Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Actual CG of RX-8?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-20-2011 | 12:49 PM
  #1  
Spin9k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Momentum Keeps Me Going
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 4
From: Colorado
Actual CG of RX-8?

Does anyone know the actual center of gravity height in the S1 RX-8?

As in "The RX-8 has a very low CG of 450MM or 17.7", something like that.

Thanks.
Old 09-20-2011 | 01:09 PM
  #2  
WTBRotary!'s Avatar
Drummond Built
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
From: DFW, Texas
Good question. I'd like to know this as well +1
Old 09-21-2011 | 06:10 AM
  #3  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,083
http://www.longacreracing.com/articles/art.asp?ARTID=22
Old 09-21-2011 | 06:58 AM
  #4  
Spin9k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Momentum Keeps Me Going
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 4
From: Colorado
^ nice page, but I already knew how to figure it, the problem is I have no scales. Anyone that has some, this would be realatively easy....

"Finding the center of gravity height can be done in several ways, none of which are accomplished very easily and without some work. Presented here is the easiest method. The center of gravity height is calculated by weighing the car when level and then raising the car at least 10 inches at the rear and weighing the front again."

What I was hoping was, with all the talk about how the RX-8 has a low cg, seems that somewhere there would have actually been a number given from Mazda ...
Old 09-21-2011 | 02:40 PM
  #5  
Spin9k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Momentum Keeps Me Going
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 4
From: Colorado
Perhaps to spur someone on to make that cg discovery, the reason I ask is ...

I was reading an interview with Toshio Masuda about the Toyoya FT-86 and he said its cg height was 450mm and that was because of the new engine. Their Boxer design sits low anyway and this new one was made even more so and also made to sit further back. As this is part of the 'reasons to be' given by by us RX-8 enthusiasts, I'd like to know about this new entry.
Old 09-22-2011 | 12:44 AM
  #6  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,083
well even a bone stock factory car will vary some dependent on equipment, wear, etc.

I don't recall it being in the service highlights manual, but will doublecheck. Pretty sure I have never seen it explicitly stated any where. Just the usual marketing generic statements about it being very low.

I could probably determine mine, but it is lowered, lightened, etc. etc.
Old 09-22-2011 | 11:09 AM
  #7  
Suspension's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
CG height isn't going to be published and would definitely vary a few inches based on equipment (ie sun roofs are heavy additions high up on the car). For a sport-ish car like the RX-8, I would think the CG would be below the top of the tire, but how much lower, I don't know. The bulk of the car's mass is below this point (subframes, suspension, engine, wheels, drivetrain). The OD on the tires is like ~25". That would be a good initial guess.
Old 12-11-2011 | 10:46 AM
  #8  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,083
At the factory ride height it was 18.585"
Old 12-11-2011 | 12:48 PM
  #9  
Spin9k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Momentum Keeps Me Going
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 4
From: Colorado
Thanks! So with the Toybaru somewhere in the 18.1" area for CG, guess it is somewhat lower. Interesting.
Old 12-11-2011 | 01:26 PM
  #10  
MongoRX's Avatar
Mo. Val's White Comet
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Moreno Valley
I'll give this thread a bump with actual data on my car. I have roll over scales at work so I'll see about weighing later tonight when I get to work.
Old 12-11-2011 | 01:29 PM
  #11  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,866
Likes: 2,083
Lol, I read a blurb about that spec and it being lower than "even the RX-8" this morning which spurred me on to find the data. Some of that difference is due to BRZ having a bit smaller tire diameter.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quiggs321
New Member Forum
2
09-03-2015 04:28 PM
whitelight42
Series I Engine Tuning Forum
5
09-02-2015 05:02 PM
mariohardleft
New Member Forum
14
08-28-2015 09:26 PM
motohegg
RX-8 Discussion
2
08-23-2015 08:14 AM
Eirulisse
New Member Forum
13
08-15-2015 12:34 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Actual CG of RX-8?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.