Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Alternate Brand of 5W/20 vs Mazda brand

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-24-2005, 05:17 PM
  #26  
PoloRican Rotary
 
cas2themoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm think Redline make 5W-20 too
Old 02-24-2005, 06:04 PM
  #27  
Music and Cars!!! :)
 
VikingDJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarymagic
My Mazda dealer said that the oil they get is from Mobil 1.

Mobil 1 and castrol seem to be the best from my research.
Well, I think dealer meant MOBIL. Mobil 1 is synthetic oil, but Mobil has conventional oils you can find at various car parts places. I had the dealer change my oil last November. They used Castrol GTX 5w20. It said it right on invoice. I guess people say Mobil 1, because that's the only oil they sell commercially. I'd take Castrol GTX over Mobil any day. I used that stuff on my old car, and it just looked weak to me. Maybe this explains why we burn so much oil. I wonder where Walmarts' Supertech comes from. It might be just as good of oil made by someone big at fraction of cost, and we just don't know it.
Old 02-25-2005, 10:19 PM
  #28  
Coming thru in waves...
 
Racer X-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere between Yesterday and Tomorrow.
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rXter
RacerX8---

I realize that this thread is old, but couldn't hold back. Dude, Pennzoil is a brand name, nothing more. The oil from Pennsylvania fields was depleted in the early 1900s. Ever heard of JD Rockefeller? All of the majors are getting their oil from wherever the stuff is being pumped out of the ground. Most likely the Middle East.
http://www.amref.com/

http://www.gulflubricants.net/

Here's an excerpt from http://info.cba.ksu.edu/bloodgood/mg.../ksf/ksf95.htm ...

Manufacturing. Motor oils are made by blending additives with lubricant
stocks refined from crude oil. Quaker State's motor oils are made from lubricant
stocks produced at its Congo refinery located at Newell, West Virginia or from
lubricant stocks purchased from other refiners. The Congo refinery is specially
designed to maximize the production of lubricant stocks from Pennsylvania Grade
crude oil. Although it was built in 1971, the Congo refinery remains one of the
newer lubricant stock refineries in the United States, and it has sufficient
capacity to meet planned production requirements.

During the three years ended December 31, 1995, the following amounts of
Pennsylvania Grade crude oil were processed at the Congo refinery: [blah, blah, blah...]

and further down this webpage...

Availability of Pennsylvania Grade
crude oil depends primarily on the price which purchasers, including Quaker
State, are willing to pay, which in turn depends on the prevailing market prices
for all types of crude oil. The available supply of Pennsylvania Grade crude oil
has been declining for some time and is expected to continue to decline.
Although Quaker State believes that an adequate supply of Pennsylvania Grade
crude oil will be available for the Congo refinery for the near future, the
Company is studying the cost and availability of alternatives, should a shortage
occur.

Quaker State owns and operates a fleet of tank trucks to gather crude oil
produced in eastern Ohio and western Pennsylvania and transport it to the Congo
refinery or to a crude oil terminal and storage complex owned and operated by
Quaker State at Magnolia, Ohio. From there, crude oil flows through a pipeline
to the Congo refinery. Other crude oil is gathered by regulated pipeline
companies and barged to the Congo refinery.



Here's an excerpt from http://www.leeric.lsu.edu/bgbb/3/display.html ...

Of the two types of crude oil, paraffin or methane series oil is the most prized, but it comprises less than 2% of the total world supplies. The "Industry Standard" is "Pennsylvania Crude" derived from oil wells in the state of Pennsylvania.

Here's an excerpt from http://www.bmwcca.org/tips/tiplube.shtml ...


Pennsylvania Grade Crude, from which Kendall Motor Oil is refined, has the highest VI of all oils produced and marketed. In its crude state, its VI is 95-100 and after refining its index averages 100-115. (Some Kendall oils have been refined to a VI as high as 140 without the addition of improving additives).
In comparison with Pennsylvania Grade Crude, Mid-Continent shows a VI of 65-75 before refining and 80100 after refining; East Texas's comparative VIs are 50-60 and 80-95 and California's are 0-35 and 40-65.
__________________________________________________ ___________________

About Pennzoil & Quaker State, here's some history dialog from Quaker Sate's website, also can be fould almost verbatim @ Pennzoil's website...
On December 30, 1998, Quaker State® Corporation was merged with Pennzoil Company's marketing, manufacturing and fast oil change businesses to form Pennzoil-Quaker State® Company, a worldwide leader in consumer automotive products and vehicle care.

On October 1, 2002, the acquisition of Pennzoil-Quaker State® Company by Shell Oil Company, an affiliate of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies, was completed. In May of 2003, Pennzoil-Quaker State® Company began doing business as SOPUS Products. Combining Shell lubricant's networks and infrastructure and Pennzoil-Quaker State® Company's leading motor oil brands, portfolio of car care brands and Jiffy Lube stores, the new company is a leader in the U.S. lubricants and car care business.

So, I dunno. I dropped these oils from my zone of interest so long ago, I hadn't noticed their changes. In any case (pardon the pun) I'm stickin with Castrol GTX.
Old 02-25-2005, 10:24 PM
  #29  
Coming thru in waves...
 
Racer X-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere between Yesterday and Tomorrow.
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ummm, you must have been thinking of Pennsylvania's most excellent supply of bituminus coal. That DID get depleted, except for the high-sulfer crap that nobody wants.
Old 02-25-2005, 10:27 PM
  #30  
Coming thru in waves...
 
Racer X-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere between Yesterday and Tomorrow.
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hence, the abundent supply of Pennsylvania mushrooms, btw. Those old coal mines make for great mushroom farms, dontchya know...
Old 02-25-2005, 10:41 PM
  #31  
Coming thru in waves...
 
Racer X-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere between Yesterday and Tomorrow.
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talk about crude oil? Check this out...

http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/102sprin...ects/M.Sexton/

Canadian tar sands. As technology advances to make this more recoverable (when I was in college, it practically wasn't), Canada may well become the Middle-East of the future!
Old 02-27-2005, 10:26 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
RX8 JET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Formerly GTA, ON now back in Dexter, MI
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think my dealer also uses Mobil (non-syn). So I too bought some from our local stores. I used Castrol for a short time because I was not sure what to use before I found out what the dealer uses.

Is there a different smell if Synthentic is used?

I do not know whether others have seen the Castrol "fine print". All the commercials you see about Castrol and out performing their competition only apply to 10W30 and 10w40. I thought it was applied across the their line until I read a little closer what was written in fine print.
Did anyone else see this also?
Old 03-02-2005, 09:18 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
myfuncar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: St. Louis Missouri
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oil Capacity question

I can't quite figure this out - I check the oil pretty often and the lowest it gets on me is the bottom of the "OK" range on the dipstick. The little Mazda video says to fill it to the top of the range. Is a full quart too much, or it that the right amount to go from the bottom to the top? They should have said the video!
Old 03-02-2005, 10:18 AM
  #34  
Mean Green Keeny Machine
 
aggietiff28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NRH
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8daniel
Does anyone know who makes the oil Mazda sells? Anyone have an opinion on brand recommendations? I've always been a fan of Castrol as it held it's viscosity better in older Consumer Reports testing. Lately it seems the differences are very small. I'll go with that unless someone suggests strongly something else or can tell me the mfgr of Mazda's 5W/20. thanks.
Mazda's 5W/20 is Motorcraft...same as Ford. I was told that the cars were manufactured around that oil. It was used during all the testing, etc. It is a semi-synthetic. I have used both Castrol GTX and Motorcraft. With Motorcraft the car doesn't burn as much oil and the dealer changes the oil at 5000 miles instead of 3000 miles (not sure that this is a good thing, but I have not had any problems yet with 24000 miles on the car).
Old 03-03-2005, 12:52 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
Sig-Sauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OMG Parafin = wax YES. BUT not in the oil industry. There is no wax in motor oil. As oil additives break down it turns into tar. Its a natural process of the oil if you put some in a frying pan and bake it for hours it will turn into tar also. Sludge is caused by lack of oil changes and neglegent car owners. ALL brands will turn to garbage if you give them time to do it. With the curent GF-4 spec for motor oils you CANT buy a bad oil if its GF-4 rated. A GF-4 rated oil is ALMOST as good as a full syn.

As far as Castrol is concerned, read the disclaimer on a box of Castrol oil. Castrol north america is just a name for whatever brand oil they can buy cheap and bottle in a cool package. Then advertise the hell out of to make people buy it. NOT that it is a bad product if it meets the specs. Seriously look for the disclaimer on any case of Castrol all you have to do is look.
I love their slogan for their Syntec full syn oils " Out performs all CONVENTIONAL leading motor oils". Well DUH no **** a full syn outperfors a conventional oil go figure.
Old 03-03-2005, 09:05 AM
  #36  
Coming thru in waves...
 
Racer X-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere between Yesterday and Tomorrow.
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well then, how do you explain this?

http://www.cobweb.net/~bug2/vft/oil_advanced.htm

"This region is part of what was once the most important oil fields in the United States; the Appalachian field. The oil-bearing rocks, primarily Devonian are located within a great structural trough that contains many subordinate folds. The pay sands range in depth from 400 to 4000 feet and produce high-grade (Pennsylvania grade) paraffin rich oil that is practically free of sulfur."



Too much paraffin separates from the oil and simply coats the innards of your engine.
Old 03-03-2005, 09:15 AM
  #37  
Coming thru in waves...
 
Racer X-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere between Yesterday and Tomorrow.
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm tired of this discussion. Here...

http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q...+oil&FORM=QBRE

Bon apetite.

I'm sticking with the junk I like, you stick with the junk you like. I've known of the problems with paraffin coating the innards of engines since 1974. It's like underarm deodorant. If you find one that you like and it works well for you, stick with it unless there is a real breakthrough in deodorant development. Synthetics are that for oils, but they cost too darn much for me. My MX-6 is 210,000+ miles old and still going strong - all Castrol non-syn.
Old 03-05-2005, 08:49 PM
  #38  
Pro Audentius
 
SpacerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by aggietiff28
Mazda's 5W/20 is Motorcraft...same as Ford. I was told that the cars were manufactured around that oil. It was used during all the testing, etc. It is a semi-synthetic. I have used both Castrol GTX and Motorcraft. With Motorcraft the car doesn't burn as much oil and the dealer changes the oil at 5000 miles instead of 3000 miles (not sure that this is a good thing, but I have not had any problems yet with 24000 miles on the car).
I was never certain of this, but it's reasonable to suspect that the factory fill is Motorcraft...

Anyway, I've been using the Motorcraft since the first oil change, and I think it's perfomed excellently. It's marketed as a "semi-synthetic" but it is most cetainly NOT a PAO (i.e., group IV base stock) synthetic motor oil. It's a blend of group II, II+, and III base stocks.

The term "synthetic" has become a pure marketing term ever since Castrol won their court case versus Mobil. It consequently allowed them to market their "syntec" oil, which is NOT a "traditional" PAO-based synthetic oil, as a "synthetic" oil based on its performance characteristics -- not its chemical composition. The term "synthetic" is based nowadays purely on how well the oil -- along with additive packages -- performs under various conditions.

I did a lot of research prior to choosing the Motorcraft. I did find that not all 5W20 oils pass the most rigorous engine condition testing -- that's the Ford spec. I tell people to look for BOTH 5W20 specs when purchasing a 5W20 oil -- the Honda spec AND the Ford spec. Ford almost single-handedly developed the new 5W20 grade of oil, so it makes sense that their tests are the industry standard.

The Motocraft 5W20 synth blend oil is actually produced by Conoco, so you can get the same oil from them if the Motorcraft is not available. But I can get the Motorcraft at Wally World (i.e., Wal Mart) for about $1.50 a quart, so it's pretty widely available.

I plan on sticking with the Motorcraft. It's a solid performer with a lot of R&D behind it, it's inexpensive, widely available, and most importantly, yields outstanding performance data -- based on the used oil analysis I've gotten back from Blackstone Labs.

Last edited by SpacerX; 03-06-2005 at 09:13 AM.
Old 03-05-2005, 11:29 PM
  #39  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
MRX_Rotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Alto, GA
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Racer X-8
My MX-6 is 210,000+ miles old and still going strong - all Castrol non-syn.
And you're not good about changing the oil in that car, are you? :D
Old 03-06-2005, 11:16 AM
  #40  
Coming thru in waves...
 
Racer X-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere between Yesterday and Tomorrow.
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MRX_Rotary
And you're not good about changing the oil in that car, are you? :D
You are absolutely correct. I stink about keeping up with oil change intervals. My internal clock which at times tells me it's time to do oil changes is ALWAYS way too late (or I ignore it for too long). I'm just a lucky guy, I guess.

SpacerX, I like what you said about Motorcraft 5W20. You just about instantly converted me. Lemme think on this...

One thing I remember about Motorcraft - and it's pretty old information, so... I was informed by my ex-father-in-law (back when he was my father-in-law) that Motorcraft oil filters were the best in as far as how small in microns the filter filters-out contaminants. He was a Ford mechanic who won national prizes in Ford mechanic competitions (yeah, they have competitions), so you could say he really knew his stuff. What you're saying about their 5W20 oil kinda fits in that way, so... I'm interested.

Right now however, I get free routine maintenance for the life of the waranty period (2.5 more years to go) and they're using Castrol - based on what's on the service report.
Old 03-06-2005, 12:02 PM
  #41  
Pro Audentius
 
SpacerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If memory serves, the Motorcraft filters are well designed and manufactured by the a company that makes other high quality filters -- name escapes me, right now. The info sites below may have the info, but I haven't referenced them since I made my decsions about which oil/filter combo to go with.

Some of the most excellent info I found was on a motorcycle info site. The filters in some of the analysis were the same models, for the most part, that would be applicable to the RX8.

Here's the main site:
Motorcycle Info
Links to specific topics:
All About Oil
All About Oil Filters

I currently use the PureOne PL14612 from Purolator -- exact replacement size for our factory filter. When I got my UOA back from Blackstone, they recommended I stick with whatever filtration I'm currently using -- they said it obviously was performing exceedingly well!
Old 03-06-2005, 06:18 PM
  #42  
Rotary Newbie
 
bxb40's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SpacerX,
Seems we both use the same oil and the same filter though I did not run any analysis on mine. Are you sure about Motorcraft using Group II ? If they use Group III, they can get away with a Group I and also call it a synthetic blend. Except their profit margin would be higher. But I am not sure about the Ford spec - maybe Group I will fail that, if present....
Also, the Renesis engine was developed in Japan using probably 5W-30 oil. The US changed to 5W-20 for fuel economy issues. To this day I am not sure how extensively they tested it. The higher temperatures of this engine and the higher average RPMs sure do shear the oil faster, so starting with a thinner oil does not sound like a great idea to me... Maybe we should give-up the non-existant fuel economy and go with Motorcraft Semisynth in 5W-30 or 5W-40. Any ideas if those grades are approved by Ford?
I change oil every 4000-6000miles, depending on the season and car driving patern (short trips vs. hwy trips). How often do you change it?
The real test is to take the engine apart and measure wear on its parts - not sure how metals in used oil correlate for our engine. The limits any lab would compare the results with are from piston engines, but those have more metal parts / area. So I would guess that for the same metal content, our engines would be much worse in wear than a V6 or V8... That should depend on the total oil volume in the engine too. We have a small engine with a lot of oil - a lot is stuck in the coolers though.
Old 03-06-2005, 06:57 PM
  #43  
Pro Audentius
 
SpacerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bxb40
SpacerX,
Seems we both use the same oil and the same filter though I did not run any analysis on mine. Are you sure about Motorcraft using Group II ? If they use Group III, they can get away with a Group I and also call it a synthetic blend. Except their profit margin would be higher.
Actually, I'm guessing on the constituents in the "blend." Obviously, it's all going to be proprietary, but I took my cues from a lot of other sources and some of the more experienced guys in the discussion forums located at Bob Is The Oil Guy .

All of those guys were guessing group II & group III as the primary ingredients. The main result of my research was determining that the oil has no PAO-based (group IV) base stock. Apparently it is highly refined and has a lot of additives. I highly doubt there's group I base stock. Again, that's based on my assessment of others' opinions. For me (and you, it seems) the most important thing is that the stuff performs well :D
Old 03-06-2005, 07:23 PM
  #44  
Pro Audentius
 
SpacerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bxb40
SpacerX,
Also, the Renesis engine was developed in Japan using probably 5W-30 oil. The US changed to 5W-20 for fuel economy issues. To this day I am not sure how extensively they tested it. The higher temperatures of this engine and the higher average RPMs sure do shear the oil faster, so starting with a thinner oil does not sound like a great idea to me... Maybe we should give-up the non-existant fuel economy and go with Motorcraft Semisynth in 5W-30 or 5W-40. Any ideas if those grades are approved by Ford?
In order to have it listed in the North American owners manual, they would've had to test it with 5W20. I'm not entirely certain it was the motorcraft/conoco 5W20 Mazda used for its factory fill, but it's more probable than any other 5W20, simply because of their relation to FoMoCo.

A lot of the guys at the Bob's Oil forum also said the same things you're saying about exteme heat and breakdown under heavy duty conditions -- not just about the RX8, though. They were talking about F150/250/350 superduty truck engines performing a lot of towing and hauling and using the supposedly "whimpy" 5W20 oil. They were skeptical, and I was seriously considering going to a 5W30 oil, but the motorcraft 5W20 started returniing really good UOAs from the guys with the trucks -- they were sold. So was I. It's actually a lot tougher oil than the 5W20 grade might imply.

Last edited by SpacerX; 03-06-2005 at 07:42 PM.
Old 03-06-2005, 07:37 PM
  #45  
Pro Audentius
 
SpacerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bxb40
SpacerX,
I change oil every 4000-6000miles, depending on the season and car driving patern (short trips vs. hwy trips). How often do you change it?
The real test is to take the engine apart and measure wear on its parts - not sure how metals in used oil correlate for our engine. The limits any lab would compare the results with are from piston engines, but those have more metal parts / area. So I would guess that for the same metal content, our engines would be much worse in wear than a V6 or V8... That should depend on the total oil volume in the engine too. We have a small engine with a lot of oil - a lot is stuck in the coolers though.
I know we don't have to change the oil very often, but I do it anyway. I've been "changing" the oil and filter at 2500 mile intervals. Probably overdoing it, but I enjoy it, actually. Kinda like how you enjoy washing/waxing the car. Plus, at that interval, I've not had to add any additional oil between changes. I'm nearing the 10K mile mark, and I'm thinking of switching to the recommended 5K mile oil/filter change after that. Depends on how the UOA comes back from Blackstone.

I'm still on the learning curve with the differences between a rotary and piston engine. Actually, Blackstone has quite an extensive databse from rotary engines in the past -- the oil analysis, that is. So when they tell me my engine/oil/filter are performing well, I trust them. I imagine RotaryGod or some of the other rotary gurus on the board who've actually taken engines apart would have some insights on what a "good" rotary engine should look like after many years of dedicated service.

Regarding wear metals -- I got really good feedback -- kudos, really -- from the Blackstone guys. They really liked the filter I was using (PureOne PL14612 -- the one you're using, too!). Having a good filter can make all the difference when it comes to contaminants and wear metals. Because of the fact that we really only "change" half of the oil capacity every time you drain/fill, the filter becomes EXTREMELY important.

Last edited by SpacerX; 03-06-2005 at 07:40 PM.
Old 03-06-2005, 07:48 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
crossbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
SpacerX,

To add to your argument, there was recently a motorcraft filter cutup thread posted on bobs.
http://theoildrop.server101.com/ubb/...c;f=6;t=002244

As for the thicker vs thinner debate...its pretty much been debunked now. Though the original reason that 5w-20 oils were spec'd was "CAFE" based, the primary manufacturers made sure to setup a set of specifications that were above and beyond the current base stock oils. Most of the 5w-20 oils on the market currently are actually superior in most aspects to 30 wt oils of yesteryear.

I'm sure in another 5 yrs, everyone will be bitching that 0w-5 is too thin to protect.
Old 03-06-2005, 08:28 PM
  #47  
Pro Audentius
 
SpacerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Good link, Crossbow. Thanx.

Methinks I will have to deconstruct my PureOne PL14612 filter in a few hundred miles when I cross the 10K mark...

Concur with your remarks on the 5W20 oils. They really are performing well beyond what conventional wisdom would've originally expected.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ugafan97
SE For Sale/Wanted
3
04-28-2016 03:35 PM
PotatoCannon
New Member Forum
13
09-06-2015 11:48 AM
Sifu
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
3
08-30-2015 10:51 PM
Psychofox
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
0
08-20-2015 04:48 AM
RXeckless
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
6
08-16-2015 12:51 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Alternate Brand of 5W/20 vs Mazda brand



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 AM.