AT to MT swap
#26
I'll snap his neck.
Wow, congrats on the swap!
Interesting that the driveshafts are exactly the same except material. Does that mean us AT owners could swap to the manual driveshaft and reduce some rotational mass without changing anything else? The connnections, etc all the same?
Interesting that the driveshafts are exactly the same except material. Does that mean us AT owners could swap to the manual driveshaft and reduce some rotational mass without changing anything else? The connnections, etc all the same?
#29
kevin@rotaryresurrection
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: east of Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes
on
35 Posts
I imagine steel is a good bit cheaper than carbon with plastic/resin covering. I wonder why mazda went that extra mile to do the shaft on the manual cars...a light driveshaft is one of those 0.1% modifications that you do after everything else has been exhausted, in most cases.
#30
I'll snap his neck.
Does the weight difference between the two feel substantial? I wonder if this would be a worthwhile, noticeable mod for us AT owners if we can find a relatively cheap used one?
Thanks for posting all this info!
Thanks for posting all this info!
#31
kevin@rotaryresurrection
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: east of Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes
on
35 Posts
I didnt think to weigh them, but the auto is definitely heavier by at least 2-3lb.
Odds are that you could do a before and after test...not knowing which shaft was on during which test...and not be able to tell the difference.
Odds are that you could do a before and after test...not knowing which shaft was on during which test...and not be able to tell the difference.
#34
kevin@rotaryresurrection
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: east of Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes
on
35 Posts
I checked mine, it is a 4.44 and LSD. I believe they are all the same, but I am not an rx-8 options expert like I am on rx7s. It is easy to check...jack the back end up in the air and put it in neutral. Mark the differential input/driveshaft with a piece of chalk, facing the ground, and do the same for one wheel. Now rotate the input/driveshaft slowly, counting the number of turns it takes to turn the wheel one complete turn. You should be at about 4 and a half.
During this test, also note if both wheels turn the same direction, opposite directions, or only one wheel turns. This tells you if you have an open diff or a limited slip diff, or a worn out limited slip. IF both wheels turn and seem to be locked together, it is LSD. If one wheel turns forward and one wheel turns backward, it is a standard open differential (peg leg). IF one wheel turns and the other doesn't, it is likely an LSD that is badly worn out.
Speaking of that, I need to verify my mph versus the road markers and a stopwatch, but I see no reason why the speedo would be off given that the diff ratios are the same between the models.
During this test, also note if both wheels turn the same direction, opposite directions, or only one wheel turns. This tells you if you have an open diff or a limited slip diff, or a worn out limited slip. IF both wheels turn and seem to be locked together, it is LSD. If one wheel turns forward and one wheel turns backward, it is a standard open differential (peg leg). IF one wheel turns and the other doesn't, it is likely an LSD that is badly worn out.
Speaking of that, I need to verify my mph versus the road markers and a stopwatch, but I see no reason why the speedo would be off given that the diff ratios are the same between the models.
#38
kevin@rotaryresurrection
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: east of Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes
on
35 Posts
possibly, but not really. I got this car about a year and a half ago for 10 grand cash. At the time, even medium mileage 04 MT's were still pulling 16-17 most of the time. I didnt have 16-17 to put into one at the time, and I didn't want to finance one. So it was either buy this auto that fell into my lap at the time, or not have an rx-8. I chose to buy it, figuring I could learn about the cars as I went and develop knowledge that I could use as part of my business later.
even now, I think most MT's still pull 14 grand or more in good shape, and I have a rebuilt motor and trans to show for about the same amount of money spent whereas most of those cars have used engines (or questionable mazda remans) and worn transmissions.
even now, I think most MT's still pull 14 grand or more in good shape, and I have a rebuilt motor and trans to show for about the same amount of money spent whereas most of those cars have used engines (or questionable mazda remans) and worn transmissions.
The following users liked this post:
Rock10 (04-24-2023)
#40
I'll snap his neck.
From what I understand, the base model AT had a different rear end gear ratio, but the sport package on up (or touring, i'm not sure which) had the same 4.44 with LSD as the manual.
#41
I'll snap his neck.
Oh well, I was hoping for more of a difference.
#42
kevin@rotaryresurrection
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: east of Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes
on
35 Posts
What would make it not worthwhile, is the fact that you pretty much have to remove the PPF to get the driveshaft out, and that PPF is heavy as a bitch. You want some weight savings? Get a carbon PPF instead of a metal one.
It probably only weighs 40lb, but when you are under a car on your back trying to bench press that ****** for about 45 seconds to get all the bolt holes lined up, and then you take one hand off to try and start a nut, you realize exactly how heavy it is.
And it's not like most rx8s (even modded) make enough ground thumping torque to crack a PPF anyway, unlike some modded rx7s that have done it.
It probably only weighs 40lb, but when you are under a car on your back trying to bench press that ****** for about 45 seconds to get all the bolt holes lined up, and then you take one hand off to try and start a nut, you realize exactly how heavy it is.
And it's not like most rx8s (even modded) make enough ground thumping torque to crack a PPF anyway, unlike some modded rx7s that have done it.
Last edited by RotaryResurrection; 07-24-2008 at 01:03 PM.
#44
laulongfei
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Francisco,CA
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey RotaryResurrection, I just want to say you are awesome for making impossible to possible. Support you all the way for doing all kind of experience on AT rx8
#45
the enemy in the mirror
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: billerica, ma
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought the 'mileage' was stored on a CAN module located near the gauges.
You might be able to swap just that part...
But that could've just been hearsay, I'll have to check.
You might be able to swap just that part...
But that could've just been hearsay, I'll have to check.
#46
kevin@rotaryresurrection
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: east of Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes
on
35 Posts
IF the mileage were stored on a module in the car, it would still read the same. The mileage must be stored in the cluster itself, since the new cluster has retained it's old mileage each time, even though it was plugged into my car with all my original modules and boxes (I did this before I ever did the swap).
#48
kevin@rotaryresurrection
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: east of Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes
on
35 Posts
The cluster is one integrated micro board, there are many things soldered to the inside of it but I did not see fit to try and remove the needles and jack up the gauges to get to the inside of the board and see what was in there. Bottom line, the cluster is an integrated, sealed, non serviceable unit, except to those very good with electronic boards and soldering. The solder points are so small and close that I couldn't even tell which functions most of the stuff went to...it is very hard to follow the traces compared to older, less complex boards.
The following users liked this post:
Rock10 (04-24-2023)
#50
kevin@rotaryresurrection
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: east of Knoxville, TN
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes
on
35 Posts
****, I wish mine had a 4.10 in it like the rx7s run. I mainly use mine for cruising and I see no reason for it to be turning 3500-4000 at interstate speed. The 3000-3300 that rx7s turn at similar speeds is bad enough for gas mileage.