of idle control does it give? could you show a pic of that screen?

Thanks for the info

Last edited by brillo; 08-19-2005 at 08:55 AM.
Old 08-19-2005 | 02:55 AM
  #45  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 25
From: Houston
That would definitely be cool.
Old 08-19-2005 | 09:25 AM
  #46  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 26
From: Under my car
It doesn't completly sever control of the ignition or fuel. It still intercepts the OEM signals.
However, it now allows individual control over both leading and trailing ignition and all three injector signals (though now the injectors can add AND subtract fuel).
It is the O2 feedback that is really the main advantage.
It can read the stock wheel, which is an improvement over the "approximate" timing calculation of the old version, though I don't think it is particularly important since the error was only 1° by the old method.

Here is the idle control MAP:

Attached Thumbnails Turning Up the Boost-iviewcapture_date_19_08_2005_time_09_22_54.jpg  
Old 08-19-2005 | 09:58 AM
  #47  
brillo's Avatar
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
Jeff,

this looks really good man, so if I understand you correctly, and I'm sure your getting tired of repeating yourself here, the ultimate sits in between the PCM and the injectors and spark control, takes the PCM signals, sticks them in some deep dark place never to bee seen again, and then directly controls the fuel and ignition timing off its own maps. It can also read a WBo2 and use that to tune on the fly, and send a signal back to the PCM saying everything is peachy and in a afr range you decide the PCM will like.

Can you just tap the stock o2 signal? Why are you guys buying another sensor?

it appears with the idle adjustment table you can lean or richen the mixture as your adjustment, is that correct?

Last edited by brillo; 08-19-2005 at 10:01 AM.
Old 08-19-2005 | 10:30 AM
  #48  
TORacing's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 683
Likes: 1
The problem with the Ultimate it still draws and alters the original signal, while the Interceptor makes a whole new one.
Old 08-19-2005 | 10:36 AM
  #49  
rkostolni's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
From: Virginia/Maryland
I contacted Greddy, and you do still have to use the cold water temp dongle with this unit because it does only modify the ecu's original signals, just like the blue emanage, and so it needs to force the stock ecu into open loop. This one just gives more features. However, I think if you had an ecu that learned and fought back before, this will not change anything and will not really help you. If you ecu didn't fight back, then this could add some cool new capabilities.
Old 08-19-2005 | 11:03 AM
  #50  
zoomzoom_8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 531
Likes: 1
From: Topsail Island, NC
scrap that then, my ecu is fighting like a champ!


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 PM.