get higher RPM?
#52
Originally Posted by Rich Rx-8
I still think the power is maxed at like 6K, after that it's all the same, even at 8K rpms. No big suprise in the higher RPM's, just sound really.
Are you being serious, or just trolling?
Hopefully you're trolling. The MT6 just STARTS making power once you're above 5k rpm.
#53
G-force addict
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rich Rx-8
I still think the power is maxed at like 6K, after that it's all the same, even at 8K rpms. No big suprise in the higher RPM's, just sound really.
Yeah peak power flattens out, between 7750 and 8250 RPM Notice the dips at 6500 and 7500, those have been mostly tuned out by the new PCM flashes.
Only thing I can think of is that you've only revved past there when running 87 octane gas. Put the right stuff in and you get extra power way up there. Bad gas doesn't really make a difference below 6k ish rpm.
#54
Originally Posted by teen_living_a_dream
When racing every tenth of a second count right? That's why you guys are speending money on better filters and such to be a couple of tenths faster. Have you driven an auto rx8? As soon as you press the button it shifts instantly unlike most autos. So, how can pushing and pulling a lever be faster a quick press of the button? It should save you a couple tenths of a second right?
#55
Originally Posted by Rich Rx-8
I still think the power is maxed at like 6K, after that it's all the same, even at 8K rpms. No big suprise in the higher RPM's, just sound really.
#56
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by Rich Rx-8
I still think the power is maxed at like 6K, after that it's all the same, even at 8K rpms. No big suprise in the higher RPM's, just sound really.
#58
Hot Pit
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Castro Valley, CA
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
shifting fast is very easy, press the clutch, shift the gear, let go of the clutch, all at the same time. auto shifting is not faster, but easier.
step on gas, push a botton. Done.
If Mazda start with a 6 speed auto, then most of the people will buy an auto. who like driving a stick in traffic.
step on gas, push a botton. Done.
If Mazda start with a 6 speed auto, then most of the people will buy an auto. who like driving a stick in traffic.
#59
Originally Posted by Winning 8
shifting fast is very easy, press the clutch, shift the gear, let go of the clutch, all at the same time. auto shifting is not faster, but easier.
step on gas, push a botton. Done.
If Mazda start with a 6 speed auto, then most of the people will buy an auto. who like driving a stick in traffic.
step on gas, push a botton. Done.
If Mazda start with a 6 speed auto, then most of the people will buy an auto. who like driving a stick in traffic.
#62
Yeah man I honestly still don't feel any more power at 9k rpms than I do at like 6krpms. If it's there it's only noticeable noise wise. Thanks for all the written info but I've never been impressed with the power in the high RPM's while actually driving.
#63
Originally Posted by Rich Rx-8
Yeah man I honestly still don't feel any more power at 9k rpms than I do at like 6krpms. If it's there it's only noticeable noise wise. Thanks for all the written info but I've never been impressed with the power in the high RPM's while actually driving.
#64
the giant tastetickles
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in the basement
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DjRx8
Come to think of it, F1s have AT, right?
#65
G-force addict
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rich Rx-8
Yeah man I honestly still don't feel any more power at 9k rpms than I do at like 6krpms. If it's there it's only noticeable noise wise. Thanks for all the written info but I've never been impressed with the power in the high RPM's while actually driving.
#66
Registered
From a dig, if the MT 8 does a 7k feathered drop and dead hooks it the race will be over!
In lower HP/TQ cars manual transmissions always dominate, they give more control and consume less drivetrain energy. Only in higher HP/TQ cars (like F-body A4's as someone mentioned) do automatics become easier to launch and are more consistent.
I think if mazda could have made the A6 redline @ 9000 without exploding they would have done it!
In lower HP/TQ cars manual transmissions always dominate, they give more control and consume less drivetrain energy. Only in higher HP/TQ cars (like F-body A4's as someone mentioned) do automatics become easier to launch and are more consistent.
I think if mazda could have made the A6 redline @ 9000 without exploding they would have done it!
#68
I tried it with the dealer and I still didn't feel it, the high RPM's are not impressing me, they lack torque, that's what those loud RPM's are missing. The sound is there but the feeling isn't. That's why I'm still in my AT. The MS6 test ride on the other hand felt awesome, but I still think the shifting isn't that great in it. Nothing has really fully impressed me enough to swap yet.
Last edited by Rich Rx-8; 05-15-2006 at 06:56 PM.
#69
Originally Posted by Rich Rx-8
I tried it with the dealer and I still didn't feel it, the high RPM's are not impressing me, they lack torque, that's what those loud RPM's are missing. The sound is there but the feeling isn't. That's why I'm still in my AT. The MS6 test ride on the other hand felt awesome, but I still think the shifting isn't that great in it. Nothing has really fully impressed me enough to swap yet.
#71
Originally Posted by yiksing
Don't bother with him, he obviously can't feel the torque starts to get going above the 6000 rpm.
#72
G-force addict
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe he rode in one of those cars that had a stuck VFAD valve. I know some early cars suffered from this problem and the tertiary ports got stuck and didn't open up at high RPMS meaning that about 40hp was missing from 6k-9k RPM (because its a known fact you gain that much HP in that powerband).
From what you've said, you didn't try to go steady at 6k RPM in 1st or second and then floor it, the powerband is so linear that it is hard to feel the kick in the high RPMs without doing that.
I'll repeat, 1st gear, acellerate until about 20 mph, hold it there for a second, then floor it - your head will get tossed back. Same effect if you hold it in second at about 45, wait a sec, then floor it. Due to the linear powerband, pausing before you floor it gets you that full effect.
From what you've said, you didn't try to go steady at 6k RPM in 1st or second and then floor it, the powerband is so linear that it is hard to feel the kick in the high RPMs without doing that.
I'll repeat, 1st gear, acellerate until about 20 mph, hold it there for a second, then floor it - your head will get tossed back. Same effect if you hold it in second at about 45, wait a sec, then floor it. Due to the linear powerband, pausing before you floor it gets you that full effect.
#73
Baro Rex
iTrader: (1)
I'm glad to see threads like these on forums I am new to. It makes me feel at home. Maybe I'll do a search for 20$ ebay "chips" that add hundred of horsepower.
If I had gotten my car a week earlier, I'd have a stock 6spd dyno plot to show here for proof of the power above 6k. I'm sure there are plenty on here.
Also, I believe the auto's are retuned to match their redline. This may entail altered intake geometry, fuel mapping, and such. This means they could be optimized for 4k-7.5k power where the manual is optimized more for the 5k-9k power. I don't know if they did, but I would have if I were them.
Torque converter fluid dynamics are what limit most standard automatic sporty vehicles. At 9000 rpm, periphereal fluid flow is 20% faster (20% higher redline than 7500). This can lead to all sorts of issues including exponential viscous effects and power loss, heat dissipation issues, and possible sonic fluid flows.
If you're not able to run at 100% throttle and put it to the ground, then the MT and AT would be indistinguishable. You would just have a heavier foot in the AT. If you like to beat your car, the MT can put down quicker quarter miles with launching and power shifting. Depending on stall speed of the torque converter and the ignition/fuel cut used when shifting, these things are not usually possible in an auto, and with good reason.
I don't really have anything valuable to add to this thread, but I am pretty bored at work. Thinking about cars is infinitely more interesting.
If I had gotten my car a week earlier, I'd have a stock 6spd dyno plot to show here for proof of the power above 6k. I'm sure there are plenty on here.
Also, I believe the auto's are retuned to match their redline. This may entail altered intake geometry, fuel mapping, and such. This means they could be optimized for 4k-7.5k power where the manual is optimized more for the 5k-9k power. I don't know if they did, but I would have if I were them.
Torque converter fluid dynamics are what limit most standard automatic sporty vehicles. At 9000 rpm, periphereal fluid flow is 20% faster (20% higher redline than 7500). This can lead to all sorts of issues including exponential viscous effects and power loss, heat dissipation issues, and possible sonic fluid flows.
If you're not able to run at 100% throttle and put it to the ground, then the MT and AT would be indistinguishable. You would just have a heavier foot in the AT. If you like to beat your car, the MT can put down quicker quarter miles with launching and power shifting. Depending on stall speed of the torque converter and the ignition/fuel cut used when shifting, these things are not usually possible in an auto, and with good reason.
I don't really have anything valuable to add to this thread, but I am pretty bored at work. Thinking about cars is infinitely more interesting.
#74
Pining for the Fjords
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DjRX8
Come to think of it, F1s have AT, right?.
Originally Posted by yiksing
No, they have electronic controlled clutches i.e. Sequential Manual Transmission.
In any case, Dj, F1 cars don't have AT's even in a roundabout way, since they will not automatically upshift or downshift like AT's will... They have to be commanded to shift by the driver, or at least they do THESE days. Calling them Sequential Manual Transmissions is pretty darned close, but I prefer "semiautomatic".
#75
Originally Posted by maxxdamigz
I
If you're not able to run at 100% throttle and put it to the ground, then the MT and AT would be indistinguishable.
If you're not able to run at 100% throttle and put it to the ground, then the MT and AT would be indistinguishable.