Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Gas/Oil Premix Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 12-06-2008, 12:31 PM
  #1476  
BDC
BDC Motorsports
 
BDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What kind of pump issues and what oil are you using?

B
BDC is offline  
Old 12-07-2008, 09:17 AM
  #1477  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by BDC
What kind of pump issues and what oil are you using?

B
brian,

i sent you a pm on this issue..

beers
swoope is offline  
Old 12-07-2008, 04:00 PM
  #1478  
Registered Noob
 
GaMEChld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Island (Suffolk), NY
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by swoope
brian,

i sent you a pm on this issue..

beers
send me a pm too!
GaMEChld is offline  
Old 12-08-2008, 09:35 AM
  #1479  
BDC
BDC Motorsports
 
BDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by GaMEChld
send me a pm too!
He sent me a PM to give him a call. Maybe we can give you a call, too.

B
BDC is offline  
Old 12-08-2008, 09:52 AM
  #1480  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by BDC
He sent me a PM to give him a call. Maybe we can give you a call, too.

B
we need to finish up. we never got the the fuel pump issue!

hope dinner was good.

beers
swoope is offline  
Old 12-08-2008, 12:22 PM
  #1481  
Lubricious
 
Nubo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by swoope
in my observations it is better than dumping premix in the tank and filling it up. a lot better..

but i have to pull the pump and the other side, and wipe the inside of the tank down again to be sure..

this is a huge issue for those that premix, and do track days..


right now i would say dont dump and pump. if you do you will have fuel pump issues. i did and others do..

mix and fill at half tank then finish the fill, might be the answer. but right now i am running without premix. go figure..

beers
So it sounds like a portion of the heavier oils is staying on the bottom of the tank instead of dispersing in the fuel?

I'm sensing another advantage of a lighter oil and solvent mix like Marvel.
Nubo is offline  
Old 12-08-2008, 03:19 PM
  #1482  
Registered
 
peterlemonjello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: B'ham, Alabama
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Interesting timing on this discussion. I dump and pump idemitsu. My fuel pump just went out at 60k miles.
peterlemonjello is offline  
Old 12-08-2008, 03:31 PM
  #1483  
Registered Noob
 
GaMEChld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Island (Suffolk), NY
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But how many miles were you premixing on that pump?
GaMEChld is offline  
Old 12-08-2008, 04:27 PM
  #1484  
Registered
 
peterlemonjello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: B'ham, Alabama
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not exactly sure but I'd estimate at most 11-12k miles.

edit: If it makes any difference the pump ran fine until it got hot. Then it would cut in and out under heavy acceleration. Once it cooled it would run fine again.
peterlemonjello is offline  
Old 12-08-2008, 05:26 PM
  #1485  
Registered
 
robrecht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hunterdon County
Posts: 1,932
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I don't have any premix when I fill up, I just add it when I get home. I figure it mixes up well enough while driving.
robrecht is offline  
Old 12-17-2008, 03:30 AM
  #1486  
Registered
 
neXib's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I tend to think premixing is one of those old myths. But if rotary builders can see actual results from it I guess there could be something to it. But then again, people who premix in the first place are probably enthusiasts, and don't do oil changes every 10,000 miles that some of the other engines they open could be doing. Hard to say. I might want to do it just in case, will have to see which products are available here.

On the topic of cleaning, won't that BG44K cleanup clog up the cat?
neXib is offline  
Old 12-17-2008, 11:55 AM
  #1487  
Lubricious
 
Nubo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by neXib
I tend to think premixing is one of those old myths.
I wouldn't call it a myth. Before oil metering pumps, Mazda engines simply metered oil directly into the gas. So, that's got to be an effective mechanism for lubrication delivery. I'd really like to see some technical explanations of how that works though. You'd think the atomized oil would simply go *poof*. I mean, an atomized hydrocarbon in a compressed oxygen-rich atmosphere and a volatile fuel... surely it would just combust? Obviously not. For one thing that should disrupt the notion of "the oil needs to burn" -- hell, it needs to NOT burn! But more interesting is how does it manage to survive combustion and being swept out with the exhaust stroke and instead somehow deposit a useful film? That's a hell of a trick.
Nubo is offline  
Old 12-17-2008, 01:05 PM
  #1488  
Relax baby!
iTrader: (3)
 
rx 8speciale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nurburgring driver, Germany
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mazda Has Know This Engine For A Long Time Before Any Of Us So My Opinion About Pre Mix Is If Is Not On The Manual Dont Do It ......
rx 8speciale is offline  
Old 12-17-2008, 02:55 PM
  #1489  
3-wheeler
 
Flashwing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx 8speciale
Mazda Has Know This Engine For A Long Time Before Any Of Us So My Opinion About Pre Mix Is If Is Not On The Manual Dont Do It ......
There's a lot of truth to that. One thing to keep in mind is the engineers and designers are only one phase of a car's production process. Mazda had to design the RX8 to operate in nearly every kind of condition in various countries and climates across the world. In addition to that, the car had to function in a way that 99% of buyers would be able to easily use.

On the flip side, you have restrictions such as environmental regulations as well as political issues like fuel mileage which all play into the mix. Why else would Mazda suggest 5w-20 for the US and 5w-30 for everywhere else? Why is it that Mazda at one time suggested 20w-50 for the RX7? The changes adapted to the needs of the market.

If Mazda had a handle on the motor, we wouldn't have seen the engine recalls we've seen. Those of us in hot climates wouldn't have had oiling issues under extreme temperatures. This doesn't mean it's a flawed product, but it means that mistakes were made and the system isn't perfect.

The fact is, the car is well designed but it's still designed by humans and it's forced to abide by standards and laws which might sacrifice long life in order to bring it to market.

Originally Posted by Nubo
But more interesting is how does it manage to survive combustion and being swept out with the exhaust stroke and instead somehow deposit a useful film? That's a hell of a trick.
I totally agree! An article or post I read suggested that the oil would remain suspended inside the combustion chamber until the fuel detonates and then it's flung against the rotor housing walls. It's certainly got more design behind it than simply pumping it into the combustion chamber and hoping for the best.

The changes to the 2009 OMP suggest the need for an additional OMP nozzel. The motor is unchanged so there's clearly a lubrication need that wasn't being met.

Frankly I think the real question is not whether or not you should be pre-mixing but how much. How much would be determined by your driving habits, modifications, and whether you have accessport altered OMP values.

In the end, it's a personal choice. There's just no way after 100,000 miles we can look at a motor and say X caused this wear. It would require many constants such as keeping the same oil, same oil change intervals, same driving style and environment etc. We know that's impossible to duplicate outside of a lab.

Myself, I find it a cheap insurance should my OMP fail or there be a lubrication need not being met. I have 70,000 miles on my origional motor, origional tranny, and the car still feels great.

Last edited by Flashwing; 12-17-2008 at 03:03 PM.
Flashwing is offline  
Old 12-17-2008, 03:00 PM
  #1490  
Registered
 
neXib's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rx 8speciale
Mazda Has Know This Engine For A Long Time Before Any Of Us So My Opinion About Pre Mix Is If Is Not On The Manual Dont Do It ......
And mothers of serial murders knew them long before anyone else, I'm pretty sure they'll say he didn't do it
neXib is offline  
Old 12-17-2008, 04:09 PM
  #1491  
...pondering...
 
thawk97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Marvel Mystery Oil

Hey, can anyone tell me what the pros and cons of using Marvel Mystery Oil as a premix instead of 2 cycle engine oil? I like the idea of a lighter weight fluid which both cleans and lubricates but it seems like maybe there is a downside (too good to be true argument here)...
thawk97 is offline  
Old 12-17-2008, 05:54 PM
  #1492  
Registered
 
New Yorker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,319
Received 58 Likes on 51 Posts
If a) premix is necessary to prevent premature engine replacement (let's define "premature" as < 100K miles), and b) only 3% (?) of owners premix, then c) 97% of engines are being/will need to be replaced prematurely.

If my conclusion is incorrect—and I'm pretty sure it is—then 'a' or 'b' is wrong. My money is on 'a'.
New Yorker is offline  
Old 12-17-2008, 07:13 PM
  #1493  
Registered
iTrader: (7)
 
invasion08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New jersey
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by neXib
I tend to think premixing is one of those old myths. But if rotary builders can see actual results from it I guess there could be something to it. But then again, people who premix in the first place are probably enthusiasts, and don't do oil changes every 10,000 miles that some of the other engines they open could be doing. Hard to say. I might want to do it just in case, will have to see which products are available here.

On the topic of cleaning, won't that BG44K cleanup clog up the cat?
BG44k Is only cat converter safe it will not clean it. If BG44k cleaned your cat then every dealership would pour that in the gas tank instead of replacing expensive cat
invasion08 is offline  
Old 12-18-2008, 02:56 AM
  #1494  
Registered
 
neXib's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by invasion08
BG44k Is only cat converter safe it will not clean it. If BG44k cleaned your cat then every dealership would pour that in the gas tank instead of replacing expensive cat
What I meant was, if it cleans up the engine, will the resulting cleanup end up in the cat? Like, could there be some heavy **** in there that clogs it. I have no idea, so I'm asking :P
neXib is offline  
Old 12-18-2008, 03:32 AM
  #1495  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by neXib
What I meant was, if it cleans up the engine, will the resulting cleanup end up in the cat? Like, could there be some heavy **** in there that clogs it. I have no idea, so I'm asking :P
no it will not it is gradual. unlike the seafoam treatment that is not so much..

beers
swoope is offline  
Old 12-18-2008, 03:41 AM
  #1496  
Registered
 
neXib's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ah ok. Thanks.
neXib is offline  
Old 12-20-2008, 02:00 AM
  #1497  
Registered Noob
 
GaMEChld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Island (Suffolk), NY
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nubo
I wouldn't call it a myth. Before oil metering pumps, Mazda engines simply metered oil directly into the gas. So, that's got to be an effective mechanism for lubrication delivery. I'd really like to see some technical explanations of how that works though. You'd think the atomized oil would simply go *poof*. I mean, an atomized hydrocarbon in a compressed oxygen-rich atmosphere and a volatile fuel... surely it would just combust? Obviously not. For one thing that should disrupt the notion of "the oil needs to burn" -- hell, it needs to NOT burn! But more interesting is how does it manage to survive combustion and being swept out with the exhaust stroke and instead somehow deposit a useful film? That's a hell of a trick.
That's interesting. If they used to meter it directly into the fuel, why did they switch to the metering pumps? Are the pumps better at the task?
GaMEChld is offline  
Old 12-20-2008, 02:36 AM
  #1498  
Super Moderator
 
ASH8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10,870
Received 322 Likes on 229 Posts
Originally Posted by Nubo
I wouldn't call it a myth. Before oil metering pumps, Mazda engines simply metered oil directly into the gas. So, that's got to be an effective mechanism for lubrication delivery. I'd really like to see some technical explanations of how that works though. You'd think the atomized oil would simply go *poof*. I mean, an atomized hydrocarbon in a compressed oxygen-rich atmosphere and a volatile fuel... surely it would just combust? Obviously not. For one thing that should disrupt the notion of "the oil needs to burn" -- hell, it needs to NOT burn! But more interesting is how does it manage to survive combustion and being swept out with the exhaust stroke and instead somehow deposit a useful film? That's a hell of a trick.
AH, as far back as 1969 Mazda have always used a MOP (Sump Oil) for lubricating, instead of injection nozzles on the rotor housings as used in latest rotary engines the oil via MOP went through the intake chamber at the base of the 4 barrel carby.
So technically it was not "mixed" in the liquid gas (Fuel) like pre-mixing done today via your gas tank.
ASH8 is offline  
Old 12-20-2008, 11:57 AM
  #1499  
No means yes
iTrader: (1)
 
CnnmnSchnpps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Jersey City NJ
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can't believe this thread is still going...
CnnmnSchnpps is offline  
Old 12-20-2008, 03:32 PM
  #1500  
Lubricious
 
Nubo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by GaMEChld
That's interesting. If they used to meter it directly into the fuel, why did they switch to the metering pumps? Are the pumps better at the task?
They allow more control over the amount of oil; allowing for the least amount of oil to do the job. Necessary to meet emissions standards.
Nubo is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 6 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Gas/Oil Premix Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM.