Notices
Series I AT-Specific Performance Mods Discuss engine and transmission modifications for your AT equipped RX-8

0-60 question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-31-2010 | 11:02 PM
  #1  
450rrider14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
0-60 question

Okay so my AT does 0-60 in a little over ten seconds on a good day. For some reason that seems a little slow even for an AT. what are your 0-60 times, mine is an 05 with just a k and n drop in
Old 01-31-2010 | 11:05 PM
  #2  
ZumnRx8's Avatar
RX8 & RX7 owner
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,172
Likes: 3
From: So. California
LOL- im not going to say nothing... ill let the Pirahnnas do thier job.
Old 01-31-2010 | 11:16 PM
  #3  
450rrider14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
wow i didn't know piranha know anything about cars. Just one question, without hands how can they type?

Last edited by 450rrider14; 01-31-2010 at 11:18 PM.
Old 01-31-2010 | 11:20 PM
  #4  
ZumnRx8's Avatar
RX8 & RX7 owner
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,172
Likes: 3
From: So. California
^You'll see
Old 01-31-2010 | 11:23 PM
  #5  
450rrider14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
haha alright sounds good
Old 01-31-2010 | 11:30 PM
  #6  
ZumnRx8's Avatar
RX8 & RX7 owner
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,172
Likes: 3
From: So. California
answer: ATs are slow as hell, i have 1, 4 port especially, there is no point in comparing 1/4 mile times or 0-60.... too many variables. Its the reason Im going Turbo this month . It sounds like 0-60 time is what it is though You wanna know if your car is slow because it feels like it lost power? GET A COMPRESSION TEST!

edit: or clogged CAT
Old 01-31-2010 | 11:36 PM
  #7  
450rrider14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
lol alright thank you. Ill test the compression in the morning. Thanks for the answer.
Old 02-01-2010 | 12:00 AM
  #8  
REDRX3RX8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 715
Likes: 22
0-60
My 07 6spd auto gets it in approx 7 sec by stomping gas while in gear. It'll feel even quicker when I put on 225/40r18 tires to lower final gearing 3.3%.
Old 02-01-2010 | 12:22 AM
  #9  
RyansRx8's Avatar
Brettward is/has a G
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
I did a run it was high 6's and low 7's...why does everything say our 0-60 time is like 5.8 or around there...is that with the stig driving it? lol
Old 02-01-2010 | 01:23 AM
  #10  
450rrider14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
could a compression problem also contribute to a long starting process? My car starts first try but it seems to take about 2 to three seconds longer than any other rx8 manual or auto that i have started up.
Old 02-01-2010 | 01:38 AM
  #11  
ZumnRx8's Avatar
RX8 & RX7 owner
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,172
Likes: 3
From: So. California
^yup
Old 02-01-2010 | 01:39 AM
  #12  
REDRX3RX8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 715
Likes: 22
RyansRx8,
Because the normal test time for 6spd AT is about 7.1 sec. The 5.8 could be achieved with a manual 6spd especially if you're good with the clutch and right tires.
Ok, yeah, you got a clutch, you're in the wrong forum.

Last edited by REDRX3RX8; 02-01-2010 at 01:46 AM. Reason: new info
Old 02-01-2010 | 03:04 PM
  #13  
450rrider14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
So i just left the dealership and they will not even take a look at the compression or anything unless the check engine light is on. I'm college right now and don't have access to a good garage so i guess im stuck for a while. Come on Mazda.
Old 02-01-2010 | 03:10 PM
  #14  
ZachLegend's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, California
5.8 is the MT.

But 10 seconds?! Oh my GAWDDD
Old 02-01-2010 | 03:55 PM
  #15  
Kpoc's Avatar
2010 Sparkling Black Mica
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Fort Campbell KY
5.8 is the MT time but according to the article I read that was also done @ 6k poping the clutch for the launch. I don't know about some of you but I would also think your clutch has about 5 of these starts in it before it self destructed. but as this is the AT forum who cares.
Old 02-02-2010 | 06:32 PM
  #16  
kersh4w's Avatar
Hit & Run Magnet
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 3
From: DC Area
Originally Posted by ZachLegend
But 10 seconds?! Oh my GAWDDD
at 10 seconds im over 80mph.

i know a few auto guys (6 port, 2006+) have run 16 flat in the 1/4. the 330 foot is generally around 60mph, i've done it in 6 flat. so if you can find an auto rx8s drag slip, you can see some data.
Old 02-03-2010 | 05:28 AM
  #17  
freaklinkmusic's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by kersh4w
at 10 seconds im over 80mph.

i know a few auto guys (6 port, 2006+) have run 16 flat in the 1/4. the 330 foot is generally around 60mph, i've done it in 6 flat. so if you can find an auto rx8s drag slip, you can see some data.
i ran a 16 flat. I dont have the timeslip. When it dries ill hit the track again.
Old 02-04-2010 | 02:30 AM
  #18  
cfm251's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Sac CA
10 seconds is slow, thats around the number I was getting right when my 1st motor crapped out. Good luck though.


----on a side note I recently "launched" my Rx8 a bit different than most AT owners say they do. It might be a placebo like effect but I feel that it climbs to 60 a bit faster.

1. While stationary turn traction control off.

2. while in manual more (still stationary) paddle shift into 2nd gear.

3. Hold the brake and build the revs to 2.25K it should be easier to hold it while in second without the car lurching forward than in first.

4. With the revs built to 2.25K simultaneously release the brake, downshift to first (with paddle), and step on the accelerator.

----i don't know if it makes a difference compared to a standard AT launch, but it would be cool if other AT owners could try this out see if they feel a difference.
Old 02-04-2010 | 12:54 PM
  #19  
450rrider14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
haha well thats not good news about the 1st motor. What actually was the cause for the failed motor? And ya ill try that later today and report back
Old 02-05-2010 | 01:59 AM
  #20  
450rrider14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
so that starting technique felt like i had a little more torque off the line, but that was very shortly stopped with a drop in rpms. It was just a slight drop but it was enough to keep my 0-60 practically the same
Old 02-05-2010 | 02:01 AM
  #21  
Chavy's Avatar
I did it for the lulz
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: red oak / waco
Originally Posted by 450rrider14
so that starting technique felt like i had a little more torque off the line, but that was very shortly stopped with a drop in rpms. It was just a slight drop but it was enough to keep my 0-60 practically the same
what's torque?
Old 02-05-2010 | 03:25 AM
  #22  
cfm251's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Sac CA
Originally Posted by 450rrider14
haha well thats not good news about the 1st motor. What actually was the cause for the failed motor? And ya ill try that later today and report back
low compression
Old 02-09-2010 | 12:15 AM
  #23  
RxMadness's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin-Zoom!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 204
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by ZachLegend
5.8 is the MT.

But 10 seconds?! Oh my GAWDDD
Somethings wrong, I'm usually in 3rd gear climbing past 70 in 10 seconds.


edit: this would be a real awesome place for a F&F joke

Last edited by RxMadness; 02-09-2010 at 12:20 AM.
Old 04-17-2011 | 07:58 PM
  #24  
tpg1188's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
0-60

10 seconds is slow, thats obvious. I'm sure you want to know to know how the car funtions as a road driver right? problem is, these 13b's are no where near as torquey as they were in the RX7s. Torque is what gets you off the line- you probably know that, i'm not tryin to lecture or teach. Problem is these cars are powerful in the upper rpm range. the reason a MT is faster off the line is the ability to dump the clutch. YOU have the advantage of a consistent shift. The only REAL- and thats not to diagnose your engine in any, way, shape or form- problem you have is a 1000k sheered redline compared to an MT and a rated 200hp. I wouldn't recomend neutral bombing it- thats always bad juju. Ever seen a burnout comp? RWDs remove the rear brakes, line lock the front and gas it. You should be able to do that, revving the engine anywhere from 4-6 grand and releasing the brakes. Just an opinion and just a thought. Those tires need to spin, ya know? i would think you should lauch hard off the line that way. And for those with MTs I've hit high 6's low 7's with a launch at 5500. You're not gonna explode a clutch after 5 drags. Mazda wanted these cars to be economical yet able to tear up the track in a fun enough way. the clutch that comes with the car is fine, ever wonder why mazda doesn't offer a performance clutch kit? The stock one is fine. anyway, thats not the purpose of this thread. My opinion- check your plugs, wire, coils. Check/ change your oil, filter. Run the highest octane you can. Avoid fuel and oil additives and carefully, carefully decide whether or not to take mazdas word about synthetic oils. Personally I wont use synthetic oils regardless of what Royal Purple claims. And 18" wheels are hard to turn.
Old 04-17-2011 | 08:13 PM
  #25  
Rotary-RX8's Avatar
Girls who drive stick FTW
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,429
Likes: 2
From: Toronto
oh okay


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 PM.