Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Twin Turbos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-29-2007 | 02:21 AM
  #1  
that_one_guy03's Avatar
Thread Starter
jkskaggs
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Louisville
Twin Turbos

So i want to put twin turbos on my rx-8; similar to the 97 supras. Is this possible. Sorry if i sound retarded, I dont know much about rotary engines.
Old 05-29-2007 | 02:34 AM
  #2  
Swerve76's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Before you get bashed dude....use the search function. This topic has been brought up more than once before
Old 05-29-2007 | 10:18 AM
  #3  
JB_Rotary's Avatar
Always lurking
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
It won't fit without extensive modification.
Old 05-29-2007 | 10:19 AM
  #4  
Cody Red's Avatar
always filling [the c]up
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
From: Alice, Texas
a single would be fine. +twenty five characters.
Old 05-29-2007 | 11:28 AM
  #5  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 25
From: Houston
Originally Posted by that_one_guy03
So i want to put twin turbos on my rx-8; similar to the 97 supras. Is this possible. Sorry if i sound retarded, I dont know much about rotary engines.
Why do you want twins? Just to be like Supras? Two isn't necessarily better than 1 although it can be. On a rotary there really isn't a reason to use 2 unless you just want to be different. From a power standpoint there isn't an advantage and it costs much more.

Supra guys make many design mistakes just to make huge peak power numbers on a dyno. If ANY of them would actually design a total system properly, they could get much more usable powerbands and still keep high numbers. Don't copy them if you want smooth predictable performance.
Old 05-29-2007 | 11:34 AM
  #6  
maxxdamigz's Avatar
Baro Rex
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 1
From: NJ
I like twins.
I could see going to some kind of uber complicated sequential/staged setup if you wanted to crank out 500 whp up top and have boost down low. Then again, it kind of goes with the saying, "if you have to ask, you can't afford it." But if you have piles of money laying around, it's certainly doable.
Old 05-29-2007 | 11:58 AM
  #7  
chickenwafer's Avatar
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Isn't Maddog doing a custom twin turbo setup on his 8?

Unless you want to be different, there is almost no reason to go twin. Single turbos now spool quickly and have near the same responce. Not to mention that we are working towards around 330-rwhp, maybe a tad more, and a single turbo can accoomplish that with ease and virtually no spool time.
Old 05-29-2007 | 01:01 PM
  #8  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,444
Likes: 2,799
From: The Dark Side
There's a reason a lot of the RX-7 guys took out their twin turbo's and went with a larger / single turbo.
Old 05-29-2007 | 01:19 PM
  #9  
chickenwafer's Avatar
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Originally Posted by Jedi54
There's a reason a lot of the RX-7 guys took out their twin turbo's and went with a larger / single turbo.
that is mainly because the system was overly complicated and failed often, not because the twins suck. But in the qwest for huge rwhp numbers a single turbo is used for packaging mainly. But companies like BNR have twin turbo kits for the FD that work flawlessly.
Old 05-30-2007 | 05:51 PM
  #10  
~)('s Avatar
~)(
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
Question Exactly how fast can a single turbo start producing boost?

For street, I'm not 100% sold on how a large turbo will improve the car overall where the majority of time is spent below 3.5-4k rpms. So here's a question. At what RPM does a 'large turbo' kick in at? It would be nice to see a comparison between 250, 300, 350, and 400 rwhp.
Old 05-30-2007 | 06:49 PM
  #11  
N rider89's Avatar
^NieL
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 1
From: santa clara ,ca
Originally Posted by ~)(
For street, I'm not 100% sold on how a large turbo will improve the car overall where the majority of time is spent below 3.5-4k rpms. So here's a question. At what RPM does a 'large turbo' kick in at? It would be nice to see a comparison between 250, 300, 350, and 400 rwhp.
its all in the tuning and which turbo you choose. there are many variables
Old 05-30-2007 | 06:52 PM
  #12  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,444
Likes: 2,799
From: The Dark Side
I'm just going to get one of those fake BOV things from ebay.... It'll sound like I've got twin turbo's. I think N rider already has some...
Old 05-30-2007 | 06:54 PM
  #13  
dillsrotary's Avatar
jersey fresh
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,688
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by chickenwafer
that is mainly because the system was overly complicated and failed often, not because the twins suck. But in the qwest for huge rwhp numbers a single turbo is used for packaging mainly. But companies like BNR have twin turbo kits for the FD that work flawlessly.
good point, plus look at the new 3 series 330 bmw, though i'm unfamiliar to its exact setup
Old 05-30-2007 | 07:31 PM
  #14  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by ~)(
For street, I'm not 100% sold on how a large turbo will improve the car overall where the majority of time is spent below 3.5-4k rpms. So here's a question. At what RPM does a 'large turbo' kick in at? It would be nice to see a comparison between 250, 300, 350, and 400 rwhp.
Boosting below 3-4k really isn't needed. When you need power, the amount of time you'll be under 3k is non existant.

If you want to see how the 270 vs 330 whp turbos compare, look for the dyno sticky in the major hp forum.
Old 05-30-2007 | 07:31 PM
  #15  
imput1234's Avatar
I ♥ Drifting!!!
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,069
Likes: 5
From: Lexington, KY
Originally Posted by that_one_guy03
So i want to put twin turbos on my rx-8; similar to the 97 supras. Is this possible. Sorry if i sound retarded, I dont know much about rotary engines.
Buy a supra. Problem solved!

Or swap a 2jz in our car, it will be pretty amazing, but will ruin the purpose of the car.
Old 05-30-2007 | 07:34 PM
  #16  
Jedi54's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 22,444
Likes: 2,799
From: The Dark Side
Did someone say 2JZ swap???


Old 05-30-2007 | 07:37 PM
  #17  
habinero's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Regina
Originally Posted by Jedi54
Did someone say 2JZ swap???


How much does this cost? Can you get 3 JZ's?
Old 05-30-2007 | 10:59 PM
  #18  
~)('s Avatar
~)(
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
Originally Posted by mysql101
Boosting below 3-4k really isn't needed. When you need power, the amount of time you'll be under 3k is non existant.

If you want to see how the 270 vs 330 whp turbos compare, look for the dyno sticky in the major hp forum.
Somehow I don't believe that the time spent under 3k is shorter than the time spent between the last 1k rpms to redline. Think about it the other way around.... waiting for boost to kick in takes an eternity when you're under 3-4k.
Old 05-30-2007 | 11:13 PM
  #19  
LabDad's Avatar
Doggie Style :)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, HI
Originally Posted by ~)(
... waiting for boost to kick in takes an eternity when you're under 3-4k.
I had a MR-2 with a large aftermarket turbo and have aquired a skill which takes care of this problem...it's called "down shifting". Works like a charm.
Old 05-30-2007 | 11:25 PM
  #20  
chickenwafer's Avatar
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Originally Posted by ~)(
Somehow I don't believe that the time spent under 3k is shorter than the time spent between the last 1k rpms to redline. Think about it the other way around.... waiting for boost to kick in takes an eternity when you're under 3-4k.
You get to 3500 rpm pretty quick. You only have to worry about 1st gear, too. Once you're past that if you're goen fast you're above 4 grand, or you downshift.

And we're only talking about 9-12 psi of boost here. It doesn't take that long for a properly sized dual ball-bearing CHRA-equipped turbo to reach that boost
Old 05-31-2007 | 12:08 AM
  #21  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by ~)(
Somehow I don't believe that the time spent under 3k is shorter than the time spent between the last 1k rpms to redline. Think about it the other way around.... waiting for boost to kick in takes an eternity when you're under 3-4k.
That's news to me, since I happen to have a turbo on my car and don't recall sitting around for an eternity for boost to show up.

As I said, if I wanted power, the last thing I'm going to do is slowly accelerate from 900 rpm. If I'm driving on the highway in 6th gear, the rpms are going to be around 4,000 anyway. Boost is INSTANT the second I mash the throttle.


For those who think throttle at low rpm is going to take forever to build boost...

http://youtube.com/watch?v=vTFWJiHOGv0

watch at 42 secs in. I'm accelerating from about 2,500 rpm in second gear (you can hear the crappy stock boot making noises every time I move the shifter).

just keep in mind this is an old video, before it was dyno tuned, so it made about 30 whp less than now.

Last edited by mysql101; 05-31-2007 at 12:17 AM.
Old 05-31-2007 | 11:51 AM
  #22  
~)('s Avatar
~)(
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
Originally Posted by mysql101
That's news to me, since I happen to have a turbo on my car and don't recall sitting around for an eternity for boost to show up.

As I said, if I wanted power, the last thing I'm going to do is slowly accelerate from 900 rpm. If I'm driving on the highway in 6th gear, the rpms are going to be around 4,000 anyway. Boost is INSTANT the second I mash the throttle.


For those who think throttle at low rpm is going to take forever to build boost...

http://youtube.com/watch?v=vTFWJiHOGv0

watch at 42 secs in. I'm accelerating from about 2,500 rpm in second gear (you can hear the crappy stock boot making noises every time I move the shifter).

just keep in mind this is an old video, before it was dyno tuned, so it made about 30 whp less than now.
Thanks for posting the video. Is that a stock flywheel on there?

When I made my comment, I stated large turbo, and while the Greddy may be fast, I don't consider it to be a large turbo. So does anyone know at what rpms boost kicks in for larger turbos (than the Greddy)?
Old 05-31-2007 | 12:09 PM
  #23  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
yes, stock flywheel, stock pulleys.

far as larger turbos go, look at the graphs here:

https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-major-horsepower-upgrades-93/dyno-comparison-rx-8-turbo-supercharger-etc-115447/

Everything besides the DNA supercharger makes more hp than stock by 3500 - enough that you would feel. Looks like the larger turbos start to really shine by 4300 rpm though.
Old 05-31-2007 | 12:11 PM
  #24  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
If you are going for a land speed record, then multiple turbocharged rotors would do the trick. If you just want to go to the store, save your money for gas this summer.
Old 05-31-2007 | 01:16 PM
  #25  
maxxdamigz's Avatar
Baro Rex
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 1
From: NJ
If you are under 4k rpms in anything other than 1st gear, are you actually driving hard?

Also, I believe the Greddy is a bushing turbo. You could increase the turbo size and upgrade to ball bearing and not lose on the spool speed.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 PM.